Title: Exploitative Interactions: Predation, Herbivory, Parasitism, and Disease
1Exploitative Interactions Predation, Herbivory,
Parasitism, and Disease
2Outline
- Introduction
- Complex Interactions
- Exploitation and Abundance
- Population Fluctuations
- Models
- Refuges
- Prey Density
- Size
3Introduction
- Exploitation Interaction between populations
that enhances fitness of one individual while
reducing fitness of the exploited individual. - Predators kill and consume other organisms.
- Parasites live on host tissue and reduce host
fitness, but do not generally kill the host. - Parasitoid is an insect larva that consumes the
host. - Pathogens induce disease.
4Parasites That Alter Host Behavior
- Spiny-headed worms (Acanthocephalans) changes
behavior of amphipods in ways that make it more
likely that infected amphipods will be eaten by a
suitable vertebrate host. - Infected amphipods swim toward light (positive
phototaxis), which is usually indicative of
shallow water, and thus closer to predators. - Only when the worm reaches the appropriate stage
in life.
5Parasites That Alter Host Behavior
- In a terrestrial example, a spiny-headed worm
infects a pill bug. - Infected pill bugs leave shelter to wander out in
the open where they are eaten by starlings.
6Parasites That Alter Host Behavior
- Experiments showed that infected isopods were
more likely to be eaten by starlings. - Likely due to behavior.
7Parasites That Alter Host Behavior
- Rust fungus Puccinia monoica manipulates growth
of host mustard plants (Arabis spp.).
8Parasites That Alter Host Behavior
- Puccinia infects Arabis rosettes and invades
actively dividing meristemic tissue. - Rosettes rapidly elongate and become topped by a
cluster of bright yellow leaves. - Pseudo-flowers are fungal structures including
sugar-containing spermatial fluids.
9Parasites That Alter Host Behavior
- The combination of the yellow color and sugary
fluids attracts pollinators. - Carry rust spermatia (fungal reproductive cells)
to other pseudo-flowers. - Host plant generally dies.
- Check out this recent blog-post by Carl Zimmer on
this subject!
10Entangling Exploitation with Competition
- Park found the presence/absence of a protozoan
parasite (Adeline tribolii) influences
competition in flour beetles (Tribolium).
11Entangling Exploitation with Competition
- Adelina lives as an intracellular parasite.
- Reduces density of T. castaneum but has little
effect on T. confusum. - T. castaneum is usually the strongest competitor,
but with the presence of Adelina, T. confusum
becomes strongest competitor.
12Exploitation and Abundance
- Predators, parasites, and pathogens influence the
distribution, abundance, and structure of prey
and host populations.
13Herbivorous Stream Insect and Its Algal Food
- Lamberti and Resh studied influence of caddisfly
larvae (Helicopsyche borealis) on algal and
bacterial populations on which it feeds. - Results suggest larvae reduce the abundance of
their food supply.
14Herbivorous Stream Insect and Its Algal Food
- In a follow up study, a set of tiles was raised
off the stream bed in a way that prevented
colonization of Helicopsyche, but not other
invertebrates.
15Herbivorous Stream Insect and Its Algal Food
- The results show that bacterial algal
populations were reduced on the streambed tiles
as compared to the elevated tiles. - Helicopsyche reduces populations of its food.
16Introduced Cactus and Herbivorous Moth
- Mid 1800s prickly pear cactus Opuntia stricta
was introduced to Australia. - Established populations in the wild with no
natural enemies. - Government sought an insect herbivore to reduce
the population. - Moth Cactoblastis cactorum found to be effective
predator. - Also disperses pathogens
- Reduced by 3 orders of magnitude in 2 years.
- Equilibrium between the two.
17A Pathogenic Parasite, a Predator, and Its Prey
- Foxes in Sweden infected with mange mites in
1975. - Results in hair loss, skin deterioration,
death. - Spread throughout Sweden in a decade.
- Population of foxes reduced by 70.
18A Pathogenic Parasite, a Predator, and Its Prey
- Ecologists studied the effects of population
reduction of foxes on their prey. - Prey species population sizes increased following
the reduction of foxes.
19Dynamics
- Predator-prey, host-parasite, and host-pathogen
relations are dynamic. - Temporal dynamics populations of predators and
prey are not static, they cycle in abundance over
time.
20Cycles of Abundance in Snowshoe Hares and Their
Predators
- Snowshoe Hares (Lepus americanus) and Lynx (Lynx
canadensis) both have extensive trapping records
that allow us to study population sizes over the
past 200 years. - Elton proposed abundance cycles driven by
variation in solar radiation. - Keith suggested overpopulation theories
- Decimation by disease and parasitism.
- Physiological stress at high density.
- Starvation due to reduced food.
