Using brand leverage to defend workers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Using brand leverage to defend workers

Description:

Using brand leverage to defend workers rights Strengths, weaknesses & challenges MFA+3: Labour rights in a changing garment industry San Pedro Sula, Honduras – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: bob1319
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using brand leverage to defend workers


1
Using brand leverage to defend workers
rightsStrengths, weaknesses challengesMFA3
Labour rights in a changing garment industry
San Pedro Sula, HondurasOctober 1st, 2008
2
Assumptions
  • Codes alone wont protect workers rights
  • Provisions weaker than ILO norms
  • Monitoring seldom accurate or effective
  • Workers left out of the process

3
However
  • Codes public commitment to worker rights
  • Acknowledgement of shared responsibility
  • Admission of weakness vulnerability of brand
    reputation
  • Tool to hold companies accountable
  • Gradual upgrading of code standards reinforcing
    ILO norms

4
Why use brand leverage?
  • Companies will respond if brand reputation
    threatened
  • Sometimes more responsive effective than
    governments
  • Compliance staff often committed to labour rights
  • Independent investigations, public reports can be
    tools for workers struggles

5
When to use brand leverage?
  • Responsive brands are major customers
  • Codes based on ILO norms
  • Violations well documented
  • Brands have experience/influence to achieve
    remediation
  • Brand/supplier relationship stable
  • Credible threat of damage to brand

6
When does brand leverage work?
  • Workers committed to strategy
  • Complements, doesnt substitute, for other
    strategies
  • Ability to mobilize if engagement fails
  • Economic/political timing is right
  • Factory owner committed to business

7
Lessons learned
  • Brands more sensitive/responsive to
    media-friendly issues
  • Less willing to touch issues where profits
    involved
  • Some will pressure on freedom of association
  • Some willing to speak out for better government
    regulation

8
Positive lesson
  • Under right circumstances, combining worker
    organizing, government lobbying, brand leverage,
    and local/international mobilization can achieve
    victories and set precedents

9
Negative lessons
  • Worker victories often temporary
  • Unionized factories are closed, production
    shifted elsewhere
  • In periods of restructuring, organizing more
    difficult, brand leverage less effective
  • Examples include
  • Vaqueros Navarra in Mexico
  • Gina Form Bra in Thailand
  • Chong Won in the Philippines

10
Challenges
  • How to pressure less brand-sensitive companies?
  • How to address increasing power of Asian
    manufacturers?
  • How to get companies to deal with systemic
    issues?

11
Conclusions
  • Growing number of companies now accept
    responsibility, but
  • Company monitoring is expensive ineffective
  • Few improvements at factory level
  • Most organizing victories short-lived
  • Global competition driving standards down

12
Reasons for optimism
  • Leading brands willing to discuss systemic
    issues, collaborate with Unions NGOs
  • Willing to support improved regulation
  • Some discount chains manufacturers joining the
    discussion
  • Increased knowledge and experience of NGOs
    Unions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com