CARCINOMA OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL AND MIDDLE EAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CARCINOMA OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL AND MIDDLE EAR

Description:

CARCINOMA OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL AND MIDDLE EAR Z.Bernstein MD Rambam Medical Center Radiotherapy Unit Case Presentation A 72-year-old male with a 40-year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Ram196
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CARCINOMA OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL AND MIDDLE EAR


1
CARCINOMA OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORYCANAL AND
MIDDLE EAR
  • Z.Bernstein MD
  • Rambam Medical CenterRadiotherapy Unit

2
Case Presentation
  • A 72-year-old male with a 40-year history of
    recurrent left ear discharge, presented to his
    private otolaryngologist with left ear
    discharge, pruritus, and hearing loss.
  • Examination revealed a firm, granular mass
    arising from the posterior half of the external
    auditory canal.
  • Biopsy of the mass revealed moderately
    differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
  • CT scan and MRI demonstrated soft tissue changes
    noted in the mastoid and middle ear cleft without
    temporal bone invasion.

3
SYMPTOMATOLOGY (Pensak et. Al)
  • Ear pain 74
  • Hearing loss 62
  • Bleeding 28
  • Facial numbness 12
  • Vertigo 10

4
Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma
in which some, but not all, of the neoplastic
cells in nests have pink keratin staining.
5
CLINICAL SIGNS
  • Ear canal lesion 88
  • Aural discharge 84
  • Preauricular swelling 25
  • Facial paralysis 18
  • Abnormal neck nodes 8

6
University of Pittsburgh TNM staging system
proposed for the external auditory canal and
middle ear.
  • T1 Tumor limited to the external auditory
    canal without bony erosion or evidence of
    soft-tissue extension
  • T2 Tumor with limited external auditory canal
    bony erosion (not full thickness) or radiographic
    finding consistent with limited (lt0.5 cm)
    soft-tissue involvement

7
University of Pittsburgh TNM staging system
proposed for the external auditory canal and
middle ear (cont.)
  • T3 Tumor eroding the osseous external auditory
    canal (full thickness) with limited (lt0.5 cm)
    soft-tissue involvement, or tumor involving
    middle ear and/or mastoid, or patients presenting
    with facial paralysis
  • T4 Tumor eroding the cochlea, petrous apex,
    medial wall of middle ear, carotid canal, jugular
    foramen or dura, or with extensive (gt0.5 cm)
    soft-tissue involvement

8
University of Pittsburgh TNM staging system
proposed for the external auditory canal and
middle ear (cont.)
  • Involvement of lymph nodes is a poor prognostic
    finding and automatically places the patient in
    an advanced stage (i.e., Stage III T1N1 or
    Stage IV T2, T3, T4, N1 disease)
  • Distant metastasis indicates a very poor
    prognosis and immediately places the patient in
    the stage IV category.

9
LITERATURE REVIEW
  • 1966 - 1996., 96 publications, 144 pts.
  • No single institution has sufficient data to
    allow analysis of results.
  • No randomized or non-randomized prospective
    studies were identified.
  • All studies were case series without control
    subjects.

10
T E R M I N O L O G Y
  • MASTOIDECTOMY - all types of modified and radical
    mastoidectomy.
  • LATERAL TBR - removal of the osseous and
    cartilaginous EAC, malleus and incus.
  • SUBTOTAL TBR - removal of the otic capsule in
    addition to removal of the osseous and
    cartilaginous EAC, malleus and incus.
  • TOTAL TBR - removal of the petrous apex in
    addition to all that is removed in subtotal
    resection.

11
Q U E S T I O N S
  • 1. What is the survival rate of pts. with EAC,
    treated by surgical resection and what type of
    operation should be performed?
  • 2. Once the disease enters the middle ear
    (ME), what is the operation that provides optimal
    survival?
  • 3. Is total TBR (Temporal Bone Resection)
    ever indicated?

12
Q U E S T I O N S (cont.)
  • 4. How does prognosis change as structures such
    as dura mater, brain, and ICA become involved? Is
    there a role for surgery in these instances?
  • 5. Does the addition of preoperative or
    postoperative RT enhance survival?

