The Selective Tuning Model of Visual Attention - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

The Selective Tuning Model of Visual Attention

Description:

A Neural Model for Detecting and Labeling Motion Patterns in Image Sequences Marc Pomplun1 Julio Martinez-Trujillo2 Yueju Liu2 Evgueni Simine2 John Tsotsos2 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: marcp179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Selective Tuning Model of Visual Attention


1
A Neural Model for Detecting and Labeling Motion
Patterns in Image Sequences Marc Pomplun1 Julio
Martinez-Trujillo2 Yueju Liu2 Evgueni
Simine2 John Tsotsos2 1UMass Boston 2York
University, Toronto, Canada
2
Data Flow Diagram of Visual Areas in Macaque
Brain
Bluemotion perception pathway
Greenobject recognition pathway
3
Receptive Fields in Hierarchical Neural Networks
4
Receptive Fields in Hierarchical Neural Networks
neuron A
in top layer
5
Problems with Information Routing in Hierarchical
Networks
6
The Selective Tuning Concept (Tsotsos, 1988)
processing
pyramid
7
Hierarchical Winner-Take-All
top-down, coarse-to-fine WTA hierarchy for
selection and localization unselected
connections are inhibited
8
Selection Circuits
unit and connection
l
a
y
e
r

l

1
in the interpretive network
unit and connection
in the gating network
unit and connection
in the top-down bias network
l
a
y
e
r

l
l
a
y
e
r

l

-
1
I
9
  • 3D Visualization of the Selective Tuning Network

Red WTA phase 1 active
Green WTA phase 2 active
Blue inhibition
Yellow WTA winner
10
The Motion Perception Pathway
MST
MT
V1
input
11
What do We Know about Area V1?
  • cells have small receptive fields
  • each cell has a preferred direction of motion
  • there are three types of motion speed selectivity

12
What do We Know about Area MT?
  • cells have larger receptive fields than in V1
  • like in V1, each cell has a preferred combination
    of the direction and speed of motion
  • MT cells also have a preferred orientation of the
    speed gradient

13
What do We Know about Area MST?
  • cells respond to motion patterns such as
  • translation (objects shifting positions)
  • rotation (clockwise and counterclockwise)
  • expansion (approaching objects)
  • contraction (receding objects)
  • spiral motion (combinations of rotation and
    expansion/contraction)
  • the response of a cell is almost independent on
    the position of the motion pattern in the visual
    field

14
The Motion Hierarchy Model V1
  • V1 receives image sequences as input and extracts
    the direction and speed of motion

counterclockwise rotation
clockwise rotation
contraction
expansion
15
The Motion Hierarchy Model V1
  • V1 is simulated as 60x60 hypercolumns
  • each column contains 36 cells one for each
    combination of direction (12) and speed tuning
    (3)
  • direction and speed selectivity are achieved with
    spatiotemporal filters
  • these filters process local information from the
    last seven images in the sequence
  • example cells tuned towards upward motion

16
The Motion Hierarchy Model MT
  • MT is simulated as 30x30 hypercolumns
  • each column contains 432 cells one for each
    combination of direction (12) speed (3), and
    speed gradient tuning (12)
  • problem how can gradient tuning be realized from
    activation patterns in V1?
  • solution detect gradient differences across the
    three types of speed selective cells
  • this solution leads to a simple network structure
    and remarkably good noise reduction
  • the activation of an MT cell is the product of
    its activation by direction, speed, and gradient

17
The Motion Hierarchy Model MST
  • how can MST cells detect motion patterns such as
    rotation, expansion, and contraction based on the
    activation of MT cells?
  • idea the presence of these motion patterns is
    indicated by a consistent angle between the local
    movement and speed gradient

18
The Motion Hierarchy Model MST
direction of movement
orientation of speed gradient
19
The Motion Hierarchy Model MST
  • MST cells integrate the activation of MT cells
    that respond to a particular angle between motion
    and speed gradient
  • this integration is performed across a large part
    of the visual field and across all 12 directions
  • therefore, MST can detect 12 different motion
    patterns
  • we simulate 5x5 MST hypercolumns, each containing
    36 neurons (tuned for 12 different motion
    patterns, 3 different speeds)

20
MST
MT
V1
21
Simulation clockwise rotation
22
Simulation counter- clockwise rotation
23
Simulation receding object
24
Attention in the Motion Hierarchy
What happens if there are multiple motion
patterns in the visual input?
  • Visual attention can be used to
  • determine the type and location of the most
    salient motion pattern,
  • focus on it by eliminating all interfering
    information,
  • sequentially inspect all objects in the visual
    field.

25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Conclusions and Outlook
  • the motion hierarchy model provides a plausible
    explanation for cell properties in areas V1, MT,
    and MST
  • its use of distinct speed tuning functions in V1
    and speed gradient selectivity in MT leads to a
    relatively simple network structure combined with
    robust and precise detection of motion patterns
  • visual attention is employed to segregate and
    sequentially inspect multiple motion patterns

29
Conclusions and Outlook
  • the model predicts inhibition of visual functions
    around any attended motion pattern
  • the model also predicts that different motion
    patterns induce different activation patterns in
    V1, MT, and MST
  • linear motion activates V1, MT, and MST
  • speed gradients increase MT and MST activation
  • rotation, expansion, and contraction increase
    MST activation
  • this is currently being tested by fMRI scanning
    experiments in Magdeburg, Germany

30
Conclusions and Outlook
  • the model is well-suited for mobile robots to
    estimate parameters of ego-motion
  • the area MST in the simulated hierarchy is very
    sensitive to any translational or rotational
    ego-motion
  • in biological vision, MST is massively connected
    to the vestibular system
  • in mobile robots, the simulated area MST could
    interact with position and orientation sensors to
    stabilize ego-motion estimation

31
Conclusions and Outlook
  • Future work
  • lateral interaction across neighboring sets of
    gating units for improved perceptual grouping
  • simultaneous simulation of both the motion
    perception and object recognition pathways
  • introduction of working memory for an adequate
    internal representation of the current visual
    scene
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com