Introduction to Equity Valuation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Equity Valuation

Description:

Title: Training Author: Chris Argyrople Last modified by: chris Created Date: 6/2/1995 10:16:36 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: ChrisAr6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Equity Valuation


1
Introduction to Equity Valuation
  • Chris Argyrople, CFA
  • Concentric LLC
  • Enterprise Valuation
  • Cash Flow Analysis

2
Today in the Financial Markets(1998)
  • Hollywood Entertainment had a tender offer for
    11 / share that fell through.
  • Not enough investors wanted to sell at the 11
    price
  • What happened ???
  • The stock fell 20 to close at 8.8125 !!
  • DOES THIS MAKE SENSE ?? ARBs Unwinding ??

3
Today in the Markets, 9/15/98
  • Dow rose above 8,000 again, nobody knows where it
    will go next.
  • Port Mgr Likes Rainforest Café (RAIN)
  • Stock closed at 6 5/16
  • He says 3 net cash
  • 98 EPS estimate is 0.75
  • Is it a screaming buy???
  • Feb 1, 1999 Price 5 7/8
  • STOCK ULTIMATELY FELL TO 1

4
MMs Theory
  • The Value of An Asset is Independent of How it is
    Financed
  • Example Buy a 300,000 house. At closing, the
    seller just wants a certified check for 300,000.
    He doesnt care whether the money came out of
    your passbook account or whether you wrote a
    mortgage.
  • This logic holds for all assets

5
Modigliani Miller (MM)
  • MM Postulated that, Capital Structure Does Not
    Matter
  • Do you Agree?? Why or Why not?
  • My View
  • At any instant, CS DOESNT MATTER
  • But, as time horizon lengthens, CS DOES Matter.
  • Debate??

6
P/E Ratio can be Misleading
  • Company A B
  • are Identical
  • Identical
  • Assets, CashFlow,
  • Growth Rates
  • P/Es
  • A 15.0 , B 8.5

7
Why P/E is Misleading
  • Why is P/E Misleading? Comments?
  • Why doesnt Interest Expense properly account for
    associated cost of the debt?
  • Capitalized Interest
  • Yield Curve ST Debt vs. LT Debt
  • This is part of it, but
  • Cost of Debt NOT Cost of Equity
  • You cant compare Apples Oranges

8
So, is B Cheaper than A?
  • Which firms stock is cheaper, B or A?
  • My answer B is cheaper (lower P/E), but A is
    probably a better equity investment.
  • A is less risky, throws off more free cash flow,
    and has less constraints (less debt)
  • Bs debt constrains its choices, and if something
    goes wrong, B gets hammered
  • Debt can make managements either Very Aggressive
    OR Very Risk Averse

9
Enterprise Value
  • Total Enterprise Value (TEV) Firm Value
  • TEV Debt Equity - Cash
  • Use Market Values, NOT Book Values, but, it is ok
    to use Book Debt as a Proxy for Market Debt
    (usually)
  • Measures the value of the entire company,
    independent of capital structure.
  • This is the right way to do it. Any arguments??

10
Why Subtract Cash from TEV?
  • Cash is not really part of the business, it is
    portable fungible
  • It can be used to pay down debt (same as
    subtracting off cash from TEV)
  • It can be dividended to equityholders (same as
    subtracting cash from TEV)
  • IMAGINE A SHELL COMPANY WITH ONLY CASH, WHAT IS
    THE COMPANY WORTH? This is why you subtract cash.

11
More Sophisticated TEV
  • TEV Debt Equity - Working Capital
  • If there is extra working capital, it may make
    sense to subtract off the WC
  • This technique is difficult to implement because
    companies require a certain amount of WC to
    sustain operations, so it is difficult to
    ascertain how much to subtract. Subtracting WC
    is sophistic.

12
TEV Trick
  • Subtract Working Capital when it is Negative
  • Why? Because negative Working Capital usually
    requires additional funding, thus diluting
    current stockholders (somehow)
  • Subtracting a negative is equivalent to adding
    the Working Capital to TEV
  • When WC lt 0, it would be kind of erroneous to
    subtract cash (wrong way)

13
Valuation Operating Cash Flow
  • How do we value a company using TEV?
  • Answer
  • Compare Enterprise Value to Operating Cash Flow
  • EBITDA Earnings Before Interest
    Taxes Depreciation Amortization
  • EBITDA Operating Cash Flow
  • EBITDA Operating Income NonCash
    Charges

