???: ???? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 74
About This Presentation
Title:

???: ????

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author *** Last modified by: rmc Created Date: 4/28/2004 7:38:10 PM Document presentation format: Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 75
Provided by: 8029160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ???: ????


1
????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????
  • ????? ????, ????? ????? ??????? ??????
  • ??? ???? 2000
  • ??? ???? ?. ???? , ??? 2004 , ????? ??????
    2006
  • ????? ???? ???????
  • ????? ?????? ??????
  • n_haim_at_rambam.health.gov.il

2
  • CTCAE formerly known as CTC (CommonToxicity
    Criteria)..

3
CTCAE formerly known as CTC (Common Toxicity
Criteria Common Toxicity Criteria)
  • http//ctep.cancer.gov
  • ..CTCAE (formerly known as CTC) v2.0 and
    v3.0
  • (v3.0 publish date December 12, 2003)

4
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
  • Recent guidelines.
  • NK1 receptor antagonists.
  • ??? ???? "??????? ????? ??????? ?? ??????
    ??????????? ??????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ??
    ??????? ??????.

5
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting-Recent
guidelines
  • 1. Perugia International Cancer Conference VII-
    MASCC (Multinational Association of Supportive
    Care in Cancer)
  • www.mascc.org (last update Sept 2005)
  • See also The Antiemetic Subcommittee of the
    Multinational Association of the Multinational
    Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC).
    Ann Oncol 17 20-8, 2006.
  • 2. ASCO Guidelines
  • Kris MG et al. J Clin Oncol 24 May 22, 2006
    (published ahead of print)
  • 3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)
  • http//www.nccn.com ---see Clinical
    Practice Guidelines in Oncology-v.2.2006----see
    Antiemesis

6
NK1 receptor antagonists
  • de Wit R et al. Addition of the oral NK1
    antagonist Aprepitant to standard antiemetics
    provided protection against nausea and vomiting
    during multiple cycles of cispltin-based
    chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 21 4105-11, 2003
  • Hesketh PJ et al. The oral neurokinin-1
    antagonist Aprepitant for the prevention of
    chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting a
    multinational , randomized , double-blind,
    placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving
    high-dose cisplatin-the Aprepitant Protocol 052
    Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21 4112-19, 2003
  • Kris MG. Why do we need another antiemetic? Just
    ask. J Clin Oncol 21 4077-80, 2003 (editorial)

7
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants
  • ASCO guidelines for the use of mesna,
    dexrazoxane,and amifostine .
  • ??? ???? "??????? ????? ??????? ?? ??????
    ??????????? ??????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ??
    ??????? ??????....
  • ??? ???? "???????????? ?????????..." ???? ?????
    ??? ?? mesna.
  • ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?????????? ????? ???? ??????
    ???????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ?"? ????????? ?
  • www.iscort.org.il

8
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants-ASCO
Guidelines
  • Schuchter LM et al. 2002 update of
    recommendations for the use of chemotherapy and
    radiotherapy protectants clinical practice
    guidelines of the American Society of Clinical
    Oncology. J Clin Oncol 20 2895-2903, 2002
  • Guidelines for the use of mesna, dexrazoxane,
    and amifostine.

9
ASCO recommendations on fertility preservation in
cancer patients
10
ASCO recommendations on fertility preservation in
cancer patients
  • Lee SJ et al. J Clin Oncol 24 2917-31, 2006

11
GCSF Feblile neutropenia
  • NCCN Guidelines.
  • ASCO Guidelines (GCSF).
  • EORTC Guidelines.
  • 2002 guidelines of the Infectious Diseases
    Society of America (IDSA) Fever and Neutropenia
    Guidelines Panel.
  • Antibacterial prophylaxis after chemotherapy for
    solid tumors and lymphomas.
  • ??? ?? ???? "??????? ????? ?? ?????? ???????????
    ??????? ??????"
  • ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ??????
    ????? ?? ????? ????? ?
  • www.iscort.org.il

12
GCSF- NCCN, ASCO EORTC Guidelines
  • NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology /
    Myeloid Growth Factors in Cancer Treatment /
    Version 2.2005
  • http//www.nccn.com
  • ASCO 2006 Update of recommendations for the use
    of white blood cell growth factors an
    evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines.
    Smith TJ et al. for the American Society of
    Clinical Oncology Growth Factor Expert Panel.
    Published ahead of print on J Clin Oncol May 8,
    2006
  • EORTC EORTC guidelines for the use of
    granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce
    the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile
    neutropenia adult patients with lymphomas and
    solid tumors. Aapro MS et al. Published ahead of
    print, Europ J Cancer , 2006

