Title: Design for Construction Safety
1Design for Construction Safety
OSHA Alliance Construction Roundtable Design for
Construction Safety Workgroup
2Designing for Construction Safety
- Overview
- What is DfCS?
- Practical Benefits
- The DfCS Process
- Examples
- Solutions to barriers
- Organizations working on DfCS
3Designing for Construction Safety What is it?
- The process of addressing construction site
safety and health in the design of a project - Construction site safety as a design criterion
- Safety Constructability
- Focus on the design of the permanent facility
4Benefits of DfCS
- Increased productivity
- Reduced workers compensation premiums
- Fewer delays due to accidents during construction
allow continued focus on quality - Improved ability to meet clients needs
5Construction Accidents in U.S.1
- Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,200 deaths
each year - 7 of workforce but 21 of fatalities
- Every design, engineering and construction
professional must do what they can to reduce
these numbers - 1 Bureau of Labor Statistics
6Considering Safety During Design Offers the Most
Payoff
The earlier safety is incorporated into the
schedule the more influence it will have on the
total project!
High
Conceptual Design
Detailed Engineering
Procurement
Ability to Influence Safety
Construction
Start-up
Low
Project Schedule
7Design Matters
- 50 of general contractors identified poor design
features as affecting safety - 60 of accidents could have been reduced during
design - 22 of injury incidents and 42 of fatality
incidents linked to design
8Codes of Ethics Related to DfCS
- National Society of Professional Engineers
- Engineers shall hold paramount the safety,
health, and welfare of the public. - American Society of Civil Engineers
- Engineers shall recognize that the lives, safety,
health and welfare of the general public are
dependent upon engineering decisions .
9DfCS Practices Around the Globe
- Designers first required to design for
construction safety in the United Kingdom in 1995 - Other European nations have similar requirements
- Australia also leading in DfCS
10DfCS Examples Prefabrication
Concrete Wall Panels
Concrete Segmented Bridge
Steel stairs
11DfCS Examples Roof Deck Anchors
Wood Roof Anchor
Permanent Anchors
Metal Roof Anchor
12DfCS Examples Anchorage Points
13DfCS Examples Roofs
Upper story windows and roof parapets
Skylights
14DfCS Examples Steel Design
- Avoid hanging connections design to bear on
columns instead using safety seats - Require holes in columns for tie lines 21 and
42 above each floor slab - Specify shop welded connections instead of bolts
or field welds to avoid dangerous positions
during erection - Consider approximate dimensions of connection
tools to prevent pinches or awkward assemblies
National Institute of Steel Detailing and Steel
Erectors Association of America. Detailing Guide
for the Enhancement of Erection Safety. 2001
15DfCS Examples Well Locations
- Worker electrocuted when his drill rig got too
close to overhead power lines. - Design engineer specified groundwater monitoring
wells were to be dug directly under power lines. - Engineer could have specified wells be dug away
from power lines and/or better informed the
employer of hazard posed by wells proximity to
powerlines through the plans, specifications, and
bid documents.
16Other DfCS Design Examples
- Design underground utilities to be placed using
trenchless technology1 - Specify primers, sealers and other coatings that
do not emit noxious fumes or contain carcinogenic
products2 - Design cable type lifeline system for storage
towers3 - 1 Weinstein, Can Design Improve Construction
Safety, 2005 - 2 Gambatese, Viability of Designing for
Construction Worker Safety, 2005 - 3 Behm, Linking Construction Fatalities to the
Design for Construction Safety Concept, 2005
17DfCS Barriers
- Like many good ideas, DfCS faces a number of
barriers that will likely slow its adoption. - Solutions to these barriers involve long-term
education and institutional changes.
18Barrier Designers' Fear of Liability
- Some designers may avoid DfCS for fear of
undeserved liability for worker safety. - Solution Clearly communicate the DfCS
initiative does NOT suggest designers should be
held responsible for construction accidents. - Solution Develop revised model contract language
and legislation that encourage DfCS. - Solution Propose legislation is facilitate
designing for construction safety without
inappropriately shifting safety duties and
liability onto designers.
19Barrier Increased Designer Costs Associated
with DfCS
- While DfCS results in decreased total project
life cycle costs for the owner, DfCS processes
will increase both direct and overhead costs for
designers. - Increased direct costs will result from more time
spent on many design tasks. - Increased overhead costs will result from
providing safety training and perhaps increased
insurance premiums. - Solution Educate owners that they must be
willing to pay slightly higher design fees to
save themselves money in the long run.
20Barrier Designers' Lack of Safety Expertise
- Barrier Few design professionals possess
sufficient expertise in construction safety. - Solution Promote including construction safety
in construction, engineering and architectural
curricula. - Solution Develop and promote 10-hour and
30-hour OSHA courses for design professionals.
21DfCS Process
22DfCS Resources
- Construction Industry Institute database
- http//www.construction-institute.org/scriptconten
t/more/rr101_11_more.cfm - United Kingdom Health Safety Executive designer
guides - http//www.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index
.htm - CHAIR
- http//www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/S
afetyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htm - OSHA Website
- www.osha.gov
- Life Cycle Safety Process
23OSHA Alliance Program Construction Roundtable
DfS Workgroup Members
- American Society of Civil Engineers-Construction
Institute - American Society of Safety Engineers
- Independent Electrical Contractors
- ADSC International Association of Foundation
Drilling - Laborers Health and Safety Fund of North America
24DfS Workgroup Members, continued
- Mason Contractors Association of America
- National Fire Protection Association
- National Institute for Occupational Safety
Health - Sealant, Waterproofing and Restoration Institute
- Washington Group International
25Summary
- Designing for construction safety is the right
thing to do and the smart thing to do - Increased productivity
- Reduced workers compensation premiums
- Fewer delays due to accidents
- Better able to meet clients needs
- Many countries require or promote designing for
safety - National organizations are working to create
tools, eliminate barriers and facilitate adoption
of this important process in the United States
26Thanks for Listening
- Questions?
- Comments?
- For more information, please contact