Satellite observation systems and reference systems (ae4-e01) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Satellite observation systems and reference systems (ae4-e01)

Description:

Title: Satelliet geodesie (ge-2112) Last modified by: Schrama Created Date: 9/30/1996 6:28:10 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: deosTude
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Satellite observation systems and reference systems (ae4-e01)


1
Satellite observation systems and reference
systems (ae4-e01)
  • Orbit Mechanics 2
  • E. Schrama

2
Contents
  • Perturbed Kepler orbits
  • Linear C20 perturbations and classification of
    orbits
  • Orbit determination, solve the equation of
    motions
  • Effects of other acceleration models
  • Numerical implementation
  • Example 1 Bullet physics
  • Example 2 Kepler and higher order physics
  • Orbit determination
  • Parameter estimation
  • Parameters in function model
  • Parameter estimation procedure
  • Variational equations
  • Organisation parameter estimation

3
Perturbed Kepler Orbits
  • Please remember that the Kepler problem assumes a
    central force field with UGM/r
  • In reality the gravity potential U is more
    difficult than that and spherical harmonics are
    involved.
  • Moreover there are other conservative and
    non-conservative forces that determine the motion
    of a spacecraft

4
Linear perturbations by C20
C20 not normalised, n mean motion
Ref Seeber p 84
5
Classification of orbits
  • Sun synchronous orbits ? runs as fast as the
    Earths rotation around the Sun. This is possible
    by tuning the a, e and I.
  • Golden inclination Perigee is frozen in time
  • Repeating Ground tracks reoccupy the same
    geographic locations after a certain time (a
    cycle)
  • Polar orbits the orbit plane is fixed in
    inertial space despite the presence of
    gravitational flattening.

6
Orbit determination
Keplers theory happens to be a very good
approximation to describe the motion of small
particles in a gravity field as a result of the
presence of a large body like the Earth or the
Sun. In reality there are higher order multipoles
in the gravity field and other accelerations play
a role. The more complete equations of motion
are therefore
7
This is Y200
8
Y300
9
Y210 and Y211
10
Y320
11
Y330
12
Solution equations of motion
  • Analytic
  • Lagrange planetary equations
  • Gravity Potential in Kepler elements
  • Isolate first order solution
  • Approximate higher order perturbations
  • Numeric
  • Conversion to system of first order ODE
  • Integration of system of equations

13
What other accelerations?
  • Tidal forces cause by Sun and Moon
  • Gravity effect of air, water in motion etc
  • Radiation pressure as a result of sun light and
    light reflected from Earth (Albedo)
  • Heat radiating away from the spacecraft
  • Atmospheric drag
  • Relativistic mechanics

14
Effect of perturbing accelerations
The table below lists various acceleration terms
that act on the orbit of a GPS satellite,
gravitational flattening is by far the largest
contributor.
Ref Seeber table 3.4
15
Hard to model perturbations
  • The remaining perturbations always result in
    oscillating functions. There are cos/sin series
    from which the amplitudes and phases are defined
  • Numerical integration is the way to go, all orbit
    determination s/w uses this method.
  • Required is an initial state vector and an
    acceleration model for the satellite.
  • To classify satellite orbits a first-order
    analytical solution can be used.

16
Numerical implementation
  • Keplerian physics is easy to understand,
    essentially follows from a central force field
    with a point-mass potential
  • The real world is more difficult, essentially
    because there are higher order terms in the
    potential and because there are other
    accelerations
  • Orbit dynamics can be described in the form of
    ordinary differential equations. You should
    formulate the problem as a system of first-order
    ODEs
  • There are efficient numerical tools to solve
    ODEs, in particular single-step and multi-step
    integrators

