Title: Financial Accounting and Accounting Standards
1Accounting Changes and Error Analysis
2Learning Objectives
- Identify the types of accounting changes.
- Describe the accounting for changes in accounting
principles. - Understand how to account for retrospective
accounting changes. - Understand how to account for impracticable
changes. - Describe the accounting for changes in estimates.
- Identify changes in a reporting entity.
- Describe the accounting for correction of errors.
- Identify economic motives for changing accounting
methods. - Analyze the effect of errors.
3Accounting Changes Reporting Issues Approaches
- Why are accounting changes made?
- New FASB pronouncements
- Changing economic conditions
- Changing internal circumstances
4Accounting Changes Reporting Issues Approaches
- Essential issues in reporting accounting
changes - Whether an accounting change is allowed.
- Whether to restate prior years?financial
statements. - Whether to recognize the effect of the change in
the current years net income or in the beginning
retained earnings balance .
5Accounting Changes
6Accounting Changes
- Error corrections . . .
- Are not classified as accounting changes.
- Do affect the income of prior periods and
- require special treatment.
7Objectives of Reporting Accounting Changes
Relevance
Consistency
Public Confidence
8Accounting Principle Changes
9Accounting Principle Changes
- The following are not accounting principle
changes - Initial adoption of an accounting principle
- Adopting an accounting principle for a new group
of assets or liabilities - Change from inappropriate accounting principle to
GAAP - Planned change to straight-line depreciation
- Change in accounting principle that cannot be
distinguished from a change in accounting estimate
10Changes in Accounting Principle
- Three approaches for reporting changes
- Currently (cumulative effect).
- Retrospectively.
- Prospectively (in the future).
- FASB requires use of the retrospective approach.
11Basic Principles
According to the provisions of FASB No. 154
- A change in an accounting principle is accounted
for by the retrospective application of the new
accounting principle. - A change in an accounting estimate is accounted
for prospectively. - A change in a reporting entity is accounted for
by the retrospective application of the new
accounting principle. - A material error is accounted for by prior period
restatement (adjustment).
12Retrospective Adjustment Method
A company accounts for a change in principle by
the retrospective application of the new
accounting principle as follows
- The company computes the cumulative effect of the
change to the new accounting principle as of the
beginning of the first period presented. That is,
it computes the amounts that would have been in
the financial statements if it had always used
the new principle.
Continued
13Retrospective Adjustment Method
- The company adjusts the carrying values of those
assets and liabilities (including income taxes)
that are affected by the change. The company
makes an offsetting adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings to report the
cumulative effect of the change (net of taxes)
for each period presented.
Continued
14Retrospective Adjustment Method
- The company adjusts the financial statements of
each prior period to reflect the specific effects
of applying the new accounting principle. That
is, each item in each financial statement that is
affected by the change is restated to the
appropriate amount under the new accounting
principle. The company uses the new accounting
principle in its current financial statements.
Continued
15Retrospective Adjustment Method
- The companys disclosures include (a) the nature
and reason for the change in accounting
principle, including an explanation of why the
new principle is preferable, (b) a description of
the prior-period information that has been
retrospectively adjusted, (c) the effect of the
change on income, earnings per share, and any
other financial statement line item for the
current period and the prior periods
retrospectively adjusted, and (d) the cumulative
effect of the change on retained earnings (or
other appropriate component of equity) at the
beginning of the earliest period presented.
16Retrospective Adjustment Method
- The following accounting principle changes are
subject to the - retroactive approach
- Change from LIFO to another inventory method
- Change in the method of accounting for long-term
construction contracts - Change to or from full-cost method in extractive
industries - Changes in accounting principle made in
conjunction with an initial public offering of
equity securities (exemption available only once)
17Retrospective Adjustment Method
- The following accounting principle changes are
subject to the - retroactive approach
- Change from retirement/replacement accounting to
depreciation accounting for railroad track
structures - Change to a principle required by a new
pronouncement recognized as GAAP that requires
retroactive application - Change to the equity method of accounting for
investments in common stock (sometimes classified
as a change in reporting entity)
18Retrospective Change Example
Example (Retrospective Change) Buildmore
Construction Company used the completed contract
method to account for long-term construction
contracts for financial accounting and tax
purposes in 2007, its first year of operations.
In 2008, the company decided to change to the
percentage-of-completion method for financial
accounting purposes. Income before long-term
contracts and taxes in 2007 and 2008 was 80,000
and 100,000. The tax rate is 40 and the company
will continue to use the completed contract
method for tax purposes.
