Title: Folie 0
1(No Transcript)
2INTERSOL 2008 La réglementation Européenne de la
Responsabilité Environmentale Exemple
dApplication en Allemagne concernant les Sites
Pollués
The European Environmental Responsibility
Regulation Example for Application in Germany
concerning Contaminated Sites Stefanie
Beste Hoffmann Liebs Fritsch Partner
3European Environmental Responsibility Regulation
- consisting of
- European Environmental Liability Directive
- 2004/34/EC
- implemented
- in Germany as
- Umweltschadensgesetz
- (Act on Environmental Damages)
- 14 November 2007
4German Soil Protection Law
- Federal Soil Protection Act
- (Bundesbodenschutzgesetz BBodSchG)
Statutory Order on Soil Protection
(BundesbodenschutzV) Technical Bylaws
5Soil Protection Act Scope of Protection
- Soil, 2 (1)
- Upper layer of the earths crust, in so far as
the layer carries out soil functions - Soil functions, 2 (2)
- Natural functions
- Functions as an archive of natural and cultural
history - Functions useful to man
- Protection against
- Harmful soil changes, 2 C(3)
- Residual Pollution, 2 (5)
6Case Study German Soil Protection Law
Lessee AGLegal Successor
Purchased 1976
Purchase of site 30 January 2001
Lessee GmbH Lessee until 1970 of industrial site
Lease contract 01.01.1950 - 31.12.1970
FO Former Owner
O Owner
Industrial Site CHC-Contamination
Parent Company PC of O
Administration (Mrs. Clearwater)
Mrs. Clearwater asks Who is liable?
7Soil Protection Act - Responsible Parties
- Who can be held liable by the authorities ?
- Polluter (polluter pays-principle) disturber
by conduct - Legal Successor of polluter (to the extent a
legal obligation to avoid pollution already
existed at the time of the legal succession) - Owner of the contaminated land disturber in
fact - Party who exercises actual physical control over
the land harbouring residual pollution (e.g. the
lessee) disturber in fact - Former owner in case transfer of property took
place after 01.03.1999 - Parent company responsibility on the basis of
commercial and company law (lifting the
corporate veil) - Former owner who is responsible for dereliction
of contaminated land
8Soil Protection Act - Scope of Responsibility
- Investigation and Examination of potential
contamination in case of initial suspicion - Safety Precautions in case pollution has already
occurred (prevention of harmful substances from
seeping into the soil or the prevention of
polluted ground water flowing onwards) - Remediation (removal of the threat posed)Type
and scope of the remediation are determined by
competent authorities. The authorities have to
take into account the permissible use of the land
- remediation requirements for industrial areas
may be lower than those for residential areas
9Soil Protection Act - Application in time
- No statute of limitations!
- In principle, the party responsible can be
called to account by the competent authority for
an unlimited period of time. - The liability scheme of the Soil Protection Act
applies retroactively to contaminations generated
a long time before the Soil Protection Act became
effective if and to the extent contemporary
public law provisions prohibiting soil or
groundwater pollution already existed at the time
the pollution occurred.
10European Environmental Responsibility Regulation
- Responsibility
- for soil damage
- under the
- European Environmental Liability Directive
- and its German act of implementation
- Umweltschadensgesetz USchadG
- (Act on Environmental Damages)
11Scope of Umweltschadensgesetz
- The USchadG regulates solely responsibility
under public law! - It does not provide for
- Civil Law claims for damages or indemnification
(no compensation for personal damages, damage to
property or economic losses). - Administrative offences including
administrative fines in case of violation
(unlike for instance other Environmental Law
Acts such as the Water Protection Act
(Wasserhaushaltsgesetz), Soil Protection Act
(Bundesbodenschutzgesetz) or Federal
Immission Control Act (Bundesimmissionsschutzge
setz).
12Umweltschadensgesetz
- Damage to protected species and natural habits
pursuant to (new) 21a Federal Nature Protection
Act (Bundesnaturschutzgesetz) - Water damage pursuant to (new) 22a Water
Protection Act (Wasserhaushaltsgesetz) - Soil damage Adverse effects on the soils
functions pursuant to 2 (2) Soil Protection
Act (Bundesbodenschutzgesetz) which additionally
creates a significant risk for human health - Notice USchadG only provides guidelines for
liability! - For more detailed provisions it refers to
already existing Environmental Law Acts
13Umweltschadensgesetz - Responsible Person
- Polluter-Pays-Principle
- Operator means any natural or legal, private or
public person who operates or controls the
occupational activity or to whom decisive
economic power over the technical functioning of
such an activity has been delegated, including
the holder of a permit or authorisation for such
an activity or the person registering or
notifying such an activity. - (USchadG 2 (3))
-
- Every person competent to make important
decisions (for instance managing directors can
directly be held liable under USchadG even
after having left the liable company
14Umweltschadensgesetz - Responsible Person
- Polluter-Pays-Principle
- Occupational Activities which may trigger a
liability (in the event they cause a soil damage)
are enumerated in Annex 1 of Umweltschadensgesetz
- Operational activities requiring a permit under
Federal Immission Control Act (ICPC-
Installations) - Waste handling and disposal
- Discharge of hazardous substances into water
bodies - Handling of hazardous substances
15Umweltschadensgesetz- Scope of Responsibility
- Information, 4
- In case of imminent threat of soil damage, the
responsible operator is obliged to inform the
authorities without delay!Information should
contain all relevant facts and circumstances so
that the competent authority is in a position to
take the appropriate action.
