Title: Corrections Past and Present
1Section I
- Corrections Past and Present
2Chapter 1
3Objectives
- Grasp why the concept of punishment has become
such a major force in the American administration
of justice. - Identify the differences between the Auburn and
Pennsylvania systems. - Outline the history and trends of prison reform,
including the significant change in the prison
environment after World War II and the decline of
the medical model.
4Sentencing
- Four predominant sentencing goals in America
- Rehabilitation
- Specific deterrence
- General deterrence
- Punishment
- Fines monetary sanctions as punishment for
crime - Restitution compensation to victim or community
for damages - Probation supervision that allows an offender
to remain in the community under certain
conditions - Incarceration confinement in a prison or jail
5Role of Law
- Law social construct members trade some
restrictions in exchange for benefit from the
government - Definition of what is legal and what is illegal
can change as society changes - Punishment infliction of a penalty, often with
a component of retributive suffering
6Role of Religion
- Evolution of retributive punishment has
intertwined with that of religion over the years - Concept of free will has evolved from the
religious beliefs - Idea that people chose to violate the law and
should be held responsible for their actions has
formed the center focus for American CJ system
7History of Punishment
- Earliest prisons in America were modeled after
English gaols - Severe corporal punishment was commonplace
- All punishment was public
- Bridewells institutions used to confine and
beat misdemeanor offenders were commonplace
8History of Punishment (cont.)
- Reformer John Howard noted that more prisoners
died from sickness and disease than from
execution - All inmates were confined together
- England used deportation to send criminals to
American colonies and later to Australia. - Penitentiary Act of 1779 provided major reforms
- Secure and sanitary facilities and inspections
- Abolishing fees for basic services
- Introducing reformatory model
9Punishment in the American Colonies
- Harsh penalties, including death, banishment, and
corporal punishment - Jail conditions were as bad as in England
- William Penn passed Great Law to combine reform
and rehabilitation in Pennsylvania system - Following Penns death, the state returned to
corporal and capital punishment
10Punishment in the American Colonies (cont.)
- Americas first prisons
- Abandoned copper mine in Simsbury, CN
- In 1790, Pennsylvania legislature opened the
Walnut Street Jail - Humanitarian approach
- Educational opportunities, religious and health
care services, prison industries - Closed in 1835 due to staff turnover
- Concepts of penitence, work, single cells, and
separation by type of offender became important
11Punishment in the American Colonies (cont.)
- American Prison Philosophy
- Pennsylvania system was founded on belief of
solitary reflection and solitary cells - Silent or separate system prisoners not allowed
to talk to one another - Goal was rehabilitation through isolation,
contemplation, silence, and prayer - Pervasive idleness led to mental illness
12Punishment in the American Colonies (cont.)
- American Prison Philosophy (cont.)
- Alternative system was Auburn, or congregate
system in New York - Kept in solitary confinement at night, but
permitted to work collaboratively outside of cell
during the day - Expected to maintain total silence
- Designed as industrial factory with small cells
13Punishment in the American Colonies (cont.)
- American Prison Philosophy
- Principles of economical operation, restricted
interaction among convicts, congregate work,
extreme discipline, and tight control - Chains, beatings, solitary confinement, and
limited food became instruments of punishment and
control - Auburn system emerged as the model adopted by
most states highly regimented activities and
fiscally successful due to prisoners work.
14Punishment in the American Colonies (cont.)
- Regional Differences
- Southern states developed a program where
citizens could lease prisoners as laborers - Western settlers built small local jails,
contracted with other states for housing of
prisoners, and eventually developed their own
prison system modeled after the Auburn system.
15Development of Reformatories
- Overcrowding, poor management, insufficient
funding, and shifting of resources post-Civil War
led to end of original models of prison
management - Custodial concerns were dominant
- Decision was made to replace prisons with
reformatories emphasizing educational and
vocational programming for young adult offenders
16Development of Reformatories (cont.)
- Alexander Maconochie
- Mark system - prisoners earn freedom through
marks for industrial work and conformity to rules - Progress through various stages of increasing
responsibility - Walter Crofton
- Stages of imprisonment
- Progression through stages leads an inmate closer
to release
17Development of Reformatories (cont.)
