Cross-Cultural Relations Between Civilian and Military Organizations Melinda Hofstetter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Cross-Cultural Relations Between Civilian and Military Organizations Melinda Hofstetter

Description:

Cross-Cultural Relations Between Civilian and Military Organizations Melinda Hofstetter Center for Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:198
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Step129
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cross-Cultural Relations Between Civilian and Military Organizations Melinda Hofstetter


1
Cross-Cultural Relations Between Civilian and
MilitaryOrganizationsMelinda Hofstetter Center
for Disaster Management and Humanitarian
Assistance Tulane University Washington, D.C.
2
(No Transcript)
3
Perception is Reality !
4
PERCEPTIONS NGOs HAVE OF THE MILITARY
5
PERCEPTIONS NGOs HAVE OF MILITARY ACTIONS
  • KILL, WOUND AND MAIM NON-COMBATANTS.
  • DESTROY HOMES, CROPS, AND LIVESTOCK.
  • DESTROY ESSENTIAL CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE.
  • DISPLACE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF NON-COMBATANTS.
  • THREATEN OR PERPETRATE RAPE, TORTURE, GENOCIDE
    AND OTHER GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
  • LEAVE BEHIND QUANTITIES OF BOMBLETS, OTHER UXO,
    MINES, AND DEPLETED URANIUM WHICH CONTINUE TO
    KILL AND MAIM NON-COMBATANTS LONG AFTERTHE
    CONFLICT HAS ENDED.


    S. ARCHER/ 9/2000

6
PERCEPTIONS NGOs HAVE OF MILITARY ACTIONS
  • MILITARY HAVE GREATER CAPABILITIES IN
  • SECURITY, LOGISTICS, TRANSPORT, HEAVY
  • EQUIPMENT, AND COMMUNICATIONS THAN DO
  • MOST IOs AND/OR NGOs
  • ARRIVAL OF EXTERNAL MILITARY UNITS IN A
  • COMPLEX EMERGENCY RESULTS IN INCREASED
  • WORLDWIDE MEDIA COVERAGE
  • INCREASED MEDIA COVERAGE MEANS
  • INCREASED VISIBILITY AND INCREASED
  • FUNDING S.ARCHER 9/2000

7
PERCEPTIONS THE MILITARY HAVE OF NGOs
8
PERCEPTIONS THE MILITARY HAS OF NGO ACTIONS
  • WILL NOT TAKE ORDERS FROM MILITARY EVEN IF
    THEIR PERSONAL SECURITY IS AT STAKE.
  • WILL BE RESISTENT TO THE CHANGES THE MILITARYS
    ARRIVAL BRINGS.
  • WILL NOT BE WILLING TO COLLABORATE WITH THE
    MILITARY.
  • CONSTANTLY ASK MILITARY FOR HELP WHEN THEY
    CANNOT COPE ALONE WITH SECURITY, LOGISTICS,
    TRANSPORT, COMMUNICATIONS NEEDS.
  • S. ARCHER 9/2000


9
CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE ?(AKA other reasons
for cultural antagonism)
10
CAN THEY ?
11
SOLDIERS DRESSED LIKE THIS BRUTALIZED AND KILLED
THEIR FAMILIES, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS.
12
THE FUTURE IS HERE ! The U.S. military/NGO
relationship is a fundamental trait of our
present and the era into which we are entering.

13
THE FUTURE IS HERE ! Both are mission
driven. Both are synergistic. They shouldnt be
antagonistic. But attitudes can cause them to be
so. Its the perception!!! LTC M.M. Smith, USA

14
Cooperation Unity of Effort
Military Efforts
IO/NGO Activities
15
NGO Culture Contrasted With Military Culture
  • Independent
  • Decentralized Authority
  • On-The-Job Training
  • Few Field Manuals
  • Long-term Perspective
  • Field Experience
  • Highly Disciplined
  • Hierarchical Command
  • Extensive Branch Training
  • Doctrinal Publications
  • End-State Approach
  • Combat Experience

16
  • NGO/IO MILITARY
  • C3A
    C3I
  • COOPERATION COMMAND
  • COORDINATION CONTROL
  • CONSENSUS COMMUNICATIONS
  • ASSESSMENT INTELLIGENCE

17
Cultural Problems
  • Perceptions
  • Lack of Compatible Doctrine
  • Lack of Common Interests
  • Lack of Communication
  • Lack of Prior Joint Experience

