Title: Capacity Setting and Queuing Theory
1Capacity Setting and Queuing Theory
2Capacity and Resources
- A key lever for improving patient flow.
- How do we measure capacity?
- What is the capacity of a 20 seat restaurant?
- A 16 bed ward?
- Capacity is a RATE
- Patients/day
- Customers/hour
- We can view a 16 bed ward as a queuing system
with 16 servers - What is the capacity of a bed?
- Does this analogy apply to the restaurant?
- A system is composed of resources with
capacities. - Often we use the expressions resource and
capacity interchangeably (hopefully without
confusion)
3How Much Capacity is Needed? or How Many
Resources are Needed?
Surge capacity
Base capacity
4Capacity tradeoffs when demand is variable
- Too much capacity or too many resources
idleness - Not enough capacity waits
- Should we set capacity equal to demand?
- What does this mean?
- This is called a balanced system
- It works perfectly when there is no variation in
the system - It works terribly when there is variation! Why?
- Once behind, you never can catch up.
- Queuing theory quantifies these tradeoffs in
terms of performance measures.
5Queuing Models
- (Mathematical) queuing models help us set
capacity (or determine the number of resources
needed) to meet - Service level targets
- Average wait time targets
- Average queue length targets
- Queuing models provide an alternative to
simulation - They provide insights into how to plan, operate
and manage a system - Where are there queues in the health care system?
6A single server queuing system
Buffer
Server
- A queue forms in a buffer
- Servers may be people or physical space
- The buffer may have a finite or unlimited
capacity - The most basic models assume customers are of
one type - and have common arrival and service rates
7A multiple server queuing system
Server
Buffer
Server
Server
8Several parallel singer server queues
9Parallel Queues vs. Multiple server Queues
- Provide examples of multiple server queues (MSQs)
- Provided examples of parallel queues (PQs)
- In what situations would each of these queuing
systems be most appropriate? Why?
10Networks of queues
- Most health care systems are interconnected
networks of queues and servers with multiple
waiting points and heterogeneous customers. - What examples have we seen in the course?
- Often we model these complex systems with
simulation. - But in some cases we can use formulae to get
results
11Queuing Theory background
- Developed to analyze telephone systems in the
1930s by Erlang. - How many lines are needed to ensure a caller
tries to dial and obtains a line. - Applied to analyze internet traffic,
telecommunications systems, call centers, airport
security lines, banks and restaurants, rail
networks, etc.
12Queues and Variability
- There are two components of a queuing system
subject to variability - The inter-arrival times of jobs
- The service times or LOS
- Why are these variable?
- We describe the variability by
- Mean
- Standard deviation
- Probability distribution
- Usually the normal distribution doesnt fit well
- Often an exponential distribution fits well
- If we know its rate or mean we know everything
about it.
13The exponential distribution
- P(T t) 1 e-?t
- The quantity ? is the rate.
- The mean and standard deviation of the
exponential distribution is 1/rate (1/?). - Example Patients arrive at rate 4 per hour.
- The mean interarrival time is 15 minutes.
- What is the probability the time between two
arrivals is less than 10 minutes (1/6 of an hour) - P( T 1/6) 1 e-4(1/6) 1- e-2/3 1 - .487
.513. - The exponential distribution underlies queuing
theory. - A queue with exponential service times and
exponential inter-arrival times and one (FCFS)
server is called an M/M/1 queue. - Exponential distributions dont allow negative
times and have a small probability of long
service times.
14Capacity management and queuing systems
- Capacity management involves determining the
number of servers to use and the size of the
waiting rooms. - Examples
- How many long term care beds are needed?
- How many porters are needed?
- How many nurses are needed?
- How many cubicles are needed in an ED?
- Some healthcare systems have no buffers all the
waiting is done outside of the system or
upstream. - ALC cases waiting for LTC beds
15Analyzing a queuing system
Outputs Capacity Utilization Wait Time in
Queue Queue Length Blocking Probability Service
Levels
Inputs Arrival Rate Service Rate Number of
Servers Buffer Size
Queue Analyzer
QUEUMMCK_EMBA.xls
16Single server queues some definitions
- Ri average inflow rate (customers/time) (?)
- 1/Ri average time between customer arrivals
- Tp average processing time by one server
- 1/Tp average processing rate of a single server
(?) - c number of servers
- Rp c/Tp system service rate (often c1)
- K buffer capacity (often K?)
