Title: Heightened Pleading Requirements
1Heightened Pleading Requirements
2Ross v.A.H. Robins
3Basic Nature of the Suit
What did Ct find insufficiently specific?
- Robins issued glowing reports about Dalkon Shield
- Robins knew (or learned) that reports were false
- Robins did not correct them
- P bought held stock due to misrepresentations
- P injured because stock was overvalued (at time
of purchase) due to misrepresentations
4What standard does the Ross court set for
pleading knowledge of falsity in securities cases?
5Dont facts pled already create strong inference
of knowledge?
Where did Gabrielson get her information?
What else should P have alleged to show strong
inference?
Is decision consistent with Rule 9(b)?
Do heightened pleading requirements make sense in
this type of suit?
6Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
In certain private securities class action
cases the complaint shall . . . state with
particularity facts giving rise to a strong
inference that the defendant acted with the
required state of mind.
7Leatherman
8Municipal 1983 Liability
- Under the Monell doctrine, cities are not
liable under respondeat superior - Theyre only liable if the employee was executing
or implementing city policy
Whats the pleading issue in Leatherman?
9Three Ways of Thinking About a Case
Outcome
Substantive Legal Rule
Meta-Rule
10Meta-Rule
How did the Leatherman Court decide what rule to
apply?
11What should Court consider when deciding what a
FRCivP means?
Text of Rule
Prior Cases
Best Result
Legislative History
Purpose
Canons
12Crawford El
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)