Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned

Description:

Title: U.S. EPA s Models-3 : An Integrated One-Atmosphere Third-Generation Air Quality Modeling System Author: US_EPA Last modified by – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: USE876
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned


1
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ Issues and
Lessons Learned
  • Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel,
  • Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart
  • Air Quality Modeling Group
  • USEPA/OAQPS/EMAD
  • Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

M3 User Workshop, 10/21/2002
2
OUTLINE
  • Applications and evaluations of Models-3/CMAQ
    at USEPA/OAQPS
  • Issues related to annual modeling of ozone and PM
  • Preliminary comparison results between CMAQ-2002
    and -2001 releases
  • On-going and upcoming activities

3
Models-3/CMAQ Applications and Evaluations at
EPA/OAQPS
  • Western U.S. Application
  • Episodic O3, July 96, 36/12 km, evaluation, (AWMA
    2001)
  • Annual Continental U.S. Application
  • 1-atmosphere, annual 1996, 36-km, evaluation
    diagnostics, on-going for 2001, (AWMA 2001
    2002)
  • Eastern U.S. Application
  • 1-atmosphere, July 95, urban applications,
    36/12/4-km, emissions control growth (on-going)
  • Intercontinental Transport modeling
  • Trans-Oceanic transport of air pollutants and
    nested U.S. Asia/China modeling for year 2001

4
Models-3/CMAQ Modeling Domain Maps
36 km eastern US domain
4 km domain
12 km domain
12 km western US ozone domain
36 km western US ozone domain
36 km Annual National US domain
5
Annual Continental U.S. Application
  • Features
  • Annual CMAQ modeling
  • over the continental U.S.,
  • One-Atmosphere
  • Model Setup
  • Annual PM and O3 (1996)
  • 36-km, 8/12 vertical layers
  • Meteorology MM5
  • Emissions Processing SMOKE
  • Model Evaluation Compared against observed data
    (IMPROVE CASTNET) REMSAD
  • Papers published in AWMA (2001 2002)

6
(No Transcript)
7
NOx Emissions
SO2 Emissions
July 1, 1996
8
Run Time Disk Space Requirementfor Annual CMAQ
Simulation
  • CMAQ annual run time was 14 days
  • 4 CPUs (400 MHz) Sun Workstations (Enterprise
    450) Running 4 quarters of the year
    concurrently
  • 4 hours/model day (8 layers)
  • Model-Ready Inputs/Outputs (entire year)
  • Emission (SMOKE/ECIP) 40 GB
  • Meteorology (MM5/MCIP) 100 GB
  • Outputs (M3/CMAQ) 250 GB, compressed to 9 GB
  • The model runs gt4 times faster on new Linux PCs
  • 1.6GHz AMD Athlon MP (single CPU)
  • Current modeling are transitioned to Linux PCs
    (parallel processing on the PC/Linux cluster is
    being investigated)

9
Annual Continental U.S. CMAQ Modeling O3 (July
Max in ppb, 1996)
56
99
149
62
134
132
139
76
137
107
126
119
131
215
127
144
113
194
10
Annual CMAQ Modeling Visibility (January
Average in Deciview)
18
16
11
19
14
22
26
9
26
16
24
10
9
26
24
15
22
12
24
14
23
11
Annual CMAQ Modeling Wet Deposition
Sulfur Wet Deposition
Nitrogen Wet Deposition
(January average)
12
Models-3/CMAQ Simulation Annual Average
PM 2.5
Sulfate PM
Organic PM
Nitrate PM
13
Annual Average Total PM 2.5 mass
Model
Observation (IMPROVE)
14
Annual Average PM 2.5 Species (SO4, NO3, OC)
SO4
NO3
Model
OC
Observation
15
Models-3/CMAQ Monthly Average (July)
Sulfate PM
PM 2.5
Organic PM
Nitrate PM
16
Summer Average PM 2.5 Species (SO4, NO3, OC)
SO4
Model
NO3
OC
Observation
17
Models-3/CMAQ Monthly Average (January)
Sulfate PM
PM 2.5
Organic PM
Nitrate PM
18
Winter Average PM 2.5 Species (SO4, NO3, OC)
NO3
SO4
Model
OC
Observation
19
Annual CMAQ Modeling CB4 vs.
RADM2
Nitrate PM (January avg, 1996)
20
Annual CMAQ Modeling CB4 vs.
RADM2
Sulfate PM (July avg, 1996)
21
NH3 Sensitivity Modeling
Base 50 NH3 reduction
0.62
0.70
0.08
0.09
0.53
1.69
1.16
1.24
Nitrate PM (January Avg, 1996)
22
On-going and Upcoming Modeling Activities at
OAQPS/AQMG
  • Continue model evaluation and sensitivity test
    for the annual 1996 continental US run
  • Examine nitrate and organic PM issues
  • Emissions issues (NH3, BEIS3, Fire, CA emis.
    etc.)
  • Vertical layer sensitivity (8-14 layers)
  • Nitrate nighttime chemistry issue
  • N2O5 H2O --gt 2HNO3 and NO2 OH --gt HNO3
  • Dry deposition Issue
  • Vertical diffusion sensitivity