- Indeterminate sentencing allowed reformatory
officials to decide when an inmate was ready to
be released. - Benefits were canceled out by overcrowding,
poorly trained staff, and continued emphasis on
control - Reformatory era presented American corrections
with a new model that included individual
treatment, indeterminate sentencing,
classification, parole, and a focus on education
18Industrial Period and Progressive Era
- Industrial programs offered a structured means of
establishing a strong work ethic and vocational
training while offsetting institutional costs - Different prison industrial systems
- Contract
- Lease
- State-use
- Public works and ways
19Industrial Period and Progressive Era (cont.)
- Industrial prisons produced a wide range of
products and were widely accepted - Labor organizations began to complain
- Hawes-Cooper Act prison made goods were subject
to the laws of any state where the product would
be sold - Ashurst-Sumners Act prohibited interstate
shipment of prison-made goods
20Industrial Period and Progressive Era (cont.)
- Reformers continued to propose normalization of
the institutional setting - Classification became very important to separate
inmates by age, aggressiveness, and programmatic
needs - Education and vocational training were
reemphasized - Federal Bureau of Prisons was created
21Post-World War II
- In the 1940s and 1950s, inmates were seen as
misunderstood - Treatment programs were instituted in many
prisons - Inmates were seen as individuals with social,
intellectual, or emotional deficiencies who
needed diagnosis and treatment
22The Medical Model
- Three components
- Diagnosis
- Evaluation
- Treatment
- Proper classification was important
- Wardens and superintendents had a hard time
accepting this new gentle incarceration
23The Medical Model (cont.)
- Associations and Federal Guidelines
- APA published manual of standards for prison
administration - Congress created LEAA to provide research grants
and help in development of programs - Architectural Programs
- Medical model brought architectural restructuring
with it - Prisons included educational and vocational
programs, extensive health care, counseling, and
prison work industries
24A Return to Punishment
- Public wanted to toughen system
- Federal courts developed a hands on approach
- Brought prisons in compliance with Bill of Rights
and Constitution - Chaos and confusion reigned, especially after the
riot in Attica
25A Return to Punishment (cont.)
- Private Family Visiting
- Furlough system allowed inmates to leave prison
to visit family, seek education, and pursue jobs - Cut back or eliminated after high-profile case of
an inmate on furlough attacking a young couple - Family visiting idea promoted conjugal visits to
maintain marital ties, but it never gained much
popularity
26A Return to Punishment (cont.)
- End of the Medical Model
- Basically vanished by the late 1970s
- Major blow was report by Robert Martinson that
showed no significant difference in recidivism
rates for those in rehabilitation programs vs.
those who did not participate - Public desire for punishment took the place of
rehabilitative programs
27Conclusion
- Evolution of prisons and jail has followed the
shifting forces at work in the nation - Some have advocated that prisons work to reform
criminals - However, primary focus over time has been custody
and punishment of offenders - Fiscal resources have continued to be
insufficient to meet the needs
28Chapter 2
29Objectives
- Identify the size and scope of the local jail
population in the United States - Explain the system of health care in American
jails and issues of mental illness, substance
abuse, and infectious and communicable diseases - Comprehend the difficulties associated with
housing long-term prisoners in local jails.
30Jail Populations
- Federal, state, and local correctional facilities
house over 2.3 million persons on a daily basis,
with 750,000 of those in local jails - Between 10 and 15 million persons pass through
jail systems in a calendar year - Most persons booked into jail remain for short
periods of time
31Health Care
- All persons entering jails receive initial
screening, evaluation, treatment, or
community-based referral - Magnitude of health care problems
- HIV/AIDS
- Hepatitis
- Sexually transmitted diseases
- Tuberculosis
- Alcoholism and substance abuse
- Heart disease
- Womens issues
32Health Care (cont.)
- People often arrive in jail with preexisting
conditions and little or no relationship to
community health care programs. - Jail must triage extant issues, secure emergency
interventions, and provide referrals to
community-based health care delivery programs
33Health Care (cont.)
