Group Dynamics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Group Dynamics

Description:

Group Dynamics Social Inhibition The presence of an audience leads to a decrease in performance Speech class? Watch me, Mommy! Social Facilitation The presence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:328
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 81
Provided by: ST42
Learn more at: http://faculty.etsu.edu
Category:
Tags: dynamics | group

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Group Dynamics


1
Group Dynamics
2
Social Inhibition
  • The presence of an audience leads to a decrease
    in performance
  • Speech class?
  • Watch me, Mommy!

3
Social Facilitation
  • The presence of an audience leads to an increase
    in performance
  • Michael Jordan in a packed stadium

4
Inhibition Facilitation?
  • Both social inhibition and social facilitation
    are the same phenomenon
  • The presence of an audience increases the
    performers dominant response

5
Importance of Audience
  • The mere presence of others can affect our
    performance

6
Dominant Responses
  • For a newly learned, but not yet mastered task,
    the dominant response is to fail.

7
Dominant Response
  • For a well learned task, the dominant response is
    to perform well.

8
Pop Quiz!
  • A
  • B

9
Aschs Study
  • Control group Everyone identified B as the
    longer line
  • Experimental group Contained stooges!

10
Aschs Study
  • In experimental group, 1/3 of subjects identified
    A as the longer line.
  • Peer Pressure.
  • Mom was right

11
Why Do People Join Groups?
  • What makes groups attractive to people?

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Social Elements
  • Group members attractiveness

16
Social Elements
  • Activities of Groups

17
Why Do People Join Groups?
  • Goals or Means to Goals
  • Young Republicans
  • United Way

18
Group
  • Two or more people who interact with one another,
    are aware of one another, and think of themselves
    as being a group.

19
Why join a group?
  • Closeness--Being members of the same group builds
    ties among people.
  • Common goals--Moral and practical support is
    gained by working with others who have the same
    or similar goals.
  • Achievement of personal objectives--Time spent
    with group members can be enjoyable, enhance a
    persons prestige, and satisfy peoples desire to
    feel important.

20
Formal Groups
  • Functional Groups--Carry out the ongoing needs in
    the organization, such as producing goods,
    selling a product, or investing funds.
  • Task Groups--Set up to carry out a specific
    activity, then disband when the activity is
    completed.

21
Informal Groups
  • Individuals in the organization that develop
    relationships to meet personal needs.

22
Team
  • A group of people who collaborate to some degree
    to achieve a common goal.

23
Groups versus Teams
  • Teams have
  • Stronger sense of identification
  • Common goals or task
  • Task interdependence
  • More differentiated and specialized roles
    between team members

6
24
Characteristics of Groups
  • Roles--Patterns of behavior related to employees
    positions in a group.
  • Norms--Group standards for appropriate or
    acceptable behavior.
  • Status--A group members position in relation to
    others in the group.
  • Cohesiveness--The degree to which group members
    stick together.
  • Homogenity--The degree to which the members of a
    group are the same.

25
Cohesiveness
  • Stick-togetherness
  • Tight knit group

26
Conditions Influencing Cohesiveness
  • Degree of dependency on group
  • Size of group
  • Stability of group
  • Competition

27
Degree of Dependency on Group
  • More dependent on group for taking care of needs,
    more cohesiveness
  • More needs taken care of by group, more
    cohesiveness

28
Size of Group
  • Everything else being equal, the smaller the
    group, the more cohesiveness

29
Stability of Group
  • Everything else being equal, the greater the
    stability of the group, the more cohesiveness
  • Membership
  • Roles

30
Competition
  • INTRA-group competition
  • Competition within a group
  • INTER-group competition
  • Competition between groups

31
Intra-group Competition
  • Intra-group competition decreases cohesiveness
  • Every man for himself

32
Inter-Group Competition
  • Inter-group competition increases cohesiveness
  • Us against them

33
Effects of Cohesiveness
  • Absenteeism and Turnover
  • Internal Group Events
  • Performance

34
Absenteeism and Turnover
  • Greater cohesiveness leads to less absenteeism
    and turnover

35
Internal Group Events
  • Greater cohesiveness leads to group members being
    better able to resist outside pressure
  • Dirty Dozen
  • Substitute Teachers

36
Performance
  • Increase performance?
  • Decrease performance?
  • Neither!

37
Performance
  • Cohesiveness affects relative performance, not
    absolute performance.

38
Performance
  • Greater cohesiveness leads to group members
    tending to produce at similar levels.

39
Stages Of Group Growth
PERFORMING
NORMING
STORMING
Dissatisfaction
FORMING
3
40
Stages Of Group Growth
PERFORMING
FORMING
STORMING
NORMING
INSIGHTFULNESS
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
RESISTANCE
EXCITEMENT
SATISFACTION
ANTICIPATION
ACCEPTANCE
OPTIMISM
RELIEF
4
41
Group Growth Behavior
PERFORMING
FORMING
STORMING
NORMING
PERSONAL DISCUSSIONS
ABSTRACT DISCUSSIONS
ARGUING
CONSTRUCTIVE SELF-CHANGE
IDENTIFYING THE TASK
BID FOR POWER
COMMON GOALS
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINTS
TENSION
COHESION
TEAMWORK
5
42
Teambuilding
  • Developing the ability of team members to work
    together to achieve common objectives.

