Title: Bank ACATS
1(No Transcript)
2 Bank ACATS
BDUG Annual Meeting October 24,2005 Scottsdale,
AR
3Bank ACATS Program
- Topics
- History of Program
- Primary Differences
- Benefits of Participation
- Current Bank/Stats
- Current Initiatives
- Questions
4History of Program
- Pilot for Banks 1999
- Originally 7 Banks Participating
- Good Faith Effort Participation Not Mandated
- Most Brokerage Firms Participated in Pilot
- DTCC Opened Program to all Banks June 1999
5Primary Differences
- Good Faith Effort Not Mandated
- Paperwork Required
- Assets Move Free of Payment
- No Valued Fails
6Benefits
- Customer Satisfaction
- Reduced Timeframe to Transfer Account
- Initial Experience a Positive One
- Competitive Advantage
- Cost Reduction
- Follow up Process
- Pending Reversal of Transactions
- Ability to Trade and Collect Fees Sooner
7Benefits
- Electronic Notification of Assets and Cash
- Standardization/Automation
- Ability to Accelerate Process
- Residual Balances Processing
- Contacts within Financial Community
8Current Users
- Huntington Natl
- IBT
- Key Bank
- Mellon Bank
- Natl City Bank
- Reliance Trust
- SEI Trust Co.
- State Street Bank
- SunTrust Bank
- UMB
- Union Bank of Cal
- Wachovia
- Bank of America
- Bank One Trust Co.
- Bank of NY
- Citigroup PVT Bank
- City Natl Bank
- Comerica
- Country Trust Bank
- First American Trust
- Fleet Bank
- FNB Omaha
- Glenmede Trust Co.
9Volumes (Transactions)
Year TIFS Assets Settled Increase Settled
2001 4,800 7,200 58,800 -
2002 6,900 16,800 90,000 53
2003 9,600 28,800 114,000 27
2004 14,400 36,000 138,000 21
2005 15,000 54,000 156,000 8
10ACATS Process Overview
Snap Shot of Assets currently held in the Account
6-7 Day Cycle
Stocks Bonds
ACATS
Mutual Funds
Mutual Fund Companies
Cost Basis Information
IPS/Annuities
11Current Initiatives
- Trust System Automation
- Discussions with Regulatory Agencies
- Cost Basis / IPS
- Mutual Funds as Participants
12 Cost Basis Reporting Service
13Cost Basis Reporting Service
- Topics
- General Description of CBRS - What is it?
- Benefits of CBRS
- Current CBRS Users / Volume
- CBRS Fees
14What is CBRS?
- The Cost Basis Service (CBRS is an automated
system that provides brokerage firms, banks and
other financial organizations the ability to
transfer cost basis information from one firm to
another on any asset transfer through ACATS - Passes Asset and Tax Lot information for customer
to calculate tax liability (gain loss) - Available for a wide range of assets
15Benefits of CBRS
- Expands firms customer service
- Automates the transfer of Cost Basis data
- Centralizes and standardizes the information
transfer - Eliminates the manual re-entry and/or
recalculation of Cost Basis portfolio information - Significantly reduces cost associated with
obtaining and maintaining Cost Basis data
16Current CBRS Users
- Currently 27 firms using CBRS
- Merrill Lynch Linsco Private Ledger
- Citigroup Janney Montgomery Scott
- UBS Financial Pershing
- Piper Jaffray HSBC Securities
- Stifel Nicolaus Robert Baird
- First Clearing Davenport
- Wells Fargo Investments Huntleigh Securities
- Ferris, Baker Watts Sterne, Agee Leach
- National Investors Hilliard Lyons
- Wedbush Morgan Morgan Stanley DW
- Legent Clearing Bear Stearns
- Scott Stringfellow Raymond James
- H R Block Morgan Keegan
- National Financial
17Current CBRS Volume
- Approximately 175,000 CBRS records processed on a
daily basis - Approximately 35,000 assets and 140,000 tax lot
records - Average 4.0 tax lots per asset
18CBRS FEES
- 9 cents per asset record received (Receiver firm
only) - Can have unlimited amount of associated Tax Lots
per asset
19CBRS Via PC Web
- Screen Input capability available
- Expanded file upload capability for CBRS
- Important Notice A5999 dated March 14, 2005
20 ACATS/IPS Overview
21What is ACATS/IPS?
- A link between the ACATS system and the IPS
system to allow insurance assets to be included
in a ACATS transaction. - IPS will be the link to the Insurance Carriers,
as FundServ acts as the link for mutual fund
assets in ACATS/FundServ. - ACATS/IPS automates broker/dealer change process
between Broker/Dealers and Insurance Carriers.