13
2002 guidelines of the Infectious Diseases
Society of America (IDSA) Fever and Neutropenia
Guidelines Panel
  • Hughes WT et al. Clin Infect Dis 34 730-51, 2002

14
Antibacterial prophylaxis after chemotherapy for
solid tumors and lymphomas
  • Cullen M et al. N Engl J Med 353 988-98, 2005
  • Pts treated with chemo protocols associated
    with severe neutropenia, but not routinely
    treated with GCSF, were randomized to receive
    levofloxacin or placebo for 7 days to cover the
    the period of anticipated neutropenia.
  • The prophylactic use of levofloxacin reduced
    the incidence of fever, probable infection, and
    hospitalization.

15
Epoeitin
  • ASCO/ASH Guidelines.
  • EORTC Guidelins.

16
Epoeitin-ASCO EORTC Guidelines
  • Rizzo JD et al. Use of Epoeitin in patients with
    cancer evidence-based clinical practice
    guidelines of the American Society of Clinical
    Oncology and the American Society of Hematology.
    J Clin Oncol 20 4083-4107, 2002
  • Guidelines for the use of epoietin in patients
    with chemotherapy induced anemia.
  • Bokemeyer C et al. EORTC guidelines for the use
    of erythropoietic proteins in anemic patients
    with cancer. Eur J Cancer 40 2201-16, 2004
  • Guidelines for the use of epoietin in anemic
    cancer patients.

17
Recommended guidelines for the treatment of
cancer chemotherapy-induced diarrhea
  • Independent panel (mortality associated with
    IFL)
  • Panel recommendations.
  • ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ??????
    ?????? ??????????-?? ??? ???? ?????????? ?
  • www.iscort.org.il

18
Independent panel-mortality associated with IFL
  • Rothenberg ML et al. Mortality associated with
    irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin
    summary findings of an independent panel. J Clin
    Oncol 19 3801-7, 2001
  • Guidelines suggested after a report of high
    mortality rate associated with the Saltz
    regimen.

19
Recommended guidelines for the treatment of
cancer chemotherapy-induced diarrhea
  • Benson III Al B et al. Recommended guidelines for
    the treatment of cancer treatment-induced
    diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 22 2918-26, 2004
  • Guidelines of an independent panel of
    experts. Includes also guidelines for
    radiotherapy-induced diarrhea).
  • See also previous panel recommendations
    (Wadler S et al. Recommended guidelines for the
    treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. J
    Clin Oncol 16 3169-3178, 1998)

20
Extravasation of cytotoxic agents
  • ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ??????
    ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ?
  • www.iscort.org.il

21
Extravasation of cytotoxic agents
  • Ener RA et al. Extravasation of systemic
    hemato-oncological therapies. Ann Oncol 15
    858-62, 2004
  • includes background and suggested guidelines.

22
Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays
  • ASCO assessment.

23
Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays
ASCO assessment
  • Schrag D et al. American Society of Clinical
    Oncology technology assessment chemotherapy
    sensitivity and resistance assays. J Clin Oncol
    22 3631-8, 2004
  • The use of chemotherapy sensitivity and
    resistance assays to select chemotherapeutic
    agents for individual patients is not recommended
    outside the clinical trial setting.
  • See also a systematic review
  • Samson DJ et al. J Clin Oncol 22 3618-30,
    2004
  • .These results do not establish the
    relative effectiveness of assay-guided treatment
    and empiric treatment.

24
Thalidomide
  • Mechanism of action, side effects, current role
    in solid tumors.

25
Thalidomide Mechanism of action, side effects,
current role in solid tumors
  • Kumar S et al. J Clin Oncol 22 2477-88, 2004
    (review) and/or Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V et
    al. Ann Oncol 15 1151-60, 2004 (review)

26
Somatostatin analogs
  • Consensus report of the use of somatostatin
    analogs for the management of neuroendocrine
    tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system.

27
Somatostatin analogs
  • Oberg K et al. Consensus report of the use of
    somatostatin analogs for the management of
    neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreati
    c system. Ann Oncol 15 966-73, 2004
  • A consensus report on the use of somatostatin
    analogs in the management of neuroendocrine
    tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system.