23
On-going and Upcoming Modeling Activities at
OAQPS/AQMG (contd.)
  • Modeling support for regulatory analysis
  • Clear Skies Initiative (on-going)
  • PM Transport Rule (2002/03)
  • Nonroad Rule (2002/03)
  • Section 812 CAAA Prospective Update (2003)
  • 8-Hour Ozone Implementation Guidance (2002/03)
  • PM NAAQS Review (2003)
  • Regional Haze Rule (on-going)

24
On-going and Upcoming Modeling Activities at
OAQPS/AQMG (contd.)
  • Improvement of base model simulation
  • Increase vertical resolution (from 8 to 12
    layers)
  • Monthly NH3 emissions adjustments from animal
    husbandry fertilizer operations (based on ORD
    inverse modeling)
  • BEIS-3/BELD-3
  • NOx emissions from new Nonroad model
  • California NOx VOC emission adjustments
  • Updated plume rise algorithm in SMOKE
  • Upgrade to latest Models-3/CMAQ release (July
    2002)

25
National 1996 CMAQ Modeling
Old Base vs. New Base
8-layer CMAQ 12-layer CMAQ
Peak Ozone (July 1996)
26
Annual CMAQ Modeling
Old Base vs. New Base
8-layer CMAQ 12-layer CMAQ
Sulfate PM (Monthly average, July 1996)
27
Annual CMAQ Modeling
Old Base vs. New Base
8-layer CMAQ 12-layer CMAQ
Nitrate PM (Monthly average, January 1996)
28
Annual CMAQ Modeling
Old Base vs. New Base
Organic PM (July 1996)
8-layer CMAQ 12-layer
CMAQ
Anthropogenic SOA
Biogenic SOA (BEIS2 vs. BEIS3)
29
Spring
Summer
CMAQ Seasonal Ozone (8-hr max) Evaluation
Model
Fall
Winter
Observation
30
Spring
Summer
CMAQ Seasonal Sulfate PM Evaluation
Model
Observation
Fall
Winter
31
Spring
Summer
CMAQ Seasonal Organic PM Evaluation
Model
Fall
Winter
Observation
32
Spring
Summer
CMAQ Seasonal Nitrate PM Evaluation
Model
Fall
Winter
Observation
33
Spring
Summer
CMAQ Seasonal Total NO3 (HNO3 Nitrate
PM) Evaluation
Model
Fall
Winter
Observation
34
CMAQ vs. IMPROVE Model performance Annual
average
35
Nitrate Nighttime Chemistry Sensitivity N2O5
?HNO3 rxn rate (sensitivity test)
CB-IV SAPRC-99
(January Average)
36
Kv (vertical diffusion) Sensitivity
Base Kv(min) 5
Kv(min) 1, Stable up to 3rd layer,
230 m
(January Average)
37
NH3 Dry Deposition Issue in CMAQ
NH3 Dry Dep. (Vd) Air Temp.
(January 19, 2002)
38
On-going and Upcoming Modeling Activities at
OAQPS/AQMG (contd.)
  • Improvement of base model simulation
  • Increase vertical resolution (from 8 to 12
    layers)
  • Monthly NH3 emissions adjustments from animal
    husbandry fertilizer operations (based on ORD
    inverse modeling)
  • BEIS-3/BELD-3
  • NOx emissions from new Nonroad model
  • California NOx VOC emission adjustments
  • Updated plume rise algorithm in SMOKE
  • Upgrade to latest Models-3/CMAQ release (July
    2002)
  • Computer time issue (runtime doubled)
  • Nitrate PM overprediction issue
  • Organic PM/Biogenic SOA issue

