NEPOTISM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

NEPOTISM

Description:

Title: Nepotism and Impartiality: Definitions and Considerations, USPS Law Department, 2004 Keywords: 200404 Last modified by: sinderrp Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:375
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ethicsLett
Category:
Tags: nepotism

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NEPOTISM


1
  • NEPOTISM IMPARTIALITY
  • Definitions and Considerations
  • USPS Law Department
  • 2004

2
NEPOTISM
  • What is nepotism?
  • Nepotism generally refers to favoritism shown
    to a relative in the workplace on the basis of
    the personal relationship.

3
  • What is impartiality?
  • Impartiality is what we demonstrate when we are
    fair, rather than partial or biased, in our
    dealings with other employees.

4
NEPOTISM
  • Why do/must we care about nepotism and
    impartiality?
  • Criminal statute 18 USC 208
  • Civil statute 5 USC 3110
  • USPS rules EL-312, ELM 660
  • Fed. ethics regs 5 CFR 2635
  • Workplace morale
  • Legal actions, OIG, public opinion, congressional
    inquiries

5
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATUTE 18 USC 208
  • Under this statute, an employee may not
  • participate personally and substantially
  • in any particular matter
  • that would have a direct and predictable
    effect on his financial interests, or those
    imputed to him.

6
IMPARTIALITY REGULATION 5 CFR 2635.502
  • An employee must consider whether her
    impartiality would reasonably be questioned if
    she participated in a particular matter involving
    others with whom she has certain personal or
    business relationships.
  • If her impartiality could be questioned, she
    should not participate in the matter unless she
    informs an ethics official about the matter and
    is authorized to proceed.

7
ANTI-NEPOTISM STATUTE 5 USC 3110
  • Prevents a federal employee from
  • Appointing, employing, promoting or advancing a
    relative
  • Advocating the appointment, employment, promotion
    or advancement of a relative

8
POSTAL POLICY EL-312
  • Postal selection policies prohibit an employee
    from being on a promotion review board, or a
    selecting official, when the employees child,
    sibling, housemate, parent, or other relative is
    an applicant.

9
NEPOTISM
  • Spousal Relationships
  • It is never appropriate for spouses to have a
    direct reporting relationship.
  • Criminal statute (shared financial interests)
  • Impartiality concerns
  • Appearance issues

10
NEPOTISM
  • Household Members
  • It is not appropriate for one household member to
    report to another.
  • Criminal statute does not apply
  • BUT impartiality regulations do apply
  • AND so do appearance issues

11
NEPOTISM
  • Other Relatives
  • Whether non-spousal relatives may be in reporting
    relationships depends on the facts of the
    situation and relevant postal policy.
  • Criminal statute does not apply
  • BUT impartiality regs do apply
  • As do appearance issues

12
CONSIDERATIONS IN NON-SPOUSAL SITUATIONS
  1. What exactly is the nature of the personal
    relationship between the supervisory and
    subordinate employees?
  2. Are the employees dating but not living
    together?
  3. If they are parent and child, siblings, cousins,
    or in-laws, do they reside in the same household?
  4. Do the two employees share any financial
    interests?

13
CONSIDERATIONS IN NON-SPOUSAL SITUATIONS
  • 5. Do the two own any real property together?
  • 6. Have other employees complained about, or
    simply noted, special treatment being received by
    the subordinate employee?
  • 7. Is there any evidence of any type of
    favoritism?
  • 8. Is an investigation necessary in order to
    elicit answers to these questions?

14
NEPOTISM
  • Attempting to exert influence in a selection,
    promotion, or transfer matter, especially when it
    involves a relative, violates the impartiality
    section of the Standards of Ethical Conduct, and
    the EL-312.

15
NEPOTISM
  • Responses to these issues
  • Changes to EL-312 (and corresponding references
    in ELM 660)
  • Policy changes (add transfer to EL-312 direct
    committee members to recuse if related to any
    employee under consideration, etc.)
  • Require disclosure from employees
  • Discuss with employees potential problems with
    reporting relationships

16
FOR ADVICE AND ASSISTANCE
  • For assistance with matters involving nepotism,
    please contact
  • Human Resources
  • Your Field Law Office
  • or
  • Chief Counsel, Employment Law, or Chief Counsel,
    Ethics and Federal Requirements, in the Law
    Department at Headquarters
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com