28
Bisphosphonates
  • ASCO Guidelines.

29
Bisphosphonates-ASCO Guidelines
  • Hillner BE et al. American Society of Clinical
    Oncology 2003 Update on the Role of
    Bisphosphonates and Bone Health Issues in Women
    With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 21 4042-57,
    2003
  • Schedule of administration of pamidronate,
    and zoledronic acid guidelines for
    administration in patients with renal
    dysfunction.
  • see also previous version J Clin Oncol 18
    1378-91, 2000.

30
Brain Tumors
  • Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant
    temozolomide for glioblastoma.

31
Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant
temozolomide for glioblastoma
  • Stupp R et al. N Engl J Med 352 987-96, 2005
  • The addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy
    for newly diagnosed glioblastoma resulted in
    clinically meaningful and statistically
    significant survival benefit with minimal
    additional toxicity.

32
Breast cancer
  • Dose-dense vs. conventional AC/taxol as adjuvant
    in node-positive breast cancer.
  • Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast
    cancer (TAC vs. FAC).
  • ATAC.
  • Letrozole vs tamoxifen as adjuvant..
  • adjuvant hormone therapy beyond tamoxifen
  • - Exemestane after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen in
  • post menopausal women.
  • - Anastrazole after 2-3 yrs of tamoxifen.
  • - Letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen.
  • Herceptin with chemotherpy and as single agent
    ..
  • Herceptin every 3 weeks.
  • Herceptin as adjuvant.
  • HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to
    adjuvant chemo.
  • ASCO technology assessment of the use of
    aromatase inhibitors.

33
Dose-dense vs. conventional AC/taxol as adjuvant
in node-positive breast cancer
  • Citron ML et al. J Clin Oncol 21 1431-39, 2003
  • See also editorial Piccart-Gebhart MJ,
    Mathematics and oncology a mach for life? J Clin
    Oncol 21 1425-8, 2003 (editorial)
  • The dose-dense arms improved DFS severe
    neutropenia was less frequent in pts treated with
    the dose-dense regimens.

34
Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast
cancer (TAC vs. FAC)
  • Martin M et al. N Engl J Med 352 2302-13, 2005
  • Adjuvant chemo with TAC, as compared with
    FAC, significantly improves the rates of
    disease-free and overall survival among women
    with operable node-positive breast cancer.

35
ATAC study
  • Atac Trialists Group. Results of the ATAC
    (arimidex, tamoxifen, alone or in combination)
    trial after completion of 5 years adjuvant
    treatment for breast cancer. Lancet December 8,
    2004

36
Breast cancer-Extending adjuvant hormone therapy
beyond tamoxifen
  • Goss PE et al. N Engl J Med 349 1793-802, 2003
  • As compared with placebo, letrozole after the
    completion of standard tamoxifen significantly
    improves DFS. (See also updated report Goss PE
    et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 97 1262-71, 2005)
  • Coombes RC et al. N Engl J Med 350 1081-92, 2004
  • Exemestane therapy after 2 to 3 years of
    tamoxifen significantly improved DFS as compared
    with the standard 5 yrs of tamoxifen.
  • Boccardo F et al. J Clin Oncol 22 5138-47, 2005
  • Anastrazole after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen
    significantly improved DFS as compared with the
    standard 5 yrs of tamoxifen (see also editorial
    Pritchard KI. J Clin Oncol 22 4850-2, 2005)

37
Letrozole vs tamoxifen as adjuvant
  • The Breast International Group (big) I-98 Group.
    N Engl J Med 353 2747-57, 2005
  • Compared with tamoxifen, letrozole reduced
    the risk of recurrent disease, especially at
    distant sites.

38
Herceptin chemotherpy and as single agent
  • Slamon DJ et al. N Engl J Med 344 783-792, 2001
  • Herceptin increases the clinical benefit of
    first-line chemotherapy in MBC that overexpress
    HER 2.
  • Vogel CL et al. J Clin Oncol 20 719-26, 2002
  • Single agent herceptin is active and well
    tolerated (objective response rate 26 34 in
    FISH positive).

