THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING A COMMUNITY RESILIENT TO EARTHQUAKES

About This Presentation
Title:

THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING A COMMUNITY RESILIENT TO EARTHQUAKES

Description:

THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING A COMMUNITY RESILIENT TO EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA –

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: Walte58
Learn more at: https://sites.pitt.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING A COMMUNITY RESILIENT TO EARTHQUAKES


1
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING A COMMUNITY
RESILIENT TO EARTHQUAKES
Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster
Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA
2
MAKING OUR FUTURE BETTER THAN OUR PAST
PERIOD OF INTEGRATION 1990-2012
WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY 2012
PERIOD OF IMPLEMENTATION NOW
PERSON-ALIZE
ACT
3
COMMUNITIES ARE AT RISK FROM
  • FLOODS
  • SEVERE WINDSTORMS
  • EARTHQUAKES
  • TSUNAMIS
  • DROUGHTS
  • VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS
  • LANDSLIDES
  • WILDFIRES

4
A COMMUNITYS BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE MUST
BE RESILIENT TO GROUND SHAKING AND GROUND FAILURE
5
THE RISK TO A COMMUNITYS BUILT ENVIRONMENT IS
DIRECTLY RELATED TO ITS VULNERABILITIES
RISK
6
WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT A CITY AND ITS BUILT
ENVIRONMENT (B.E.)
  • CITIES AND MEGACITIES EXIST BY GEOLOGIC,
    HYDROLOGIC, AND ATMOSPHERIC CONSENT AND THE
    B.E.s VULNER-ABILITIES

7
CAUSES OF VULNER-ABILITIES
INADEQUATE BUILDING CODES
INADEQUATE LIFELINE STANDARDS
SITING IN LOCATIONS PRONE TO SURFACE FAULTING,
LAND-SLIDES, LIQUEFACTION
IRREGULARITIES IN ELEVATION AND PLAN
EARTHQUAKES
INADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
DISASTER LABORATORIES
SITING ON SOFT SOILS
INADEQUATE ANCHORAGE OF NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
8
CONSEQUENCES OF COMMUNITY VULNERABILITIES
RISK
9
EVERY COMMUNITY CAN MAKE ITS FUTURE BETTER THAN
ITS PAST
  • GOAL 1 LEARN FROM THE PAST
  • GOAL 2 REDUCE COMMUNITY VULNERABILITIES THAT
    INCREASE RISK FOR PEOPLE, PROPERTY, AND
    INFRASTRUCTURE

10
PAST DISASTERS PROVIDE A REALITY CHECK Source
Munich Re and many past earthquakes

11
ALL VULNERABILITIES CAN BE FIXED
12
ALL VULNERABILITIES ARE FIXABLE
13
ALL VULNERABILITIES ARE FIXABLE
14
ALL VULNERABILITIES ARE FIXABLE
  • A UTILITY CORRIDOR IS VULNERABLE TO LOSS OF
    FUNCTION WHEN ROUTED THROUGH SOILS THAT ARE
    SUSCEPTIBLE TO LIQUEFACTION.

15
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
  • WHAT LEVEL OF CASUALTIES WILL OCCUR IN A FUTURE
    EARTHQUAKE IF THE VULNERABILITIES IN THE B.E. ARE
    NOT FIXED?
  • WHAT LEVEL OF ECONOMIC LOSSES WILL OCCUR IN A
    FUTURE EARTHQUAKE IF THE VULNER-ABILITIES IN THE
    B.E. ARE NOT FIXED?

16
INADEQUATE SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS
(I.E., BUILDING CODES AND LIFELINE
STANDARDS)
  • MEAN
  • 1) INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO HORIZONTAL GROUND
    SHAKING
  • 2) COLLAPSE OF BUILDINGS AND LOSS OF FUNCTION OF
    LIFELINES

17
NOTABLE PAST DISASTERS
  • SAN FRANCISCO
  • 1906 EARTHQUAKE FIRE
  • 3,000 CASUALTIES
  • 524 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 180 M INSURED LOSS

18
(No Transcript)
19
NOTABLE PAST DISASTERS
  • TOKYO
  • 1923 EARTHQUAKE FIRE
  • 142,807 CASUALTIES
  • 2,800 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 590 M INSURED LOSS

20
(No Transcript)
21
NOTABLE PAST DISASTERS
  • MANAGUA
  • 1972 EARTHQUAKE
  • 11,000 CASUALTIES
  • 800 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 100 M INSURED LOSS

22
(No Transcript)
23
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • TANGSHAN
  • 1976 EARTHQUAKE
  • 240,000 CASUALTIES
  • 5,600 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • ---0 M INSURED LOSS

24
(No Transcript)
25
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • MEXICO CITY
  • 1985 EARTHQUAKE
  • 9,500 CASUALTIES
  • 4,000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 275 M INSURED LOSS

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • LOMA PRIETA (SAN FRANCISCO)
  • 1989 EARTHQUAKE
  • 61 CASUALTIES
  • 5,000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 1,000 M INSURED LOSS

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • NORTHRIDGE, CALIFORNIA
  • 1994 EARTHQUAKE
  • 61 CASUALTIES
  • 44,000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 15,300 M INSURED LOSS

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • KOBE, JAPAN
  • 1995 EARTHQUAKE
  • 6,400 CASUALTIES
  • 100,000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 3,000 M INSURED LOSS

39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • IZMET, TURKEY
  • 1999 EARTHQUAKE
  • 17,200 CASUALTIES
  • 12,000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • 600 M INSURED LOSS

44
(No Transcript)
45
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • BAM, IRAN
  • 2003 EARTHQUAKE
  • 40,000 CASUALTIES
  • ?000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • --00 M INSURED LOSS

46
2003 Bam, Iran Earthquake
47
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • BANDA ACHE, INDONESIA
  • 2004 EARTHQUAKE TSUNAMI
  • 240,000 CASUALTIES
  • 4,000 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • ?--00 M INSURED LOSS

48
2004 BANDA ACHE EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI
49
2004 BANDA ACHE EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI
50
PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS
  • SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA
  • 2008 EARTHQUAKE
  • 80,000 CASUALTIES
  • 13,300 M LOSS (ORIGINAL VALUES)
  • --00 M INSURED LOSS

51
SICHUAN, CHINA EARTHQUAKE INADEQUATE BUILDING
CODE
52
TWENTY-ONE DAYS LATER
  • 45,690,000 people were affected by the disaster.

53
HAITI EARTHQUAKE INADEQUATE BUILDING CODE
JANUARY 12, 2010
54
TSUNAMI JAPANMARCH 12, 2011
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com