- Standards of Healthcare Delivery
- Jails must provide constitutional levels of
health care - Proactive efforts must be made with respect to
medication, intake screening, interviews, health
assessments, sick call procedures, emergency
services, recordkeeping, etc. - Standards of correctional health care have
blended the security responsibilities of access
to health care with the screening, evaluation,
and treatment of health care professionals.
34Health Care (cont.)
- Mental Illness and Substance Abuse
- Jails face increased level of persons with mental
illness and substance abuse due in part to
closing of mental health facilities - Mentally ill prisoners tend to remain in jail
longer than other prisoners with the same offense - Jails are generally not appropriate mental health
treatment environments - Mentally ill offenders require a tremendous
amount of resources to ensure treatment services
are met
35Health Care (cont.)
- Mental Illness and Substance Abuse (cont.)
- Jail populations would drastically decrease if
levels of substance abuse decreased in community - In 2004, 68 of jail inmates nation-wide abused
or were dependent on drugs or alcohol - Jails can provide effective short-term
intervention if they are funded properly
36Health Care (cont.)
- Co-Occurring Disorders
- Triage uncovers a growing population with
co-occurring disorders - Particularly disproportionate numbers of persons
who are both mentally ill and substance abusers - Police are often unable to find treatment options
that offer alternatives to jail
37Health Care (cont.)
- Occupational Exposure and Communicable Disease
Safety Measures - Staff training on universal precautions helps
alleviate fears regarding diseases - Dealing with bloodborne and airborne pathogens
are a routine part of operations - Variety of communicable diseases found in jails
- Jails must have written exposure control plan
38Health Care (cont.)
- Occupational Exposure and Communicable Disease
Safety Measures - Court orders can compel testing of inmates
following potential exposure incident - Requires commitment to training for staff
- Following safety measures and ensuring both
training and proper equipment will dramatically
minimize the potential for transmission
39Victim Notification
- Historically, jails did not become involved in
affairs of victim - Victims groups have advocated for release
hearings and notification of victims prior to
release, especially in domestic violence
situations - Names of those in custody are not kept
confidential if release of information would
protect victims
40Information Technology and Integration
- Historically, human error and poor data entry
resulted in release of inmates with pending
warrants or additional charges - Technologies such as electronic imagery, swift
fingerprint identification, multiple systems to
seek identity, etc. have improved this situation - Still little collaboration and systems
integration between agencies
41The Hidden Jail Population
- Thousands of misdemeanant bookings do not occur
due to insufficient jail space - Hundreds of thousands of existing warrants are
not served or citations are given when arrest
would be more appropriate - Challenge to sheriffs who are sworn to uphold the
law, but must turn away prisoners due to a lack
of space and funds
42Diversity in Jail Intake
- Linguistic skills and cultural sensitivity are
extremely important in jail intake process - Jails must increase staff diversity to deal with
diverse population of inmates
43Systems Partnership and the Role of the Community
- Jails should be seen as an integral part of the
community, as part of community-based service
networks - Jails should collaborate with service areas and
share information on inmates - Jails must serve as broker of services
44Growth of Jail Populations
- Most jails keep pretrial offenders, prisoners in
transit, probation/parole violators, people in
protective custody, or those serving sentences of
less than 1 year - Crowding pressures have resulted in increased
numbers of jails housing long-term convicted
inmates sentenced to state or federal prisons - Jails are not designed for long-term inmates
45Growth of Jail Populations (cont.)
- Reasons for increase in prison/jail populations
- More crime and longer sentences
- Overcrowded state facilities
- Local jurisdictions renting out jail space
- In 2005, jails held about 5 of state and federal
prisoners
46Growth of Jail Populations (cont.)
- Housing Long-Term Inmates
- Jails lack program and recreational space needed
by long-term inmates - Budgets are insufficient to meet their needs
- State laws increasing sentence lengths seem to be
the main factor in increasing prison crowding
47Growth of Jail Populations (cont.)
