SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum

1
SWIM-SUITFinal User Forum
2
SWIM Cost Benefit Analysis

• Luis López
• Investment Analyst

3
Contents

• Results of the analysis
• Risk Analysis
• Sensitivity Analysis
• Economic Model
• Benefits
• Costs
• SWIM Business Model

4
CBA Results
Big swing on the Net Present Value or Result of
the project due to number of uncertainties
5
Sensitivity Analysis
Number of Interfaces per year is the main
uncertainty
6
Economic Model

• New Model created due to specifities of the
  project
• Ensure re-use by SESAR initiative
• Current Benefits and Costs known, subject to
  changes due to new discoveries.
• Big number of uncertainties at this stage

7
Benefits

• Application Interface Costs Whenever a new
  application-to-application interface is required
  SWIM will reduce the overall costs of software
  coding the interface.

• New information consumer applications can be
  developed without requiring modification to
  existing information producer application(s).
• In developing new information consumer
  applications, software reuse is increased and
  application development time is decreased by
  using common protocols, message formats, schema
  definitions, etc.

• Calculations for application interface costs
• Number of Interfaces
• x
• Subscriber cost savings
• x
• Subscriber cost
• x
• Publisher cost saving
• x
• Publisher Cost

8
Benefits

• Overall Program Costs Whenever a new
  application is launched native-SWIM, it will take
  advantage of SWIM core services to implement
  information security, systems management and
  interconnection between applications.

• The engineering effort for interconnections
  between applications is greatly reduced.
• Common information security functions, such as
  authentication, access control, confidentiality
  and integrity, may be used by all applications.
• Simplified information security certification
  efforts through reuse of SWIM information
  security services and certification for use by
  all applications.
• Core Services for systems management reduce
  overall program cost.

9
Benefits

• Overall Program Costs Whenever a new
  application is launched native-SWIM, it will take
  advantage of SWIM core services to implement
  information security, systems management and
  interconnection between applications.

• Calculation for Overall Program Costs
• Annual Facilities Equipment Expenditure on
  information rich programs
• x
• () SWIM Impacted Activities
• x
• () SWIM Cost Reduction

10
Unquantifiable Benefits

• Reduced program flow time through the
  availability of SWIM-published data upon program
  start
• Aggregation of common information services (e.g.
  backup)
• Access to live data during application testing
  reduces simulation cost and identifies problems
  earlier in a program
• Common data standards, metadata registries and
  access to data promote the exploration and
  validation of new operational concepts
• Loose coupling between applications that can
  extend application life
• More efficient use of bandwidth through SWIM
  brokered transactions rather than multiple
  point-to-point connections
• Reduced code development and maintenance as data
  and functionality is shared rather than recoded
• Reduced manual data sharing

11
Methodology of qualitative assessment

• STEP 1
• Definition of Lines of Change (LoCs) and
  Operational Improvements (OIs) in which SWIM acts
  as an enabler
• STEP 2
• Definition of roles of SWIM in particular OIs
• STEP 3
• Assignment of particular OIs to correspondent
  KPAs

12
Example KPA Efficiency
Fuel efficiency

Factor name Ground Queuing (Departure or arrival) Factor name Ground Queuing (Departure or arrival) Qualitative assessment Medium Qualitative assessment Medium Qualitative assessment Medium Qualitative assessment Medium
OI Step ID OI Step description Benefit Mechanism Qualitative assessment Role of SWIM Details
TS-0202 Departure Management Synchronised with Pre-departure Sequencing DMAN allow to optimise Gnd Queueing and wait at stand -gt saving some fuel but not saving time Medium Institutional Enabler LEG-01 EU Legislation - SWIM Interoperability Implementing Rule
SWIM related SESAR benefits qualitative
assessment based on SESAR definition phase
docs. BENEFIT PLANNING T3.4.4/D5
DLT-0710-344-00-07 TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS AND
SELECTION OF TRANSITION SCENARIOS T3.3.3
Milestone 4 DLT-0706-333-00-05 COST BENEFIT
MODELLING WP1.4.1/D1, DLT-0507-141-00-10
13
RD Current Costs on Infrastructure

• Cost of WP1 and WP2 SWIM-SUIT 5 M
• Cost of SESAR WP8 and WP14 112 MM x 16K per MM
  1,8 M
• Total Cost 6,8 M

14
SWIM Costs M
15
SWIM Business Model

• The question of the SWIM Operator is key in term
  of safety and also key in term of business model.
• In the example of the GNSS framework, an EC
  regulation Regulation (EC) No 638/2008 of the
  European Parliament and of the Council, of 9 July
  2008, on the further implementation of the
  European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS
  and Galileo) declare that the EC shall be the
  owner of all EGNOS system assets, shall finance
  the procurement of evolution, shall fund its
  operation and maintenance for the provision of an
  EGNOS services by means of public service
  contracts.
• For SWIM services, one can envisaged that they
  are sold to users on the basis of an annual
  subscription subject to a payment of a fee in
  respect of the users needs. It should also be
  considered the possibility that this annual
  subscription of SWIM services by the major actors
  of Air Transport (airlines, airports, ANSP, etc.)
  be mandatory

