Analysing Multifunctionality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Analysing Multifunctionality

Description:

Analysing Multifunctionality Uruguay Round Agreement on agriculture (URAA)-countries agreed to resume agricultural trade negotiations by late 1999, with the aim of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: Smurfit5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysing Multifunctionality


1
Analysing Multifunctionality
  • Uruguay Round Agreement on agriculture
    (URAA)-countries agreed to resume agricultural
    trade negotiations by late 1999, with the aim of
    making further reductions in trade distortions.
  • New negotiations will take into account
    non-trade concerns, including food security and
    the need to protect the environment.
  • WTO limits trade-distorting policies, not policy
    objectives. Policies are subject to different
    levels of discipline, referred to as boxes,
    according to their degree of trade distortion
  • Green boxno, or minimal trade distorting
    effects.
  • Amber boxsupport that is linked to production
    that distorts markets and trade.

2
Multifunctionality and Traditional Agricultural
Policy Goals
  • There are several externalities/non-food
    functions that result from the production of
    food, and can have both positive and negative
    externalities which are not accounted for in the
    market.
  • In the multifuncitonality debate the existence of
    (primarily positive) externalities is used as
    justification for government intervention.
  • However, multifunctional services do not
    necessarily require government provision. In some
    instances club goods provide an alternative.
    Organisations like the Nature Conservancy,
    through admissions and membership fees, finance
    the preservation of unique ecological niches.
  • Membership in WTO makes member countries
    accountable for these international spill over
    effects. It constrains domestic policies to being
    targeted to domestic markets and to be minimally
    trade distorting.
  • Multifunctional services are typically local in
    nature. Thus one size-fits-all policies set at
    the national level are inefficient.

3
  • Agricultural price support programs are an
    inferior means to multifunctional ends because
    they distort production and trade.
  • Thus there is the requirement that domestic
    policies be minimally trade-distorting prevents
    one countrys domestic policy from adversely
    affecting resource allocation in other countries.
  • Jointness of Desirable Outputs and Agricultural
    Production
  • In the multifunctionality debate, jointness has
    been used to characterize a production
    relationship where two outputs can be produced
    only simultaneously.
  • Some countries have used the joint product
    concept to argue that production of a non-food
    output is linked to production of the
    agricultural commodity. They claim that
    production-linked payments are necessary to
    obtain socially desired non-food outputs.
  • Because production of the agricultural commodity
    is required to create a by-product, then it is
    equally efficient to target policies toward
    production of either the agricultural commodity
    or the by-product.
  • The jointness argument falls apart when
    agricultural production is not the only possible
    source of providing the amenity.

4
Multifunctional Aspects of AgricultureThe
Environment
  • Three main functions of agriculture-environment,
    food security and rural development.
  • Many countries cite positive environmental
    externalities as a rational for government
    support of their agricultural sectors.
  • Determining the appropriate amount of the
    positive or negative externality requires a
    trade-off between all benefits and all costs.
  • For both positive and negative externalities, the
    costs of policies are generally easier to measure
    than benefits.
  • In terms of environmental policy instruments
    government based schemes may not be efficient. A
    market-based approach that relies on private
    insurance to accomplish environmental goals, at
    no or minimal cost to the government, may be able
    to achieve the same level of adoption at less
    cost.

5
Instruments for Modifying Levels of the
Environmental Functions
  • Public
  • Cost share (EQIP)
  • Regulation (pesticide use restrictions)
  • Land set aside payments (CRP)
  • Taxation of inputs
  • Tax reductions
  • Private
  • Land buyouts (National Preservation Trust, Ducks
    Unlimited)
  • Insurance
  • Emission trading
  • Performance bonding
  • These instruments are more directly targeted to
    achieving environmental objectives than
    production-linked instruments that have
    incidental environmental impacts.

6
Summary
  • Economic arguments under multifunctionality hinge
    on the existence of an exclusively joint
    relationship between agricultural production and
    non-food outputs.
  • In reality, most non-food outputs can be produced
    independently of agriculture and a range of
    policy instruments and private actions are
    available to achieve each objective related to
    non-food outputs.
  • The WTO respects member country sovereignty and
    does not evaluate the merits of agricultural
    policy objectives.
  • The degree of international spillovers or
    distortions from domestic agricultural policies
    emerges as the critical question for
    international trade agreements.
  • Further analysis is needed to identify the types
    and magnitudes of distortions from different
    types of domestic policies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com