- Housing State Inmates
- State officials sometimes allow inmates to back
up in local jails to relieve overcrowding - State of Texas faced lawsuits related to
overcrowding of state inmates in jails, and
ultimately had to pay millions in reimbursement
to jails for housing prisoners - At one time, local jails in New Jersey housed
over 10 of prison population - Lawsuits and threats of lawsuits were needed in
other states to alleviate back up of state
prisoners in jails
48Growth of Jail Populations (cont.)
- Resolution
- By July 1994, state prison construction relieved
some of the pressure on counties - Some jails increased their capacity and rented
out space to the state or federal governments - Missouri contracted out with a private
corrections company, but had to regain control
following allegations of prisoner abuse
49Growth of Jail Populations (cont.)
- Considerations with Commitments to Other
Jurisdictions - When prisoners are serving longer terms, the
orientation of the detention operation must shift - Security measures must also be enhanced
- Authorities must insist that counties contracting
out bed space are providing certain services for
state inmates
50Matrix Classification System
- Plan for release of inmates due to overcrowding
at a jail and prison - Least dangerous persons should be released first,
based on an objective, computer-based scoring
system - Score based on the nature of the crime
committed, with additional points for felony
charges and failure to appear in court
51Conclusion
- Public administrators and elected officials
should understand the unique role of the jail and
its potential in broader public safety
considerations - Local jail has increasingly been used to house
federal and state inmates
52Chapter 3
53Objectives
- Understand the limitations of building
correctional facilities with specific materials - Distinguish different housing unit models on the
basis of their architectural characteristics. - Differentiate among security levels that are
suitable for various housing units
54Housing Configuration
- Prison architecture is influenced significantly
by the operating agencies policies and
management styles - Sometimes architecture changes depending on a
shift toward increased punishment or increased
rehabilitation - In recent years, prison architecture has
reflected classification systems that assess
inmates behavior
55Historical Models
- The Bastille
- Linked to a harsh approach to punishment
- Four levels high, continuous stone masonry wall,
eight cylindrical towers linked together - Two interior courtyards, crenellated parapet,
accessible only by drawbridge - Only design goal was containing masses of people
and resisting attackers
56Historical Models (cont.)
- Convict Hulks
- Wooden ships docked in harbors
- Crowded, dirty, infested with insects and
diseases - Separated Englands convicts from freedom
regardless of offense
57Historical Models (cont.)
- Panopticon
- Two-person cells arranged side-by-side in a
circular plan in the form of a drum - Four tiers high supervision tower in the center
- Difficult for officers to move about on the upper
floors - Extremely high ambient noise levels
58Historical Models (cont.)
- Pennsylvania Model
- Eastern Penitentiary in Philadelphia was
developed based on cellular housing - Cell buildings arranged in a spoke pattern
- Flanking cells were arranged in a linear plan and
faced a common central corridor and another row
of cells on the other side - Concept led to radiating wing organization for
large housing units
59Historical Models (cont.)
- Auburn Model
- Two back-to-back rows of multi-tiered cells
arranged in a straight, linear plan - Dominated US prison and jail design in 19th and
20th centuries - Over time, electrical, plumbing, and ventilation
systems were introduced to housing unit design - Usually accommodated in a continuous space behind
cells known as a chase
60Historical Models (cont.)
- Pennsylvania and Auburn Models (cont.)
- Rows of cells can be stacked in tiers accessible
by stairs - Cells are organized in the middle of the overall
space and facing the exterior walls - Beginning in late 1970s, modern fire and safety
concerns have influenced correctional
architecture - Together, the Auburn and Pennsylvania
configurations are now known as the
linear-indirect configuration because both of
them feature the long, narrow organization and
can only be effectively supervised by walking
back and forth
61Direct Supervision
- Federal BOP developed a housing unit that is
nearly square - Large, open central day room space
- Individual cells organized around square
- Correctional officer can see interior space from
any vantage point - Cells stack two high
- Known as the direct supervision model
- Encourages inmate-staff communication as well as
security
62Supermaximum Security
- BOP operated US Penitentiary on Alcatraz Island
for 30 years for dangerous inmates - Was a combination of Auburn and Pennsylvania
systems - Cells were high also featured a central dining
room, outdoor stacked two recreation, industries,
and staff housing - California introduced security housing units to
house the most violent offenders - Featured single cells, a grille-covered
recreation yard, and little movement from the
cell for inmates
63Supermaximum Security (cont.)
