Title: Variable pay or straight salary
1Variable pay or straight salary
- University Professors get a straight salary
which is mainly based on age which might be
considered high or low, depending on your point
of view. - Should we introduce incentive pay, e.g. by of
exams or scientific papers written - What are the tasks of academics?
- What about fixed jobs without layoff risk?
- What are problems of incentive pay?
2Incentive pay
- Should pay be based on input or output?
- How should output be defined?
- Does paying for output cause workers to seek the
wrong goals? - Does output-based compensation induce people to
focus on the short-run only? - Should it be tied to individual or group output?
3Why choose output based pay?
- Positive influence on hiring and retention
- also known as adverse selection
- low ability workers will look for jobs that pay
by input rather than output - workers who do not want to work hard are likely
to leave the firm.
- If you can sell gt 5, you go to thecompany with
output based pay. If lt 5 you go to the flat base
pay
4Example taxi drivers
- Driver rents the car, pays for gas and keeps all
revenues - or
- Company gives the driver the cab, pays for gas
and they split the revenues 5050 - Some problems with second scheme???
- Moral hazard on the side of the driver
- Efffort of driver is sub-optimal
5Agency Theory or Principle-Agent-Model
- Implicit assumptions
- Worker is averse to effort E (otherwise
everything is just fine) - Worker is averse to risk (otherwise the problem
is simple) - The parties cannot contract on the level of
effort E (otherwise they would write a contract
on e, leaving the employer all the risk)
6A simple model with risk neutrality
- Disutility of effort E is C(E) i.e. the worker
does not exert effort E0 unless he gets at least
C(E0) paid. - How does the worker choose effort optimally to
max his utility - total compensation (risk neutral!!) minus effort
cost - gt marginal effort cost should be equal to
marginal return for effort
7 How does the firm choose ? and ? ?
- Firm will try to maximize profits, but has to
check - Choice of ? will determine Effort E
- Total compensation must be high enough to keep
the worker with the firm, i.e. - Assume E is equal to output also
- gt
- gt
8Surprising result worker should get the whole
additional output
- If risk-neutral worker should act as residual
claimant worker acts like an entrepreneur - Only this contract will allow the optimal choice
of effort - How does the firm make profit in this case?
- gt choose ? as high as possible, so that profit
increases, but worker should be willing to sign
the contract!
9Example salespersons commission
- Marginal cost for computers 900
- Market price 1000
- Optimal commission is 100 per piece sold.
- Optimal for worker as it seems, but is this
really optimal for the firm???
10Findings at Safelite Glass Corporation
- (Based on Lazear, E.P., Performance pay and
productivity, American Economic Review, 2000,
1346-1361) - switch from salaries to piece rates induced a 36
increase in productivity - about 2/3 of this is due to incentives, rest is
due to changing composition of the workforce - Pay increased by 9
- Remarks about Quality and External validity
11Why dont you see workers often paying for their
jobs?
- Principle idea 100 commission rate, and worker
has to pay in order to get the job - No explicit payment, but implicit
- Is it better to have, say, 10 in sales or 100
in profits? - Moral hazard on the side of the firm!
- Capital market imperfections do not allow buying
the firm, which would be sometimes the best
solution to maintenance problems
12Problem gets more complicated in reality and with
risk-aversion of workers
- 1st principle of optimal insurance the party who
can more easily absorb risk (ie the party that is
most risk neutral) should insure the other party.
- employees are likely to be more risk averse than
the firm. The firm should not avoid risks if
avoiding would lead to lower profits.
Stockholders can diversify risk across
investments. They want the firm to earn the
highest profit possible. Therefore the firm
should insure the employees - the firm can pay lower wages if it accepts the
risk - firms that pay by output will need to pay higher
compensation. If they do not get greater
productivity, it is a waste
13Sometimes output is difficult to measure
- Possible that variations in output are due to
external factors that are not controllable by the
employee. Unless the firm can condition on these
factors it may be difficult to give the proper
incentives. - If the work of the employee depends upon
coordination with other employees, it may be
difficult to single out their individual
contribution. It may be necessary to pay on a
team basis. - There may be multiple tasks. Incentives must be
balanced across different tasks. If it is
difficult to measure the performance on one task,
strong incentives on other tasks will result in
the employee ignoring that task. There can be a
severe problem of distortion of incentives.
14Equal Compensation Principle
- If the worker has two tasks, either compensate
effort alike in both, or dont use incentive
contracts - Quality versus quantity
- Sales today versus next year...
- University professors do teaching and research
15It may be difficult to set the rate.
- Workers have incentives to slow down when you are
attempting to set the appropriate rate. - Management has the incentive to increase the
required rate when the workers easily surpass
their old levels of productivity. This is called
the ratchet effect. Since workers realize that
the ratchet effect exists, they will be reluctant
to work to their full capacities or they may try
to force other workers to work at less than full
capacity.
16In case of risk aversion of workers ...
- The higher the ability of workers, the stronger
should be incentives. - The higher the risk aversion among workers, the
lower the incentives should be. - The stronger the effect on company profits of
increased effort by the employee, the greater the
incentives should be - The stronger the impact on effort, the greater
the incentive should be. - The greater the precision of measurement of
output, the greater the incentive should be.
17Different types of pay-performance payment
- Output based measures often involve quotas, bonus
payments, caps or promotions - Quotas are very good as long as the workers are
homogeneous. However, they suffer from the
problems of discontinuity little incentive if
there is low prob. of making the quota and little
incentive after the quota is made.
18Bonus or Penalty
- Consider 2 different job offers
- Scheme A pays 10,000 per month plus a bonus of
1 for every unit sold - Scheme B pays 15,000 per month with a 5,000 unit
quota penalizing the worker with 1 for every
unit below the quota - suppose its not possible to produce more than
5,000 to make it simple - What is more attractive for workers?
- Which job offer creates the highest incentives?
19Whats the psychology behind these schemes?
- only use positive rewards
- Theory of loss aversion (Kahneman and Tversky)
experiments showing that people hate more to give
up something they think they own. - Establish a rule (social norm) you think people
should obey - Economic considerations
- Use bonus when there is no cost to poor
performance - Use penalty if there is no benefit to high
performance - Examples??
20Performance pay for Managers (CEOs)
- Two views
- CEOs are overpaid board of directors do not
represent shareholders interests, they also are
too short-term oriented - CEOs are worth every nickel they get
- What should CEOs maximize?
- importance of efficient market hypothesis
21Empirical evidence
- Compensation through stock options in a much
higher proportion for US CEOs - Some results for the US
- Pay and firm size 10 extra sales, 2-3 extra
salary - pay and performance pay responds to performance
- intensity of incentives largest estimate 3.25
for 1,000 increase in shareholder value
22Question
- CEOs often receive a substantial part of their
compensation as variable pay. It is difficult to
measure the CEO's performance. You are a
compensation consultant. To which of the
following accounting measures do you propose to
tie executive compensation? - Change in earnings reported by the company.
- EBIT or change thereof.
- Change in revenues.
- Change in the market value of the company.
- Change in market value relativ to change in Dow
Jones.
23Answer
- What you should consider
- Discretion of manager to influence bookkeeping
figures - Influence of short- vs. long-term investments
- Is the market valuation rational?
- What does the relative compensation do
24Question
- Both CEOs and VPs tend to have a certain
percentage of their compensation tied to the
companys overall per-formance. Who (VPs or the
CEO) should have a larger percentage of wages
tied to the company performance? - Explain.