Molecular Biology Fourth Edition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 74
About This Presentation
Title:

Molecular Biology Fourth Edition

Description:

Title: Inquiry into Life Twelfth Edition Author: Administrator Last modified by: Horng Created Date: 8/8/2006 9:50:44 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:316
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 75
Provided by: memoCguE89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Molecular Biology Fourth Edition


1
Molecular BiologyFourth Edition
  • Chapter 17
  • The Mechanism of Translation I Initiation

Chapter 18 The Mechanism of Translation II
Elongation and Termination
Chapter 19 Ribosomes and Transfer RNA
Robert F. Weaver
2
17.1 Initiation of Translation in Bacteria
  • Two important events must occur before
    translation initiation can take place
  • Generate a supply of aminoacyl-tRNAs
  • Amino acids must be covalently bound to tRNAs
  • Process of bonding tRNA to amino acid is called
    tRNA charging
  • Dissociation of ribosomes into their two subunits
  • The cell assembles the initiation complex on the
    small ribosomal subunit
  • The two subunits must separate to make assembly
    possible

3
tRNA Charging
  • All tRNAs have same 3 bases at 3-end (CCA)
  • Terminal adenosine is the target for charging
    with amino acid
  • Amino acid attached by ester bond between
  • Its carboxyl group
  • 2- or 3-hydroxyl group of terminal adenosine of
    tRNA

Amino acid
4
Two-Step Charging
  • Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases join amino acids to
    their cognate tRNAs
  • This is done in a two-step reaction
  • Begins with activation of the amino acid with AMP
    derived from ATP
  • In the second step, the energy from the
    aminoacyl-AMP is used to transfer the amino acid
    to the tRNA

5
Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Activity
AMP/amino acid coupling
AMP/tRNA displacement
6
Dissociation of Ribosomes
  • E. coli ribosomes dissociate into subunits at the
    end of each round of translation
  • IF1 actively promotes this dissociation
  • IF3 binds to free 30S subunit and prevents
    reassociation with 50S subunit to form a whole
    ribosome

7
Ribosomal Subunit Exchange
Grow in heavy isotope of nitrogen, carbon, and
hydrogen. Then 3H labeled
8
Formation of the 30S Initiation Complex
  • When ribosomes have been dissociated into 50S and
    30S subunits, cell builds a complex on the 30S
    subunit
  • mRNA
  • Aminoacyl-tRNA
  • Initiation factors
  • IF3 binds by itself to 30S subunit
  • IF1 and IF2 stabilize this binding
  • IF2 can bind alone, but is stabilized with help
    of IF1 and IF3
  • IF1 does not bind alone

9
First Codon and the First Aminoacyl-tRNA
  • Prokaryotic initiation codon is
  • Usually AUG
  • Can be GUG
  • Rarely UUG
  • Initiating aminoacyl-tRNA is N-formyl-methionyl-tR
    NA
  • N-formyl-methionine (fMet) is the first amino
    acid incorporated into a polypeptide
  • This amino acid is frequently removed from the
    protein during maturation

10
N-Formyl-Methionine
Lipman et al., Marcker and Sanger
11
Formyl-Met-tRNA and Met-tRNA
  • Which codons they respond to?
  • Which position within the protein they placed
    methionine?

12
Which codons they respond to?
  • Make a labeled aminoacyl-tRNA, mix it with
    ribosomes and a variety of trinucleotides, such
    as AUG.
  • Met-tRNA bind AUG, formyl-Met-tRNA binds AUG,
    GUG, and UUG.

AUG gt90 , GUG about 8 UUG 1
13
Which position within the protein they placed
methionine?
  • mRNA Sequence AUG AUG AUG.
  • In vitro translation system
  • In the presence of tRNAmet, met is incorporated
    into interior of the product
  • In the presence of formy-tRNAmet, met is
    incorporated into the first codon of the product

14
Weigert and GarenFormyl-Met of the the
polypeptide is always removed in bacteria and
phage proteins
15
Binding mRNA to the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
  • The 30S initiation complex is formed from a free
    30S ribosomal subunit plus mRNA and fMet-tRNA
  • Binding between the 30S prokaryotic ribosomal
    subunit and the initiation site of a message
    depends on base pairing between
  • Short RNA sequence
  • Shine-Dalgarno sequence
  • Upstream of initiation codon
  • Complementary sequence
  • 3-end of 16S RNA

16
Binding mRNA and fMet-tRNA to the 30S ribosomal
subunit
  • How does the cell detect the difference between
    the initiation codon and an ordinary codon with
    the same sequences?