43
Teambuilding
  • Leadership
  • Selection of team members
  • Team Building
  • Communication Style
  • Rewards

44
Leadership
  • Openness and honesty
  • Leadership that does not dominate
  • Decision made by consensus
  • Acceptance of assignment
  • Listening
  • Accepted goals that are understandable
  • Assessment of progress and results
  • Comfortable atmosphere
  • Debate and discussion

45
Leadership
  • Access to information
  • Relatively low turnover
  • Win-win approach to conflict

46
Selection of Team Members
  • Selecting candidates who work well with others.

47
Team Building
  • Setting goals
  • Analyzing and allocating work
  • Examining how well the group is working
  • Examining the relationships among the team members

48
Communication Style
  • Create a climate of trust and openness
  • Encourage members to collaborate
  • Acknowledge disagreements

49
Rewards
  • Reward entire group rather than individuals

50
(No Transcript)
51
Self-Regulating Work Teams
  • Lecture 15

52
Self-Regulating Work Teams
  • Self-Managed Teams
  • Self-Regulating Work Groups
  • Autonomous Work Groups
  • Work Teams

53
Team
54
Changes due to Teams
  • Teams take on traditional management functions
  • Planning
  • Organizing
  • Directing
  • Controlling

55
Changes due to Teams
  • Supervisors take on new roles
  • Coaches
  • Facilitators

56
Coach
  • Helping employees to
  • work up to their potential
  • Learning from athletic
  • coaches

57
Facilitator
  • Help the group work better as a group
  • Help group members
  • with process skills

58
For Teams to be Successful
  • Task differentiation
  • The extent to which the task of the group is
    autonomous and forms a relatively self-completing
    whole.
  • -- Cummings Huse

59
(No Transcript)
60
For Teams to be Successful
  • Boundary Control
  • The extent to which employees can influence
    transactions with their task environment.
  • -- Cummings Huse

61
For Teams to be Successful
  • Task Control
  • The degree to which employees can regulate their
    own behavior in producing the product or
    providing the service.
  • -- Cummings Huse

62
High Involvement Plant (HIP)
63
High Involvement Plants (HIP)
  • HIPs are designed around the ideas of task
    differentiation, boundary control, and task
    control.
  • Other critical characteristics of HIPs include

64
Organization Structure
  • Flat
  • Team Based

65
Information System
  • Open
  • Springfield Remanufacturing Company opens books
    to employees, and trains them to understand the
    companys finances.

66
Training
  • Conducted by Peers (for tasks)
  • Interpersonal Skills
  • Taught by supervisors or staff

67
Reward System
  • Open
  • Skill Based
  • Gain Sharing (more comprehensive than profit
    sharing)

68
Selection
  • Realistic Job Preview
  • Team Based

69
Identifying Individual and Group Jobs
70
Social Needs
  • Determine whether people are likely to be
    satisfied with individual jobs or work groups

71
Growth Needs
  • Affect whether people will be satisfied by
    traditional work designs or by enriched,
    self-regulating forms of work

72
Technical Interdependence
  • The extent to which employees must cooperate with
    each other in order to produce a produce or
    provide a service

73
Technical Uncertainty
  • The extent to which employees must process
    information and make decisions in order to
    produce a product or provide a service

74
Technical Interdependence/Uncertainty
Low Interdependence Low Uncertainty Traditional Job High Interdependence Low Uncertainty Traditional Work Group
Low Interdependence High Uncertainty Enriched Job High Interdependence High Uncertainty Self-Managed Team
75
Social Needs / Growth Needs
Low Social Needs Low Growth Needs Traditional Job High Social Needs Low Growth Needs Traditional Work Group
Low Social Needs High Growth Needs Enriched Job High Social Needs High Growth Needs Self-Managed Team
76
Lessons from REAL Teams
  • 1995-1996 Chicago Bulls
  • 72 Wins 10 Losses
  • .878 winning percentage
  • Best NBA record ever

77
Lessons from REAL Teams
  • Killer Bees, high school team in New York
  • 1980 1993 went 164-32
  • .836 winning percentage
  • State Tournament 6 times
  • Final Four 4 times
  • State Champs 2 times

78
Lessons from REAL Teams
  • School population varied from 41 to 67 total
  • Never more than 19 boys
  • Team never had more than 7 members

79
Lessons from REAL Teams
  • Reading High (Mass.) boys track field
  • Hasnt lost a league dual meet in 29 years
  • Tied once in a 1973 meet

80
Lessons from REAL Teams
  • Both the Killer Bees and the Reading High teams
    cross-train.
  • The members can fill in a variety of tasks.
  • What does this say about specialization?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com