39
Herceptin every 3 weeks
  • Leyland-Jones B et al. J Clin Oncol 21 3965-71,
    2003
  • Herceptin every 3 weeks in combination with
    paclitaxel is generally well tolerated.
    Additional investigation of this schedule is
    warranted.
  • See also editorial
  • Cobleigh M and Frame D. J Clin Oncol 21 3900-1,
    2003

40
Herceptin as adjuvant therapy- randomized trials
  • Piccart-Gebhart M et al. N Engl J Med 353
    1659-72, 2005 (HERA herceptin adjuvant)
  • (Herceptin every 3 wks was given for one or
    two years after locoregional therapy).
  • Romond EH et al. N Engl J Med 353 1673-84, 2005
    (NSABP B-31 Intergoup N9831)
  • Herceptin weekly for one year initiated after
    AC paclitaxel adjuvant therapy or concomitantly
    with paclitaxel).
  • Joensuu H et al. N Engl J Med 354 809-20, 2006
    (FinHerFinish trial)
  • Herceptin was given for 9 weeks in
    combination with docetaxel or vinorelbine.

41
HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to
adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Pritchard KI et al. N Engl J Med 354 2103-11,
    2006
  • Amplification of HER2 in breast-cancer cells
    is associated with a larger benefit from CEF
    (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5FU), as compared
    with CMF.

42
ASCO technology assessment of the use of
aromatase inhibitors
  • Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ et al. American
    Society of Clinical Oncology technology
    assessment of the use of aromatase inhibitors as
    adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with
    hormone receptor-positive breast cancer status
    report 2004. J Clin Oncol 23 619-29, 2005

43
Colorectal cancer
  • Bevacizumab (avastin) in metastatic colorectal
    cancer.
  • Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as
    adjuvant treatment for colon cancer.
  • Cetuximab Cetuximab plus irinotecan in
    irinotecan-refractory MCRC.
  • ASCO recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for
    stage II colon cancer.
  • Capecitabine as adjuvant in stage III (X-ACT).
  • Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in
    rectal cancer.

44
Bevacizumab (avastin) in metastatic colorectal
cancer
  • Kabbinavar F et al. J Clin Oncol 21 60-5, 2003
  • A phase II randomized study that compared
    5FU/LCV to 5FU/LCV avastin as first-line in
    MCRC. ...encouraging results
  • Hurwitz H et al. N Engl J Med 350 2335-42, 2004
  • Addition of avastin to standard IFL
    (irinotecan, 5FU, leucovorin) in MCRC improved
    response rate, progression free survival, and
    survival.
  • Kabbinavar FF et al. J Clin Oncol 23 June 1,
    2005
  • The addition of bevacituzumab to FU/LV
    provides a statistically significant and
    clinically relevant benefit in pts with
    previously untreated CRC.

45
Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as
adjuvant treatment for colon cancer
  • Andre T et al. N Engl J Med 350 2343-51, 2004
    (Multicenter International Study of
    Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the
    Adjuvant Treatment of Colon CancerMOSAIC)
  • Adding oxaliplatin to a regimen of 5FU/LCV
    improves the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

46
Cetuximab Cetuximab plus irinotecan in
irinotecan-refractory MCRC
  • Cunnigham D et al. N Engl J Med 351337-45, 2004
  • Cetuximab has clinically significant activity
    when given alone or in combination with
    irinotecan in pts with irinotecan-refractory CRC.

47
ASCO recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for
stage II colon cancer
  • Benson III AlB et al. J Clin Oncol 22 3408-19,
    2004

48
Capecitabine as adjuvant in stage III (X-ACT)
  • Twelves C et al. N Engl J Med 352 2696-2704,
    2005
  • Capecitabine is at least equivalent to the
    Mayo Clinic regimen (better DFS less toxicity.

49
Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in
rectal cancer
  • Bosset JF et al. N Engl J Med 355 1114-23, 2006
  • In pts with rectal cancer who receive
    preoperative radiotherapy, adding
    fluorouracil-based chemopre or post operatively
    has no significant effect on survival.
    Chemotherapy (whether pre or post op.) confers a
    significant benefit with respect to local control.

50
Gastric cancer
  • Chemoraio after surgery vs surgery alone
    (Macdonald JS et al, NEJM,2001).
  • Perioperative chemo (ECF) vs. surgery alone in
    resectable gastrointestinal cancer (MAGIC).

51
Chemo-raiotherapy after surgery vs surgery alone.
  • Macdonald JS et al. N Engl J Med 345 725-30,
    2001
  • Postoperative chemo (5FU/LCV) and radio
    improves overall survival in high-risk pts with
    adenocarcinoma of the stomach or GEJ.