Consensus sequences?
17
Positive strand phages
  • R17
  • f2
  • MS2
  • Positive strand phages
  • Encode three genes A (maturation) protein, coat
    protein and replicase

18
Gene structure of MS2 phage RNA
19
The secondary structures have inhibitory effect
20
  • Lodish et al
  • Translating f2 coat mRNA by ribosomes from
    different bacteria
  • B. stearothermophilus could only translate A
    protein but not coat protein
  • (This is not due to initiation factors but
    ribosomes)

21
  • Nomura et al.,
  • The important element is in the 30S ribosome
  • If the 30S ribosome from the E. coli, the coat
    protein can be translated
  • If the 30S ribosome from the B.
    stearothermophilus, the coat protein can not be
    translated
  • The active elements are S12 and 16S rRNA

22
  • Shine and Dalgarno
  • Upstream of initiation codon 5- AGGAGGU
  • 3 end of the 16S rRNA 3HO-AUUCCUCCAC
  • B. stearothermophilus has poor match

23
  • Bacillus 16S rRNA
  • 4 Watson Crick base pairing with the A protein
    and replicase ribosome binding sites
  • 2 with the coat protein gene
  • E. coli
  • At least three base pairs with all three genes

Could the base pairing between 16S rRNA and the
region upstream of the translation initiation
site be vital to ribosome binding?
24
Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence
  • See Table 17.1
  • AGGAGGU
  • From ribosomes from C. crescentus and P.
    aeruginosa
  • No ribosome binding would occur for less than 3 bp

25
(No Transcript)
26
  • Steitz and Jakes
  • Ribosome from E. coli bound to initiation site
    and treated with Colicin E3 (RNase)
  • Fingerprinting
  • Initiation site including S-D sequence
  • An oligonucleotide from 3end of the 16S rRNA

27
The best evidence
  • Hui and De Boer in 1987
  • Clone the human growth hormone gene into E. coli

Translation
WT SD sequence WT 16S rRNA GGAGG CCUCC (5 pairing) OK
SD sequence 16S rRNA CCUCC CCUCC (no pairing) NO
SD sequence 16S rRNA GUGUG CCUCC (2 pairing) NO
SD sequence 16S rRNA CCUCC GGAGG (5 pairing) OK
28
Initiation Factors and 30S Subunit
  • Binding of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence with the
    complementary sequence of the 16S rRNA is
    mediated by IF3
  • Assisted by IF1 and IF2
  • All 3 initiation factors have bound to the 30S
    subunit at this time

29
Binding of fMet-tRNA to the 30S Initiation Complex
  • IF2 is the major factor promoting binding of
    fMet-tRNA to the 30S initiation complex
  • Two other initiation factors also play an
    important supporting role
  • GTP is also required for IF2 binding at
    physiological IF2 concentrations
  • The GTP is not hydrolyzed in the process

30
30S Initiation Complex
  • The complete 30S initiation complex contains one
    each
  • 30S ribosomal subunit
  • mRNA
  • fMet-tRNA
  • GTP
  • Factors IF1, IF2, IF3

31
Formation of the 70S Initiation Complex
  • GTP is hydrolyzed after the 50S subunit joins the
    30S complex to form the 70S initiation complex
  • This GTP hydrolysis is carried out by IF2 in
    conjunction with the 50S ribosomal subunit
  • Hydrolysis purpose is to release IF2 and GTP from
    the complex so polypeptide chain elongation can
    begin

32
What is the function of GTP hydrolysis
  • GTP hydrolysis is to remove IF-2 from the
    ribosomes
  • Exp 30S initiation complexlabeled IF-2 and
    fMet-tRNA and either GDPCP or GTP, add 50S and
    ultracentrifugation

