Title: Emergence of Landscape Ecology
1Emergence of Landscape Ecology
?
- Equilibrium View
- Constant species composition
- Disturbance succession subordinate factors
- Ecosystems self-contained
- Internal dynamics shape trajectory
- No need to look outside boundaries to understand
ecosystem dynamics
?
?
?
2Emergence of Landscape Ecology
- Dynamic View
- Disturbance ecosystem response key factors
- Disturbance counter equilibrium
- Ecosystems NOT self-contained
- Multiple scales of processes, outside inside
- Essential to examine spatial temporal context
3Scale
- Seminal pubs
- Allen Starr (1982) Hierarchy perspectives
for ecological complexity - Delcourt et al. (1983) Quaternary Science
Review 1153-175 - ONeill et al. (1986) A hierarchical concept of
ecosystems
4Ecological Scaling Scale Pattern
- Acts in the ecological theatre (Hutchinson 1965)
are played out across various scales of space
time - To understand these dramas, one must select the
appropriate scale
Speciation Extinction
Species Migrations
Secondary Succession
Windthrow
Fire
Treefalls
Recruitment
5Ecological Scaling Scale Pattern
- Different patterns emerge, depending on the scale
of investigation
Regional Scale (thousands of ha)
Local Scale (4 ha plots)
6Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- Grain minimum resolution of the data
- Cell size (raster data)
- Min. polygon size (vector data)
- Extent scope or domain of the data
- Size of landscape or study area
7Ecological Scale
- Scale characterized by
- grain smallest spatial resolution of data
- e.g., grid cell size, pixel size, quadrat size
(resolution) - Fine Coarse
8Ecological Scale
- Scale characterized by
- extent size of overall study area (scope or
domain of the data) - Small Large
9Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- Minimum Patch Size min. size considered gt
resolution of data (defined by grain) - Size of landscape or study area
10Ecological Scaling Definitions
- Ecological scale cartographic scale are exactly
opposite - Ecological scale size (extent) of landscape
- Cartographic scale ratio of map to real distance
11Scale in Ecology Geography
- ecological vs. cartographic scale
Ecology Geography
Small (Fine) Fine resolution Small Extent Coarse resolution Large Extent
Large (Broad) Coarse resolution Large extent Fine resolution Small extent
12Scale in Ecology Geography
- ecological vs. cartographic scale
- e.g., map scale
- 124,000 vs. 13,000
- fine vs. coarse
- large vs. small extent
13124,000
1200,000
14Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- Grain and extent are correlated
- Information content often correlated with grain
- Grain and extent set lower and upper limits of
resolution in the data, respectively.
15Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- From an organism-centered perspective, grain and
extent may be defined as the degree of acuity of
a stationary organism with respect to short- and
long-range perceptual ability
16Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- Grain finest component of environment that can
be differentiated up close - Extent range at which a relevant object can be
distinguished from a fixed vantage point
Extent
Grain
Coarse
Fine
Scale
17Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- From an anthropocentric perspective, grain and
extent may be defined on the basis of management
objectives - Grain finest unit of mgt (e.g., stand)
- Extent total area under management (e.g.,
forest)
18Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- In practice, grain and extent often dictated by
scale of available spatial data (e.g., imagery),
logistics, or technical capabilities
19Ecological Scaling Components of Scale
- Critical that grain and extent be defined for a
study and represent ecological phenomenon or
organism studied. - Otherwise, patterns detected have little meaning
and/or conclusions could be wrong
20(No Transcript)
21Scale Jargon
- scale vs. level of organization
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25Ecological Scaling Implications of Scale
- As one changes scale, statistical relationships
may change - Magnitude or sign of correlations
- Importance of variables
- Variance relationships
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Implications of Changes in Scale
- Processes and/or patterns may change
- Hierarchy theory structural understanding of
scale-dependent phenomena
Example Abundance of forest insects sampled at
different distance Intervals in leaf litter,
29Implications of Changes in Scale
Insects sampled at 10-m intervals for 100 m
30Implications of Changes in Scale
Insects sampled at 2000-m intervals for 20,000 m
31Identifying the Right Scale(s)
- No clear algorithm for defining
- Autocorrelation Independence
- Life history correlates
- Dependent on objectives and organisms
- Multiscale analysis!
- e.g., Australian leadbeaters possum
32Multiscale Analysis
- Species-specific perception of landscape features
scale-dependent - e.g., mesopredators in Indiana
- Modeling species distributions in fragmented
landscapes
33Hierarchy Theory
- Lower levels provide mechanistic explanations
- Higher levels provide constraints
34Scale Hierarchy Theory
- Hierarchical structure of systems helps us
explain phenomena - Why? next lower level
- So What? next higher level
- minimum 3 hierarchical levels needed
35Constraints (significance)
Level of Focus (level of interest)
Components (explanation)
36Constraints
Community
Why are long-tailed weasel populations declining
in fragmented landscapes?
Population
Components
Individual
37Constraints
Community
Why are long-tailed weasel populations declining
in fragmented landscapes?
Population
Small body size mobility
Individual
38Predators Competitors Prey distn
Community
Why are long-tailed weasel populations declining
in fragmented landscapes?
Population
Components
Individual
39Scale Hierarchy Theory
- Change scale
- influential variables might not change, but
- shift in relative importance likely
Example Predicting rate of decomposition of
plant matter Local scale lignin content
environ. variability Global scale temperature
precip.