Computation Fluid Dynamics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Computation Fluid Dynamics

Description:

Computation Fluid Dynamics & Modern Computers: Tacoma Narrows Bridge Case Study Farzin Shakib ACUSIM Software, Inc. 2003 SGI Technical Users Conference – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Farzin4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computation Fluid Dynamics


1
Computation Fluid Dynamics Modern Computers
Tacoma Narrows Bridge Case Study
  • Farzin Shakib
  • ACUSIM Software, Inc.
  • 2003 SGI Technical Users Conference
  • June 13, 2003

2
Content
  • Brief Company Product Overview
  • Tacoma Narrows Bridge Upgrade Project
  • Effectiveness of CFD in a large scale project
  • Need for ever larger and more complex solutions
  • Design for High Performance Computers
  • Conclusions

3
Company Overview
  • Founded in 1994
  • First product sold in 1997
  • Who has continued in production and steadily
    increased usage
  • Marketed through distributor channels and direct
    sales
  • Success stories
  • Visteon employs AcuSolve for
  • climate control (ICCE) and
  • underhood cooling (UPV)
  • analyses of production cars
  • ORCA A fully integrated
  • mixing package for chemical
  • and pharmaceutical companies

4
CFD Product AcuSolve
  • A powerful general-purpose finite element
    incompressible flow solver
  • AcuSolves differentiation
  • Robustness Most problems solved on the first
    attempt
  • Speed Coupled solver on distributed parallel
    machines
  • Accuracy Highly accurate in space and time
    while
  • globally and locally conservative
  • Features Rich set of functionality continuously
    growing
  • An ideal enabling technology for
  • integrated engineering and
  • scientific applications

5
Tacoma Narrows Bridge Upgrade Project
Advanced Simulation Bechtel National, Inc.
6
CFD Project
  • Use CFD to predict time-varying loads and moments
    on new bridge caissons (East and West) for Flood
    and Ebb flows
  • Show CFD can predict known drag coefficients
  • Show CFD can match experiment scale model
  • Use CFD to predict variation in loads
  • due to changing flow directions
  • for different caisson drafts
  • for full scale geometry

7
Validation flow around standard objects
8
Cylinder Test Case - Re 1.15 e08
  • Time history of computed Drag

9
Cylinder Test Case - Performance
  • Mesh 500K Tet-elements, 100K nodes
  • 2-processors 900MHz Itanium II
  • Steady-state RANS Solution (SA turbulence model)
  • 50 time steps in 30 minutes
  • CD 0.5
  • Transient Hybrid RANS/LES Solution (DES)
  • 1000 time steps in 8 hours
  • CD 0.7
  • Same solution with 3.5M Tet-element mesh

10
Square Cylinder Test Case - Re 115000
  • Time history of computed Drag

CFD fine mesh Cd 1.98, Sh 0.12
NACA at Re100000 Cd2.0, Parker Welsh Sh
0.12
11
Computational Domain / Mesh
Transient simulation Hybrid RANS/LES model
3M Tet/Prism-elements ICEM-CFD Tetra Module
12
East Side Caisson 4.6 m/s Flood
13
Force Time History East Side 4.6 m/s Flood
14
East/West caissons 3.6 m/s Ebb
Flow streamlines around caisson
East Side
West Side
15
East/West caissons 3.6 m/s Ebb
Velocity profile at 120 ft depth
East Side
West Side
16
Validation Against Experiment
  • HR Wallingford (in UK) conducted experiment
  • Re 105 Model-Scale
  • CFD Solutions at
  • Re 108 Full-Scale
  • Re 105 Model-Scale
  • Comparison
  • CFD Re105 compared with experiment
  • CFD Re105 / Re108 comparison is used to
  • Scale up HRW measurements to Re108

17
Model Scale vs. Full Scale Y Force
18
Frequency Spectrum
19
Observations
  • Excellent agreement between CFD and Experiment on
    large scale measures
  • Total Drag and Lift
  • Drag and Lift RMS (total energy)
  • Primary shedding frequency
  • CFD solution is too coarse to resolve fine scale
    frequencies

20
Fine Mesh
  • Mesh 23M Tet-elements 5M nodes
  • 8x finer than previous meshes
  • Hybrid RANS/LES transient solution
  • Requires fast parallel machine
  • 32-processor SGI Altix (900 MHz Itanium II)
  • 750 time steps
  • 30 hours
  • 8.5 GBytes of memory

21
Fine Mesh Solution
22
Fine Regular Mesh Solution Comparison
23
Demand on CFD
  • Users are placing ever larger demands on
    performance of CFD solvers
  • AcuSolve responds through
  • Accurate numerical technology
  • Galerkin/Least-Squares Finite Element technology
  • Fast/robust linear and nonlinear solution
    algorithms
  • Coupled pressure/velocity iterative solution
    algorithms
  • Design for High Performance Computers
  • Single processor performance
  • Parallel performance

24
Single-Processor Performance
  • Fast element formation
  • Block elements in self similar groups
  • Arrange memory with stride 1 block data
  • Optimize memory layout for cache access
  • Fast linear solution
  • Access LHS matrices sequentially
  • Reorder equations based on proximity
  • Avoid excessive indirections
  • Hybrid programming
  • C for overall control of program
  • Fortran for numerical computation

25
Parallel Processing
  • Designed from beginning for coarse grain parallel
    machines
  • Host-less architecture
  • Domain decomposition distributes elements and
    nodes to different processors
  • Transparent to the user
  • The number of processors may be changed at
    restart
  • MPI for distributed-memory machines
  • MPI and/or OpenMP for SMP machines
  • All algorithms work seamlessly on parallel
    machines

26
Conclusions
  • AcuSolve accurately computed transient turbulent
    flows around caisson and pier.
  • Solution was used to design anchoring system of
    new span of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.
  • Solution agreed well with experiment on all
    primary features.
  • Fine scale features required finer meshes, which
    required faster and larger machines.
  • This trend will continue in the foreseeable
    future.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com