MR Enterography - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

MR Enterography

Description:

MR Enterography Inflammatory Bowel Disease Why? What the clinician wants to know Presence, localization, and extent of disease Complications strictures, abscesses ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:501
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: kb97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MR Enterography


1
MR Enterography
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2
Why? What the clinician wants to know
  • Presence, localization, and extent of disease
  • Complications strictures, abscesses, fistulas
  • Disease activity active vs fibrotic

3
How to do it?
  • Patient prep
  • Bowel prep day before low residue diet, fluids,
    laxative
  • Overnight fasting or NPO 4-6 hrs prior to study
  • Oral contrast
  • Water results in inadequate distention, long
    transit time
  • Biphasic oral contrast agents
  • Different signal intensities on different
    sequences (low T1, bright T2)
  • VoLumen - a low-conc barium (0.1 weight/volume)
    that contains sorbitol (CHOP, Emory 2007)
  • Mannitol, sorbitol and polyethylene glycol have
    been used to slow down intestinal reabsorption of
    water
  • Can cause N/V, diarrhea, cramping

4
How to do it?
  • Prone positioning
  • Glucagon IM or IV
  • to stop peristalsis
  • ½ dose before study starts, ½ dose prior to
    contrast
  • Timing
  • Typical adult 1-1.5 L over 45-90 min
  • Child 1 L one hour prior to exam
  • Filling of TI occurs in kids at 20-25 minutes,
    adults 1 hour
  • Rectal contrast water enema for better
    distention of colon, TI
  • not generally used unless incomplete colonoscopy
  • MR Entercolysis improved bowel distention (esp
    jejunum)
  • Invasive, time consuming

5
Egleston Protocol
  • No patient prep
  • Oral contrast Kool-aide with gastroview
  • Powerade/gatorade cannot be used due to
    susceptibility artifact
  • Timing
  • 2 doses first dose wait one hour, then drink ½
    scan 30 minutes later
  • Ex 24/12
  • Volume and timing same as CT guidelines
  • No glucagon
  • Supine position
  • Magnevist

6
Sequences
  • T2w HASTE (haste, spair)
  • TrueFISP (trufi, space)
  • Post contrast
  • Axial and coronal planes
  • Coronal plane good for terminal ileum, appy good
    overview
  • Sagittal thru pelvis

7
HASTE
haste non FS spair - FS
  • Fast
  • High contrast between bowel lumen and wall
  • Best sequence for determining bowel wall
    thickness
  • Fluid collections
  • Submucosal edema (spair)
  • Sensitive to intraluminal flow voids
  • Poor evaluation of mesentery

8
TrueFISP
trufi space - pelvis
  • Fast
  • Relatively motion insensitive
  • High contrast between small bowel lumen and bowel
    walls
  • Homogeneous endoluminal opacification
  • Good mesenteric anatomy (LAN, comb sign, vessels)
  • Susceptibility artifacts from intraluminal air
  • Chemical shift artifacts black boundary
  • Occurs in pixels with fat water
  • Improved with FS

9
Post contrast VIBE FLASH
  • Venous, delayed for bowel (enteric phase at 75
    sec post gad)
  • VIBE 3D more motion sensitive
  • FLASH 2D, thicker slices, but relatively motion
    insensitive (Shiran insurance plan)
  • Combination of FS and low SI intraluminal
    contrast increase the ability to detect wall
    enhancement
  • Active vs fibrotic disease
  • Bowel wall enhancement in active disease and
    fibrotic disease
  • Stratification can indicate active disease
  • Enhancing mesenteric adenopathy sign of active
    disease
  • Complications fistulas, abscess best seen post
    gad

10
Pelvis T1 axial FS, high res
  • Post gad T1 images are better for the pelvis than
    the gradient echo (VIBE and FLASH)
  • Gas/stool in rectum degrade images thru the
    pelvis due to susceptibility artifact on the
    gradient echo images
  • Motion is not usually a big issue in pelvis

11
MR Features IBD
  • Transmural bowel wall thickening, thickened folds
  • Cobblestone
  • Submucosal Edema use spair images indicates
    active dz
  • Mesenteric changes
  • Fat wrapping/creeping fat
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Vascular hyperemia comb sign
  • Complications
  • Strictures
  • Fistulas
  • Abscess

Early disease with mucosal ulceration and
nodularity is not well seen on MR
12
Fold thickening ulceration
  • Deep ulcerations focal linear areas of high SI
    through thickened bowel wall
  • Normal bowel wall and folds are low SI on both
    the true FISP and HASTE images