- A single server queuing system is stable whenever
Rp gt Ri - A single server queuing system is balanced
whenever Rp Ri
17Examples
- A Finite Capacity Loss System
- Model for an (old-fashion) phone system
- c servers
- K0
- When all servers are busy, system is blocked and
customers are lost - Performance measure fraction of lost jobs
this is legislated! - Walk-in Clinic with 6 seats and 1 doctor
- c 1
- K 6
18Characteristics and Performance Measures
- System characteristics
- Traffic Intensity (or utilization) ? arrival
rate/service rate - Safety Capacity Rs Service rate arrival
rate - Performance Measures
- Average waiting time (in queue) Ti
- Average time spent at the server - Tp
- Average flow time (in process) T Ti Tp
- Average queue length Ii
- Average number of customers being served - Ip
- Average number of customers in the system I Ii
Ip
19Performance measure formulas (M/M/1 queue no
limit on queue size)
- System Utilization P(Server is occupied) ?
- If traffic intensity increases, the likelihood
the server is occupied increases - This occurs if the arrival rate increases or the
service rate decreases - P(System is empty) 1- ?
- P(k in system) ?k(1- ?)
- Average Time in System 1/ Safety capacity
- Average Time in Queue Average time in system
average service time - If safety capacity decreases time in queue
increases! - Average Number of jobs in the system (including
being served) ?/(1- ?) - Average Queue Length ?2/(1- ?)
- If we know safety capacity, service time and
traffic intensity, we can compute all system
properties - Littles Law holds too
- number in queue arrival rate x waiting
time in queue
20An Example - M/M/1 Queue
- Customers arrive at rate 4 per hour, mean service
time is 10 minutes. - Service rate is 6 per hour
- System utilization Probability the server is
occupied ? 2/3. - Safety capacity service rate arrival rate 2
- P(System is empty) 1- ? 1/3.
- P(k in the system) ?k(1- ?) (1/3)(2/3)k
- Average Time in system 1/safety capacity ½
hour - Average Time in queue Average time in system
average service time ½ - 1/6 1/3 hour - Average Queue Length ?2/(1- ?) 4/3
- Suppose arrival rate increases to 5.9 customers
per hour. - Then ? 5.9/6 .9833
- So P(System is empty) .0167 Average time in
system 10 hours and Average number of customers
in the system 58.9!
21About QUEUMMCK.xls
- An M/M/c queue is the same as an M/M/1 queue
except that there may be more than one server. - In this model, there is a single buffer and c
servers in the resource pool. - Customers are processed on a FIFO basis.
- When there are more than c customers in the
system, the buffer is occupied and waiting for
service occurs. - An M/M/c/K queue is an M/M/c queue with a finite
buffer of size K. - There are at most K c customers in the system.
- When the buffer is filled, the system is blocked
and customers are lost. - QUEUMMCK.xls, which is now called
performance.xls, computes performance measures
including blocking probabilities for the M/M/c/K
queue.
22Problem 1
- Patients arrive at rate 5/hr. They require on
average 1 hour of treatment. - How many service providers do we need to ensure
that the average wait time is 30 minutes? - Assume a large waiting room.
- Running QUEUEMMCK.xls we find that with
- 6 service providers - average wait is 1 hour and
average number waiting is 2.94 - 7 service providers - average wait is ½ hour and
average number waiting is .80 - Note that with 7 service providers all 7 are
occupied less than 1 of the time. - Thus we tradeoff throughput with capacity
utilization
23Problem 2 A LTC Facility
- Bed requests arrive at the rate of 3 per month
- Patients remain in beds for about 15 months.
- How many beds are required so that the average
wait for beds is 1 month. - Trial and error with queummck shows that 59 beds
are required. - Also we can see that there is only a 3 chance of
waiting and average occupancy is 45 beds. - We can also do sensitivity analysis with arrival
rates and length of stays
24Problem 3
- A walk in clinic has 3 doctors
- Average time spent with a patient is 15 minutes
- Patients arrive at rate of 12 per hour
- How many chairs should we have in the waiting
room so only 5 of patients are turned away? - Queummck suggests 17.
25Implications of queuing formulas
- As the safety capacity vanishes, or equivalently,
the traffic intensity increases to 1 - waiting time increases without bound!
- queue lengths become arbitrarily long!
- In the presence of variability in inter-arrival
times and service times, a balanced system will
be highly unstable. - These formulas enable the manager to derive
performance measures on the basis of a few basic
descriptors of the queuing system - The arrival rate
- The service rate
- The number of servers
- When the system has a finite buffer, the
percentage of jobs that are blocked can also be
computed
26Dont Match Capacity with Demand
- If service rate is close to arrival rate then
there will be long wait times. - Recall average queue length ?2/(1- ?)
- If traffic intensity near 1, queue length will
be very small.
27Idle Capacity And Wait Time Targets
28Summary
- When the manager knows the arrival rate and
service rate, he/she can compute - The average number of jobs in the queue.
- The average time spent in the queue.
- The probability an arriving patient has to wait.
- The system utilization.
- This can be done without simulation!
- This information can be used to set capacity or
explore the sensitivity of recommendations to
assumptions or changes. - Thus queuing theory provides a powerful tool to
manage capacity.