17
Demonstration numerical solution ordinary diff.
eq.
function f bullet( t,state ) implements
bullet dynamics xp state(1) yp state(2) xv
state(3) yv state(4) g 9.81 dia
0.442.54 length 1.52.54 dens 8000 area
pi(dia/2).2 mass densarealength cd 1 h
yp f exp(-h/6000log(2)) rho 1.2 f v
sqrt(xvxvyvyv) ad 0.5rho(area/mass)vvcd
nx xv/v ny yv/v xa -nxad ya -nyad
- g f state(3) state(4) xa ya'
Example gun bullet physics
In reality
18
Demonstration Numerical Implementation (2)
function f satdyn( t,state ) implements
Kepler dynamics xp state(1) yp state(2) xv
state(3) yv state(4) mu 4e14 r
sqrt(xp.2yp.2) factor mu/r/r/r xa
-factorxp ya -factoryp f state(3)
state(4) xa ya'
Example Kepler orbit physics
In reality
19
Orbit prediction (1)
During orbit perdiction one needs to integrate
the equations of motion. Suitable numerical
techniques are used to treat differential
equations of the following type
There are numerical procedures like the
Runge-Kutta single step integrator and
Adams-Moulton-Bashforth multi step integrator
that allow the state vector y0 to be propagated
from y0 till yn. In this case a state vector at
index j coincides with the time index t0(j-1)h
where h is the integrator step size.
20
Example in MATLAB
span 0 14500 state 1e7 0 0 7e3 option
odeset('RelTol',1e-10) t,y
ODE45('satdyn',span,state,option)
plot(y(,1),y(,2))
21
Orbit prediction (2)
  • The orbit prediction problem is entirely driven
    by the choice of the initial state vector y0, the
    definition of F(y,t) and g(t).
  • The basic question is of course, where does this
    information come from?
  • F(y,t) and g(t) fully depend on the realism of
    your mathematical model and its ability to
    describe reality
  • However, knowledge of the initial state vector
    should follow from 1) earlier computations or 2)
    launch insertion parameters
  • The conclusion is that it is desirable to
    estimate initial state parameters from
    observations to the satellite.

22
Parameter estimation
  • Terminology
  • Here, a problem refers to an interesting case to
    study.
  • Problems in satellite geodesy
  • Type of problem
  • does it contain orbit parameters?
  • does it contain gravity field parameters?
  • does it contain any other geophysical parameters?
  • How do you organize parameter estimation?
  • it is a batch or a sequential least squares
    problem?
  • can you solve it from one observation set or are
    more sets involved?
  • Is preprocessing of observations involved or is
    it in the problem?

23
Function model (1)
  • The function model aims to relate observations
    and parameters to another
  • The unknowns are gathered in vector
  • The observations are in vector
  • Usually we begin to approximate reality by a
    priori estimates and

24
Function model (2)
Ze
S
?Rij
B
Rj
Ri
Ye
Xe
25
Function model (3) Examples
  • The over-determined GPS navigation solution for
    one receiver
  • VLBI observations of phase delay
  • Two GPS receivers double difference processing
  • SLR network station, orbit parameters, earth
    rotation parameters
  • DORIS with orbit and gravity field improvement
  • Spaceborne GPS receiver on a LEO

26
Implementation
  • From our function model we conclude that
  • it is by definition a non linear problem
  • it depends on a priori information
  • it almost always depends on orbit dynamics
  • orbit predictions are used to correct the raw
    observations and to set-up the design matrix
  • the orbit prediction model is not necessarily
    accurate the first time you apply it

27
Least squares
28
Minimize cost function
  • The way the A matrix is computed completely
    depends on the type of observations and
    parameters in your problem.
  • We will distinguish between problems that contain
    orbit parameters and problems that do not.
  • Our first task will always be to model an orbit
    in the best possible way given the existing
    situation
  • This task is called orbit prediction

29
Example Initial state vector estimation in POD
Task determine the size, orientation and
position of the arrow, it determines whether you
hit the bulls eye
30
Variational equations
Example ? initial state vector component, terms
in force model etc
31
Set-up parameter estimation program
  • In reality orbit parameters are estimated from
    observations like range, Doppler or camera to the
    satellite or inbetween satellites
  • Orbit prediction method
  • Numerically stable schemes are used
  • Choice initial state vector
  • Definition satellite acceleration model
  • Variational method
  • Define parameters that need to be adjusted using
    least squares
  • Iterative improvement of these parameters
  • Use is made of the variational equations

32
Parameters in POD
  • Station coordinates
  • Station related parameters (clock, biases)
  • Initial state vector elements of satellite orbits
  • Parameters in acceleration models satellite
  • Other satellite related parameters (clock,
    biases, etc)
  • Signal delay related parameters
  • Earth rotation related parameters
  • Gravity field related parameters

33
Organization parameter estimation
  • For large scale batch problems
  • separation of arc -- and common parameters
  • combination of normal matrices and right hand
    sides
  • choice of optimal weight factors for combination
  • example development of earth models like EGM96
  • Sequential problems
  • apart from the adjustment procedure there is a
    state vector transition mechanism
  • During transition state vector and variance
    matrix are advanced to the next time step
    (normally with a Kalman filter)
  • Example JPLs GPS data processing method
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com