Should Policy Makers Be Restrained? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?

Description:

Should Policy Makers Be Restrained? Is a balanced-budget amendment a good idea? Uncertainty and Policy Macroeconomic policy makers in general do not have all the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Noy9
Learn more at: http://www2.hawaii.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?


1
Should PolicyMakers BeRestrained?
2
  • Is a balanced-budget amendment a good idea?

3
Uncertainty and Policy
  • Macroeconomic policy makers in general do not
    have all the knowledge required for solving
    economic problems.
  • They rely on macroeconometric models, all of
    which give different answers for how to solve a
    particular problem.

4
How Much DoMacroeconomists Actually Know?
  • The Response of Output to a Monetary Expansion
    Predictions from 12 Models

There is substantial uncertainty about the
effects of policy.
5
Uncertainty and Restraintson Policy Makers
  • There is substantial uncertainty about the
    effects of macroeconomic policies. This
    uncertainty should probably lead policy makers to
    be more cautious, and to use less active policies.

6
Expectations and Policy
  • Until 20 years ago, the economy was seen as a
    machine. Methods of optimal control were being
    used to design macroeconomic policy.
  • People and firms try to anticipate what policy
    makers will do. Hence, macroeconomic policy is a
    game between them. We dont need optimal control
    theory but rather game theory, which studies
    strategic interactions between players.

7
Hijackings and Negotiations
  • By giving up the option to negotiate, governments
    can prevent hijackings in the first place.
  • Exactly the same logic is involved in the design
    of macroeconomic policy to control inflation and
    unemployment.

8
Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
  • The relation between unemployment and inflation
    is as follows
  • Suppose the Fed announces that it will constant
    inflation, and wage setters believe that expected
    inflation will be zero. Then
  • In the U.S., ? ? 1. If ? 0, then the announced
    policy calls for ? ?e 0, and uun.

9
Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
  • But the Fed could deviate from its stated policy
    and achieve an unemployment rate of 1 below the
    natural rate with just a 1 increase in the
    inflation rate.
  • If ? 1 and ? 0, then (u?un.) ? 1.
  • This incentive to deviate from the announced
    policy once the other player (in this case wage
    setters) has made its move is known as the time
    inconsistency of optimal policy.

10
Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
  • Wage setters wise up and begin to expect positive
    inflation of 1. Eventually, the economy returns
    to the natural rate of unemployment, but with
    higher inflation.
  • By credibly committing not to do something that
    would appear desirable at the time, policy makers
    can achieve a better outcomeno inflation.

11
Establishing Credibility
  • Ways to deal with the problem of time
    inconsistency, without totally stripping
    policy-making power from the central bank,
    include
  • Make the central bank independent. This way, the
    central bank resists political pressure to
    decrease unemployment.
  • Choose a conservative central banker who dislikes
    inflation.

12
Establishing Credibility
  • Inflation and Central Bank Independence

13
Politics and Policy
  • If voters are short-sighted, the temptation for
    politicians to cut taxes may prove irresistible.
  • With the right timing and short-sighted voters,
    political parties can win elections. Thus, we
    might expect a clear political business cycle,
    with higher growth on average before elections
    than after elections.
  • However, there is little evidence of manipulation
    of the macroeconomy to win elections.

14
Games BetweenPolicy Makers and Voters
  • The Evolution of the Ratio of U.S. Debt to GDP,
    1900-2000

15
Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations Growth During Democratic and Republican Administrations
GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year) GDP Growth ( per Year)
First First Second Second Third Third Fourth Fourth
Democratic
Truman 0.0 8.5 10.3 3.9
Kenney/Johnson 2.6 5.3 4.1 5.3
Johnson 5.8 5.8 2.9 4.1
Carter 4.7 5.3 2.5 ?0.2
Clinton I 2.7 4.0 2.7 3.6
Clinton II 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.1
Average Democratic 3.4 5.5 4.4 3.5
Republican
Eisenhower 4.0 ?1.3 5.6 2.1
Nixon 2.4 ?0.3 2.8 5.0
Nixon/Ford 5.2 ?0.5 ?1.3 4.9
Reagan I 1.9 ?2.5 3.6 6.4
Reagan II 3.6 3.0 2.7 3.0
Bush 2.5 1.2 ?0.7 2.6
Bush (George W) 1.1
Average Republican 3.3 ?0.1 2.1 4.0
16
Games Between Policy Makers
  • Game theorists refer to situations in which each
    side holds out, hoping the other side will give
    in, as wars of attrition. These wars usually
    result in delays in the implementation of policy.
  • Also, each party worries more about either
    inflation or unemployment. We would expect, for
    example, to see stronger growth during Democratic
    administrations.

17
The Case Against aBalanced-Budget Amendment
  • A balanced-budget amendment would eliminate the
    problem of deficits, but it would also eliminate
    the use of fiscal policy as macroeconomic policy
    instrument.
  • A constitutional amendment is not the only way to
    achieve deficit control and reduction.

18
The Case For aBalanced-Budget Amendment
  • Economists in favor of a balanced-budget
    amendment are more skeptical of the usefulness of
    macroeconomic policy in general, and of fiscal
    policy in particular.
  • Lags in the legislative process prevent Congress
    from changing fiscal policy in time to stabilize
    the economy.
  • Rules that Congress may impose on itself can be
    changed by a vote later on.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com