33
17.18 Effect of GTP hydrolysis on release of
IF-2 from the ribosome.
After adding 50S, IF-2 is released from the 70S
ribosome but fmet-tRNA is still associated
34
  • In Fig 17.18, more fMet-tRNA is associated with
    the 70S ribosomes
  • Catalytic function of IF2
  • Hydrolysis of GTP is necessary to release IF2
    from the 70S initiation complex so it can bind
    another molecule of fmet-tRNA, otherwise, IF2
    only acts stoichiometrically

35
Bacterial Translation Initiation
  • IF1 influences dissociation of 70S ribosome to
    50S and 30S
  • Binding IF3 to 30S, prevents subunit
    reassociation
  • IF1, IF2, GTP bind alongside IF3
  • Binding mRNA to fMet-tRNA forming 30S initiation
    complex
  • Can bind in either order
  • IF2 sponsors fMet-tRNA
  • IF3 sponsors mRNA
  • Binding of 50S with loss of IF1 and IF3
  • IF2 dissociation and GTP hydrolysis

36
17.2 Initiation in Eukaryotes
  • Eukaryotic
  • Begins with methionine
  • Initiating tRNA not same as tRNA for interior
  • No Shine-Dalgarno
  • mRNA have caps at 5end
  • Bacterial
  • N-formyl-methionine
  • Shine-Dalgarno sequence to show ribosomes where
    to start

37
Scanning Model of Initiation
  • Eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunits locate start
    codon by binding to 5-cap and scanning
    downstream to find the 1st AUG in a favorable
    context
  • Kozaks Rules are a set of requirements
  • Best context uses A of ACCAUGG as 1
  • Purine (A or G) in -3 position
  • G in 4 position
  • 5-10 cases ribosomal subunits bypass 1st AUG
    scanning for more favorable one

38
The scanning model of initiation
Kozak systematically mutated nucleotides around
the initiation ? codon in a cloned rat
preproinsulin gene ? Introduce into COS cells ?
Label newly synthesized protein with 35S-Met ?
Immunoprecipitate ? Electrophoresis ? Detect by
autoradipgraph
39
The scanning model of initiation
The better the translation initiation, the more
proinsulin was made
40
The best initiation occur with a G or an A in
position 3 and a G in position 4 (where the A
in ATG is position 1)
A/G C C A T G G -3 -2 -1 1 2 3
4
41
(No Transcript)
42
If this really is the optimum sequence for
translation initiation, introducing it out of
frame and upstream of the normal initiation codon
should provide a barrier to scanning ribosomes
and force them to initiate out of frame
43
Out-of-frame ATG
The closer it resembled the optimal sequence, the
more it interfered with initiation at the
downstream ATG
44
Translation With a Short ORF
  • Ribosomes can use a short upstream open reading
    frame
  • Initiate at an upstream AUG
  • Translate a short Open Reading Frame
  • Continue scanning
  • Reinitiate at a downstream AUG

45
Scanning Model for Translation Initiation
46
Effects of mRNA Secondary Structure
  • Secondary structure near the 5-end of an mRNA
    can have either positive or negative effects
  • Hairpin just past an AUG can force a pause by
    ribosomal subunit and stimulate translation
  • Very stable stem loop between cap and initiation
    site can block scanning and inhibit translation

47
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors
  • Bacterial translation initiation requires
    initiation factors as does eukaryotic initiation
    of translation
  • Eukaryotic system is more complex than bacterial
  • Scanning process
  • Factors to recognize the 5-end cap

48
Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes
  • Eukaryotic initiation factors and general
    functions
  • eIF2 binds Met-tRNA to ribosomes
  • eIF2B activates eIF2 replacing its GDP with GTP
  • eIF1 and eIF1A aid in scanning to initiation
    codon
  • eIF3 binds to 40S ribosomal subunit, inhibits
    reassociation with 60S subunit
  • eIF4 is a cap-binding protein allowing 40S
    subunit to bind 5-end of mRNA
  • eIF5 encourages association between 60S ribosome
    subunit and 48S complex
  • eIF6 binds to 60S subunit, blocks reassociation
    with 40S subunit

