Title: The Minimum Wage
1The Minimum Wage
2Minimum Wages
- Systems of minimum wages vary across countries
2 most common systems are - statutory minimum wage (set by govt or in
national collective bargaining) - set by sectoral collective bargains with
extension to non-signatory employers - Some countries have a single minimum (e.g. US),
others have variation by age, region, industry,
occupation - Measure of bite of minimum wage
- Kaitz index minimum/median
- Spike percentage of workers at minimum
3Kaitz Index selected countries
4Kaitz Index Selected Countries
5Kaitz Index (net, at mean) OECD
6Kaitz Index in Labor Costs OECD
7Summary
- Minimum wage lowest in US, highest in France
but age variation in FR, not US - For teenagers US Kaitz 80-90
- Most countries have Kaitz index of 40-50
- No big increases in recent years most countries
have falls - CZ in 2007 8000 / 19300 42
- CZ in 2003 6200 / 15000 41
8Introduction
- Have introduced in context of institutions that
might affect wage inequality - But will also have discussion about impact on
employment as this is often regarded as most
interesting question - Effect on labor supply (and wage gains of
low-skilled) often ignored.
9Minimum Wage and Employment
- Competitive model has a very clear prediction
- Minimum wage above market-clearing wage will
cause job losses (unemployment) - Follows from the fact that factor demand curves
slope downwards - As wMRPL any increase in wage makes marginal
worker unprofitable
10A Picture
11Any models with a different prediction?
- Monopsony can give a different prediction
Starting from wage chosen by monopsonist, an
increase wage will raise employment. Intuition - MRPLMCLgtw so marginal worker still profitable
after rise in wage and more workers want to work -
- Y(N)MRPLMCLw(N)w(N)N
- Employment is supply-determined and increased
wage increases labour supply
12A Picture
13Can one raise the minimum wage and employment
without limit?
- Does not sound very plausible
- Will not be possible there comes a point where
employment demand determined can think of
Nmin(Ns(w),Nd(w)) - Employment will be maximized at wage where
Ns(w)Nd(w) i.e. market-clearing wage
(intersection of supply and MRPL) - This is efficient minimum wage to set (with no
involuntary unemployment)
14How useful is this in practice?
- Market-clearing wage different in different
labour markets by age, education, region - Typically minimum wage does not have much
variation too high in some markets, too low in
others. - It is a blunt policy instrument
- Also have only considered single employer
interactions are likely to be important
15Models of Oligopsony
- May have very different prediction about
employment effect of minimum wage - E.g. suppose labour supply curve is
- NiBi(Wi/W)e
- Where W is average wage
- Then each employer has some monopsony power but
raising minimum wage does not raise employment
16Conclusion on Theory
- Competitive model has clear prediction
- Monopsony prediction ambiguous
- gt should look at evidence with open mind
- Lee Saez (2008) if society cares about equity
(wages of low-skilled) MW welfare improving
despite disemployment effects. - Until Card-Krueger Myth and Measurement
consensus in US was small negative employment
effect especially for teenagers
17Card-KruegerMyth and Measurement
- Re-examined all evidence for negative employment
effects of minimum wage - Look at variety of natural experiments
- Concluded no evidence for view that minimum wage
causes job loss - Will focus on NJ/PA study as that is most famous
- also Card-Krueger, AER 94
- Neumark-Wascher, Card-Krueger, AER 00
18The NJ/PA Study
- US system of minimum wages is a federal minimum
with individual states choosing higher minimum if
they want - in 1992 NJ raised its minimum wage to 5.05
above the federal minimum of 4.25 - NJ fast food restaurants the treatment group,
restaurants in eastern PA the control group - Data collected by phone interview before and
after rise in NJ minimum wage
19A Map
20Effect on Wages
21Basic Results Difference in Difference Estimator
22Neumark-Wascher Criticism
- They argued data was of very poor quality,
especially on dependent variable does this
matter? - Got hold of payroll data and claimed to find
evidence of negative employment effects - Unfortunately some of this data was supplied by
noted opponent of minimum wage so perhaps not
random sample - Results strongest in this sub-sample
- Perhaps some evidence of reduction in hours per
worker - See AER 2000 for exchange and make your own mind
up
23Longer Time Series Using Administrative Data
24Evidence on Employment Effects for other Countries
- The UK
- Studies of introduction of NMW in 1999
- Aggregate studies failed to find any impact
- Machin, Manning, Rahman did find small negative
effect among care workers where 30 affected - Problem for many other countries is lack of big
change to be basis of natural experiment - E.g. France SMIC seems very high but lack of
much variation in recent years means that hard to
evaluate
25Machin, Manning, RahmanJEEA, 2003 Research
Design
- Sample of care workers in retirement homes for
elderly very low paid job - Surveyed both before and after introduction of
NMW - Some homes unaffected as initially paid above NMW
these are effectively the control group - Look at change in hours and employment
26Machin, Manning, RahmanJEEA, 2003 - Results
27The Minimum Wage and Wage Inequality
- Yet again, most research for US
- Consensus was that minimum wage unimportant for
wage inequality as lt5 of workers paid the
minimum wage - This was challenged by
- Dinardo, Fortin, Lemiuex, Ecta, 1996
- Lee, QJE 1999
28diNardo, Fortin, Lemiuex
- Pointed out that minimum wage had a very obvious
effect on wage distribution in 1979 - Because it did not change in nominal terms in
period until 1990, declined in real terms so
seemed unimportant by the end - But can help to explain rise in lower-end wage
inequality - Especially true for women
29A Picture to give flavour of results
30Lee, QJE 1999Basic idea
- Federal minimum wage does not vary across states
but average level of wages does so minimum wage
more important in AK than in NY - If minimum wage important for wage inequality
should see bigger rise in wage inequality in
low-wage states - This is what he finds
31A Picture to Summarize Results
32Interpretation
- Low-end wage inequality initially much smaller in
low-wage states in 1979 consistent with minimum
wage being important - Low-end wage inequality then rises much faster in
low-wage states - Top-end wage inequality similar in low- and
high-wage states and shows no trend - Concludes that min wage can explain almost all of
rise in low-end wage inequality in 1980s - Implies substantial spill-overs
33Evidence from UK
- Initial studies of impact effect of introduction
of NMW suggested modest effect because only 5
directly affected and there seemed no
spilll-overs e.g. Dickens-Manning, EJ 2004 - But perhaps some indication that more powerful in
longer-run - Perhaps can explain most or all or reduction in
low-end wage inequality in UK but cant explain
the top - CZ little data available on low-wage sectors