Week 5: Perceptual development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

Week 5: Perceptual development

Description:

Week 5: Perceptual development Visit website! Midterm in two weeks! Perceptual Development 3 Methods of determining infant perception Visual Preference Developed by ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: Judi89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Week 5: Perceptual development


1
Week 5 Perceptual development
  • Visit website!
  • Midterm in two weeks!

2
Perceptual Development
  • 3 Methods of determining infant perception
  • Visual Preference
  • Developed by Fantz
  • Infant in chamber with peephole, what do they
    look at most?

3
(No Transcript)
4
Perceptual Development
  • 4 Methods of determining infant perception
  • Visual Preference
  • Evoked potentials

5
(No Transcript)
6
Perceptual Development
  • 4 Methods of determining infant perception
  • Visual Preference
  • Evoked potentials
  • High Amplitude sucking
  • Habituation/dishabituation

7
Senses of the Newborn
Sense Newborn Capabilities
Vision Least developed sense accommodation and visual acuity limited sensitive to brightness discriminates some colours tracks moving targets
Hearing Turns to a sound can differentiate loudness, direction, frequency very responsive to speech recognize mothers voice
Taste Prefers sweet discriminates between sour, salty, bitter, sweet
Smell Detects odours turns away from unpleasant ones Breast-fed babies can tell own mothers breast and underarm odor
Touch Responsive to touch, temperature change and pain
8
Senses continued
  • Infants legally blind at birth
  • 20/600 at birth, by 12 months, down to 20/100
  • Auditory perception good
  • Esp speech perception
  • Have likes and dislikes re. Food
  • Have sweet tooth like many of us
  • Show aversion to unpleasant smells
  • Wrinkle their noses at bad smells
  • Babies like to be touched
  • Massaged preemies grow faster

9
Pattern Perception (0-2 months)
  • Prefer moderately complex stimuli over highly
    complex stimuli
  • Like a lot of contrast, like black on white

10
Examples Which will babies prefer?
11
Examples Which will babies prefer?
This one, due to high contrast!
12
Pattern Perception (0-2 months)
  • Prefer moderately complex stimuli over highly
    complex stimuli
  • Like a lot of contrast, like black on white
  • Show externality effect

13
Externality Effect
Seen at 1 month!
14
Externality Effect now Obsolete!
Gone at 2 months
15
Pattern Perception (0-2 months)
  • Prefer moderately complex stimuli over highly
    complex stimuli
  • Like a lot of contrast, like black on white
  • Show externality effect
  • Like curvy things, contours

16
Which will babies prefer?
17
Which will babies prefer?
This one!! Its curvilinear
18
Pattern Perception (0-2 months)
  • Prefer moderately complex stimuli over highly
    complex stimuli
  • Like a lot of contrast, like black on white
  • Show externality effect
  • Like curvy things, contours
  • Vertical symmetry

19
Which will babies prefer?
20
Which will babies prefer?
This one! Its symmetrical!
21
Later Form Perception 2 4 months
  • Are scanning whole objects
  • Start to show a preference for the human face ?

22
Face perception
  • Babies seem to like to look at faces Why?
  • Contrast
  • Curvy
  • Symmetrical

23
Take all features into account
24
Face perception
  • Babies seem to like to look at faces Why?
  • Contrast
  • Curvy
  • Symmetrical
  • Will track a face-like picture over something
    else

25
Guess which baby prefers?
26
Guess which baby prefers?
27
Face perception
  • Early on, spend more time looking at edges and
    contours than at middle of face
  • By 3 months clearly prefer normal faces, and that
    of own mother, and that of attractive people
  • By 7 months, can categorize and remember faces
  • By 8-10 months, can interpret emotion in faces

28
Meaning of face preference
  • Could be simply a result of stimulus preferences
  • Could be social
  • Dannemiller Stevens, 1988
  • Data from eye gaze studies
  • We as adults have a face processing area

29
Intermodal Perception
  • Enrichment vs differentiation theory
  • Senses separate must integrate vs. senses
    integrated must differentiate
  • Former is probably correct
  • Bahricks research

30
(No Transcript)
31
Integrating modalities
  • Babies need to achieve three tasks
  • Attending
  • At 5-7 months, sight and sound well integrated
  • Identifying
  • Can integrate two sense to identify source or
    objects
  • Locating
  • They can integrate visual and grabbing
    information to time a grasp properly

