Ecological Sustainability: what can models tell us? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ecological Sustainability: what can models tell us?

Description:

Ecological Sustainability: what can models tell us? CSCI 1210 Fall 2003 Note: please don t forget the online student evaluations! What is sustainability? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: GEOG163
Learn more at: http://cobweb.cs.uga.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ecological Sustainability: what can models tell us?


1
Ecological Sustainabilitywhat can models tell
us?
  • CSCI 1210
  • Fall 2003
  • Note please dont forget the online student
    evaluations!

2
What is sustainability?
  • Humans living in a way that does not diminish
    Earths capacity to sustain life
  • Alternatively living within Earths ecological
    carrying capacity
  • Are we going through a global ecological crisis?

3
Overshoot and collapse
  • Previous model assumes carrying capacity is
    constant
  • What if a severe overshoot degrades the
    environment?
  • Carrying capacity might be permanently reduced
  • Imagehttp//www.dieoff.com/page80.htm

4
Humans are different
  • Human carrying capacity is hard to define,
    because
  • Technological changes affect food production
  • Complex social factors affect population

5
UN world population projections
  • World population may have passed its inflection
    point in 1970.
  • Herman Kahn called this time The Year Zero

6
World3The Nightmare Scenario
  • World3 model created by MIT systems group for the
    Club of Rome
  • Model updated, 1990
  • Graphic www.dieoff.com

7
Malthus in, Malthus out!
  • Nonrenewable resources run out
  • Capital is diverted to resource extraction
  • Less capital for agriculture
  • Yields fall, leading to famine and death
  • Is this realistic??

8
The Cornucopians
  • Economist Julian Simon bet ecologist Paul Ehrlich
    that prices of nonrenewable resources would fall
  • Ehrlich lost and had to pay Simon 1000
  • Cornucopians argue that human ingenuity will
    surmount all limits to growth.
  • http//www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/cpr-20n2-1.
    html

9
Are there limits?
  • Simon and climatologist Steven Schneider offered
    to bet Simon 1000 on each of 15 ecological
    indicators getting worse over time.
  • Simon declined this bet.
  • The limits to growth are not industrial
    resources, but ecological resources
  • The real limit may be the ability of Earth to
    absorb pollution

10
World3 model and pollution
  • Here is what happens when you increase the
    initial stock of natural resources by 1000 times.

11
World3 model and pollution
  • This time there is no shortage of agricultural
    inputs, but land fertility suffers because of
    pollution.

12
The IPAT formula I PAT
  • Proposed by Paul Ehrlich
  • I environmental Impact
  • P population size
  • A Affluence
  • T Technology factor
  • http//www.stanford.edu/group/CCB/Staff/paul.htm

13
IPAT a conceptual model
  • Population is not the only factor
  • An American has more environmental impact than a
    Bangladeshi or Chinese
  • To reduce environmental impact we must control P,
    A, T or all three
  • Problem with IPAT no defined measure of total
    impact I

14
Ecological Footprint model
  • Definition of total impact
  • Ecological fooprint is the total land area that
    would be needed to support a city, country, or
    other population unit.
  • http//www.ire.ubc.ca/ecoresearch/ecoftpr.html

15
Results of Ecological footprint
  • Were everyone on Earth to live as an average
    North American
  • It would require three Earths to sustain this
    lifestyle.

16
World3 Persistent Pollution
17
World3 pollution model
  • In World3, the world reacts to pollution problems
    after the pollution has already become a problem
  • Inevitable delays in inventing and deploying
    technology cause overshoot.
  • Pollution technology is modeled as a stock. You
    can add more technology but cannot make
    qualitative changes.

18
Real-world pollution response
  • In order to avoid overshoot, societies try to
    deal with pollution problems before they become
    severe
  • In the long term, qualitative changes
    (redesigning technology) is more powerful than
    adding filters to the back end of the smokestack

19
Ecological safety factor?
  • Many scientists believe that humans should use at
    most 50 of Earths ecological capacity
  • This gives us a safety margin in case our
    calculations are off
  • It also leaves some room for other living things
    to share our planet

20
The Big Question
  • How much do humans have to change in order to
    live within Earths carrying capacity?

21
And the answer is
  • Ecological overload factor if every Earthling
    comes up to US lifestyle 3
  • Additional population increase from
  • 6 to 9 billion
    1.5
  • Further improvement needed to
  • leave 50 of Earth alone 2
  • TOTAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDED 9

22
What does this mean?
  • We need at least a 9-fold reduction in the amount
    of pollution caused by each dollar of economic
    activity
  • Design school Factor Ten
  • Another design school Zero Waste

23
Is Zero Waste possible?
  • Nature does it!
  • Bill McDonough divide materials into industrial
    nutrients and ecological nutrients
  • Recycle industrial nutrients
  • Compost biological nutrients
  • Voila! Future technology!

24
A Democracy Deficit?
  • Those most vulnerable are far away
  • And have little power to promote change
  • Needed effective planetary democracy
  • Struggle over the global trade system the front
    line of the battle to save the Earth?

25
Acknowledgements
  • DOE vs EIA Hubbert curves http//www.dieoff.org/p
    age177.htm
  • Hubbert curves from http//www.hubbertpeak.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com