Standardizing Arguments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Standardizing Arguments

Description:

Standardizing Arguments with the Toulmin Model Premises(Grounds) Conclusion (Claim) REASONING (WARRANT) G So C; Since W Harry was ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Gerr56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Standardizing Arguments


1
Standardizing Arguments
  • Premise 1 New Mexico offers many outdoor
    activities.
  • Premise 2 New Mexico has rich history of Native
    Americans and of Spanish conquest
  • Premise 3 New Mexico is inexpensive.
  • _______________________________
  • Conclusion New Mexico is an excellent vacation
    choice.

2
Standardizing Arguments
  • Claim New Mexico is an excellent vacation
    choice.
  • ______________________________________
  • Support/Evidence 1 New Mexico offers many
    outdoor activities.
  • Support/Evidence 2 New Mexico has rich history
    of Native Americans and Spanish conquest
  • Support/Evidence 3 New Mexico is inexpensive.

3
Standardizing Arguments with the Toulmin Model
  • Premises(Grounds)???Conclusion (Claim)
  • REASONING (WARRANT)
  • G ? So C Since W
  • Harry was born in the U.S. (Grounds)
  • ? So Harry is a U.S. citizen (Claim)
  • Since A person born in the U.S. is legally a U.S.
    citizen (Warrant) 

4
Toulmin Model, cont.
  • (G) Harry was born in the U.S.
  • ?So
  • (Q) presumably,
  • (C) Harry is a U.S. citizen
  • (R) unless he did not claim the U.S. citizenship
  • Since
  • (W) A person born in the U.S. is legally a U.S.
    citizen
  • On account of (B) U.S. immigration law

5
Main Types of Reasoning
  • INDUCTIVE forming generalizations from specific
    instances
  • DEDUCTIVE reasoning from principles (known
    facts)
  • CAUSAL reasoning
  • PARALLEL CASE

6
Inductive Reasoning
  • Reasoning that moves from particular facts to a
    general conclusion.

7
Guidelines for Inductive Reasoning
  • Are there enough specific instances?
  • Are the specific instances typical?
  • Are the instances recent / relevant?

8
Deductive Reasoning
  • Reasoning that moves from a general principle to
    a specific conclusion.
  • The conclusion of deductive reasoning is certain
    rather than probable.

9
Syllogisms
  • Major Premise All humans are mortal
  • Minor Premise Socrates is a human
  • Therefore
  • Conclusion Socrates is mortal

10
Guidelines for Deductive Reasoning
  • Make sure listeners will accept your general
    principle (major premise)
  • Provide evidence to support your minor premise

11
Causal Reasoning
  • Reasoning that seeks to establish causal
    relationship between two phenomena / events.
  • A causes B

12
Guidelines for Causal Reasoning
  • Avoid the fallacy of false cause
  • Do not assume that events have only a single cause

13
Parallel cases Reasoning
  • Reasoning in which a speaker compares two
    similar cases and infers that what is true for
    the first case is also true for the second.

14
Guidelines for Parallel Cases Reasoning
  • Above all, make sure the two cases being
    compared are essentially alike

15
Fallacy
  • An error in reasoning.

16
Fallacies
  • Hasty generalization
  • Causal Fallacies (False cause)
  • Bandwagon Fallacy
  • Ad Hominem
  • Either / Or Fallacy
  • Invalid analogy
  • Appeals to Misplaced Authority, Ignorance,
    Emotion, Tradition

17
Hasty Generalization
  • A fallacy in which a speaker jumps to a general
    conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence.

18
False Cause
  • A fallacy in which a speaker mistakenly assumes
    that because one event follows another, the first
    event is the cause of the second.

19
Invalid Analogy
  • An analogy in which the two cases being compared
    are not essentially alike.

20
Red Herring
  • A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to
    divert attention from the subject under
    discussion.

21
Red Herring
  • Why should we worry about the amount of violence
    on television when thousands of people are killed
    in automobile accidents each year?

22
Ad Hominem
  • A fallacy that attacks the person rather than
    dealing with the real issue in dispute.

23
Ad Hominem
  • The governor has a number of interesting
    economic proposals, but lets not forget that she
    comes from a very wealthy family.

24
Either-Or
  • A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between
    two alternatives when more than two alternatives
    exist.

25
Either-Or
  • The government must either raise taxes or
    reduce services for the poor.

26
Bandwagon
  • A fallacy that assumes that because something is
    popular, it is therefore good, correct, or
    desirable.

27
Bandwagon
  • The President must be correct in his approach
    to domestic policy after all, polls show that 60
    percent of the people support him.

28
Slippery Slope
  • A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step
    will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be
    prevented.

29
Slippery Slope
  • Passing federal laws to control the amount of
    violence on television is the first step in a
    process that will result in absolute government
    control of the media and total censorship over
    all forms of artistic expression.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com