18
IO/NGO Culture
  • Independent
  • Decentralized authority (?)
  • On the job training
  • Specific organizational objective

19
NGO Pluses
  • Ability to single focus
  • Synergistic relationship to other NGOs
  • Experience and size for quick action
  • Impartiality (often problematic)
  • Experience in function or region

20
NGO Challenges
  • Synergism is not always automatic to other NGOs
  • Narrow perspective and agenda
  • Minimum operational staff
  • Fiercely independent
  • Need for external support

21
Military Culture
  • Highly structured and disciplined
  • Firm chains of command
  • Extensive specialty training
  • Policy and guidance are internal and external

22
Military Considerations
  • Mission Statement and Guidelines
  • Principles of Participants
  • Application of Peacekeeping Principles

23
Military Challenges
  • Mandate
  • Force Structure
  • Rules of Engagement
  • National and International Law

24
Non-NATO Partners Russia Ukraine UAE
Jordan Lithuania Sweden Finland
Austria Azerbaijan Argentina Morocco
Slovakia Switzerland Georgia
NATO Partners United States UK Germany
France Italy Denmark Spain Poland
Greece Canada Norway Hungary Belgium Turkey Th
e Netherlands Portugal
25
IOs and NGOs UN OSCE EU
UNHCR ICTY UNICEF UNMIK-P IMC MSF
WFP OXFAM CARE IRC ICRC
KFOR Structure 43,000 Troops in Kosovo 7,000
Troops in FYROM 5,800 U.S Troops
26
Aid Architecture
United Nations Security Council
U.N. Agencies Programs
Donor Nations Organizations
OCHA
Affected Nation
IOs
NGOs
U.N. Military
27
Coordination Tools
  • Interpreters
  • Communications Compatibility
  • Common Boundaries
  • Functional Meetings
  • Co-location of Headquarters

28
CIMIC and CMOCIMIC Civil Military
CooperationCMO Civil Military Operations
29
CIMIC/CMO is
  • Cooperation with the local population
  • Cooperation with International Agencies
  • Cooperation with relief groups/NGOs

30
CIMIC/CMO is Not
  • Giving up military authority
  • Having IO/NGOs in charge at the tactical level

31
THE CIVIL DIMENSION ASSUMES A PRIMARY ROLE IN
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE OPERATIONS
CIVIL MILITARY OPERATIONS
COMMUNITY GROUPS
UN MISSION
UNHCR
RELIGIOUS GROUPS
ICRC
CARE
UN WHO
UN CIVPOL
MSF
IOM
UN WFP
  • CMO ASSUMES A PRIMARY ROLE FOR PEACE AND
    HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE OPERATIONS.

32
CIMIC/CMO Tasks
  • Liaison With Civil Sector
  • Identification of Resources
  • Protocol
  • Information Exchange
  • Support Interoperability
  • Unity and Economy of Effort

33
CIMIC/CMO Tasks
  • Foster Dialog
  • Ensure policies and operating procedures are
    understood (multiple levels)
  • Coordinate Requests
  • Military support (logistics security)
  • Integrate efforts
  • Numerous contributing (competing?) organizations
    and groups

34
Why Conduct CMO/CIMIC?
  • CMO is Not New!
  • CMO is a Military Requirement
  • Support the Commander
  • Accomplish the Mission
  • Information Source
  • Make Life Easier
  • Political Reality

35
A Civil Dimension exists in all military
operations
36
USG
UN/IOs
MOD
Host Nation
NGOs
Religion
Business
Zone of Collaboration/Coordination
37
Military U.S. ?
NGO IO PVO
UN Agencies
CMOC
US Govt Agencies
ICRC
HN/Local Populace
38
Alphabet Soup
CMCC
CMOC
CIMIC
HACC
HOC
OSOCC
HAC
39
(No Transcript)
40
Information Sharing
  • Open Source Information
  • Information versus Intelligence
  • Methods of acquiring
  • Is this collection?
  • Analysis
  • Exchange
  • Dissemination

41
CIMIC/CMO Challenges
  • Clash of cultures goals vocabulary
  • Lack of knowledge about each other
  • Lack of mutual respect
  • Lack of comparable doctrine practice
  • Asymmetry
  • Military has power but is in support
  • Civilians in charge but not in control
  • Perceptions!!!

42
QUESTIONS ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com