13
R E S U L T S (1)
  • E A C - Patients experience similar survival,
    regardless of whether mastoidectomy, lateral TBR,
    or subtotal TBR is performed ( 50, 38.8, 50
    5-year survival respectively).
  • The addition of RT to lateral TBR does not appear
    to improve survival.

14
R E S U L T S (2)
  • ME extension - survival of pts. Treated with
    subtotal TBR (41.7 5-year survival) appeared to
    be improved over those treated with lateral TBR
    (28.6) or mastoidectomy (17.1).
  • Remains uncertain whether the addition of RT to
    mastoidectomy improves survival.

15
R E S U L T S (3)
  • Petrous apex involvement -value of surgical
    resection remains unclear.
  • subtotal TBR - 0 1-year survival
  • total TBR - 50 1-year survival
  • - 0 2-year
    survival

16
R E S U L T S (4)
  • Resection of involved dura mater does not appear
    to improve survival.
  • Incomplete data regarding margins of resection
    were reported.
  • Determination of the value of resection of
    involved brain parenchyma or ICA will require
    further study.

17
  • THE ROLE OF RADIOTHERAPY (CURRENT STATUS)

18
Testa JR, et al. San Paulo, BrazilArch Otol.Head
Neck Surg. 1997 Jul 123 (7) 720 - 4
  • 79 pts. T1-2 - 34 T3-4 - 43 Tx - 2
  • Available - 68 pts.
  • 5 - year survival
  • Surgery - 65
  • Radiotherapy - 29
  • Surgery Radiotherapy - 63

19
Hashi N, et al. Hokkaido, Japan. Radiother.
Oncol.2000 Aug56(2) 221-5
  • 20 pts.
  • 8 (T1) - RT alone 65 Gy in 26 fx. Over 6.5
    weeks.
  • 12 (T2) - surgery RT (perioper.) 30 - 75 Gy
    in 12 - 30 fx.
  • T1 - 100 5-year survival.
  • T2 - 48 5-year survival.

20
Moody SA, et al. Pittsburg, USAAm. J Otol. 2000
Jul 21(4) 582-8
  • 32 pts. All pts.underwent surgery of the
    temporal bone and RT (depending on stage and
    surgical margins)
  • Results S T A G E 2-YEAR
    SURVIVAL
  • T1
    100
  • T2
    80
  • T3
    50
  • T4
    7

21
Perefunder L. et al. Wuerzburg, Germany.Int. J.
Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. Vol.44 No. 4 pp.
777-88, 1999
  • 27 pts.
  • 5-year survival
  • T1-2 - 86
  • T3 - 50
  • T4 - 41
  • Complete tumor resection - 100
  • Positive surgical margins - 66
  • 3D CT treatment planing HDR brachytherapy -an
    effective tool in management of local recurrence
    following surgery and full course of EBRT.

22
Radiation technique for treatment of T3N1
carcinoma of the external auditory canal with
involvement of an intraparotideal lymph node and
perineural tumor spread along the facial nerve.
23
Dose distribution for brachytherapy treatment of
EAC recurrence.Treatment was performed after
surgery and a full course of EBRT (70 Gy).
24
Overall survival of 27 patients with carcinoma of
the EAC and middle ear treated at the University
of Wuerzburg, and freedom of local recurrence.
25
Survival of patients with carcinoma of the EAC
and middle ear according to T-stages of
Pittsburgh classification
26
Survival of patients with carcinoma of the EAC
and middle ear influence of margins of resection
and of intracranial tumor infiltration
27
C O N C L U S I O N
  • RT -treatment of choice in T1 disease
  • (Our patient).
  • SurgeryRT recommended as standard of care for
    tumors with bony invasion
  • Survival for T3 tumors is 50 with
    postoperative RT compared to 0 with surgery
    alone. (Moody SA et al.)
  • HDR brachytherapy is an effective tool in
    management of local recurrence following surgery
    and full course EBRT.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com