22ACATS/IPS - Goal
- To automate the Broker/Dealer change process for
Annuity contracts between Broker/Dealers, Banks
and Insurance Carriers by leveraging the ACATS
and IPS processing systems
23ACATS/IPS - Benefits
- Elevate level of Customer Service
- Eliminate Lost Annuity Contracts Revenue
- Automate Transaction Processing
- Automate Notification of Transfer
- True Paperless Process
24ACATS/IPS Process Overview
Delivering Broker/Dealer
IPS
Insurance Carrier
4. IFT (Accept/Reject Confirmation)
4. IFT (Accept/Reject Confirmation)
1.TI
2. AT
ACATS
3. IR
3. IFT
3.IR
1.TI
2. AT
4. IFT (Accept/Reject Confirmation)
Receiving Broker/Dealer
IFT (Corrective Action)
IFT (Corrective Action)
IFT (Cor. Action Confirm)
IFT (Cor. Action Confirm)
25ACATS/IPS Production
- Insurance Carriers
- Allstate
- The Hartford
- Pacific Life Insurance
- Broker/Dealers
- Merrill Lynch
- Piper Jaffray (Beta)
- Robert W. Baird (Beta)
- Stifel Nicolaus (Beta)
- Wachovia Securities (Beta)
- Wells Fargo Investments (Beta)
26ACATS/IPS Website Info
- insurance.dtcc.com
- IFT Record Layouts
- Standard Usage
- ACATS/IPS User Guide
- Selling Agreement Samples
- Fact Sheets
- acats.nscc.com
- ACATS Record Layouts
- ACATS/IPS User Guide
?
?
?
?
?
27Strategic Initiatives of SIA CAT Division
- Increasing financial institutions participation
in ACATS - Banks Sub-committee meeting every 3 weeks
- Coordinated by Bill Kapogiannis
- Insurance Companies Continue to grow ACATS/IPS
interface - Mutual Funds
- Liquidations
- Potentially shortening the ACATS cycle 7 to 4
days
28Proposed Process Change
- The ACATS process for full account transfers
facilitates fast and efficient transfer of client
assets. Both the investor and the member firms
benefit from speed and efficiency with which
client transfer request can be communicated,
validated and settled through ACATS. - The industry as a whole would realize significant
processing efficiencies and standardization
provided non-ACAT firms fully participated in the
ACATS process - Specifically, Mutual Fund Companies and current
ACATS participants would greatly increase
processing efficiencies and standardize the
transfer process by leveraging the ACATS
functionality currently available to Banks (and
other non-broker/dealer firms) for non-valued
transfers.
29Benefits
- Mutual Fund Companies would be able to utilize
the Partial Transfer Receive and Partial Transfer
Deliver functions to move client assets. - Mutual fund companies would no longer be
dependent upon instructions from the
broker/dealer. - Increase the level of client satisfaction through
greater reliability and speed
30Benefits cont
- There would be a diminished risk of re-registered
shares left unaccounted for at the fund
companies these positions become seemingly lost
to the client - Retirement transfers between funds and
broker/dealers would no longer require the
creation of intermediary accounts - Participant firms and Mutual Fund Companies would
have a standardized, automated process for
handling non-ACATS transfers by introducing them
into existing ACAT functionality.
31Next Steps
- Create industry committee. The following fund
companies are participating - Putnam
- Fidelity
- Janus
- Develop detailed process flow and requirements
32LIQUIDATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS VIA THE ACAT SERVICE
- IN TODAYS ENVIRONMENT
- SPEED AND ACCURACY IS THE KEY
33ISSUES
- RECEIVING AND DELIVERING FIRMS DO NOT HAVE A
STANDARD OR UNIFORM PRACTICE FOR LIQUIDATING
RECEIVER ADJUSTED MUTUAL FUNDS - INVESTORS HAVE LIMITED UNDERSTANDING OF WHY
CERTAIN HOLDINGS CANNOT BE TRANSFERRED OR HELD AT
NEW BROKER DEALER.
34MUTUAL FUNDS
Branch Offices
Operations Depts.
Processes
LIQUIDATIONS
35WHAT WE THINK WE NEED
- Develop new mechanism/transaction type
- Only Full ACATS will be eligible
- Firms need to establish consistency
- Firms will need internal control to prevent
selling asset types not eligible
36Next steps
- WHITE PAPER NEXT MONTH
- Comments welcomed and encouraged
37QUESTIONS ?