- Administrative maximum institution at US
Penitentiary in Colorado is the current federal
supermax facility - Each cell has its own shower, toilet, and
lavatory - Inmates can use a large recreation area between
units on schedule
64Other Design Factors
- Housing unit of a prison or jail is the most
important element of correctional design - Space is also needed to prepare and serve food,
run programs, provide medical services, put out
fires, ensure security, and provide for
sanitation and maintenance - Institutions often undergo continuous renovations
- Prisons often employ technology originally
designed for other buildings - Architecture needs to contribute to safety and
health of inmates and staff
65Conclusion
- Prison design and architecture are driven by
societal attitudes and directly relate to the
purpose for which the institution is designed.
66Chapter 4
67Objectives
- Examine technological developments in the field
of corrections - Outline concerns about new technology and
institutional security - Grasp implementation techniques to increase the
acceptance of new technology
68Development of New Technology
- New technological and automated processes can
greatly assist staff - Many military innovations have been adaptable to
prison and jail settings - Barrier wire
- Infrared night vision technology
- Identification verification equipment
69Development of New Technology (cont.)
- Information Management Systems
- Computers monitor many aspects of institutional
life - One of the best uses of technology in a
correctional environment is management of inmate
data disciplinary records, work assignments,
educational needs, medical needs - Law enforcement entities are improving their
information sharing, and information is also more
readily available to the public
70Development of New Technology (cont.)
- Prisoner Identification
- Technology helps update prisoner identification,
processing, and tracking - Digital mug shots
- Retina-imaging
- Iris-scanning equipment
- Barcoded wrist bands and electronic bracelets
- PRISM Prison Inmate and Safety Management
System monitors location of staff and inmates
with electronic wristbands
71Development of New Technology (cont.)
- Perimeter Security
- Motion detectors
- Electric fences
- Closed-circuit television cameras
- Perimeter points of ingress and egress, including
identification cards with magnetic barcodes,
voice printing and hand geometry readers,
biometric recognition, heartbeat detectors, x-ray
screening, etc.
72Development of New Technology (cont.)
- Inmate Programming
- Inmate programming that teaches about technology
and computer skills can greatly ease
reintegration - Can be done at minimal cost using donated or
recycled computers
73Development of New Technology (cont.)
- Medical Services
- Management of inmate medical records is a
substantial challenge - Electronic files allow heath care providers to
focus more on treatment rather than redundant
histories, lab work, filing - Advances in digital imaging and data transmission
have enhanced the provision of medical care by
allowing for remote diagnosis and treatment of a
variety of conditions
74Development of New Technology (cont.)
- Crisis Management
- Less-lethal weapons are now the first level of
response in crisis situations - Stun guns
- Flash bang distraction devices
- Gas
75Development of New Technology (cont.)
- New Construction and Reconstruction
- Pre-finished concrete modules have become widely
accepted - Modular buildings have exceptional quality
control, last longer, require less maintenance,
and are cheaper and faster to build
76Security Concerns
- Critical that staff be trained in protecting
system access and protecting information from 3rd
party disclosure - Technology should be secured when not in use by
authorized persons - Staff should be trained thoroughly on when and
how information can be disclosed
77Security Concerns (cont.)
- Access
- Staff should only be given access to information
that is required to perform their jobs - Line staff should not be able to access sensitive
medical data - Software systems that store private inmate data
should include user access controls and secure
passwords
78Implementation of Technological Change
- Correctional workers often express ambivalence
toward new technology and change - Technology is expensive and often represents a
departure from the traditional direct supervision
of inmates - Staff reluctance to adapt to new procedures
creates a significant management issue
79Conclusion
- Corrections-related expenditures have grown
exponentially - New technology is important and critical for
survival - To meet the demands of the future, correctional
leaders need to seek new ways of doing business,
while continuing to operate safe, secure, and
humane correctional programs