16
Questions and Feedback
http//www.swim-suit.aero/swimsuit/
17
The SWIM Legal Framework

• Anna Masutti
• AST Law Firm

SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
18
SWIM Infrastructure

• The key characteristics influencing SWIM
  Governance
• In the SWIM System any single actor (public or
  private entity) can be a publisher or a user of
  ATM information, operating independently of each
  other.
• There is no hierarchical relationship between the
  SWIM actors.
• How can we design a Governance system for SWIM?
  Let us examine how others similar situations have
  been regulated, if any.

SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
19
Governance

• Identification of similarities with the Internet
  both are formed by many actors that operate with
  a certain degree of freedom in both cases the
  actors can be publishers or users of information,
  operating independently.
• The Internet Society (ISOC) has developed the
  main principle for an internet Governance
  proposed in a code of conduct that has not been
  approved yet.
• A code of conduct is adopted for regulating
  several fields where many actors operate
  independently.

19
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
20
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• Possible solution for SWIM Governance
• The code of conduct shall enforce the technical
  principles which ensure the stability and
  security of the system and the traceability of
  eventual responsibility, and shall be compulsory
  for all actors and all parties.
• there shall be a system of administrative
  sanctions for infringement of the above
  regulations.
• If an infringement causes damage to third
  parties and/or their properties a third party
  liability regime shall be set up.

20
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
21
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• Regarding point 1)
• SWIM already contains many technical principles
  regarding data security, for example
  authentication, authorisation, confidentiality,
  non-repudiation, standardised language and
  service interoperability, which should form the
  code of conducts technical regulations.
• All these technical features should be translated
  into a set of compulsory (technical) regulations
  for SWIM actors, for the correct functioning of
  the System within a complete legal framework.
• The regulations of the code of conduct can be
  contained in a contract between a possible future
  operator of the System and the users. But
• What is the most suitable type of contract when
  you have to define the relationship between a
  single entity and many parties?

21
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
22
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• ... we have come to the conclusion that one of
  the instruments that should be used for a
  complete Governance of SWIM is the contract of
  adhesion. The contract shall set out the
  different services offered by SWIM, their
  features and their performance standards.
• This contract is a standard framework agreement
  set up by the SWIM service provider, which the
  users must adhere to if they wish to purchase
  SWIM services
• How can one enter into such a contract?

22
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
23
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• We assume that a commercial operator will
  provide and offer SWIM services and will be one
  party of the contract.
• The other party is represented by a multitude of
  SWIM users regardless of their role (manager,
  publisher and contributor).
• Services will be offered to users on the basis of
  an annual subscription subject to a payment of a
  fee on the basis of the users needs.
• A contractual relationship should be mandatory.
  This is because commercial flights can not be
  provided without using ATC services.

23
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
24
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• Regarding points 2 and 3 (liability system and
  sanctions)
• The technical principles ensure the stability and
  security of the system and the traceability
  system, which allows the identification of
  responsible parties (liable party) that published
  wrong or misleading or incomplete information.
• The framework contract should comprise two
  different provisions for wrong or misleading or
  incomplete information, when it doesn't causes
  damage and when it does.

24
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
25
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• In the first case, if wrong or misleading or
  incomplete information published in the system
  has not caused problems or even incidents, but
  was potentially a cause of incidents, a sanction
  should be established. In this case the
  (administrative) sanction acts as a deterrent.
• The contract shall designate who is in charge of
  such evaluation and of imposing sanctions.
• Sanctions will be progressive and proportional in
  respect of the gravity of the mistake up to the
  notice and termination of the contract.

25
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
26
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• In the second case when damage is caused by
  wrong or incomplete information, a liability
  system including a compensation system for damage
  of properties and personal injury to the victims
  should be created.
• Normally, principles of private law quite common
  to Member States for compensation of damage
  comprise the loss of profit and accruing damage,
  and these principles will be taken into due
  consideration.

26
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
27
The SWIM Code of Conduct

• Again, in the second case when damage is caused
  also to third party not linked to liable party by
  any contract, a Third Party Liability System must
  be established, according to international
  principles.
• These principles, which normally includes
  channelling, strict and limited liability and
  compulsory insurance system, have already been
  presented in the occasion of the previous Users
  Forum (see presentation on SWIM website)

27
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
28
SWIM
A EU Regulation for SWIM is necessary to regulate
governance, responsibilities and liability,
including third party liability
28
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
29
Questions and Feedback
http//www.swim-suit.aero/swimsuit/
SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome
30
SWIM-SUITFinal User Forum