Title: Food Law FSC-421
1Food Law FSC-421
Dr. Thomas P. Wilson, J.D., Ph.D.Attorney at
Law / Assistant ProfessorDepartment of Food
Science and Human NutritionMichigan State
University lawdoc_at_msu.edu
2Course Basics
- Tues/Thur 800am - 920am
- 1235 Anthony Hall
- Primary computer generated presentations
- Strong Internet component
- Cyber-attendance
- Legal / Scientific Perspectives
3Course Materials
- Homepage
- http//www.msu.edu/course/fsc/421/
- Textbook
- Handouts
- External References
- Legal Research
4Grading
- 3 exams final
- Class participation
- Cyber-attendance
5Student / Instructor Communications
- MSU (Webtalk)
- ICQ - (I Seek You)
- Email
- Phone/Fax
- Office Hours (Real and Cyber)
6Internet Components
- Home Page
- Student/Instructor Communications
- Online Resources
- Nexis/Lexis
- Listservs
- Cyber-Attendance
7What is the Internet?
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union 117 S.Ct.
2329 (1997)
- international network of interconnected
computers - ARPANET 1969
- Military, defense contractors, universities
doing military research - Redundant channel communication in case of war
- World Wide Web (www) is best known network
8Law
- A rule established by authority, society or
custom - A body of rules governing the affairs of man
within a community or among states - A declaration or position which is never to be
questioned or disputed
9Science
The observation, identification, description,
experimental investigation and theoretical
explanation of natural phenomena.
10Science
Such activity restricted to a class of
natural phenomenaSuch activity applied to any
class of phenomena
11Science
- Any methodological activity discipline or
study - Any activity that appears to require study and
method
12Policy
Any plan or course of actions adopted by a
government, political party, business
organization, or the like, designed to influence
and determine decisions action and other matters.
13Food
Any material, usually of plant or animal origin,
containing or consisting of essential body
nutrients as carbohydrates, fats, proteins,
vitamins, or minerals as taken in and assimilated
by an organism to maintain life and growth.
14Magic Words
- Adulteration
- Misbranding
- Jurisdiction
- Enabling Legislation
- Federal Preemption
- Harmonization
- Standardization
- Common Law
- Pre-market Approval
- Liability
- Administrative vs. Judicial
- Interstate Commerce
- Caveat Emptor
15Jack in the Box
- Wrongful Death
- Defendants
- Responsible Parties
- Negligence
- Breach of Warranty
- Plaintiffs
- Damages
- Judgment
- Attorneys Fees
- Discovery
- Proximate Causation
- Punitive Damages
16Philosophy of Food Law
- Food law primarily about things
- Manufacture, distribution, sale, are secondary
- Purpose of FDCA is to protect consumer from
regulated products that are unsafe - Job delegated to FDA and USDA
- Law revised as new risks recognized
- Law vs. Science?
17Philosophy of Food Law
- Law makes it legally to market any product which
is adulterated or misbranded or which does not
have FDA approval in interstate commerce - FDA must show that the product (thing) violates
the statute in one of these ways
18Philosophy of Food Law
- FDA acts through the Department of Justice to
prevent future violations by seeking injunction
or punishment - FDA philosophy is premarket approval
- To the greatest extent possible, all significant
benefits and risks should be accessed before
product is marketed
19Philosophy of Food Law
- If risks are justified, product should be
marketed - If risk justified only if product used in
accordance with certain conditions, those
conditions must be listed - If risks are not justified, product should not be
marketed (olestra, saccharin, nutra-sweet)
20Philosophy of Food Law
- FDA/USDA are essentially scientific regulatory
agencies - Protect public by screening unsafe products
- Courts typically defer to FDA views (exception
Supreme Beef) on validity of regulatory
requirements
21Philosophy of Food Law
- Relationship between regulator and regulated
community (food industry) - Voluntary compliance vs. enforcement
- Must rely on consumer to protect their own health
to some extent - Comparative negligence