Title: Sustaining Community Projects: Logic Model Construction and Implementation
1Sustaining Community Projects Logic Model
Construction and Implementation
- CYFAR Evaluation Team
- CYFAR, 2005
2Introduction
- Across the United States there are a multitude of
programs designed to improve the quality of life
for individuals, families, and communities. - Evaluation is essential for successful
programming to document what happens in the
program, demonstrate which strategies work best,
and assess the short-term and long-term outcomes
of the program.
3- Understanding how a program achieves results is
critical to determine if program elements should
be modified and provide stakeholders with
evidence that the program is effective. - Evaluation theory provides the basic conceptual
framework for thinking about problems and how
change should occur. - Logic models provide valuable ways to organize
that thinking around evaluation theory.
4Logic Model
- Program theory articulates program impact and
program processes. - Logic models provide a visual picture of program
theory in action (Mancini, Huebner, McCollum and
Marek, 2005). - Of primary importance in developing logic models
is establishing and maintaining a focus on
results rather than on activities.
5- Logic models help program professionals,
evaluators and stakeholders reach consensus about
which elements are essential to the program
(Millar, Simeone, Carnevale, 2001 Orthner
Bowen, 2004). - Consequently program professionals and
researchers are more able to identify faulty or
implausible links early on.
6SCP Logic Model
- The logic model you are asked to complete
includes five elements Identified needs and
assets, Desired results (short-term and
long-term), Indicators (short-term and
long-term), Activities, and Resources. - These are found on the Logic Model Template
Worksheet.
7- Desired Results Worksheets are provided to help
you detail information necessary to describe
anticipated results. - An Analysis column is included on the Desired
Results Worksheets that allows you to discuss how
you will analyze the data that are collected. - To assist you in completing your Program Logic
Model, please refer to the sample logic model of
the After School Program.
8Step 1 Identified Needs and Assets
- The first step is to identify needs and assets in
the community which allow program personnel to
clearly identify and understand the issues. - Because this is the basis for the entire program,
it is important to use accurate and valid
information rather than uninformed hunches. - Be sure to look at needs and assets at many
levels, from the community systems such as
health, education, legal, etc. to families and to
individuals.
9- Needs and assets analysis is a systematic way of
gathering information that helps set priorities
for action while also recognizing the assets that
already exist in a community. - In the logic model process the information that
evaluators are gathering to understand severity
of a problem also assists them in determining
program priorities, and results that accrue from
program activities. - Census data, observations, records and existing
data bases, and literature reviews are sources of
existing information to identify needs and assets
(Witkin Altshuld, 1995).
10Step 2 Desired Results
- The second step in the logic model process is to
articulate the desired result or change you
expect to see because of your program. - This is arguably the most important aspect of a
logic model because it provides the focus that
all successful programs need. - At the completion of the program, what will be
different?
11- Results should be defined as short-term and long-
term. - Specifying results is useful because it enables
program professionals to have a more realistic
sense of how parts of the program theory fit, and
what can reasonably be expected to change over a
specific time period. - Demonstrated results are not expected to be
documented by following the same participants for
five years, but rather are focused on all
participants, or each group, as they complete
participation in programs.
12Short-Term Results
- Changes in knowledge, attitudes, and/or behaviors
that are anticipated as a result of participating
in programs can be considered short-term results. - These results should be reported at the end of
each of the five years.
13Long-Term Results
- System change or changes in organizations,
community capacity, program support, and/or
program sustainability may be considered
long-term results. - Progress toward long-term results can be reported
for each or any of the five years but MUST be
reported in year 5.
14Step 3 Indicators
- Indicators flow logically from the desired
results. How will you know if the results have
been achieved, with what evidence? - By determining program indicators, program
activities and results can be measured and
tracked. Consequently notions, hunches, hearsay,
and anecdotes are not good indicator candidates.
15- Indicators can be far-ranging, including results
from surveys and focus groups, agency
administrative data, population data, as well as
other measures (DeVellis, 2003 McKillip, 1998).
- Evaluation Work Sheets are included to help you
specify program indicators for each of your
program goals.
16Step 4 Activities
- Activities describe programs that are implemented
to achieve the desired results. - Program activities become important only when
they are linked to desired results (Bowen et al.,
2001). - Attention to the choice of programs, research
upon which it is based, population to be served
and critical elements of successful programs must
all be considered. - By referring to the Guiding Principles for the
National Outcome that you have chosen for your
project, you will be assisted in determining
appropriate activities for your projects based
upon the desired results that you have determined.
17Step 5 Resources
- Resources include the people, stakeholders,
curricula, spaces, approvals, funds and anything
else needed to conduct the activities to achieve
the desired results to meet the identified needs
and capitalize on the available assets.
