Informing health professionals, protecting patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Informing health professionals, protecting patients

Description:

Informing health professionals, protecting patients Richard Smith Editor, BMJ Lagos 2001 What I want to talk about The usefulness of information Methods for informing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:165
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: BMJ
Learn more at: https://sites.pitt.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Informing health professionals, protecting patients


1
Informing health professionals, protecting
patients
  • Richard Smith
  • Editor, BMJ
  • Lagos 2001

2
What I want to talk about
  • The usefulness of information
  • Methods for informing professionals
  • How are we doing?
  • How could we do better?
  • Are patients getting the best treatments?
  • Are they safe?
  • How do we protect patients?
  • How could we do better?

3
Utility of information
  • Utilityrelevance x validity x interactivity

    work to access

4
(No Transcript)
5
Current problems with informing professionals
  • A picture that captures in one image how doctors
    feel about information

6
(No Transcript)
7
Current problems with information supply
  • Our current information policy resembles the
    worst aspects of our old agricultural policy,
    which left grain rotting in thousands of storage
    files while people were starving. We have
    warehouses of unused information rotting while
    critical questions are left unanswered and
    critical problems are left unresolved. Al Gore

8
Current problems
  • On my desk I have accumulated journals and books
    as information sources, and I assume that I use
    them. But in some respects they are not as useful
    as they might be. Many of my textbooks are out of
    date I would like to purchase new ones, but they
    are expensive. My journals are not organised so
    that I can quickly find answers to questions that
    arise, and so I dont have print sources that
    will answer some questions. On the other hand,
    there is likely to be a human source who can
    answer nearly all of the questions that arise,
    albeit with another set of barriers. An ordinary
    doctor

9
Current problems
  • Think of all the information that you might read
    to help you do your job better.
  • How much of it do you read?

10
(No Transcript)
11
Current problems
  • Do you feel guilty about how much or how little
    you read?

12
(No Transcript)
13
Words used by 41 doctors to describe their
information supply
  • Impossible Impossible Impossible Impossible
    Impossible Impossible
  • Overwhelming Overwhelming Overwhelming
    Overwhelming Overwhelming Overwhelming
  • Difficult Difficult Difficult Difficult
  • Daunting Daunting Daunting
  • Pissed off
  • Choked
  • Depressed
  • Despairing
  • Worrisome
  • Saturation
  • Vast
  • Help
  • Exhausted
  • Frustrated
  • Time consuming
  • Dreadful
  • Awesome
  • Struggle
  • Mindboggling
  • Unrealistic
  • Stress
  • Challenging Challenging Challenging
  • Excited
  • Vital importance

14
Conclusions of studies of doctors information
needs during consultations
  • Information needs do arise regularly when doctors
    see patients (about two questions per
    consultation)
  • Questions are most likely to be about treatment,
    particularly drugs.
  • Questions are often complex and multidimensional
  • The need for information is often much more than
    a question about medical knowledge. Doctors are
    looking for guidance, psychological support,
    affirmation, commiseration, sympathy, judgement,
    and feedback.

15
Conclusions of studies of doctors information
needs during consultations
  • Most of the questions generated in consultations
    go unanswered
  • Doctors are most likely to seek answers to their
    questions from other doctors
  • Most of the questions can be answered - but it is
    time consuming and expensive to do so
  • Doctors seem to be overwhelmed by the information
    provided for them

16
Whats wrong with medical journals
  • Dont meet information needs
  • Too many of them
  • Too much rubbish
  • Too hard work
  • Not relevant
  • Too boring
  • Too expensive

17
Whats wrong with medical journals
  • Dont add value
  • Slow every thing down
  • Too biased
  • Anti-innovatory
  • Too awful to look at
  • Too pompous
  • Too establishment

18
Whats wrong with medical journals
  • Dont reach the developing world
  • Cant cope with fraud
  • Nobody reads them
  • Too much duplication
  • Too concerned with authors rather than readers

19
A vision of something better
  • "It's easy to say what would be the ideal online
    resource for scholars and scientists all papers
    in all fields, systematically interconnected,
    effortlessly accessible and rationally navigable,
    from any researcher's desk, worldwide for free.
    Stevan Harnad

