National Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

National Children

Description:

BCC Presentation Template v2.0, 16MAR07 Desktop Efficiency Team ... Innovation through Austerity? Implementation of the new National Funding Formula. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: psconfere
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Children


1
  • National Childrens Commissioning and
    Contracting Conference.
  • Innovation through Austerity?
  • Implementation of the new National
    Funding Formula.
  • Lessons learnt.
  • Annette Jones and Jackie Ong, SEN team
  • Bristol City Council

2
Why a National funding formula?
  • To move towards a fairer funding system by
    redistributing existing funding
  • To allow parents to express a preference of
    school irrespective of funding costs, or
    designation
  • To align the pre and post 16 systems in
    preparation for wider DfE changes under the
    Children and Families Bill. eg.EHCPs,0-25
    system, personalised budgets
  • To improve outcomes for yp
  • To show vfm on use of the public purse
  • This is the most highly audited budget of ALL
    councils spend

3
What is the National funding formula ?
  • The DfE introduced a requirement for all LAs to
    implement a New National funding formula (NFF)
    from April 2013.
  • A pupil led funding system by changing the way
    ALL schools and Education providers are funded
    through the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) via
    agreements with the Schools forum for the use of
    the High Needs Block.
  • We move towards a National system by 2015.

4
Who does it apply to ?
  • All state funded Mainstream schools, Academies
    and Free schools
  • All maintained specialist provision including
    resource bases
  • All alternative education providers and PRUs
  • All non maintained special schools (NMSS)
  • All colleges of FE
  • All specialist FE colleges (ISPs)
  • By 2015 all INM schools
  • ALL JOINT/ POOLED BUDGET PLACEMENTS

5
So what does this mean for commissioners ?
  • A pupil led funding system that follows the
    young person
  • All commissioning arrangements related contracts
    will change to become child centred
  • Will align 0-25, with all transitions being
    pivotal
  • Will be outcomes based
  • Will generate new markets through strategetically
    commissioned services with CCGs and others
  • Will be flexible, responsive and Vfm

6
So whats .this have to do with placements?
  • All LAs are required to have a Schools Forum
    under the Schools Finance and Early Years
    Regulations
  • The Schools Forum has representatives of each
    sector, and the LA must consult them.
  • The schools forum have discretion over all
    systems and allocations for all placements-
    including joint funded or pooled arrangements.

7
Activity
  • Do you know how the funding scheme works?
  • How do you breakdown costs?
  • How do you compare your first 10K to other
    providers?
  • How are you going to comply with LAs top up
    costs?
  • How do you measure against outcomes currently
    Progress and outcomes ?
  • How do you show measurable progress?
  • Could it be better?

8
How does it work ?
  • Its a place Plus scheme.
  • Each setting has a place amount per pupil,
    either notional or set.
  • Pupils needs then direct the additional funding
  • Bristol introduced such a delegated scheme in
    2009, and so have had 3 years of learning from
    this which we have brought to the new National
    scheme

9
Bristol City Council -Our Context
  • Bristol is an urban LA in a predominantly rural
    region
  • Nearly 2000 statements with additionally 1200
    plus funded
  • Annual pre NFF budget of 25 M
  • Rapidly increasing population ICOCo suggests 7.8
    to 2017
  • Academies, free schools, maintained mainstream
    and special, independents, UTC.
  • Increasing demand for local specialist placements

10
Why delegate funding ?
  • Principles
  • Fast, responsive early intervention to meet
    individual needs
  • More control and autonomy for Schools to support
    workforce development to meet their cohorts
  • Reduction in bureaucracy for Schools and Parents
  • Most needs could be met from within existing
    school funding

11
What did we learn from our delegated scheme- SAPE
  • 63 immediate reduction in requests for
    statutory assessments ( 5k nearly 1M saved
    from DSG and central services )
  • Schools and parents sought clarity in what was
    ordinarily provided ( aka early local offer)
  • Parental confidence was key to a quality assured
    system
  • Schools ,providers and parents confused the
    statutory legislation with funding, needs,
    objectives, provisions, outcomes
  • Goods schools managed
  • Top ups panels caused more workload for the LA
    and budget is volatile
  • It took 3 years to learn

12
Lessons learnt for NFF implementation.
  • Top-ups via costed provision maps
  • BUDs ( Bristol Universal Descriptors) across all
    settings 0-25 by 2014
  • Integrated decision making with schools
    transparent
  • Specialist QA on school based interventions
    high parental confidence
  • Provided clarity on place element provision
    early local offer
  • Ongoing interim support from LA financial teams

13
Universal Banding for High Needs
Pre 16
Post 16
MAINSTREAM
SPECIALIST
ALL SETTINGS
Element 1 Element 2 Core funding
AWPU Notional SEN DfE -10,000 p.a.
Base Funding of 10,000 allocated on planned
places for Special schools, NMSS, RBs DfE AEP,
PRU, 8,000
Programme Costs Notional SEN DfE 10,000
p.a.
Element 3 High Needs Block
BANDs 1 6 2,500 - 35,000
7 gt50,000 In addition School based
supplements allocated per pupil PFI
Hydropool Residential Hostel Split Site
Extended Day
14
Plus
  • Where children have needs that require provision
    to be made above the place cost additional funds
    to support this are required , this is the
    Plus
  • Is called Top Up
  • Is pupil led, and follows the child
  • Is allocated on a daily basis
  • Is banded into 7 universal bands ,based on the
    Bristol Universal Descriptors (BuDS)
  • Can be applied for twice a year
  • Can be allocated for up to 3 years

15
Bristol Universal Descriptors (BuDs)
  • Based on 7 universal banding levels, with a
    single cost per level across all
    settingsUniversal.
  • Describe the provision needed to meet pupils
    needs on a best fit basis . pupil typically
    has .
  • Have been taken from old LMSS bandings, SAPE and
    Top Up descriptors, existing statements
  • Are relevant for 2013-15
  • ARE A WORK IN PROGRESS
  • WILL TAKE 5 YEARS TO EMBED ( 2018)

16
Children in Care
  • All Children in Care are funded by their home
    LA, and recoupment applies- the Belongings
    regulations continue to apply
  • For 2013 a LAC factor was optional in the
    schools block element ( 1/2) , in 2014-15 this
    will be mandatory
  • CIC are eligible for pupil premium based on
    original home address under the Ever 6,and post
    16 bursary fund to meet further educational
    needs AS WELL as access to all other School
    funding streams .

17
What about the futureall change
  • Legislation via the Children and Families Bill
  • By September 2014 a New Code of Practice for SEND
  • Optional personalised budgets
  • Duty on Health and CCGs
  • Effective person centred flexible joint
    commissioning
  • Increased parental and young person choice
  • The Local Offer -increased integration of all
    systems, services and providers.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com