Title: Brief History of States Rights
1Brief History of States Rights
2- WAS A CONFLICT BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH
INEVITABLE? - DOES THE CIVIL WAR REPRESENT A CLASH OF
IDEOLOGIES? - WHAT IS YOUR OWN POSITION ON THE ISSUE TODAY
STATE INDEPENDENCE, FEDERAL DOMINATION OR
COMBINATION
3Articles of Confederation 1781
- All but powerless Federal Government
- Can not regulate trade
- Can not create an Army Navy
- Daniel Shays Rebellion
41787 Philadelphia Convention
- New Document Written
- New Government Created
- Constitution of the United States
- Ratified 1789
5Northwest Ordinance 1787
- NO STATE northwest of the Ohio River could be a
slave state - Not to benefit blacks but to prevent a shift in
the balance of power in the Congress from
northern dominance to southern dominance
6Conflicting IdeologiesFederalists v.
Anti-Federalists
- Federalists Alexander Hamilton Government by
the elite - Anti-Federalists aka Jeffersonian Republicans
government by the little people the common man
7Federal ActionAlien Sedition Acts1798
- Longer period for immigrants to attain
citizenship - President has power to imprison or deport
foreigners - Illegal to publish false or malicious writings
about the United States
8Reaction Virginia Kentucky Resolutions1798
- State laws states have the right to decide if
Federal Laws exceed agreement between state and
Federal government - Claimed that if states decided that the Federal
Govt. had exceeded its authority the state could
ignore the law
9Virginia KentuckyResolutions
- These 2 Resolutions become the basis upon which
the STATES RIGHTS movement rests.
10Missouri Compromise1820
- To preserve balance of power between north and
south in the Senate Maine is admitted as a free
state and Missouri is admitted as a slave state. - Created the line between north and south of 36
30 permanently dividing the Louisiana purchase
territory between free soil north of the line
and slave soil south of it.
11Tariff of Abominations1828
- High tariff proposed to protect Northern
Industrialists and Western interests. - Non-industrial South heavily reliant on European
manufactures is opposed. - Debate continues for 2 years
12Nullification Crisis1832
- John C. Calhoun tariff will be declared void in
South Carolina - President Andrew Jackson asks for Force Bill
would allow him to use military against state
of South Carolina - Represents clash President Federal Power vs.
State sovereignty
13Great Statesmen
14Wilmot Proviso - 1848
- As the Mexican War came to an end, the debate
over whether or not slavery should be permitted
in the Mexican Cession heated up. David Wilmot,
a congressmen from Pennsylvania suggested that
slavery be forever banned in the newly won
territories. He claimed that the 36' 30" line
which was part of the Missouri Compromise only
applied to the Louisiana purchase. Many
northerners had objected to the Mexican War.
They like Wilmot felt that the south was looking
for new lands to expand slavery. Southerners
such as John C. Calhoun of South Carolina were
horrified by Wilmot's proposal. They wanted the
institution of slavery to be extended west across
the Rockies. Wilmot's bill that would have
banned slavery in the west passed in the House of
Representatives where northerners held the
advantage. However the Bill was defeated in the
Senate by southerners such as Calhoun. The
debate over whether slavery should or should not
be allowed in the new territories would continue
in the years to come.
15David Wilmot Senator from Pennsylvania
16Compromise of 1850
- Millard Fillmore of East Aurora was President
- California admitted as a free state
- Territory of New Mexico and Utah can decide the
issue themselves
- Selling of slaves is banned in Washington D.C.
- Fugitive Slave Act is passed
- In return for admitting the free state of
California to the Union it put in place the
Fugitive Slave Law . The Rigorous requirement to
return escaped slaves made citizens of every
state personally responsible for treating human
beings as property.
171852 Election of Franklin Pierce
- Defeated General Winfield Scott hero of the
Mexican War - Claimed he favored the Compromise of 1850 to get
votes BUT - Most interested in Manifest Destiny Pierce
focused largely on foreign policy. He pledged
to continue America's Manifest Destiny into Latin
America. Pierce aggressively pursued the
annexation of Cuba and the isthmus of Central
America. In light of several revolutions in
Europe at the time, Pierce held America up as a
model of freedom for the rest of the world.
Pierce also sent Matthew Perry and the American
Navy to open Japan up to trade with the United
States though the use of gunboat diplomacy.
18Kansas / Nebraska Act 1854
- Douglas. Douglas was a Democrat with
presidential ambitions. At the time, a debate
arose over where to build the new
Transcontinental Railroad. - A bill creating the states of Kansas and Nebraska
and allowing popular sovereignty in the
territory. Passed on May 30, 1854, it was
proposed by Illinois Democratic senator Stephen
A. Douglas in an attempt to gain support from
southern senators for his organization of the
territory. It annulled the prohibition against
slavery north of 36-30' that was passed in the
Missouri Compromise - Lead to Bleeding Kansas
- Balance in the Senate is again in question
19Abraham Lincoln
20Lincolns Prediction January 27, 1838
- At what point shall we expect the approach of
danger? By what means shall we fortify against
it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military
giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow?
Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa
combined, with all the treasure of the earth in
their military chests with a Buonaparte for a
commander, could not by force take a drink from
the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in
the trial of a thousand years. At what point
then is the approach of danger to be expected? I
answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up
amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If
destruction be our lot, we ourselves must be its
author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we
must live through all time, or die by suicide.
21A. Lincoln - August 24, 1855
- Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be
pretty rapid. As a nation we began by declaring
that "all men are created equal." We now
practically read it "all men are created equal,
except negroes." Soon it will read "all men are
created equal, except negroes, and foreigners,
and Catholics." When it comes to this, I should
prefer emigrating to some country where they make
no pretense of loving liberty--to Russia, for
instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and
without the base alloy of hypocrisy.
22- "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I
believe this government cannot endure,
permanently half slave and half free. I do not
expect the union to be dissolved--I do not expect
the house to fall--but I do expect that it will
cease to be divided. It will become all one
thing, or all the other. June 16, 1858 - As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a
master. This expresses my idea of democracy.
Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the
difference, is not democracy. August 1, 1858 -
23First Inaugural Address
- In your hands, my dissatisfied countrymen, and
not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war.
The government will not assail you. You can have
no conflict without yourselves being the
aggressors. You have no oath registered in Heaven
to destroy the government, while I shall have the
most solemn one to "preserve, protect and defend"
it. March 4, 1861