Title: Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
1Should PolicyMakers BeRestrained?
2- Is a balanced-budget amendment a good idea?
3Uncertainty and Policy
- Macroeconomic policy makers in general do not
have all the knowledge required for solving
economic problems. - They rely on macroeconometric models, all of
which give different answers for how to solve a
particular problem.
4How Much DoMacroeconomists Actually Know?
- The Response of Output to a Monetary Expansion
Predictions from 12 Models
There is substantial uncertainty about the
effects of policy.
5Uncertainty and Restraintson Policy Makers
- There is substantial uncertainty about the
effects of macroeconomic policies. This
uncertainty should probably lead policy makers to
be more cautious, and to use less active policies.
6Expectations and Policy
- Until 20 years ago, the economy was seen as a
machine. Methods of optimal control were being
used to design macroeconomic policy. - People and firms try to anticipate what policy
makers will do. Hence, macroeconomic policy is a
game between them. We dont need optimal control
theory but rather game theory, which studies
strategic interactions between players.
7Hijackings and Negotiations
- By giving up the option to negotiate, governments
can prevent hijackings in the first place. - Exactly the same logic is involved in the design
of macroeconomic policy to control inflation and
unemployment.
8Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
- The relation between unemployment and inflation
is as follows
- Suppose the Fed announces that it will constant
inflation, and wage setters believe that expected
inflation will be zero. Then
- In the U.S., ? ? 1. If ? 0, then the announced
policy calls for ? ?e 0, and uun.
9Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
- But the Fed could deviate from its stated policy
and achieve an unemployment rate of 1 below the
natural rate with just a 1 increase in the
inflation rate.
- If ? 1 and ? 0, then (u?un.) ? 1.
- This incentive to deviate from the announced
policy once the other player (in this case wage
setters) has made its move is known as the time
inconsistency of optimal policy.
10Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
- Wage setters wise up and begin to expect positive
inflation of 1. Eventually, the economy returns
to the natural rate of unemployment, but with
higher inflation.
- By credibly committing not to do something that
would appear desirable at the time, policy makers
can achieve a better outcomeno inflation.
11Establishing Credibility
- Ways to deal with the problem of time
inconsistency, without totally stripping
policy-making power from the central bank,
include - Make the central bank independent. This way, the
central bank resists political pressure to
decrease unemployment. - Choose a conservative central banker who dislikes
inflation.
12Establishing Credibility
- Inflation and Central Bank Independence
13Politics and Policy
- If voters are short-sighted, the temptation for
politicians to cut taxes may prove irresistible. - With the right timing and short-sighted voters,
political parties can win elections. Thus, we
might expect a clear political business cycle,
with higher growth on average before elections
than after elections. - However, there is little evidence of manipulation
of the macroeconomy to win elections.
14Games BetweenPolicy Makers and Voters
- The Evolution of the Ratio of U.S. Debt to GDP,
1900-2000
15Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations
GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year)
First First Second Second Third Third Fourth Fourth
Democratic
Truman 0.0 8.5 10.3 3.9
Kenney/Johnson 2.6 5.3 4.1 5.3
Johnson 5.8 5.8 2.9 4.1
Carter 4.7 5.3 2.5 ?0.2
Clinton I 2.7 4.0 2.7 3.6
Clinton II 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.1
Average Democratic 3.4 5.5 4.4 3.5
Republican
Eisenhower 4.0 ?1.3 5.6 2.1
Nixon 2.4 ?0.3 2.8 5.0
Nixon/Ford 5.2 ?0.5 ?1.3 4.9
Reagan I 1.9 ?2.5 3.6 6.4
Reagan II 3.6 3.0 2.7 3.0
Bush 2.5 1.2 ?0.7 2.6
Bush (George W) 1.1
Average Republican 3.3 ?0.1 2.1 4.0
16Games Between Policy Makers
- Game theorists refer to situations in which each
side holds out, hoping the other side will give
in, as wars of attrition. These wars usually
result in delays in the implementation of policy. - Also, each party worries more about either
inflation or unemployment. We would expect, for
example, to see stronger growth during Democratic
administrations.
17The Case Against aBalanced-Budget Amendment
- A balanced-budget amendment would eliminate the
problem of deficits, but it would also eliminate
the use of fiscal policy as macroeconomic policy
instrument. - A constitutional amendment is not the only way to
achieve deficit control and reduction.
18The Case For aBalanced-Budget Amendment
- Economists in favor of a balanced-budget
amendment are more skeptical of the usefulness of
macroeconomic policy in general, and of fiscal
policy in particular. - Lags in the legislative process prevent Congress
from changing fiscal policy in time to stabilize
the economy. - Rules that Congress may impose on itself can be
changed by a vote later on.