32
Infants spatial abilities
  • Chapter 8

33
Babies 3D vision
  • Have binocular vision, or stereopsis, by 3 months
  • Can only use 2D pictorial cues at 7 months
  • Show evidence of perceiving depth by 1 month, but
    do not interpret it until they are actively
    crawling

34
(No Transcript)
35
Visual Cliff
  • Gibson and Walks animal study
  • Crawling infants wont cross to mom!
  • If placed on visual cliff at 2 months, heart rate
    DEceleration, i.e. interest
  • Richards Rader (1981)

36
Interaction
  • Babies who move understand principles of movement
    better
  • Will search for objects that have changed
    location whether due to objects movement, or to
    own movement
  • Bai Bertenthal (1992)

37
Other spatial/ pictorial cues
  • Have depth perception
  • Show size constancy to some extent, esp with
    motion between 1 and 3 months, but not fully
    until 6 months
  • Cant use linear perspective until 7 months
  • See subjective contours at 3 months

38
Subjective Contours
39
Other spatial/ pictorial cues
  • Have depth perception
  • Show size constancy to some extent, esp with
    motion between 1 and 3 months, but not fully
    until 6 months
  • See subjective contours at 3 months
  • Appear to have mature understanding of objects

40
Spelkes Rod and Frame test
41
Spelkes Rod and Frame Test, cond
Babies know that it is not 2 separate rods, but
rather one whole!
42
Childrens Knowledge of Objects
  • Baillargeons work Babies seem to have knowledge
    about objects at a very young age
  • Uses Violation-of-Expectation paradigm to infer
    4 month old infants knowledge about occluders

43
Violation of Expectation Habituation Event
Screen moves through 180 degree plane until baby
gets bored
44
Violation of Expectation Test Event 1 Possible
Event
Screen moves through 112 degree plane and stops
at occluder
45
Violation of Expectation Test Event 2
Impossible event
Screen moves through 180 degree plane despite
occluder
46
Violation of Expection Results
  • Babies are surprised by the impossible event
  • Find the same thing with other object properties
    like containment and support
  • Spelkes research with the moving rod is the same
    idea

47
What does it mean?
  • Babies may be born with principles of cohesion,
    continuity and contact
  • Maybe not innate knowledge about objects per se,
    but innate constraints
  • Possess tools to build cognition from birth
    object concept present early on!

48
Later Form Perception 6 months to 1 year
  • By 7 months get linear perspective
  • By 9 months can extract whole from a random dot
    pattern
  • By 12 months, they watch a single point of light
    trace an object, then act like theyve seen the
    whole object

49
Summary
  • Infants are born with fairly strong capabilities
  • Infant perception develops rapidly over the first
    year of life
  • By 12 months, they can see well and are moving,
    and are largely able understand their
    environment!

50
How old is this woman?
51
What do you see here?
52
Ambiguous Figures
  • Physiological perception is done early cognitive
    perception develops later
  • They cant shift back and forth between pictures
    until they are 10-11 years old!

53
Later Perceptual development, cond
  • Children also have trouble telling some letters
    apart
  • M W
  • b d h

54
Spatial orientation
  • Children before 3 have a hard time keeping track
    of their environment
  • Tend to view things in a straight line
  • Poor cognitive mapping

55
Spatial Cognition
  • Herman, Shiraki, Miller, 1985
  • Examined 12 younger (3 4) and 12 older (4.5
    5.5) nursery school children who had been at the
    same school for the same amount of time
  • Brought them to 3 locations and asked them to
    point out 5 landmarks
  • Older a bit better than younger, but still not
    great
  • Very young children have difficulty inferring
    spatial relationships, even in familiar
    environments

56
More Spatial Problems
  • Field Dependence / Independence
  • Have trouble with this until they are 10
  • Embedded Figures Task

57
Embedded Figure 1
58
Embedded Figure 2
59
More Spatial Problems
  • Field Dependence / Independence
  • Have trouble with this until they are 10
  • Embedded Figures Task
  • Role of Inhibition and Cognitive Flexibility,
    hard to separate figure and ground

60
Summary of Perception and Spatial Cognition
  • In infancy, focus is on what infants can or
    cannot see, i.e. colours, patterns, depth, etc
  • How much is present at birth? How much develops?
  • Once they see, they improve in how flexibly they
    see items
  • They also improve in how they mentally represent
    the space around them
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com