Fig. 17.22
49
Function of eIF4
  • eIF4 is a cap-binding protein
  • This protein is composed of 3 parts
  • eIF4E, 24-kD, has actual cap binding activity
  • eIF4A, a 50-kD polypeptide
  • eIF4G is a 220-kD polypeptide
  • The complex of the three polypeptides together is
    called eIF4F

50
The cap-binding proteins
GDP-binding protein Cap binding protein
51
Function of eIF4A and eIF4B
  • eIF4A
  • Has an RNA helicase activity
  • This activity unwinds hairpins found in the
    5-leaders of eukaryotic mRNA
  • Unwinding activity is ATP dependent
  • eIF4B
  • Has an RNA-binding domain
  • Can stimulate the binding of eIF4A to mRNA

52
Function of eIF4G
  • eIF4G is an adaptor protein capable of binding to
    other proteins including
  • eIF4E, cap-binding protein
  • eIF3, 40S ribosomal subunit-binding protein
  • Pab1p, a polyA-binding protein
  • Interacting with these proteins lets eIF4G
    recruit 40S ribosomal subunits to mRNA and
    stimulate translation

53
Fig. 17.27
Inhibit capped cellular mRNA
Synergy effect
  • Regulatory protein and miRNA bound to the 3UTR
    are close to the cap, which could help them
    influence the cap
  • 2. Ribosomes copleteing one round of translation
    are close to the cap
  • 3. Unavailable to RNase

54
Structure and Function of eIF3
  • eIF3 is a 5-lobed protein that binds at the same
    site to
  • eIF4G
  • Prominent part of viral IRES
  • This explains how the IRES can substitute for 40S
    ribosomal subunit to mRNA
  • Cryo-EM studies have produced a model for the
    eIF3-IRES-40S complex explaining how eIF3
    prevents premature 40S-60S association (sits at
    the site of proposed key contact between two
    particles)

55
Prevention of Premature 40S-60S Association
  • eIF3 blocks key contact point between subunits
    40S and 60S
  • eIF4G, so also eIF4E, locate close to the cap on
    an mRNA bound to 40S ribosomal particle
  • eIF4 would be in position to cap-bind

56
Functions of eIF1 and eIF1A
  • eIF1 and eIF1A act synergistically to promote
    formation of a stable 48S complex involving
  • Initiation factors
  • Met-tRNA
  • 40S ribosomal subunits bound at initiation codon
    of mRNA
  • eIF1 and eIF1A act by
  • Dissociating improper complexes between 40S
    subunits and mRNA
  • Encouraging formation of stable 48S complexes

57
Principle of the Toeprint Assay
Source Adapted from Jackson, R., J. G. Sliciano,
Cinderella factors have a ball, Nature 394830,
1998.
58
Preformed complex I is not a dead end
Marker
17.32
59
Functions of eIF5 and eIF5B (eIF5 encourages
association between 60S ribosome subunit and 48S
complex)
  • eIF5B is homologous to prokaryotic factor IF2
  • Binds GTP
  • Uses GTP hydrolysis to promote its own
    dissociation from ribosome
  • Permits protein synthesis to begin
  • Stimulates association of 2 ribosomal subunits
  • Differs from IF2 as eIF5B cannot stimulate
    binding of initiating aminoacyl-tRNA to small
    ribosomal subunit
  • eIF5B works with eIF5

60
17.3 Control of Initiation
  • Given the amount of control at the
    transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels,
    why control gene expression at translational
    level?
  • Major advantage speed
  • New gene products can be produced quickly
  • Simply turn on translation of preexisting mRNA
  • Valuable in eukaryotes
  • Transcripts are relatively long
  • Take correspondingly long time to make
  • Most control of translation happens at the
    initiation step

61
Bacterial Translational Control
  • Most bacterial gene expression is controlled at
    transcription level
  • Majority of bacterial mRNA has a very short
    lifetime
  • Only 1 to 3 minutes
  • Allows bacteria to respond quickly to changing
    circumstances
  • Different cistrons on a polycistronic transcript
    can be translated better than others

