Vocabulary of an argument... - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Vocabulary of an argument...

Description:

Vocabulary of an argument... Basic principles Fallacies of Oversimplification Either, Or - When you want to force your opponent into a single course of action or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:553
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Shelley105
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vocabulary of an argument...


1
Vocabulary of an argument...
  • Basic principles

PSAT registration deadline is this week!
2
Assertions
  • a claim or statement of opinion
  • not a fact
  • be skeptical
  • never should stand alone
  • conclusions without evidence

3
Thesis and Topic Sentences
  • A really big, main assertion which the whole
    paper is trying to prove
  • Body paragraphs contain smaller assertions which
    prove the larger

4
(No Transcript)
5
Evidence
  • support
  • fact, figure, statistic, poll, scientific data,
    example, testimony from an expert, other forms in
    literature
  • proves the assertion
  • should be accurate, recent, sufficient and fair

6
college poll
  • interview 5 students about the administration and
    approval.
  • report that 4 out of 5 approve
  • 80 of the campus approves
  • Whats wrong with the report?

7
2 Types of Evidence
  • Primary
  • Secondary

8
Primary
  • letters
  • diaries
  • first hand accounts, interviews, witnesses
  • surveys, polls
  • scientific research from reputable scientist
  • author, director (sometimes questionable)
  • in the work (story, drama, poem)

9
Secondary
  • criticism
  • journalists story
  • interpretations, explanations

10
Evidence
11
Logi c
Evidence
12
Logical Reasoning
  • 2 types
  • inductive
  • deductive

13
Inductive
  • Moves from specific pieces of evidence to a
    general conclusion
  • An inductive leap
  • Common sense
  • Can never be certain
  • The better your evidence, the less likely you
    will be proven wrong

14
Deductive
  • less common
  • more certain
  • based on syllogism - 2 general,true premises lead
    to 1 valid conclusion
  • socrates is a man
  • all men are mortal
  • Socrates is mortal

15
Deductive
  • If the premises are true, then the conclusion is
    100 valid, in other words, I win.
  • To identify other dogs, all dogs use their noses
    to sniff other dogs butts
  • My dog meets dogs regularly on our walks
  • I should not kiss my dog on her nose

16
The problem with logic...
  • Everybody wants to be logical everyone thinks
    they are logical, but not very many people
    actually ARE logical.
  • It is a rare quality, but one CAN LEARN to be
    more logical.

17
Logical Fallacies
  • Errors in logical thinking
  • Sometimes difficult to see
  • Many types
  • They are EVERYWHERE

18
Top 27 Logical Fallacies
  • These are the ones most often used
  • This is not an extensive list

19
Fallacies of Ethos or Pathos
  • False Authority (False Ethos) - When the
    authority does not have obvious, pertinent
    experience
  • Even Denzel Washington, who portrayed Colin
    Powell in a movie, believes the US should not be
    in a war.

20
Fallacies of Ethos or Pathos
  • Appeal to Pathos (Emotion Pity, Fear,
    Patriotism, etc.) - good for persuasion, bad for
    argument based on REASON. Argumentation is
    supposed to be objective. USed to make the reader
    want to act, and if used instead of real evidence
    for action, it is a fallacy.
  • Examples

21
Fallacies of Ethos or Pathos
  • Bandwagon - Appeals to the desire to be popular,
    or with the in crowd. Argues that a person
    will like something because everyone else likes
    it. OR Because something is popular, it is right.

22
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Designed to get you off track, you guys are good
    at this!
  • Red Herring - Rubbing a new topic into the
    argument so opponent follows the scent of the new
    topic and leaves the old argument (which you are
    probably losing)
  • "We admit that this measure is popular. But we
    also urge you to note that there are so many bond
    issues on this ballot that the whole thing is
    getting ridiculous."

23
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Ad Hominem (Argument to the person) - type of red
    herring where you make a personal attack on your
    opponent to try to get them off track of the true
    issue. (It usually works because we dont like to
    be attacked. It makes us angry, and we cant
    think when we are angry.)
  • Bill "I believe that abortion is morally wrong."
    Dave "Of course you would say that, you're a
    priest."

24
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Poisoning the Well - Trying to completely
    discredit an opponent, making his words suspect.
  • Its hard to believe a journalists facts when he
    spent two years in jail for perjury.

25
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Guilt by Association - Associating opponent with
    something negative, illogical association
  • Dr. Spelman was Hitlers doctor in Germany during
    WWII.

