Philosophical Issues: More Background - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophical Issues: More Background

Description:

Philosophical Issues: More Background A good starting point for our discussion of relevant, overriding philosophical issues is to define EPISTEMOLOGY. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:259
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: raym65
Learn more at: https://www.utsa.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophical Issues: More Background


1
Philosophical Issues More Background
  • A good starting point for our discussion of
    relevant, overriding philosophical issues is to
    define EPISTEMOLOGY.
  • -- The branch of philosophy which deals with
    theories of knowledge or ways of explaining how
    we understand concepts about nature and human
    behavior.
  • The work of Jean Piaget.

2
A Priori vs. PosterioriKnowledge
  • A Priori knowledge is derived from what is prior
    or comes before.
  • This type of knowledge does not come from
    experience we are born with it.
  • Like lower animal, humans also posses an array of
    instincts which help us survive and even thrive
    as we learn to interact with our world.
  • Some argue that our understanding of good and
    evil constitutes a priori knowledge.

3
Posteriori Knowledge
  • By contrast, Posteriori Knowledge is derived from
    what comes later via experience with our world.
  • In other words, this is knowledge acquired
    through experiential learning.
  • To be sure, this is a contention which enjoys
    enormous support among psychologists.

4
Other Opposing Concepts
  • Nativism versus Empiricism
  • Instinct versus Learning

5
Is Truth Knowable?
  • How can we be sure a given theory or explanation
    is true?
  • Authority its true because an authoritative
    source or person says so.
  • Empiricism the use of observable facts to
    confirm or deny truth. Seeing is believing!
  • Rationalism we posses, a priori, the organizing
    mental capabilities to know truth. We are born
    with the capacity to reason and this is how we
    can come to know truth.

6
How we Know truth
  • Aestheticism beauty always accompanies truth.
    Truth is aesthetically pleasing.
  • Pragmatism we can only know truths which can be
    subject to test.
  • Skepticism we start by questioning any proposed
    truth and never let go of our doubts completely.

7
Mixing Science and Epistemology
  • Ostensibly science combines rational, empirical,
    pragmatic, and aesthetic dimension of
    Epistemology.
  • Despite debates dating back to ancient Greek
    philosophers, we have entered the 21st century
    not having resolved many long-standing
    controversies regarding proper philosophy of
    science and research methodology.

8
Attributing Cause
  • Causality remains a central question
  • for psychologists.
  • Aristotle proposed four levels of causation
  • 1. Material Cause
  • 2. Efficient Cause
  • 3. Formal Cause
  • 4. Final Cause

9
Four Levels of Causation
  • The Material Cause of an event is the physical
    substrate through which the objects affect each
    other. The physical substrate must be appropriate
    for the action to take place.
  • The Efficient Cause is that which immediately
    sets an object in motion.
  • The Formal Cause is the shape of the objects in
    the action. The functional or causal properties
    of an object depend on its shape.
  • The Final Cause is the end or purpose for which
    an event occurred.

10
Final Cause and Teleology
  • Teleology refers to purpose or design and is an
    integral component of Final Cause.
  • Intrinsic teleology suggests that design, order,
    and purpose are imminent in nature, while
  • Extrinsic teleology is the belief that any design
    in nature reflects an external designer.

11
Cause and Psychology
  • David Hume suggests that cause does not exist in
    the world and that the word cause is only
    descriptive of the behavior of two objects
    interacting with one another.
  • Cause provides additional difficulties causation
    is complex, and it may not be possible to cleanly
    derive a single cause for an event.

12
Free Will and Determinism
  • The debate surrounding free will and determinism
    is one of the oldest in psychology, and there are
    several influential psychologists on each side.
  • Free will is the doctrine that human beings make
    choices that are, to some degree, independent of
    the antecedent conditions. Even though there
    exist several physical, genetic, biological,
    psychological, and cultural limits to human
    behavior, we may be able to transcend these
    influences via free will.

13
Free Will and Determinism
  • Proponents of free will provide several arguments
    for their position.
  • Free will is necessary to adequately explain
    human experience.
  • Saying I believe in determinism implies a
    logical contradiction.
  • Determinism makes a mess of morality by
    eliminating responsibility.
  • True randomness or indeterminism may exist.

14
Psychological Determinism
  • Psychological determinism states that there are
    causes, both known and unknown, for every
    behavior or experience. Determinists argue their
    case in numerous ways.
  • Historically, deterministic accounts are gaining
    ground and are explaining areas of psychology
    once believed to be driven by free will.

15
Psychological Determinism
  • Free will makes a mess of morality because a
    belief in free will can justify excessive
    punishment of someone who has misused his or her
    free will.
  • Determinists argue that our world is predictable
    in part because causes provide us with reasonable
    expectancies as to possible outcomes.

16
Mind vs. Body
  • The mind-body problem is related to the branch of
    philosophy called ontology, the study of the
    nature and relations of being and existence. What
    is the relationship between the subjective mind
    and the physical brain?
  • Possible relationships
  • monisms,
  • dualisms, or
  • pluralisms

17
Mind vs. Body
  • Monistic positions maintain that everything is
    related to everything else in an intimate way as
    one fundamental substance or unit.
  • Materialism is the belief that mind and brain are
    one thing, and that is matter.
  • Idealism suggests that mind and the mental world
    are fundamental and that matter is not verifiable
    outside of experience.