13
Deep ulcerations
14
Bowel wall thickening
  • gt 3 mm abnormal
  • Most patients in crohns 5-10 mm

Marked wall thickening terminal ileum
15
Bowel wall thickening
Coronal true-FISP (A) and axial HASTE (B) images
shows polypoid thickening of the cecal wall
(arrows). Compare this with the normal wall
thickness of the descending colon (arrowhead).
16
Mesenteric changes
  • TrueFISP
  • Small mesenteric lymph nodes
  • Comb sign
  • Small lymph nodes seen in active and chronic
    disease
  • Enhancement LN suggest active disease

17
Mesenteric changes
T1 and true FISP comb sign and creeping fat
18
Mesenteric changes
19
Active vs. Chronic post contrast images
  • Post contrast images
  • Fibrosis low level, mild to moderate
    inhomogeneous enhancement
  • Active disease homogeneous intense enhancement
    or stratified enhancement

20
Ileal and appendix dz
haste
Post gad
haste
Post gad
21
Active vs ChronicSubmucosal Edema
  • D. Martin RSNA 2007
  • TI post gad very sensitive for detection of IBD
    but spair better for determining active vs
    chronic
  • Submucosal edema classic finding in active
    inflammation
  • Use spair images (haste fs) to detect submucosal
    edema
  • Study found many false positives for post gad
  • T2 images better correlated with active vs
    inactive disease

22
Active vs Chronic
haste
Post gad venous
-enhancing abnl loop post gad -no edema on
spair -thus FIBROTIC disease
Spair/haste FS
23
Enhancement
Stratified enhancement (c,d) indicative of active
disease.
24
Stratified Enhancement active disease
25
Complications - strictures
  • Coronal images good for looking for strictures
  • gt 3 cm bowel distention upstream indicates
    functional obstruction

26
Complications Star sign internal fistula
Post gad
Star sign of internal fistula Patient had
entero-entero fistula
HASTE
27
Complications perianal dz
HASTE
Fistula post gad
FS post gad
28
Complications perianal fistula
spair
Post gad
29
Complications perianal fistula on T2 images
30
Complications perianal abscess
31
Complications phelgmon/abscess
Post-gad
trueFISP
Medial wall of terminal ileum is partially
indistinct and bulging medially suggesting
phlegmon/early abscess.
32
Pitfalls
  • Incomplete luminal distention
  • Can mimic bowel wall thickening
  • Black border artifact on trueFISP can over
    estimate wall thickness
  • use HASTE for wall thickness
  • Intraluminal flow artifact on HASTE can simulate
    cobblestone
  • Check TrueFISP
  • Fistula can be missed since not dynamic

33
Pitfalls
  • True FISP MR image shows extensive susceptibility
    artifacts generated by trapped endoluminal air
  • Susceptibility artifact
  • Signal dropout
  • Bright spots
  • Spatial distortion

34
Pitfalls artifacts
HASTE
TruFISP
Arrowheads black boundary Arrow
susceptibility artifact from trapped air
curved arrow on both TI thickening
35
Summary
  • Haste, trufi and post contrast images to identify
    abnormal bowel
  • Coronal images good for terminal ileum, overall
    picture
  • Evaluate for strictures
  • Look for associated mesenteric changes
  • Active vs fibrotic
  • Haste vs spair ?submucosal edema
  • Stratification of edema post contrast
  • Use space, T1 post gad high res images to look
    for perianal disease
  • Post contrast images for fistula, abscess

36
References
  • Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J,
    Rousomoustakaki M, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N. MR
    enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease.
    RadioGraphics 200121(Spec Issue)S161S172
  • Essary B, Kim J, Anupindi S, et al. Pelvic MRI in
    children with Crohn disease and suspected
    perianal involvement. Pediatr Radiol.
    200737201208
  • Darge K, Anupindi S, Jaramillo D. MR Imaging of
    the Bowel Pediatric Applications. MRI Clinics N
    America.200816(3)467-478
  • Toma P, Granata C, Magnano G, Barabino A. CT and
    MRI of paediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol.
    2007371065-1189.
  • Greenhalgh R, Punwani S, Austin C Halligan S,
    Taylor S. The MRI manifestations of small bowel
    Crohns disease revealed. Presented at RSNA
    2007.
  • Udayasankar U, Lauenstein T, Martin D. Role of
    SPAIR T2 fat suppressed MR imaging in active
    inflammatory bowel disease. Presented at RSNA
    2007.
  • Herrmann K, Michaely H, Seiderer J, et al. The
    star-sign in magnetic resonance enteroclysis a
    characteristic finding of internal fistulae in
    Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol.
    200641239241

37
Good resource
  • http//lakeside2007.rsna.org/
  • Electronic posters and papers through RSNA
    website
  • Lakeside Learning Center
  • Radiographics password

38
Facebook
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com