19Retrospective Change Example
Example Income from Long-Term Contracts
20Retrospective Change Example
Example Comparative Income Statements
21Retrospective Change Example
Example Retained Earnings Statement
22Changes in Accounting Principle
Impracticability
Companies should not use retrospective
application if one of the following conditions
exists
- Company cannot determine the effects of the
retrospective application. - Retrospective application requires assumptions
about managements intent in a prior period. - Retrospective application requires significant
estimates that the company cannot develop.
If any of the above conditions exists, the
company prospectively applies the new accounting
principle.
23Prospective Approach
Summary of the Approach for Changes in Accounting
Estimates
- No cumulative adjustment is made.
- Prior years results remain unchanged.
- New estimates are applied prospectively.
24Changes in Accounting Estimate
The following items require estimates.
- Uncollectible receivables.
- Inventory obsolescence.
- Useful lives and salvage values of assets.
- Periods benefited by deferred costs.
- Liabilities for warranty costs and income taxes.
- Recoverable mineral reserves.
- Change in depreciation methods.
Companies report prospectively changes in
accounting estimates.
25Change in Estimate Example
- Arcadia HS, purchased equipment for 510,000
which was estimated to have a useful life of 10
years with a salvage value of 10,000 at the end
of that time. Depreciation has been recorded for
7 years on a straight-line basis. In 2005 (year
8), it is determined that the total estimated
life should be 15 years with a salvage value of
5,000 at the end of that time. - Required
- What is the journal entry to correct
- the prior years depreciation?
- Calculate the depreciation expense
- for 2005.
No Entry Required
26Change in Estimate Example
After 7 years
Equipment cost 510,000 Salvage value
- 10,000 Depreciable base 500,000 Useful life
(original) 10 years Annual depreciation
50,000
First, establish NBV at date of change in
estimate.
x 7 years 350,000
Balance Sheet (Dec. 31, 2004)
Fixed Assets
Equipment
510,000
Accumulated depreciation
350,000
Net book value (NBV)
160,000
27Change in Estimate Example
After 7 years
Net book value 160,000 Salvage value (new)
5,000 Depreciable base 155,000 Useful life
remaining 8 years Annual depreciation
19,375
Second, calculate depreciation expense for 2005.
Journal entry for 2005
Depreciation expense 19,375 Accumulated
depreciation 19,375
28Reporting a Change in Entity
Examples of a change in reporting entity are
- Presenting consolidated statements in place of
statements of individual companies. - Changing specific subsidiaries that constitute
the group of companies for which the entity
presents consolidated financial statements. - Changing the companies included in combined
financial statements. - Changing the cost, equity, or consolidation
method of accounting for subsidiaries and
investments.
Reported by changing the financial statements of
all prior periods presented.
29Reporting a Change in Entity
Summary of the Approach for Changes in Reporting
Entity
- No cumulative adjustment is made.
- Prior years results are restated.
30Justification for Accounting Changes
- New principle must be preferable.
- Nature of change and justification disclosed in
notes. - Justifications
- Improved matching
- Enhanced asset valuation
- New information
- Changing conditions
- Compliance with new reporting standards
31I wonder why companies make accounting changes?
It seems like a lot of trouble to me!
32Reporting a Correction of an Error
Accounting errors include the following types
- A change from an accounting principle that is not
generally accepted to an accounting principle
that is acceptable. - Mathematical mistakes.
- Changes in estimates that occur because a company
did not prepare the estimates in good faith. - Failure to accrue or defer certain expenses or
revenues. - Misuse of facts.
- Incorrect classification of a cost as an expense
instead of an asset, and vice versa.
33Reporting a Correction of an Error
- All material errors must be corrected.
- Record corrections of errors from prior periods
as an adjustment to the beginning balance of
retained earnings in the current period. - Such corrections are called prior period
adjustments. - For comparative statements, a company should
restate the prior statements affected, to correct
for the error.
34Prior Period Restatement
A company accounts for a change in accounting
principle by prior period restatement as follows
- The company computes the cumulative effect of the
error correction on prior period financial
statements. That is, it computes the amounts that
would have been in the financial statements if it
had not made the error.
Continued
35Prior Period Restatement
- The company adjusts the carrying values of those
assets and liabilities (including income taxes)
that are affected by the error. The company makes
an offsetting entry to the beginning balance of
retained earnings to report the cumulative effect
of the error correction (net of taxes) for each
period presented.
Continued
36Prior Period Restatement
- The company adjusts the financial statements of
each prior period to reflect the specific effects
of correcting the error.