39
Difference (CMAQ/2002 CMAQ/2001)
D PM 2.5
D Nitrate PM
(January avg.)
40
Nitrate PM
CMAQ-2001 (AE2) CMAQ-2002 (AE3)
(January avg.)
41
Difference (CMAQ/2002 CMAQ/2001)
D PM 2.5
D Biogenic SOA
(July avg.)
42
Anthropogenic SOA
Biogenic SOA
6 ug/m3
2 ug/m3
CMAQ- 2001 (AE2)
CMAQ- 2002 (AE3)
(July avg.)
43
Upcoming Modeling Activities at OAQPS/AQMG
  • Annual National CMAQ run for year 2001
  • 2001 MM5 NEI emissions thru SMOKE
  • Model evaluation against expanded PM speciation
    network (TREND, IMPROVE, etc.)
  • Intercontinental Transport of Climatic Effect of
    Air Pollutants (ICAP) Project
  • Modeling of trans-oceanic pollutant transport
  • Nested modeling over East Asia/China Region

44
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects
of Air Pollutants (ICAP) USEPA Modeling
Initiative
NASA/MOPPIT CO Transport
45
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects
of Air Pollutants (ICAP)
46
Air Quality Modeling over China Ozone
47
Air Quality Modeling over China PM
PM 2.5
Sulfate PM
Organic PM
Nitrate PM
48
Air Quality Modeling over China
Visibility (Deciview)
Sulfate Wet Deposition
49
Take Home Message
  • PM 2.5 modeling more complex than O3 modeling
  • Multi-species vs. single species
  • SO2, NOx, VOC, or NH3-limited vs. VOC or
    NOx-limted
  • Annual vs. summer pollutants
  • Day nighttime chemistry vs. daytime chemistry
  • Gas aqueous aerosol chemistry vs. gas
    chemistry
  • Organic PM modeling is still a research issue
  • Emission (e.g. NH3, fire, Biogenic) monitoring
    issues (e.g., OC/EC, nitrate) and provide further
    modeling challenge
  • O3 and PM are highly linked, one-atmosphere
    modeling is necessary

50
50 NOx reduction
Nitrate PM Sulfate PM -- (decrease)
-- (decrease)
(July Average, 1996)
51
Formation of Secondary PM (PM2.5)
Sulfate PM formation H2SO4 2 NH3 ---gt
(NH4)2SO4 (s) Gas Phase O2,H2O SO2
OH ---gt H2SO4 Aqueous Phase
H2O S(IV) H2O2 ---gt H2SO4 (Dominate over
low pH) S(IV) O3 ---gt H2SO4
Organic PM formation (Gas-Particle conversion)
VOC OH ---gt SOA O3, NO3
(semi-volatile) (Long-chain VOC, Aromatics,
Biogenic VOC)
Nitrate PM formation HNO3 NH3 lt---gt
NH4NO3 (aq,s) Gas Phase
(daytime) NO2 OH ---gt HNO3 Gas Aq Phase
(nighttime) N2O5 H2O ---gt HNO3
52
50 NOx reduction
Ozone Sulfate PM --
(decrease) -- (decrease)
(July Average, 1996)
53
50 NOx reduction
Ozone Organic PM --
(decrease) -- (decrease)
(July Average, 1996)
54
50 NOx reduction
Nitrate PM Sulfate PM -- (decrease)
(increase)
(January Average)
55
50 NOx reduction
Ozone Sulfate PM (increase)
(increase)
(January Average)
56
.OH Role in Linking Pollutants Formation
One-Atmosphere
PM2.5
SOx or NOx NH3 OH ---gt (NH4)2SO4
or NH4NO3
VOC OH ---gt Orgainic PM
One Atmosphere
Ozone
Visibility
One Atmosphere
Fine PM (Nitrate, Sulfate, Organic PM)
.OH
NOx VOC OH hv ---gt O3
Acid Rain
Water Quality
SO2 OH ---gt H2SO4
NOx SOx OH (Lake Acidification,
Eutrophication)
NO2 OH ---gt HNO3
OH lt---gt Air Toxics (POM, PAH, Hg(II),
etc.)
Air Toxics
57
Questions ??????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com