Title: Lecture 21 Cosmological Models
1Lecture 21Cosmological Models
- ASTR 340
- Fall 2006
- Dennis Papadopoulos
2Spectral Lines - Doppler
3(No Transcript)
4Doppler Examples
5Doppler Examples
6Expansion Redshifts
z2 three times, z10, eleven times
7Expansion Redshifts
8Expansion - Example
9Current Record Redshift
10Hubbleology
- Hubble length DHc/H ,
- Hubble sphere Volume enclosed in Hubble sphere
estimates the volume of the Universe that can be
in our light-cone it is the limit of the
observable Universe. Everything that could have
affected us - Every point has its own Hubble sphere
- Look-back time Time required for light to travel
from emission to observation
11Gravitational Redshift
12Interpretation of Hubble law in terms of
relativity
- New way to look at redshifts observed by Hubble
- Redshift is not due to velocity of galaxies
- Galaxies are (approximately) stationary in space
- Galaxies get further apart because the space
between them is physically expanding! - The expansion of space, as R(t) in the metric
equation, also affects the wavelength of light
as space expands, the wavelength expands and so
there is a redshift. - So, cosmological redshift is due to cosmological
expansion of wavelength of light, not the regular
Doppler shift from local motions.
13Relation between z and R(t)
- Using our relativistic interpretation of cosmic
redshifts, we write - Redshift of a galaxy is defined by
- So, we have
14Hubble Law for nearby (zlt0.1) objects
- Thus
- where Hubbles constant is defined by
- But also, for comoving coordinates of two
galaxies differing by space-time interval - dR(t)?Dcomoving , have
- v Dcomoving ? ?R/?t(d/R)?(?R/?t)
- Hence v d? H for two galaxies with fixed
comoving separation
15Peculiar velocities
- Of course, galaxies are not precisely at fixed
comoving locations in space - They have local random motions, called peculiar
velocities - e.g. motions of galaxies in local group
- This is the reason that observational Hubble law
is not exact straight line but has scatter - Since random velocities do not overall increase
with comoving separation, but cosmological
redshift does, it is necessary to measure fairly
distant galaxies to determine the Hubble constant
accurately
16Distance determinations further away
- In modern times, Cepheids in the Virgo galaxy
cluster have been measured with Hubble Space
Telescope (16 Mpc away)
Virgo cluster
17Tully-Fisher relation
- Tully-Fisher relationship (spiral galaxies)
- Correlation between
- width of particular emission line of hydrogen,
- Intrinsic luminosity of galaxy
- So, you can measure distance by
- Measuring width of line in spectrum
- Using TF relationship to work out intrinsic
luminosity of galaxy - Compare with observed brightness to determine
distance - Works out to about 200Mpc (then hydrogen line
becomes too hard to measure)
18Hubble time
- Once the Hubble parameter has been determined
accurately, it gives very useful information
about age and size of the expanding Universe - Recall Hubble parameter is ratio of rate of
change of size of Universe to size of Universe - If Universe were expanding at a constant rate, we
would have ?R/?tconstant and R(t) t?(?R/?t)
then would have H (?R/?t)/R1/t - ie tH1/H would be age of Universe since Big Bang
19Modeling the Universe
Chapter 11
20 BASIC COSMOLOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS
- Germany 1915
- Einstein just completed theory of GR
- Explains anomalous orbit of Mercury perfectly
- Schwarzschild is working on black holes etc.
- Einstein turns his attention to modeling the
universe as a whole - How to proceed its a horribly complex problem
21How to make progress
- Proceed by ignoring details
- Imagine that all matter in universe is smoothed
out - i.e., ignore details like stars and galaxies, but
deal with a smooth distribution of matter - Then make the following assumptions
- Universe is homogeneous every place in the
universe has the same conditions as every other
place, on average. - Universe is isotropic there is no preferred
direction in the universe, on average.
22- There is clearly large-scale structure
- Filaments, clumps
- Voids and bubbles
- But, homogeneous on very large-scales.
- So, we have the
- The Generalized Copernican Principle there are
no special points in space within the Universe.
The Universe has no center! - These ideas are collectively called the
Cosmological Principles.
23Key Assumptions
24Riddles of Conventional Thinking
25Stability
26GR vs. Newtonian
27Newtonian Universe
28(No Transcript)
29Expanding Sphere
30Fates of Expanding Universe
31Spherical Universe
32Friedman Universes
33Einsteins Greatest Blunder
34(No Transcript)
35 THE DYNAMICS OF THE UNIVERSE EINSTEINS MODEL
- Einsteins equations of GR
G describes the space-time curvature (including
its dependence with time) of Universe heres
where we plug in the RW geometries.
T describes the matter content of the Universe.
Heres where we tell the equations that the
Universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
36- Einstein plugged the three homogeneous/isotropic
cases of the FRW metric formula into his
equations of GR to see what would happen - Einstein found
- That, for a static universe (R(t)constant), only
the spherical case worked as a solution to his
equations - If the sphere started off static, it would
rapidly start collapsing (since gravity attracts) - The only way to prevent collapse was for the
universe to start off expanding there would then
be a phase of expansion followed by a phase of
collapse
37- So Einstein could have used this to predict that
the universe must be either expanding or
contracting! - but this was before Hubble discovered expanding
universe (more soon!) everybody thought that
universe was static (neither expanding nor
contracting). - So instead, Einstein modified his GR equations!
- Essentially added a repulsive component of
gravity - New term called Cosmological Constant
- Could make his spherical universe remain static
- BUT, it was unstable a fine balance of opposing
forces. Slightest push could make it expand
violently or collapse horribly.
38- Soon after, Hubble discovered that the universe
was expanding! - Einstein called the Cosmological Constant
Greatest Blunder of My Life! - .but very recent work suggests that he may have
been right (more later!)
39Sum up Newtonian Universe