- The companys disclosures include (a) that its
previously issued financial statements have been
restated, along with a description of the nature
of the error,
Continued
37Prior Period Restatement
- (b) the effect of the correction of each
financial statement line item, and any per share
amounts affected for each prior period presented,
and - (c) the cumulative effect of the change on
retained earnings (or other appropriate component
of equity) at the beginning of the earliest
period presented.
38Retained Earnings Statement
Before issuing the report for the year ended
December 31, 2007, you discover a 62,500 error
that caused the 2006 inventory to be overstated
(overstated inventory caused COGS to be lower and
thus net income to be higher in 2006). Would
this discovery have any impact on the reporting
of the Statement of Retained Earnings for 2007?
Assume a 20 tax rate.
39Retained Earnings Statement
40Accounting ErrorsClassifications
- I. Errors occurred and discovered in the
- same accounting period.
- II. Errors occurred in previous period.
- A. Errors did not affect prior period net
- income.
- B. Errors did affect prior period net
- income.
- 1. Counterbalancing errors
- 2. Noncounterbalancing errors
41Errors Occurred and Discovered in Same Period
- Corrected by reversing the incorrect entry
and then recording the correct entry (or by
making an entry to correct the account balances)
42Previous Period Errors Not Affecting Net Income
- Involves incorrect classification of accounts.
- Requires correction of previously issued
statements (retroactive approach). - Is not classified as a prior period adjustment
since it does not affect prior income. - Disclose nature of error.
43Counterbalancing Errors Affecting Prior Net Income
- Counterbalancing errors discovered after two or
more years do not require a correcting entry. - Counterbalancing errors discovered in the second
year of the cycle require a correcting entry. - -- Treated as a prior period adjustment (net of
tax) to beginning Retained Earnings balance.
44Noncounterbalancing Errors Affecting Prior Net
Income
- These errors do not automatically correct
themselves after two years. - Correction of a noncounterbalancing error usually
requires a prior period adjustment (retroactive
approach).
45Error Analysis Example
- E22-19 (Error Analysis Correcting Entries) A
partial trial balance of Julie Hartsack
Corporation is as follows on December 31, 2008.
Instructions (a) Assuming that the books have not
been closed, what are the adjusting entries
necessary at December 31, 2008?
46Error Analysis Example
- Assuming that the books have not been closed,
what are the adjusting entries necessary at
December 31, 2008?
1. A physical count of supplies on hand on
December 31, 2008, totaled 1,100.
2. Accrued salaries and wages on December 31,
2008, amounted to 4,400.
47Error Analysis Example
- Assuming that the books have not been closed,
what are the adjusting entries necessary at
December 31, 2008?
3. Accrued interest on investments amounts to
4,350 on December 31, 2008.
4. The unexpired portions of the insurance
policies totaled 65,000 as of December 31,
2008.
48Error Analysis Example
- Assuming that the books have not been closed,
what are the adjusting entries necessary at
December 31, 2008?
5. 28,000 was received on January 1, 2008 for
the rent of a building for both 2008 and 2009.
The entire amount was credited to rental income.
6. Depreciation for the year was erroneously
recorded as 5,000 rather than the correct figure
of 50,000.
49Error Analysis Example
- E22-19 (Error Analysis Correcting Entries) A
partial trial balance of Julie Hartsack
Corporation is as follows on December 31, 2008.
Instructions (b) Assuming that the books have
been closed, what are the adjusting entries
necessary at December 31, 2008?
50Error Analysis Example
(b) Assuming that the books have been closed,
what are the adjusting entries necessary at
December 31, 2008?
1. A physical count of supplies on hand on
December 31, 2008, totaled 1,100.
2. Accrued salaries and wages on December 31,
2008, amounted to 4,400.
51Error Analysis Example
(b) Assuming that the books have been closed,
what are the adjusting entries necessary at
December 31, 2008?
3. Accrued interest on investments amounts to
4,350 on December 31, 2008.
4. The unexpired portions of the insurance
policies totaled 65,000 as of December 31, 2008.
52Error Analysis Example
(b) Assuming that the books have been closed,
what are the adjusting entries necessary at
December 31, 2008?
5. 28,000 was received on January 1, 2008 for
the rent of a building for both 2008 and 2009.
The entire amount was credited to rental income.
6. Depreciation for the year was erroneously
recorded as 5,000 rather than the correct figure
of 50,000.
53All-Inclusive Concept of Income
- Comprehensive income is defined as the net of
all changes in equity except those resulting from
investments by and distributions to owners.
54Hang in there! Were coming down the home
stretch!
Yeah, thats easy for you to say!
55C
11
hapter
The End
Task Force Image Gallery clip art included in
this electronic presentation is used with the
permission of NVTech Inc.