20
The thing
  • The information tool that will answer doctors and
    patients questions within 15 seconds - as they
    consult
  • There is a worldwide search for the thing

21
Characteristics of the thing
  • Must be able to answer highly complex questions--
    so will have to be connected to a large valid
    database
  • Electronic
  • Portable
  • Fast
  • Easy to use
  • Will prompt doctors rather than simply answer
    questions

22
Characteristics of the thing
  • Doctors must find it helpful rather than
    demeaning
  • Probably be connected to the patient record
  • A servant of patients as well as doctors
  • Will provide psychological support and
    affirmation.
  • Probably there will be no single tool but a
    family of tools

23
Are patients getting the best treatments?
  • Often no

24
Overtreatment
  • Many operations are performed inappropriately
  • Too many Caeasarean sections
  • Medicalisation of birth enemas, pubic shaving,
    episiotomies, intrapartum monitoring
  • Overprescribing of antiobiotics
  • Overuse of tranquillisers

25
Undertreatment
  • Rule of halves for most chronic diseases half
    not detected half of those detected not treated
    half of those treated not treated adequately
  • Aspirin after heart attacks or stroke
  • ACE inhibitors in heart failure
  • Statins
  • Doses of antidepressants too low

26
Are patients safe?
  • Not as safe as they should be

27
Unsafe in two ways
  • Damage from rogue doctors
  • Damage from medical error

28
Bristol babies
29
Harold ShipmanGP murderer
30
Rodney LedwardBlundering gynaecologist
31
Newspaper headlines11 November 1999
  • "University shame of the bogus professor
  • "Sterilisation surgeon suspended"
  • "Woman had breasts removed in error"
  • "Suspect doc in drug probe"
  • "Banned test kits still used in NHS hospitals"
  • "Stethoscopes and lies"

32
How common are these problems?
  • Over a five year period concerns serious enough
    to warrant the consideration of disciplinary
    action were raised about 6 of all senior medical
    staff (49/850).
  • 96 types of problem were encountered
  • Poor attitude and disruptive or irresponsible
    behaviour (32)
  • Lack of commitment to duties (21)
  • Poor skills and inadequate knowledge (19),
    Dishonesty (11)
  • Sexual matters (7)
  • 25 of the 49 doctors retired or left the
    employer's service

33
Why do these problems happen?
  • Every profession contains rogues
  • Its especially easy to get away with it in the
    NHS
  • Poor surveillance, particularly of single handed
    GPs
  • There but for the grace of God go I
  • All doctors are problem doctors

34
Responding to rogues
  • Its not easy
  • Patients
  • Colleagues--? In Nigeria
  • Criminal justice system
  • GMC
  • Commission for Health Improvement
  • National Patient Safety Agency
  • Machinery to improve quality

35
How common is error?
  • Harvard Medical Practice Study
  • Reviewed medical charts of 30 121 patients
    admitted to 51 acute care hospitals in New York
    state in 1984
  • In 3.7 an adverse event led to prolonged
    admission or produced disability at the time of
    discharge
  • 69 of injuries were caused by errors

36
How common is medical error?
  • Australian study
  • Investigators reviewed the medical records of 14
    179 admissions to 28 hospitals in New South Wales
    and South Australia in 1995.
  • An adverse event occurred in 16.6 of admissions,
    resulting in permanent disability in 13.7 of
    patients and death in 4.9
  • 51 of adverse events were considered to have
    been preventable.

37
Results of medical error
  • In Australia medical error results in as many as
    18 000 unnecessary deaths, and more than 50 000
    patients become disabled each year.
  • In the United States medical error results in at
    least 44 000 (and perhaps as many as 98 000)
    unnecessary deaths each year and 1 000 000 excess
    injuries.

38
Types of error
  • About half of the adverse events occurring among
    inpatients resulted from surgery.
  • Next come
  • Complications from drug treatment
  • therapeutic mishaps
  • diagnostic errors were the most common
    non-operative events. In the Australian study
    cognitive errors, such as making an

39
Types of error
  • Cognitive errors--such as incorrect diagnosis or
    choosing the wrong medication-- more likely to
    have been preventable and more likely to result
    in permanent disability than technical errors.