- Suggested long term studies.
21Population Fluctuations
- The data show that lynx and hare populations
fluctuate with a 10 year cycle.
22Snowshoe Hares - Role of Food Supply
- Hares live in boreal forests dominated by
conifers. - Dense growth of understory shrubs.
- In winter, they browse on buds and stems of
shrubs and saplings such as aspen and spruce. - One population reduced food biomass from 530
kg/ha in late Nov. to 160 kg/ha in late March.
23Snowshoe Hares - Role of Food Supply
- Shoots produced after heavy browsing can increase
levels of plant chemical defenses. - Reducing usable food supplies.
24Snowshoe Hares - Role of Predators
- Lynx (Classic specialist predator)
- Coyotes other generalist predators may also
play a large role. - Predation can account for 60-98 of mortality
during peak densities.
25Snowshoe Hares - Role of Predators
- Complementary
- Hare populations increase, causing food supplies
to decrease. Starvation and weight loss may lead
to increased predation, all of which decrease
hare populations.
26Experimental Test of Food and Predation Impacts
- A large-scale, long-term experiment was designed
to sort out the impacts of food and predation on
snowshoe hare population cycles. - Populations of all three trophic levels need to
be studied simultaneously.
27Population Cycles in Mathematical and Laboratory
Models
- Mathematical and laboratory models offer
population ecologists the opportunity to
manipulate variables that they cannot control in
the field.
28Population Cycles in Mathematical and Laboratory
Models
- The Lotka-Volterra model assumes the host
population grows exponentially, and population
size is limited by parasites, pathogens, and
predators.
29Model Behavior
- Host exponential growth often opposed by
exploitation. - Host reproduction immediately translated into
destruction by predator. - Increased predation more predators.
- More predators higher exploitation rate.
- Larger predator population eventually reduces
host population, in turn reducing predator
population.
30Model Behavior
- Reciprocal effects produce oscillations in two
populations. - Although the assumptions of eternal oscillations
and that neither host nor exploiter populations
are subject to carrying capacities are
unrealistic, L-V models made valuable
contributions to the field.
31Laboratory Models
- Utida found reciprocal interactions in adzuki
bean weevils, Callosobruchus chinensis, over
several generations. - Gause found similar patterns in P. aurelia.
- Most laboratory experiments have failed in that
most have led to the extinction of one population
within a relatively short period.
32Refuges
- To persist in the face of exploitation, hosts and
prey need refuges.
33Refuges
- Gause attempted to produce population cycles with
Paramecium caudatum and Didinium nasutum. - Didinium quickly consumed all Paramecium and went
extinct. (Both populations extinct) - Added sediment for Paramecium refuge.
- Few Paramecium survived after Didinium
extinction.
34Refuges
- Huffaker studied six-spotted mite Eotetranychus
sexmaculatus and predatory mite Typhlodromus
occidentalis. - Separated oranges and rubber balls with partial
barriers to mite dispersal.
35Refuges
- Typhlodromus (pred) crawls while Eotetranychus
(prey) balloons. - Provision of small wooden posts to serve as
launching pads maintained population oscillations
spanning 6 months.
36Variety of Refuges - Space
- Spatial refuges places where members of the
exploited population have some protection from
predators and parasitoids. - Burrows
- Trees
- Air
- Water or land
37Variety of Refuges - Numbers
- Living in a large group provides a refuge.
- Predators response to increased prey density
- Prey consumed x Predators Prey Consumed
- Predator Area Area
- Wide variety of organisms employ predator
satiation defense. - Prey can reduce individual probability of being
eaten by living in dense populations.
38Predator Satiation by an Australian Tree
- Synchronous widespread seed and fruit production
is known as masting. - Janzen proposed that seed predation is a major
selective force favoring mast crop production. - ODowd and Gill determined synchronous seed
dispersal by Eucalyptus reduces losses of seeds
to ants.
39Predator Satiation by Periodical Cicadas
- Periodical cicadas Magicicada spp. emerge as
adults every 13-17 years. - Densities can approach 4x106 ind / ha.
40Predator Satiation by Periodical Cicadas
- Williams estimated 1,063,000 cicadas emerged from
16 ha study site. - 50 emerged during four consecutive nights.
- Losses to birds was only 15 of production.
41Size As A Refuge
- If large individuals are ignored by predators,
then large size may offer a form of refuge.
42Size As A Refuge
- Large mussels are eaten infrequently by sea
stars. - If mussels can avoid predation long enough to
reach 10-12 cm, it will be immune from most sea
stars.
43Size As A Refuge
- Peckarsky observed mayflies (Family
Ephenerellidae) making themselves look larger in
the face of foraging stoneflies. - In terms of optimal foraging theory, large size
equates to lower profitability.