14
What is EBITDA?
  • EBITDA is the Cash Flow thrown off by the
    underlying business
  • Because it is before Financing Charges, Taxes,
    and Accounting Choices it is more difficult for
    management to game.
  • Obviously, EBITDA is still subject to Revenue
    Recognition and Inventory Accounting issues

15
Why EBITDA is Better
  • EBITDA is not Subject to acceleration of
    Depreciation or Amortization
  • EBITDA is not affected by Capitalized Interest
  • EBITDA is not altered by Capital Structure
  • EBITDA is not subject to Tax tricks
  • It is a cash flow measure, and businesses are
    propelled by cash

16
Valuation TEV EBITDA
  • Use TEV / EBITDA as one of your primary metrics.
  • Low TEV / EBITDA ratios are good
  • TEV / EBITDA measures the value of entire
    business vs. the operating cash flow
  • Better Apples to Apples Comparison than P/E,
    P/Book, and Price/Revenue ratios

17
Key Valuation Points
  • Ratios like P/E are of little value by
    themselves. They must be compared to similar
    firms to identify Relative Value
  • Growth Rate drives Valuations, if this is not the
    case, then you have a mis-pricing
  • Estimating Growth Rates is very difficult, Very
    Difficult if not Impossible.
  • So, what do you do?

18
Valuation Cash Flow Ratios
  • TEV / EBITDA Firm Value to OCF
  • TEV / Revenue Firm Value to Revenue
  • EBITDA / Sales Cash Flow Margins
  • MV Equity/FCFE Real P/E, Free Cash Flow
    (FCFE) Mult.
  • EBITDA / Interest Interest Coverage
  • Debt / EBITDA Leverage Indicator

19
Asset Valuation
  • Asset Value PV(cash flows)
  • Cash flows are independent of financing, BUT
  • Financing can dominate the Enterprise Value of a
    company
  • What does this Mean???

20
FREE CASH FLOW
  • Above all FREE CASH FLOW IS KING
  • (if you could predict growth, then growth would
    be King)
  • Free Cash Flow to Equity FCFE
  • FCFE NI Depreciation Amort - Capex
  • NI Net Income
  • Capex Capital Expenditures

21
How Free Cash Works
  • Balance Sheet
  • Year 1 Year 2
  • Cash 10 10
  • Other Assets 400 400
  • Total Assets 410 410
  • Debt 65 35 Debt
  • Other Liab Eq. 345 375 O.E.
  • Free Cash Flow 30

22
Back to Company A B
23
Free Cash Improves the B/Sheet
  • In the Example, Free Cash of 30 can be used to
  • PAY DOWN DEBT A GOOD THING
  • INCREASE CASH A GOOD THING
  • DIVIDEND PAYMENT A GOOD THING
  • ACQUISITIONS A GOOD THING
  • SHARE BUYBACK A GOOD THING
  • UPGRADE PPE A GOOD THING
  • NEW PROJECTS A GOOD THING

24
If Free Cash was -30
  • After dipping into cash of 10, THE COMPANY WOULD
    HAVE TO COME UP WITH THE OTHER 20 !!! HOW?
  • BORROW MORE A BAD THING
  • ISSUE EQUITY A BAD THING
  • GO BANKRUPT A BAD THING
  • SQUEEZE WORKING CAP. A BAD THING
  • SELL ASSETS A BAD THING
  • CUT DOWN CAPITAL EXP. A BAD THING

25
Argyrople Intro. Rule of Thumb
  • Buy Stocks Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Short Stocks Negative Free Cash Flow
  • You wouldnt believe how many people dont
    understand this.
  • This is a simple rule that will keep you out of
    some trouble.

26
Assuming No Valuation Change (TEV)
  • With No Valuation Change, Free Cash Flow is what
    determines the change in stock price. This is a
    simple concept, but most students dont
    understand it.
  • Company A B are Identical from the OCF line up,
    but due to capital structure, As stock rises
    Bs stock falls.
  • I DONT BELIEVE MM EXPLAINS THIS PROBLEM

27
MM was Right Wrong
  • In our No-Growth example, Capital Structure does
    not affect the value of the assets (partially
    because the positive free cash flow firm builds
    cash does not add to assets)
  • Enterprise Value stays constant BUT
  • Stock of Positive FCF firm Rises
  • Stock of Negative FCF firm Falls

28
Thus, Modified MM
  • At any point in time, Capital Structure does not
    matter -- Value of the Assets is Independent of
    Financing
  • Over time, Capital Structure does matter for
    stockholders AND it is important to the total
    enterprise value of the firm too (because
    eventually the stock of firm B will be wiped out)
    -- Cash Flow thrown off by Assets is altered by
    Financing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com