Title: Just War theory and its links to
1Just War theoryand its links to Natural Law
2Just War theory and taking life
- The just war theory is a largely Christian
philosophy that attempts to reconcile three
things - taking human life is seriously wrong
- states have a duty to defend their citizens, and
defend justice - protecting innocent human life and defending
important moral values sometimes requires
willingness to use force and violence
3'Just', or merely 'permissible'?
- The doctrine of the Just War can deceive a person
into thinking that because a war is just, it's
actually a good thing. - But behind contemporary war theory lies the idea
that war is always bad. A just war is permissible
because it's a lesser evil, but it's still an
evil.
4Just War Origins of Thought
- St Augustine of Hippo (4th C.) distinguished
between - Private retaliation (not justified in
Christianity) - War pursued against those who are a threat to
peace (sometimes justified) - His time saw the birth of a brand new notion
Christendom - ChristendomChrists domains
- The notion of a greater whole that was sacred and
may be threatened internally or externally
St Augustine of Hippo, 354-430. He lived right at
the end of the Roman Empire in the West.
5Just War Origins in Christianity
- St Thomas of Aquinas (13th C.) developed the
Christian doctrine of Just War - He laid out the following conditions
- Declared by the sovereign
- Just cause those attacked should deserve this
- Right intention the advancement of good or
avoidance of evil - Aquinas lived at a time when numerous small wars
between city states were common - not long after the reconquest of Sicily from
Muslim rule
St Thomas Aquinas, 1225 1274. He was a
Dominican priest and scholar.
6Just War - preservation of innocent life
- Both Natural Law and Just War theory have their
origins in Thomas Aquinas. - Primary precept preserve innocent life
-
- Just war does not give you a set of boxes
- to tick to say if war is just, its aim
- is restraint, the preservation of life
- and lasting peace.
7Just War criteria
- Other thinkers developed the concept of Just War
- Just cause
- Declared by lawful authority.
- Right intention
- Last resort
- Reasonable chance of success
- Innocents should not be harmed
- Only appropriate force should be used
These are sometimes called the Jus ad Bellum
criteria criteria to be in place before war is
prosecuted
These are sometimes called the Jus in Bello
criteria criteria for moral conduct of the war
once started
8A developing theory
- In Ethics and War Beyond Just War Theory Mervyn
Frost argues that In the global war on terror
those using violence will have to be able to
demonstrate that they really are serious about
defending the values in whose name they are
fighting, rather than just using the words to
justify terror against terror.
9Criteria explained
- Declared by lawful authority
- since only a lawful authority can act on behalf
of the whole people - Restricts the number of groups that can ethically
wage war - For example, it stops wars declared by rebels
who've overthrown a legal government being
considered ethical
President Roosevelt signs the Declaration of War
against Japan, 1941
10Hiroshima Nagasaki
- In the early morning hours of August 6, 1945, a
B-29 bomber named Enola Gay was headed north by
northwest toward Hiroshima, Japan. - The atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima contained a
mass of uranium about the size of a cricket ball.
- The explosion it unleashed was the equivalent of
that of 20,000 tons of TNT. - The devastation was horrific, but Japan refused
to surrender.
11US Warning Leaflet Nagasaki
- America asks that you take immediate heed of what
we say on this leaflet. - We are in possession of the most destructive
explosive ever devised by man. A single one of
our newly developed atomic bombs is actually the
equivalent in explosive power to what 2000 of our
giant B-29s can carry on a single mission. This
awful fact is one for you to ponder and we
solemnly assure you it is grimly accurate. - We have just begun to use this weapon against
your homeland.
President Truman took the decision to drop the
bombs
12The Death Toll
- No one will ever know for certain how many died
as a result of the attack on Hiroshima. - Some 70,000 people probably died as a result of
initial blast, heat, and radiation effects. - The five-year death total may have reached or
even exceeded 200,000, as cancer and other
long-term effects took hold. - The same grim picture unfolded in Nagasaki, the
second city to be bombed. - After this, The Emperor of Japan overruled the
military and ordered the government to surrender
to the Allied Forces.
