Network Identity and Future Direction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Network Identity and Future Direction

Description:

Network Identity and Future Direction Alan Hilliard University of Hertfordshire Andrew Middleton Sheffield Hallam University Outline Thinking about sustainability ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: tech377
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Network Identity and Future Direction


1
Network Identity and Future Direction
  • Alan Hilliard
  • University of Hertfordshire
  • Andrew Middleton
  • Sheffield Hallam University

2
Outline
  • Thinking about sustainability
  • Look at the online sites for the PPP SIG
  • Communities
  • A Hub and Spoke Model
  • Activity
  • Conclusion

3
Links to Podcasting SIG Sites
  • Podcasting SIG WIKI link and links to other
    sites.
  • http//podcastingforpp.pbwiki.com/?lS
  • Weblog Address 
  • http//podcastingforpp.blogspot.com/
  •  Podomatic Site 
  • http//www.pppsig.podomatic.com/

4
Communities
  • Communities of Practice
  • Learning Communities
  • Communities of Interest

5
Community of Practice
  • Community of Practice
  • Adopted by Lave and Wenger (1991) as a term to
    describe how professionals learn through
    collaborative and supportive social interactions.

Lave, J and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning
Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
6
Characteristics of Communities of Practice
  • Common Purpose Identified by participants
  • Shared membership and leadership
  • Participants likely to be at different stages in
    their professional life
  • Development of professional practice through
    apprenticeship
  • Acceptance of low levels of participation by new
    members, that is legitimate peripheral
    participation
  • Development, creation and management of
    knowledge within organizations
  • Open-ended, not time bound
  • Importance of dialogue, interaction and shared
    narratives

Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning
communities- A guide for practitioners.
Maidenhead SRHE and Open University Press.
7
Learning Communities
  • In learning communities members share control and
    everyone learns, including the facilitator or
    tutor or group leader. Transformative
    communication is the norm, with both sender and
    receiver of messages changed by the
    interactionall participants are engaged in the
    learning experience.
  • Wilson, B. and Ryder, M. (1996). Dynamic
    learning communities An
  • alternative to designed Instructional system.
    Retrieved 5th June, 2008 from
  • http//carbon.cudenver.edu/mryder/dlc.html

8
Characteristics of Learning Communities
  • A shared goal, problem or project
  • Shared resources
  • Shared membership and leadership
  • Commitment to improvement of professional
    practice
  • Collaborative approaches to groupwork
  • Learning and development focused on real
    work-based issues and practice
  • Autonomous community members
  • High levels of dialogue, interaction and
    collaboration
  • Information and knowledge sharing
  • Knowledge construction
  • Knowledge transfer and knowledge exchange
  • Use of information and communication technologies

Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005).
9
Communities of Interest
  • Large groups or networks, perhaps involving
    hundreds of people, and they support the
    dissemination and exchange of information but do
    not necessarily support collaborative learning
    processes. They develop when people come
    together to exchange news or information about a
    specific topic.

Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning
communities- A guide for practitioners.
Maidenhead SRHE and Open University Press, p8.
10
Simple Virtual Learning Community
Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning
communities- A guide for practitioners.
Maidenhead SRHE and Open University Press.
11
Patterns of Membership
  • There are 4 patterns of membership in simple
    VLCs
  • Small core of active members. Closed group.
    Membership remains the same over time.
  • Small core membership. Open group. Membership
    changes over time. Core of active members.
  • Large membership. Closed group. Small changes
    in membership over time.
  • Large membership. Open group. Relatively large
    changes in membership over time. Core of active
    members who provide stability.

Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning
communities- A guide for practitioners.
Maidenhead SRHE and Open University Press.
12
Managed Virtual Learning Community
Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005).
13
Benefits/Issues of Simple and Managed VLCs
Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005).
14
Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005).
15
Complex Virtual Learning Community
Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005).
16
Components of a Social Theory of Learning
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice
Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge
Cambridge University Press.
17
Hub and Spoke
  • What can a SIG do for you?
  • What can you do for the SIG?
  • What is the scope of this network?
  • What do the spokes look like?
  • What does the hub look like?

18
Hub and Spoke
  • What type of relationship would be useful to help
    a related group of interests benefit from each
    other's knowledge, activities and experience -
    administrative, knowledge sharing, open or
    closed, formal/informal, funded, etc?

19
Hub and Spoke
  • Where do activities (initiatives) begin?
  • At the centre
  • On the spokes
  • Anywhere

20
Looking to the future
  • What is the purpose of the community?
  • What is the structure of the community?
  • Who are the potential community members?
  • How will members work and learn together?
  • What ICT infrastructure is required?
  • What administrative support is required?
  • What type of design is required for the virtual
    learning environment?

Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005).
21
References
  • Lave, J and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning
    Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge
    Cambridge University Press
  • Lewis, D. and Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning
    communities- A guide for practitioners.
    Maidenhead SRHE and Open University Press
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice
    Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge
    Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, B. and Ryder, M. (1996). Dynamic
    learning communities An alternative to designed
    Instructional system. Retrieved 5th June, 2008
    from http//carbon.cudenver.edu/mryder/dlc.html

22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com