52
Perioperative chemo (ECF) vs. surgery alone in
resectable gastrointestinal cancer
  • Cunningham D et al. N Engl J Med 355 11-20, 2006
    (MAGIC Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric
    Infusional Chemotherapy)
  • In pts with operable gastric or lower third
    of the esophagus, a prioperative chemo ECF
    epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5FU (continuous
    infusion for 21 days decreased tumor size and
    stage and significantly improved PFS and overall
    survival.

53
Germ cell tumors
  • Radiotherapy vs single-dose carboplatin in
    adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma.

54
Radiotherapy vs single-dose carboplatin in
adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma
  • Oliver RT et al. Lancet 366 293-300, 2005
  • A randomized study that showed non-inferiority
    of carboplatin to radiotherapy in the treatment
    of stage I seminoma.

55
Imatinib (Glivec) in GISTs
  • .

56
Imatinib (Glivec) in GISTs
  • Demetri GD et al. N Engl J Med 347 472-80, 2002
  • 54 had PR and 28 had stable disease..no
    significant differences in response rate between
    400 mg/day and 600 mg/day.
  • Verweij J et al. Lancet 25 1127-34, 2004
  • 5 CR, 47 PR, 32 Stable disease.
  • 400 mg/day was similar to 800 mg/day in terms
    of response rate, but the higher dose produced
    significantly longer progression-free survival.

57
Gynecological tumors
  • Randomized Intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxe
    l vs. cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced
    epithelial ovarian cancer.

58
Randomized Intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxe
l vs. cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced
epithelial ovarian cancer
  • Piccart MJ et al. Randomized trial of
    cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophospha
    mide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian
    cancer three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst
    92 699-708, 2000
  • The paclitaxel-containing combination was
    associated with better progression free survival
    and survival.
  • see also GOG study
  • McGuire WP et al. N Engl J Med 334 1-6, 1996

59
Head Neck carcinoma
  • Post operative irradiation with or without
    concomitant cisplatin for locally advanced
    disease.
  • Radiotherapy plus cetuximab vs. radiotherapy
    alone in the treatment of locoregional squamous
    cell carcinoma of H N.

60
Post operative irradiation with or without
concomitant cisplatin for locally advanced disease
  • Cooper JS et al. Postoperative concurrent
    radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk
    squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N
    Engl J Med 350 1937-44, 2004
  • Bernier J et al. Postoperative irradiation with
    or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally
    advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 350
    1952-42, 2004
  • Post operative irradiation with concomitant
    cisplatin for locally advanced disease is
    associated with improved local control and
    disease-free survival.

61
Radiotherapy plus cetuximab vs. radiotherapy
alone in the treatment of locoregional squamous
cell carcinoma of H N
  • Bonner JA et al. N Engl J Med 354 567-78, 2006
  • Combined therapy improves locoregional
    control and reduces mortality without increasing
    the common toxic effects associated with
    radiotherapy to the head and neck.

62
Lung
  • Positive phase III trials with cisplatin-based
    adjuvant chemotherapy in pts with completely
    resected NSCLC.
  • Gefetinib (Iressa) plus chemotherapy is not
    better than chemotherapy alone.
  • Gefitinib/ISEL.
  • Erlotinib (Tarceva) in previously treated NSCLC.
  • Meta-analysis of cis-containing vs.
    carbo-containing in advanced NSCLC.
  • Pemetrexed (Alimta) cisplatin vs.cisplati in
    mesothelioma....

63
Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in pts with
completely resected NSCLC
  • IALT The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer
    Trial Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med
    350351-60, 2004
  • 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemo
    (vindesine/vinblastine/vinorelbine/etoposide)-imp
    roves survival (stage I-III, who had undergone
    complete resection).
  • CALGB Strauss GM et al. J Clin Oncol 22
    621s, abst 7019, 2004
  • 4 cycles of cis taxol
  • JBR.10 Winton T et al. n Engl J Med 352
    2589-97, 2005 (NCI of Canada NCI of the US)
  • 4 cycles of vinorelbine cisplatin prolonged
    DFS and survival in pts with stage IB or II.
  • ANITA Douillard J et al. J Clin Oncol 23
    624s, abstr 7013, 2005
  • 4 cycles of vinorelbine cisplatin

