Legal Update: Medical Futility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Legal Update: Medical Futility

Description:

Title: After the Revolution in Corporate Law Author: Law User Last modified by: Thaddeus Pope Created Date: 9/3/2005 4:20:30 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: LawU97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Legal Update: Medical Futility


1
Legal Update Medical Futility
  • Thaddeus M. Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  • Widener University Law School

ASBH Annual Meeting (San Diego) October 21, 2010
2
  • Baseline
  • Courts (2009-2010)
  • Legislation (2009-2010)

3
  • Baseline

4
  • Bad
  • law

5
Mass. Med. Society (Nov. 2008)
6
Consensus
Intractable
7
  • Remove the __, and I will sue you.

8
  • Why they follow the instructions of SDMs
    instead of doing what they feel is appropriate,
    almost all cited a lack of legal support.

9
  • Court Cases

10
  • Damages
  • Injunctions
  • Surrogate selection

11
  • Damages

12
  • Providers have won almost every single damages
    case brought after unilateral w/h, w/d
  • State HCDA
  • Battery
  • Medical malpractice
  • Informed consent

13
  • Providers typically only lose on claims for IIED
  • Secretive
  • Insensitive
  • Outrageous

14
  • Luce is confirming the trend of unsuccessful
    lawsuits against providers

15
  • Risk gt 0

16
  • But the process itself can be punishment
  • Even prevailing parties pay transaction costs

17
  • Injunctions

18
  • Courts frequently grant temporary injunctions to
    preserve status quo
  • But patients often die before adjudication on
    the merits

19
  • amex

20
Ruben Betancourt vs. Trinitas Hospital
21
  • 73yo male
  • PVS
  • COPD
  • End-stage renal disease
  • Hypertensive cardiovascular disease
  • Stage 4 decubitus ulcers
  • Osteo-myeletitus
  • Diabetes
  • Parchment- like skin

22
  • Intramural process
  • No consensus
  • Unilateral withdrawal
  • DNR order written
  • Dialysis port removed

23
  • January 21, 2009
  • Jacqueline files complaint
  • January 23, 2009
  • Court issues TRO
  • February 10, 2009
  • Court extends TRO

24
  • January February 2009
  • Evidentiary hearings
  • Medical expert witnesses
  • Family witnesses

25
  • March 4, 2009
  • Permanent injunction on the merits
  • August 2009
  • Appeal NJHA, MSNJ, NJP, GNYHA

26
  • August 13, 2010
  • Appellate court refuses to reverse

27
  • Surrogate Selection

28
  • A proxy shall act in accordance
  • directive . . . decisions
  • the makers . . . wishes
  • makers best interests

29
  • Helga Wanglie
  • (Minn. 1991)

30
Dorothy Livadas
31
  • Bernstein v. Superior Court of Ventura County
    (Feb. 2, 2009).

32
  • Court to
  • Barbara Howe
  • Your own personal issues are impacting your
    decisions
  • Refocus your assessment

33
Ontario Capacity and Consent Board
34
  • Limitations of surrogate replacement

35
  • Legislation

36
Texas as model
37
S.B. 1114 (Mar. 2009)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Thaddeus Mason Pope Associate Professor of
Law Widener University School of Law 4601 Concord
Pike ? L325 Wilmington, DE 19803 T
302-477-2230 F 901-202-7549 E
tmpope_at_widener.edu W www.thaddeuspope.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com