Duty to inform Right to remain silent ?
16Umweltschadensgesetz - Scope of Liability
- Obligation to ward off imminent threats of
damage, 5 - Remediation, 6
- If environmental damage has been caused, the
responsible party must take the necessary steps
of limit remediate damage - The principle of proportionality must be applied
when determining the necessary remediation
measures - The necessary measures are taken pursuant to the
relevant legislator/regulatory provisions (soil
remediation Soil Protection Act Ordinance on
Soil Protection
17Umweltschadensgesetz - Scope of Responsibility
- Remediation of land damage
-
- The necessary remediation measures shall be
taken to ensure, as a minimum, that the relevant
contaminants are removed, controlled, contained
or diminished so that the contaminated land,
taken account of its current use or approved
future use at the time of the damage, no longer
poses any significant risk of adversely affecting
human health. - (Annex 2, no 2 Environmental Liability
Directive) - USchadG simply refers to already existing soil
protection provisions
18Umweltschadensgesetz - Repartition of Costs
- Costs relating to measures for mitigation
remediation, 9 - Main principle
- Costs must be born by the responsible party
- The States must fix rules for reimbursement of
costs by administrative authorities - Repartition of costs under civil law when several
responsible parties are involved, 9
(2)(comparable to 24 (2) Soil Protection
Act)Advice for contract drafting - Exclusion of claims under 24 (2) Soil
Protection Act and 9 (2) USchadG
19Umweltschadensgesetz Repartition of costs
- Costs for mitigation remediation measures, 9
- Optional regulations concerning cost exemptions
(to be implemented by the States) - The responsible party does not have to bear the
costs in case of -
- Operations compliant with operating licence (so
called permit defence) - Operations compliant with state of the art
- Particular allowance for use of plant protection
agents in agriculture
20Umweltschadensgesetz - Participation of Third
Parties
- Request for action by third parties, 10
- Right to request that the authorities take action
to enforce obligations to remediate - Precondition To credibly demonstrate that
environmental damage or an imminent risk of
such has occurred - Beneficiary Concerned third parties or
environmental interest groups pursuant to 3
Act on Environmental Legal Actions - Legal Protection Right to file an action against
authorities in case of failure or faultive
enforcement of requirements under USchadG
21Umweltschadensgesetz - Application in Time
- Limitation of liability, 14
- USchadG neither applies to damage caused by
emissions, events or incidents that took place
before the date of enforcement (14.11.2007), nor
to damage caused by emissions, events or
incidents occurring after 14.11.2007 when such
damages arises from a specific activity that took
place and finished before 14.11.2007 - Liability claims under USchadG become time-barred
in 30 years since the emission, event or incident
resulting in the damage occurred
22Case Study
Lessee AGLegal Successor
Purchased 1976
Purchase of site 30 January 2001
Lessee GmbH Lessee until 1970 of industrial site
Lease contract 01.01.1950 - 31.12.1970
FO Former Owner
O Owner
Industrial Site CHC-Contamination
Parent Company PC of O
Administration (Mrs. Clearwater)
Mrs. Clearwater asks Who is liable?
23Umweltschadensgesetz Soil Protection Act
- Comparison Scope of Protection and Responsible
Parties
Umweltschadensgesetz Soil Protection Act
Damage to soil (and its functions) which has an adverse effect on human health or creates a risk of such an adverse effect Damage to soil and its functions Harmful soil changes Residual pollution
Polluter Polluter Legal Successor of polluter Owner Former owner Party exercising physical control Parent company
24New Impulses by European Environmental Liability
Law
- New rules for contaminated sites via the
Umweltschadensgesetz - Obligation to inform authorities in case of
pollution or risk of such - Polluter-pays-principle (in spite of the fact
that the authorities tend to oblige the
disturber in fact (owner) of the contaminated
site) - Further civil law claims for compensation are
possible if several liable parties 9 (2) USchadG - Legally compliant action is no excuse ( some
regional laws may exonerate from payment) - Extension of participation by the public
- Environmental interest groups have the right to
bring action, in order that the authorities be
forced to act by the courts
25(No Transcript)