18Monitoring and Evaluation
- An important part of the logic model is how the
intervention will be monitored and evaluated,
including program implementation and its intended
results. - Monitoring and evaluation permeate all parts of a
logic model.
19- There are multiple objectives for monitoring and
evaluation - to identify the initial extent of need
- to track how the need may change over time
- to document how well program implementation
protocols are being followed - to mark progress toward achieving results
- to know when results have been met and
- to discern how resource use has supported
particular program efforts and subsequent results.
20Logic Model Work Sheets
- The Logic Model Work Sheets allow you to put your
Program Logic Model to work for you. - These worksheets are provided to help you
identify the anticipated results (short-term and
long-term) for your program as well as
indicators. - You will also need to detail the data collection
process sources of data, time of collection, and
method of collection. - Finally, you will also note the analyses you
anticipate conducting.
21- Please refer to the Program Logic Model Example
for more detail on how you can complete these
sheets for your project. - For example, in the sample logic model, the
Short-Term Desired Result Work Sheet shows the
indicators or evidence for knowledge, attitude,
and/or behavior change. - The work sheet clearly shows what data are
needed, when it will be collected, by whom, and
how it will be analyzed. - Completion of these evaluation work sheets will
guide the entire data collection, analysis and
reporting processes over the course of the
project.
22Logic Model Template
Identified Needs and Assets
Indicators Short Term Long-term
Results Short Term Long-term
Activities
Resources
Note Monitoring and evaluation activities
permeate all aspects of the logic model.
23Example of Logic Model and Work Sheets
- The following provides an illustration and
application of the logic model using an after
school program as the example. - This example is designed to stimulate your
thinking about how to most effectively integrate
your plan with this results-oriented logic model
template. - We anticipate that your logic model will contain
more detail and be more comprehensive.
24- The Logic Model is based upon the School-Age
(K-8) national outcome. - The example shows the relationships between the
identified needs and assets, the short-term and
long-term desired results, indicators, activities
and resources. - The following work sheets for the Short-Term and
Long-Term Desired Results provide further details
regarding the indicators, including the sources
of data, times and methods of data collection,
followed by planned analyses.
25Step 1 Identified Needs and Assets
- Lack of parental monitoring after school
- Many children in park and on streets in groups
after school - Church building available for program use
- Low homework completion rates among 3rd to 5th
graders
26Step 2 Desired Results
- Short-Term
- Homework completion rates for children in grades
3-5 will increase - Parents will gain knowledge of after school
resources - Parents will gain knowledge of the importance of
parental monitoring
27Step 2 Desired Results
- Long-Term
- Community support for after school programs will
be sustained - Parents will monitor their children
28Step 3 Indicators
- Short-Term
- Attendance rate at after school program
- Increased rates of homework completion
- Increased parental requests for after school
programs - Long-Term
- Community collaboration and support for space
rental, staff training, recruitment, parent
education and funding - Fewer children on streets in park after school
29Step 4 Activities
- Develop and implement a structured tutoring
program - Develop and implement a multi-component after
school program, including recreation - Develop community media campaign on importance of
parental monitoring and after school care - Educate school, faith and business communities
about importance of after school programs through
information sessions
30Step 5 Resources
- School, faith business community leaders
- Parents
- Children in K-5
- Staff time of existing organizations
- Local media cooperation
- Grant funds
31Work Sheet Completion Short-Term Desired
Results
- Homework completion rates for children in grades
3-5 will increase. - Short-Term Indicator Homework completion rates
in grades 3, 4, 5. - Source of Data Teachers classroom records.
- Time of Collection These records are currently
kept and reported quarterly to parents. - Methods of Collection
- Individuals will be coded for confidentiality.
- Enrollment in the after school program will be
coded yes or no, and homework completion rate
will be reported as percentage of assignments
turned in. - Teachers will report to evaluator each quarter.
- Data Analysis
- Completion rates for each participant will be
compared to the rate for the previous year using
paired t-tests. - Completion rates for children who are and are not
in the after school program will be compared.
32Work Sheet Completion Long-Term Desired Results
- Community support for after school programs will
be sustained. - Long-Term Indicators
- Increased community collaboration membership
- Increased sources of fiscal responsibility for
program - Source of Data Collaboration meeting minutes,
Annual budget and financial sources for program,
Administrator interviews - Time of Collection Prior to program
implementation and annually thereafter. - Media and other relevant materials to be
collected or documented in a portfolio as they
occur. - Methods of Collection
- Project evaluator and director will work together
to document and collect minutes of collaboration
meetings and other key events that influence
system change and stakeholder involvement. - Portfolios will be used to document progress.
- Data Analysis
- Formative evaluation during the first two years
of the program will help refine and direct
efforts at building community support. - Evaluator will report at least bi-annually to the
collaboration on progress made and key areas that
need to be strengthened.