13An eyewitness
- I threw myself into a frantic search for my
family, casting about in the still-hot rubble.
Before long, the tips of my shoes were burned so
that my toes stuck out, and my hands became
swollen with blisters. Looking along the road,
near a neighbour's house, I found a charred copse
that seemed to be my wife. The dead baby on her
back I took to be our one-year-old daughter
Takako. However, I never was able to find our
eight-year-old son Tateki, or our elder daughter
Makiko. - Tsuneo Tomimatsu, Nagasaki.
14An eyewitness
- Houses and trees were levelled as far as the eye
could see, and fires began breaking out in the
ruins. At the roadside I saw the corpse of a man
who had been leading a horse cart, still on his
feet, with his hair standing on end like wire.
The river was filled with the dead and half-dead
burned children were screaming, Mommy! Mommy!
and mothers searched for their children, calling
their names in faltering voices. - Ms. Hide Kurokawa, Nagasaki
15Tricycle
16Evaluation
- Was President Trumans decision to drop the
atomic bombs justified? - How did it preserve innocent life?
- Did it prevent more deaths?
- Was it merely a Utilitarian decision with unknown
consequences?
17Sermon on the Mount Matt. 5
You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye,
and tooth for tooth. But I tell you, Do not
resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on
the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be
called children of God
Exegesis Context new Kingdom values
fulfilling the OT teachings Peacemaking ?
peacekeeping Focus more on personal living rather
than on war
Exegesis Again, focus more on personal living
rather than on war The passage doesnt say If
someone stabs you on the right of the chest
Discussion Points Do any of these two passages
shed any light on morality in war situations?
18Cycle of Violence Matthew 26
Then the men stepped forward, seized Jesus and
arrested him. With that, one of Jesus' companions
reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the
servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear.
"Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said
to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by
the sword.
Exegesis Quite obvious (unjustified?) violence
leads to more violence Has a message for both
personal conflict and for national conflict
19Is the only way to preserve innocent life to be a
pacifist?
Does Just War theory support every view from
contingent pacifism to militarism?
20Quakers
In war Conscientious objectors or medical staff
Founded in 17th C. by George Fox and friends
Anti-gossip Is it true? Is it hurtful? Is it
necessary?
Persecuted by English Church
Dedicated to simplicity and peace
Anti-slavery
Society of Friends
21Case Study Mikhail Kalashnikov
This the man who designed a rifle that...
will inflict a fatal wound at 300 yards
will spray thirty bullets in three seconds
can be bought for as little as 100 on the
world's black markets
fires 'tumbling' bullets which make a small entry
hole into flesh and yet tear out a massive exit
will function even if dirty, wet or unoiled
is light enough to be carried by a child
has been used to kill most of the fifty million
or so people in small wars since 1945
is the weapon of choice for many small armies
terrorist organisations (some 70 million have
been sold)
22Case Study
Name Automatic Kalashnikov assault rifle, first
made in 1947 - hence, AK-47 Inventor Mikhail
Kalashnikov, born 1919
What Kalashnikov says when asked about his
invention... 'When Germany invaded, I saw my
comrades in pain. They were being wheeled into
hospital, injured in defence of their Motherland
against the Fascists. Courage was not enough. The
Nazis had superior armoury. I wanted to redress
the balance.'
'My life's not been easy. I wanted my invention
to serve peace. I didn't want it to make war
easier If it was not guns, it would be knives
or axes. Guns are not guilty. People are guilty.
23Case Study
Mikhail Kalashnikov has hardly made a penny from
his invention. In 1990 he met Eugene Stoner, who
designed the M-16 (the closest thing to an
American equivalent of the AK-47), and was
shocked by the fact that Stoner had his own jet
whilst he himself could not afford the price of a
plane ticket to Washington.
If you were to sit in judgement of Kalashnikov,
of what, if anything, would you accuse him? Give
reasons for your answer.
24Does Just War Theory succeed in preserving
innocent life?