40
How dangerous is health care?
  • Less than one death per 100 000 encounters
  • Nuclear power
  • European railroads
  • Scheduled airlines
  • One death in less than 100 000 but more than 1000
    encounters
  • Driving
  • Chemical manufacturing
  • More than one death per 1000 encounters
  • Bungee jumping
  • Mountain climbing
  • Health care

41
Why do errors happen?
  • All humans make errors indeed, the ability to
    make mistakes allows human beings to function
  • Most of medicine is complex and uncertain
  • Most errors result from the system--inadequate
    training, long hours, ampoules that look the
    same, lack of checks, etc
  • Healthcare has not tried to make itself safe

42
How to think of error?
  • An individual failing
  • Only the minority of cases amount from negligence
    or misconduct so its the wrong diagnosis
  • It will not solve the problem--it will probably
    in fact make it worse because it fails to address
    the problem
  • Doctors will hide errors
  • May destroy many doctors inadvertently (the
    second victim)

43
How to think of error?
  • A systems failure
  • This is the starting point for redesigning the
    system and reducing error

44
Raising quality and reducing error
  • Clinical governance
  • Revalidation
  • Government machinery
  • Building a safety culture

45
Two ideas from clinical governance
  • Boards of hospitals have always legal and
    financial governance
  • The quality of clinical care was the
    responsibility of professionals
  • Now the boards are responsible for the quality of
    clinical care
  • This requires new ways of thinking

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
Revalidation
  • Guaranteeing to patients that doctors are safe,
    competent, professional, ethical, and up to date
  • Will happen every five years
  • Not so easy
  • A record on attending education is not enough
  • Need data on practice and outcomes
  • Linked to appraisal

49
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Principles
  • Policies
  • Procedures
  • Practices

50
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Principles
  • Safety is everybodys business
  • Top management accepts setbacks and anticipates
    errors
  • safety issues are considered regularly at the
    highest level
  • Past events are reviewed and changes implemented

51
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Principles
  • After a mishap management concentrates on fixing
    the system not blaming the individual
  • Understand that effective risk management depends
    on the collection, analysis, and dissemination of
    data
  • Top management is proactive in improving
    safety--seeks out error traps, eliminates error
    producing factors, brainstorms new scenarios of
    failure

52
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Policies
  • Safety related information has direct access to
    the top
  • Risk management is not an oubliette
  • Meetings on safety are attended by staff from
    many levels and departments
  • Messengers are rewarded not shot
  • Top managers create a reporting culture and a
    just culture

53
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Policies
  • Reporting includes qualified indemnity,
    confidentiality, separation of data collection
    from disciplinary procedures
  • Disciplinary systems agree the difference between
    acceptable and unacceptable behaviour and involve
    peers

54
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Procedures
  • -Training in the recognition and recovery of
    errors
  • Feedback on recurrent error patterns
  • An awareness that procedures cannot cover all
    circumstances on the spot training
  • Protocols written with those doing the job
  • Procedures must be intelligible, workable,
    available

55
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Procedures
  • Clinical supervisors train their charges in the
    mental as well as the technical skills necessary
    for safe and effective performance

56
Building a safe healthcare system (from James
Reason)
  • Practices
  • Rapid, useful, and intelligible feedback on
    lessons learnt and actions needed
  • Bottom up information listened to and acted on
  • And when mishaps occur
  • Acknowledge responsibility
  • Apologise
  • Convince patients and victims that lessons
    learned will reduce chance of recurrence

57
James Reasons bottom line
  • Fallibility is part of the human condition
  • We cant change the human condition
  • We can change the conditions under which people
    work

58
Conclusions
  • There is huge room for improvement within health
    care and the dissemination of medical information
  • The internet and information technology offer
    great possibilities for improvement
  • Patients are at high risk of poor treatment and
    medical error and at lower risk of abuse by a
    rogue doctor
  • The response depends more on changing systems
    than individuals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com