Title: Crime and Criminal Justice
1Chapter 1
Crime and Criminal Justice
2(No Transcript)
3Crime is not a recent phenomenon
- Crime has evolved with the nation
- The Civil War produced widespread business crime.
- From 1900 to 1935 the nation experienced
sustained increases in criminal activity
dominated by Depression-era criminals.
4Crime Commission Recommendations
- To deal more effectively with crime and
criminals, the Criminal Justice system needs
more - Time
- Money
- People
5Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA)
- Gave 7.7 billion to states to deal with crime
- Contributed to increased numbers of people
working in criminal justice - Helped invent what is known as criminal justice
6The Criminal Justice System Size and Expense
- 55,000 different public agencies
- 150 billion annual budget
- 2 million employees
- 20,000 police agencies
- 17,000 courts
7Exhibit 1.1 Components of the Criminal Justice
System
8The Criminal Justice System Size and Expense
- 8,000 prosecutorial agencies
- 6,000 correctional institutions
- 3,500 probation and parole departments
- 15 million arrests per year
- Correctional population of more than 5 million
9Role of the Police
- Maintain order
- Enforce criminal traffic law
- Provide emergency service
- Create a sense of community safety
10Role of the Courts
- To seek truth obtain justice
- To adjudicate sentence
- Consists of
- lower courts
- superior courts
- appellate courts
11Prosecution and Defense
- Opponents in an adversarial system
- Prosecutor represents the people
- Defense represents the accused
12The Prosecutor
- Represents the government
- Usually a local attorney with jurisdiction
limited to county or state - Either elected or appointed position
- Presents the states case from defendants
arrest through conviction and sentencing - Screens cases to eliminate the obviously
innocent or those lacking evidence
13The Defense Attorney
- Role involves two major functions
- Protecting the constitutional rights of the
accused - Presenting the best possible legal defense for
the defendant
14Role of Corrections
- Community supervision
- Probation
- Confinement
- Parole
15Figure 1.4 The Criminal Justice Funnel
16Exhibit 1.4 The Interrelationship of the Criminal
Justice System and the Criminal Justice Process
17Figure 1.3 The Critical Stages of the Justice
Process
18Realities of Crime
- All crimes are not treated the same by the
criminal justice system. - All criminals are not treated the same by the
criminal justice system. - Much of the public has a distorted understanding
about criminal justice processes.
19Figure 1.5 The Criminal Justice Wedding Cake
20Perspectives on Justice
- A perspective is a view point about a given
subject. It normally reveals ones understanding
about the relationship among various aspects of a
subject, both to each other and to the topic as a
whole. A perspective about the causes of crime,
the nature of criminals, the functions of
government, and the rights of victims is one of
the foundations on which public policy is based.
21Figure 1.6 Perspectives on Justice Key Concerns
and Concepts
22Crime Control Perspective
- Proper role of criminal justice is to prevent
crime through judicious use of sanctions. - If criminal justice operated effectively,
criminals would be deterred. - The system could punish in such a way to make all
believe that crime doesnt pay. - Focus of justice should be on the victim.
- Crime control measures should be sure swift.
23Effects of the Crime Control Perspective
- Mandatory sentencing
- Three strikes and youre out
- Preventative detention
- Abolition of parole
24 Rehabilitative Perspective
- The justice system should be a means of caring
for and treating people who cannot manage
themselves. - Crime is an expression of frustration and anger
created by social inequality. - Crime can be controlled by giving people the
means to improve their lives through conventional
endeavors.
25Rehabilitative Perspective
- In contrast to the Crime Control Perspective,
focus is on the offender. - Societal conditions will breed new criminals.
- Pay now by treatment or later by more prisons.
26Effects of the Due Process Perspective
- Exclusionary rule
- Right to attorney at all stages of the process
- Due process rights given to juveniles
- Granting prison inmates fundamental legal
entitlements
27Nonintervention Perspective
- Limit the involvement of the criminal justice
system with defendants whenever possible. - Long-term effects of involvement are harmful to
the individual.
28Nonintervention Perspective and Net Widening
- Nonintervention Strategies
- Decriminalization of victimless crimes
- Deinstitutionalization of nonviolent offenders
- Pretrial Diversion for first time offenders
29 Justice Perspective
- Combines
- Liberal Perspective
- Fairness, equality, and strict control of
discretion - Conservative Perspective
- Crime control
30How Does the Justice Perspective Limit Discretion?
- One of the major goals is to reduce sentencing
disparity - Advocates determinant sentencing
- Advocates use of sentencing guidelines
- Advocates abolition of parole
31Restorative Justice Perspective
- The true purpose of the criminal justice system
is to promote a peaceful and just society. - The justice system should aim for peacemaking,
not punishment.
32Figure 1.7 Strategies for Controlling Drugs
33Restorative Justice Strategies
- Mediation and conflict resolution
- Financial and community restitution programs
34Nonintervention Strategies Legalization of Drugs
- Arguments for legalization
- Prohibition failed
- More die from legal drugs
- When drugs were legal, many managed to lead
normal lives - The Netherlands is relatively crime-free
- Arguments against legalization
- If it worked, it would only be short-term
- Long-term result would be more users
- Current users could increase intake
- Legalizing wont stop the problems, e.g., DWI
35Due Process Perspective
- Combines elements of the liberals concern for
the individual with the concept of legal fairness
guaranteed by the Constitution - Provides fair and equitable treatment to those
accused of crime - Advocates strict monitoring of discretion by
justice officials to ensure no one suffers
racial, religious or ethnic discrimination