Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation Distance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation Distance

Description:

Using Lennard-Jones Potential to describe bond between two atoms. s and e can be estimated from Average bond length rbond and bond dissociation energy Ebond. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Hed9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation Distance


1
Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation
Distance
  • The Potential Energy function describes the
    energy of a particular state.
  • When given as a function of the separation
    between two bodies it is related to the force
    acting between the two bodies.
  • Correct model for U(r) depends upon what balls
    and springs represent.

r12
M1
M2
2
Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation
Distance
  • For molecular models Balls represent nuclei and
    Springs represent either bonds or weaker
    interatomic potentials (coulombic attraction,
    hydrogen bonds ,Van der Waals attraction etc.)

3
Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation
Distance
  • In meso-scale PMMA case what are Balls and
    Springs?

4
Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation
Distance
  • In meso-scale PMMA case what are Balls and
    Springs?

5
Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation
Distance
  • In meso-scale PMMA case what are Balls and
    Springs?

6
Common Potential Energy Functions of Separation
Distance
  • In meso-scale PMMA case what are Balls and
    Springs?
  • do not represent a single covalent
    bond.

7
Lennard-Jones
  • Originally developed to describe force between
    non-bonded molecules.
  • Attraction term is the Van
    der Waals potential of interacting dipoles.
  • Note that dipoles may only exist temporarily as
    is the case for nonpolar atoms/molecules such as
    Helium and Methane.
  • Repulsive term is supposedly due to repulsion of
    overlapping orbitals. But this functional form
    should be exponential (see Morse Potential).
  • s is effective Van der Waals radius of molecule

8
Lennard-Jones Potential between non-bonded
molecules
  • Lennard-Jones Parameters for typical non polar
    molecules.
  • Values can be found for gaseous molecules in
    physical chemistry text books.
  • Used in calculating second virial coefficient
    perturbation of ideal gas law.

9
Estimating Lennard-Jones between molecules
  • s is simply Van der Waals radius of molecules.
  • Can be estimated using bond additive methods
  • eg Zhou Fast calculation of van der Waals volume
    as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its
    application to drug compounds. Zhao YH, Abraham
    MH, Zissimos, AM. J Org Chem. 2003 Sep
    1968(19)7368-73
  • Or easily calculated using available quantum or
    molecular modeling software
  • eg MOPAC, MM2 etc.
  • e can be estimated using dipole moments of
    molecules and Gibbs Ensemble formula.
  • For dislike molecules use Lorentz-Berthelot
    combination rules.

10
Using Lennard-Jones Potential to describe bond
between two atoms.
  • s and e can be estimated from Average bond
    length rbond and bond dissociation energy Ebond.
  • Typical values for rbond and Ebond can be found
    in most Organic chemistry texts. Specific
    calculation requires quantum calculation eg MOPAC
    etc.
  • Assume F(r) 0 at rrbond and
    U(rrbond) U(r8)Ebond

11
Shifted-Lennard-Jones
  • Potential Function
  • f(r) chosen so both Force and Potential Energy is
    zero at rrcutoff
  • Typically f(r) arb with rcutoff 2.5s
  • Permits clipping of U(r) at short distance
    without discontinuity in force.
  • Used for molecular modeling
  • Calibration is similar to Lennard-Jones Potential

12
Morse Potential
  • Leonard-Jones is not good for real bonds. Does
    not correctly represent both bonding energy Ebond
    and vibrational strength k (eg
    U(r)0.5k(r-r0)2 ) at bottom of well.
  • Better simple potential is Morse potential.
  • Parameter a controls strength of vibration at
    bottom of well.
  • Found from vibrational spectrum frequency of
    bond.

13
Proposal of Ways to Estimate U(r) for Mesoscale
non-bonded PMMA
  • Interaction potential between non-bonded groups
    determined from Lennard-Jones potential between
    two methy-methacrylate monomers or model monomer
    units.
  • Use MOPAC etc. to determine molecular radius and
    molecular dipole moment.
  • Confirm values using macroscopic experiments from
    literature if available. melting point, boiling
    point, density, Gas/Liquid virial coefficients,
    yadda yadda ...

14
Proposal of Ways to Estimate U(r) for Mesoscale
bonds in PMMA
  • Canned Molecular modeling (MM2, Charmm, Amber,
    Alchemy etc.) and semi-empirical quantum programs
    (MOPAC etc.) can generate reasonably accurate
    potential energies for large molecules.
  • They typically do this for a given conformations
  • They also can minimize Energy to find lowest
    energy conformation.
  • Proposal
  • Determine lowest energy conformation for 3-5 MW
    PMMA.
  • Stretch chain along some coordinate r and
    calculate new U(r).

15
Proposal of Ways to Estimate U(r) for Mesoscale
bonds in PMMA
  • Potential Problems
  • Coordinate r is not a simple coordinate.
  • It probably does not involve stretching of
    covalent bonds but rather twisting of bonds.
  • How to get r?
  • Many different conformations are sampled at each
    r this introduce an Entropy contribution
  • Also in statistical mechanics sense U(r) really
    should be the Free Energy and not potential
    energy.

16
Entropic Springs
  • Systems that have degeneracies along a coordinate
    transformation possess entropic contributions to
    Force field.
  • Classic example are isolated polymer chains in
    perfect solvent.
  • Because the solvent is perfect the DU with any
    conformational change is zero.
  • However there is a resistive force to stretching
    the chain away from ltR2gt
  • This force is due to the lower entropy (fewer
    possible conformations) in the streched position
    than in the coiled position.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com