Rajeev Philip - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Rajeev Philip

Description:

Rajeev Philip Steamship Insurance Management Services Limited SUBJECTS in Charterparty Negotiations - Is there a Contract??? The concept of a duty to carry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: suetu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rajeev Philip


1
  • Rajeev Philip
  • Steamship Insurance Management Services Limited

2
SUBJECTS in Charterparty Negotiations - Is
there a Contract???
  • The concept of a duty to carry on negotiations
    in good faith is inherently repugnant to the
    adversarial position of the parties when involved
    in negotiations.

3
Subjects and Intentions
  • Objective Observation/External Evidence
  • v.
  • Private Intentions

4
Mutual Expectations
  • Uncertainty and Enforceability
  • Filling the Gaps
  • THE DIDYMI
  • equitably by an amount to be mutually agreed
    between owners and charterers
  • MAMIDOIL-JETOIL v. OKTA
  • even in the absence of express language, the
    Courts are prepared to imply an obligation in
    terms of what is reasonable

5
SUBJECTS
  • A Fixture is arrived at by the exchange of
    firm offers between brokers acting on behalf of
    their principals, an owner and a charterer, and
    when concluded, that is all terms and details
    agreed and subjects (if any) lifted, it is an
    enforceable contract It is important to note
    that no fixture has been concluded until all
    subjects have been lifted. Baltic Code 2003

6
SUBJECTS
  • CONDITIONS TO CONTRACT
  • v.
  • CONDITIONS TO PERFORMANCE

7
SUBJECT DETAILS
  • Thoresen v Fathom Marine 2004 1 LLR 622
  • Otherwise basis Saleform 93 sub details suitably
    amended also to reflect the above terms. Closing
    to take place in Piraeus

8
Thoresen v Fathom Marine
  • Mr. Kokkinis - as per telcon this is the fixing.
    Pls do best to get it confirmed timely otherwise
    sellers may run away
  • Mr. Straume - thus we have full agreement on
    price/terms, will also forward recap shortly.

9
Thoresen v Fathom Marine
  • I would respectfully suggest that it is in the
    interests of the chartering business that the
    Courts should recognise the efficacy of the
    maritime variant of the well known subject to
    contract. The expression subject to details
    enables owners and charterers to know where they
    are in negotiations and to regulate their
    business accordingly. It is a device which tends
    to avoid disputes and the assumption of those in
    the shipping trade that it is effective to make
    clear that there is no binding agreement at that
    stage ought to be respected.

10
SUBJECT DETAILS.
  • English Law -
  • we havent reached agreement, and neither of us
    is bound to do anything
  • New York (and Norway!)
  • we will discuss later other terms whose
    significance is so slight that agreement upon
    them now is unnecessary for the purposes of
    binding a contract between us

11
Losing the Thread
  • When a contract by telex or correspondence is
    alleged, the court will look at the
    correspondence as a whole and not merely at one
    or two documents picked out from connected
    sequence.

12
Conditions to Performance
  • Subject to Oil Major Approval
  • Subject to Passing an Inspection
  • Subject to Board Approval

13
UNILATERAL CONTRACTS
  • Options
  • Obligations on the party with the option
  • KKK v. Johnson Subject stem
  • The position of the party without the option
  • Withdrawal of the offer

14
CONDITIONAL CONTRACTS?
  • Subject Board Approval
  • Subject to drawing up the contract in writing
  • -Degrees of Control-

15
BOUND BY CONDUCT
  • Waiver
  • Estoppel
  • Oceanografia SA de CV v. DSND Subsea AS
  • 2006 EWHC 1360 (Comm)

16
Oceanografia SA de CV v. DSND Subsea AS
  • Offer subject to the signing of mutually
    agreeable contract terms and conditions
  • Subject to FMA Approval vessel free for winter
    season, notice to be given by 01/10
  • Contract terms were never signed.
  • No Binding Agreement

17
WAIVER
  • a party has acted in a manner which is
    consistent only with his having chosen one of the
    two alternative and inconsistent courses of
    action then open to him
  • by words or conduct the election must be
    communicated in clear and unequivocal terms
  • the party making the election must be aware not
    only of the facts giving rise to his rights but
    also of the rights themselves
  • THE KANCHENJUNGA 1990 1 Lloyds Rep. 391

18
ESTOPPEL
  • For estoppel
  • party must either agree or conduct themselves in
    a such a manner that the other party believes
    that the other party will not insist on their
    strict legal rights.
  • In addition the other party must rely on the
    representation made, such that it would be unjust
    to allow the representor to go back on the
    representation.
  • -ESTOPPEL-

19
Oceanografia SA de CV v. DSND Subsea AS
  • Charterers unaware of FMA difficulty
  • payment of the mobilisation fee
  • signing the on-hire statement
  • accepting the vessel for service
  • Charterers aware of FMA difficulty
  • extending the departure date, which was signed by
    the Charterers
  • signing the off-hire statement
  • agreement by the Charterers to pay the
    demobilization fee
  • -WAIVER-

20
CONDITIONAL CONTRACTS
  • Entirely contingent conditions
  • - Subject to weather permitting
  • Subject Superficial Inspection
  • - THE MERAK 1976 2 Lloyds Rep 250
  • Subject to satisfactory completion of two trial
    voyages
  • - THE JOHN S DARBYSHIRE 1977 2 Lloyds Rep 457

21
PRATICE TIPS
  • Private Intentions Irrelevant
  • Awareness of Terms of Art
  • Effect of Genuine Subjects v. Conditions to
    Performance
  • Track progress on terms
  • Unilateral Contracts and Withdrawal
  • Conduct yourself in line with private intentions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com