18
Mind vs. Body
  • Double-aspect monism maintains that the different
    languages humans use for mental states and brain
    states are only different languages and not
    references to different sides of the same coin.
  • Epiphenomenalism suggests that mental states
    exist but that mental states are only the
    overflow or byproduct of brain activity.
  • Dualism asserts that the mental and the physical
    are two qualitatively different orders of
    reality.

19
Mind vs. Body
  • Interactionism is the common sense position that
    the mind and the body are fundamentally different
    but interact with each other. Interactionists
    have had difficulty specifying the mode of
    interaction.
  • Psychophysical parallelism solves the problem
    faced by the interactionists by eliminating the
    interaction. Mind and body coexist in a beautiful
    preestablished harmony as two clocks, independent
    of each other yet perfectly synchronized.

20
Psychogeny
  • Psychogeny is the study of the origin of
    consciousness or experience (mind or psyche).
  • There are two primary theories of psychogeny
  • Identity theory maintains that psyche is
    instilled into the biology of the organism at
    one point in time and that the psyche instilled
    at that point remains identical throughout the
    lifespan.

21
Psychogeny
  • Problems with Identity Theory
  • (1) Although most contemporary identity theorists
    accept conception as the time of infusion, the
    time of the arrival of the psyche is a matter of
    historical debate.
  • (2) After fertilization, a blastocyst can divide
    into two bodies and presumably two psyches. When
    did the second psyche arrive? How many were
    present at conception?
  • (3) How is a conscious adult identical to a
    fertilized egg?

22
Psychogeny
  • The other theory, psychogenic emergentism,
    suggests that the psyche develops as the body or
    the neurological substrate develops.
  • Psyche can grow and decline with age.
  • Emergentists do not agree on a time at which
    psyche emerges.
  • Humans feel like we are the same people we were
    at age 5 have we changed as much as emergentists
    suggest that we change?
  • How do we value individuals who are developing
    psyche at an atypical rate or who are declining
    with age?

23
The Greek Philosophers
  • The Greek philosophers, primarily Socrates,
    Plato, and Aristotle, are commonly considered the
    intellectual foundation of Western Civilization
    (450-300 b.c.)
  • Originators of many ideas, including medicine,
    history, geometry, astronomy, democracy, the
    modern military, the scientific method, logic,
    and philosophy.

24
Before Socrates
  • According to Early Greeks, the ultimate cause of
    everything was to be found somewhere in nature.
  • Thales proposed the idea that all things are
    made from basic elemental, physical substances,
    e.g., water.
  • Heraclitus proposed idea that everything is
    changing, thus perception can be deceiving. (the
    basic problem with empirical knowledge)
  • .

25
Before Socrates
  • Pythagoras the ultimate explanations were to be
    found in numbers
  • Pythagoras was the first scientist to suggest
    that the world was a sphere, not flat.
  • Democritus all explanations were to be found in
    nature.
  • Contended nature was made up of tiny particles
    (atoms) constantly in motion.
  • Provided the first recorded explanation of
    sensation --- immediate particles contact

26
Before Socrates (2)
  • Hippocrates father of medicine proposed
    natural causes of mental and physical disorders,
    such as heredity, organ damage, and imbalance of
    fluids. (namesake of Hippocratic Oath)
  • Borrowed four basic elements from Empedocles
  • earth, air, fire, and water
  • Proposed a theory of humors within the body to
    account for four basic human temperaments

27
Before Socrates (3)
  • Blood sanguine (cheerful) temperament
  • Yellow bile choleric (fiery) temperament
  • Phlegm phlegmatic (slow) Temperament
  • Black bile melancholic (sad) temperament
  • According to Hippocrates, psychological problems
    are caused by humors that are out of balance

28
FIVE FACTOR THEORY OF PERSONALITYThe Big Five
  • Neuroticism (N3)
  • Depression a tendency to experience dysphoric
    effect (sadness, helplessness guilt).
  • Extraversion (E2)
  • Gregariousness a preference for companionship
    and social stimulation.

29
FIVE FACTOR THEORY OF PERSONALITYThe Big Five
  • Openness to Experience (O4)
  • Action a need for variety, novelty change.
  • Agreeableness (A4)
  • Compliance a willingness to defer to others
    during interpersonal conflict.

30
FIVE FACTOR THEORY OF PERSONALITYThe Big Five
  • Conscientiousness (C4)
  • Achievement striving a strong sense of purpose
    and high aspiration levels.

31
Western Civilization
  • Socrates taught Plato. Plato taught Aristotle.
    Aristotle taught Alexander the Great. Alexander
    the Great builds Greek Empire by the age of
    thirty. This is the origins of modern philosophy,
    modern science, and the modern military, all in
    the years 400-300 b.c.

32
Western Civilization
  • Greek Empire (300-100 BC) is the foundation of
    Roman Empire (100 BC to 400 AD). The revival of
    Greek knowledge is also the root of the
    Renaissance (1450-1600 AD), which ends the Dark
    Ages and Middle Ages (400-1450 AD).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com