Planning tools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Planning tools

Description:

EEP wants to do a better job creating natural ecosystems. CVS provides improved reference data, target design, monitoring, and data management and analysis CVS is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Jenn175
Learn more at: http://labs.bio.unc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning tools


1
Planning tools
  • Working together to restore North Carolina's
    natural communities

2
EEP-CVS Collaboration
  • EEP wants to do a better job creating natural
    ecosystems.
  • CVS provides improved reference data, target
    design, monitoring, and data management and
    analysis

3
Where we are going
  • CVS is developing tools and data sources to
    facilitate planning of restoration activities and
    to evaluate their success.
  • New data sources and tools are being designed
  • Suggestions for new tools and increased
    functionality are.

4
Restoration protocol
  • Document reference conditions
  • Derive restoration targets
  • Design site-specific restoration plan
  • Implement the plan
  • Monitor change and assess success
  • Employ adaptive management

5
Target generation
  • Simple goal Deliver composition target based on
    the vegetation type most appropriate for the site
    and region.
  • Sophisticated goal Automated system that uses
    site information and reference plot data to
    predict vegetation composition.

6
Improving restoration targets
  • Crude species lists
  • Plot database linked to the National Vegetation
    Classification and the Natural Heritage Program
    documentation
  • High-resolution community classification with
    quantitative descriptions.
  • Dynamically generated targets

7
Ecological Groups
  • Mountain Vegetation
  • Montane upland forests
  • Montane open upland vegetation
  • Montane alluvial wetland vegetation
  • Montane nonalluvial wetland vegetation
  • Piedmont Vegetation
  • Piedmont upland forests
  • Piedmont open upland vegetation
  • Piedmont alluvial wetland vegetation
  • Piedmont nonalluvial wetland vegetation
  • Coastal Plain Vegetation
  • Coastal Plain upland forests
  • Coastal Plain upland open woodland vegetation
  • Coastal Plain alluvial wetland vegetation
  • Coastal Plain nonalluvial wetland vegetation
  • Coastal Fringe Vegetation
  • Maritime upland forests shrublands
  • Maritime open upland vegetation
  • Maritime nontidal wetland vegetation

http//cvs.bio.unc.edu
8
Community types linked to NVC
9
Description in the NVC
10
Primary sources of data
  • Targeted communities
  • Mountain bogs
  • Piedmont alluvial forests
  • Pulse events with regional focus

11
Plot map in pulse report
12
Classification table from Pulse
13
Community summary from Pulse
14
Compositon table from Pulse
15
Goal for the next yearDescriptive summaries,
keys, maps, species tables, site data, photos
where available
16
Example compositional summary
17
Example site summary
18
Example photo of type
19
Longleaf Pine vegetation
20
Xeric barrens Subxeric uplands Longleaf
turkey oak woodlands on entisols
9 Types13 Types
21
  • Flatwoods
  • Longleaf woodlands of spodosols

5 types
22
Silty uplands Longleaf woodlands on
well-drained ultisols
12 types
23
Savannas and seeps Longleaf woodlands on moist
alfisols
13 types
24
  • Longleaf pine feasibility study
  • Few longleaf pine sites remain in original
    condition.
  • Restoration targets must be extrapolated from a
    limited number of reference stands.

25
  • Dataset
  • 188 plots across fall-line sandhills of NC, SC,
    GA
  • - All sites contained near-natural,
    fire-maintained groundlayer vegetation
  • - Soil attributes included for both the A and B
    horizon sand, silt, clay, Ca, Mg, K, P, S, Mn,
    Na, Cu, Zn, Fe, BD, pH, organic content, CEC, BS.

26
Step 1. Classification. Developed a
classification of the major vegetation types of
the ecoregion. Used cluster analysis with a
matrix of 188 plots x 619 species. Vegetation
types were seen to be differentiated with respect
to soil texture, moisture, nutrient status,
geography.
27
  • Step 2. Build model.
  • - Forward selection with linear discriminant
    analysis identified predictor variables.
  • Critical variables were Latitude, Manganese,
    Phosphorus, Clay, Longitude.
  • 75 of plots correctly identified to vegetation
    series. Typically 75 of plots within a series
    were correctly classified to community type.

28
  • Step 3. Select species.
  • Generate a list of all species in type (species
    pool) with frequency, mean cover values, and mean
    richness.
  • Randomly order the list
  • Compare species frequency to random number
    between 0 1, and if the random number is less
    than the proportion of plots the species is
    selected. Continue until the number in list of
    selected species equals the number predicted.

29
  • Summary of overall strategy
  • Identify biogeographic region and obtain
    predictive models.
  • Select pool of candidate species for a specific
    site based on range information.
  • Divide restoration site into environmentally
    homogenous areas, stratifying by topography and
    soil.
  • Use models to select species number and
    composition.

30
Looking forward to continued collaboration
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com