62
Shifts in mRNA Secondary Structure
  • mRNA secondary structure can govern translation
    initiation
  • Replicase gene of the MS2 class of phages
  • Initiation codon is buried in secondary structure
    until ribosomes translating the coat gene open up
    the structure
  • Heat shock sigma factor, s32 of E. coli
  • Repressed by secondary structure that is relaxed
    by heating
  • Heat can cause an immediate unmasking of
    initiation codons and burst of synthesis

63
Proteins/mRNAs Induce mRNA Secondary Structure
Shifts
  • Small RNAs with proteins can affect mRNA 2
    structure to control translation initiation
  • Riboswitches can be used to control translation
    initiation via mRNA 2 structure
  • 5-untranslated region of E. coli thiM mRNA
    contain a riboswitch
  • This includes an aptamer that binds thiamine and
    its metabolite
  • Thiamine phosphate
  • Thiamine pyrophosphate (TTP)

64
Activation of mRNA Translation
  • When TPP abundant
  • Binds aptamer
  • Causes conformational shift in mRNA
  • Ties up Shine-Dalgarno in 2 structure
  • Shift hides the SD sequence from ribosomes
  • Inhibits translation of mRNA
  • Saves energy as thiM mRNA encodes an enzyme
    needed to produce more thiamine and TPP

65
Eukaryotic Translational Control
  • Eukaryotic mRNA lifetimes are relatively long, so
    there is more opportunity for translation control
    than in bacteria
  • eIF2 a-subunit is a favorite target for
    translation control
  • Heme-starved reticulocytes activate HCR
    (heme-controlled repressor)
  • Phosphorylates eIF2a
  • Inhibit initiation
  • Virus-infected cells have another kinase, DAI
  • Phosphorylates eIF2a
  • Inhibits translation initiation

66
Repression of Translation by Phosphorylation
67
Phosphorylation of an eIF4E-Binding Protein
  • Insulin and a number of growth factors stimulate
    a pathway involving a protein kinase known as
    mTOR
  • mTOR kinases target protein
  • PHAS-1 (rat)
  • 4E-BP1 (human)
  • Once phosphorylated by mTOR
  • This protein dissociates from eIF4E
  • Releases it to participate in active translation
    initiation

68
Stimulation of Translation by Phosphorylation of
PHAS-1
69
Blockage of Translation Initiation by an miRNA
  • miRNA controls gene expression in two ways
  • Degradation of mRNA when base-paired perfectly
  • Inhibition of protein production if not perfect
    match
  • Filipowicz et al conTranslation initiation that
    is cap-independent due to presence of an IRES, or
    a tethered initiation factor, is not affected by
    let-7 miRNA
  • This miRNA blocks binding of eIF4E to the cap of
    target mRNAs in the human cell

70
RNA Degradation 80 20
10x
10x
P1573-
71
Blockage of Translation Initiation by an miRNA
  • The let-7 miRNA shifts the polysomal profile of
    target mRNAs in human cells toward smaller
    polysomes
  • This miRNA blocks translation initiation in human
    cells
  • Translation initiation that is cap-independent
    due to presence of an IRES, or a tethered
    initiation factor, is not affected by let-7 miRNA
  • This miRNA blocks binding of eIF4E to the cap of
    target mRNAs in the human cell

72
Fig. 17.46
Collect and fractionate polysomes from cells
transfected with RL-3xBulge gene and perform
Northern blotting
Polysomes A mRNA attached to several ribosomes
(Ch. 19)
The more active translation initiation, the more
ribosome will attach to the mRNA
Anti-miRNA inhibitor revert this effect
73
Fig. 17.47
74
Blockage of Translation Initiation by an miRNA
  • Lin-4 miRNA does not alter the polysome profile
    of its target mRNA in C. elegans and does not
    appear to block translation initiation.
  • Different miRNAs have different modes-of-action
  • miRNAs work differently in different organisms
  • Or both
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com