64
Gefetinib (Iressa) plus chemotherapy is not
better than chemotherapy alone
  • (Giaccone G et al. J Clin Oncol 22 777-84, 2004)
  • INTACT 1 addition of gefitinib to
    cisplatin/gemcitabine did not improve therapeutic
    outcome in advanced NSCLC
  • (Herbst RS et al. J Clin Oncol 22 785-94, 2004)
  • INTACT 2 addition of gefitinib to
    paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve
    therapeutic outcome in advanced NSCLC
  • Baselga J. J Clin Oncol 22 759-61, 2004
    (editorial)

65
ISEL study in NSCLC
  • A double blind, placebo controlled, parallel
    group, multicenter, randomized, phase III
    survival study, comparing gefitinib (iressa) 250
    mg BSC to BSC in pts with advanced NSCLC who
    have received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens
    and who are refractory or intolerant to their
    recent regimen.
  • Gefitinib failed to improve survival.
  • AstraZeneca 17 December 2004 (yet unpublished)

66
Erlotinib (Tarceva) in previously treated NSCLC
  • Shepherd FA et al. N Engl J Med 353 123-32,
    2005
  • A randomized phase III trial. Erlotinib (100
    mg/day), compared to placebo, can prolong
    survival and decrease symptoms in pts with NSCLC
    after first-line or second-line chemotherapy.

67
Meta-analysis of cis-containing vs.
carbo-containing in advanced NSCLC.
  • Hotta K et al. J Clin Oncol 22 3852-9, 2004
  • 8 trials (2948 pts) were identified.
  • The combination of chemotherapy consisting of
    cisplatin a new agent produced a significant
    survival advantage compared to that of
    carboplatin the same new agent
  • There was no advantage to the cisplating-containin
    g chemotherapy in an overall analysis, that
    included both new agents and new agents.

68
Pemetrexed (Alimta) cisplatin vs.cisplati in
mesothelioma
  • Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J et al.
    Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with
    cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with
    malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21
    2636-44, 2003
  • The combination was superior in terms of
    survival, TTP, and response rate.

69
Lymphomas
  • CHOP plus rituximab in elderly pts with diffuse
    large-B-cell lymphoma.in young pts with
    good-prognosis in follicular lymphoma
  • Intensive chemotherapy (ACVBP) vs. 3 cycles of
    CHOP radiotherapy in localized stage I/II
    aggressive NHL in pts lt 61 yrs without adverse
    prognostic factors.

70
CHOP plus rituximab (Mabthera) in elderly pts
with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma in advanced
follicular lymphoma
  • Coiffier B et al. N Engl J Med 346 235-242, 2002
  • R-CHOP is better than CHOP in elderly pts
    with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma in terms of CR
    rate, DFS, and OS, without a clinically
    significant increase in toxicity.
  • (Pfreundschu M et al. Lancet Oncol 5 379-91,
    2006
  • Similar conclusion for young pts with good
  • prognosis).
  • Hiddemann W et al. Blood 106 3725-32, 2005
  • Similar conclusion for advanced follicular
    lymphoma

71
Intensive chemotherapy (ACVBP) vs.3 cycles of
CHOP radiotherapy in localized stage I/II
aggressive NHL in pts lt 61 yrs without
prognostic factors
  • Reyes F et al. N Engl J Med 352 1197-205, 2005
  • Chemo alone was superior in terms of event free
    survival and overall survival.

72
Urological Tumors
  • Neoadjuvant chemo plus cystectomy vs. cystectomy
    alone for locally advanced bladder cancer.
  • Randomized trials of docetaxel in hormone
    refractory prostate cancer.

73
Neoadjuvant chemo plus cystectomy vs. cystectomy
alone for locally advanced bladder cancer
  • Grossman HB et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus
    cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for
    locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med
    349 859-66, 2003
  • Neoadjuvant chemo (MVAC) increases the
    likelihood of eliminating residual cancer in the
    cystectomy specimen and increases survival.

74
Randomized trials of docetaxel in hormone
refractory prostate cancer
  • Tannock IF et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or
    mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced
    prostatic cancer. N Engl J Med 351 1502-12, 2004
  • Petrylak DP et al. Docetaxel and estramustine
    compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for
    advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med
    351 1513-20, 2004
  • improved survival (both articles) and improved
    rates of response in terms of pain, serum PSA
    level, and QOL (Tannock IF et al.) for the
    docetaxel-containing regimens.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com