26
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Tu Quoque (Youre another) - when a person is
    attacked with an Ad Hominem and counters with
    another. (This works because the opponent thinks
    that if he/she doesnt address the remark then
    people will believe it is true when the correct
    response would be to point out the ad hominem.)
  • Peter "Based on the arguments I have presented,
    it is evident that it is morally wrong to use
    animals for food or clothing." Bill "But you
    are wearing a leather jacket and you have a roast
    beef sandwich in your hand! How can you say that
    using animals for food and clothing is wrong!"

27
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Common Practice (Everybody does it) - When an
    individual, group, or corporation gets caught
    doing something wrong but claims that at the
    time, every individual, group, or corporation was
    doing it OR that other groups did worse. (You
    guys are REALLY good at this.)

28
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Shifting Terms - When you establish one term to
    discuss an issue, but change to another. (this
    happens when the opponent is hostile towards the
    initial term)

29
Fallacies of Distraction
  • Shifting Ground - Making an assertion, and later
    changing (usually because he is losing the
    original assertion)

30
Fallacies of Oversimplification
  • Ignore the complex situations, try to convince
    using a false common sense
  • Hasty Generalization - a really bad inductive
    leap, you do not have enough or the right kind of
    evidence
  • Stereotyping - unsubstantiated claims about a
    whole group using little to no evidence

31
Fallacies of Oversimplification
  • Post Hoc (False Cause) - Because A happened
    first, then B happened later, A must have caused
    B.
  • Joan is scratched by a cat while visiting her
    friend. Two days later she comes down with a
    fever. Joan concludes that the cat's scratch must
    be the cause of her illness.

32
Fallacies of Oversimplification
  • Slippery Slope - the title is based on a metaphor
    - if you take one step down a slippery slope, you
    will have to take another quicker step to keep
    from falling, which causes you to speed up and
    need to take an even quicker step - a series of
    future false causes, none proven A causes B, B
    causes C, C causes D, and so on until tragedy
    occurs.
  • "We have to stop the tuition increase! The next
    thing you know, they'll be charging 40,000 a
    semester!"

33
Fallacies of Oversimplification
  • False Analogy - an analogy is when you compare
    two very different things, all analogies are
    false as in they are inherently different. If
    the argument relies SOLELY upon analogy, you
    should not trust it. Valuable teaching tool to
    relate to the audience, but again, all you have
    to do to win that type of argument is point out
    the differences in the compared things.
  • Government is like business. Just as business,
    government also must be sensitive primarily to
    the bottom line

34
Fallacies of Oversimplification
  • Either, Or - When you want to force your opponent
    into a single course of action or intellectual
    position by narrowing all possibilities down to
    only two and then makes one of them completely
    undesirable.
  • The Ultimatium

35
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • These distort or dismiss evidence to favor your
    case or weaken your opponents
  • Begging the Question - when you make an assertion
    and then use that assertion as evidence to defend
    the point without proving it true.
  • Circular Logic - used interchangeably with
    Begging the Question when you make an assertion
    and then defend the assertion by rewording the
    assertion

36
  • "If such actions were not illegal, then they
    would not be prohibited by the law.
  • Bill "God must exist." Jill "How do you know."
    Bill "Because the Bible says so." Jill "Why
    should I believe the Bible?" Bill "Because the
    Bible was written by God."

37
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Card Stacking - one of the most common, easily
    avoided by a concession and counter argument -
    When you ignore opponents strong points.
  • ShamWow only shows us how well it soaks up liquid
    but doesnt show its durability or toughness.

38
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Straw Man - When you describe your opponents
    positions in an unfair (incorrect) manner, making
    it weaker than it really is. Thus, your argument
    beats up on a lesser opponent (scarecrow) instead
    of the real powerful argument (Spiderman).
  • "Senator Jones says that we should not fund the
    attack submarine program. I disagree entirely. I
    can't understand why he wants to leave us
    defenseless like that."

39
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Reductio Ad Absurdum (Arguing to the absurd) -
    similar to straw man except that instead of weak
    you make opponent appear absurd, crazy, or evil
    by pushing arguments to extreme.
  • I am going into surgery tomorrow.  Please
    everyone, pray for me, so I will have a
    successful surgery and a speedy recovery.

40
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Self-Contradiction - A 2 or 3 part statement
    where at least two parts disagree.
  • We dont pollute the air with our exhaust, we
    just drive everywhere we go.
  • I dont care what you believe, as long as your
    beliefs dont harm others.

41
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Ad Ignoratiam (Appeal to Ignorance) - asserts
    that since there is no evidence to prove my
    argument false, it is true. Assertion based on no
    evidence, admits none, but then says that lack of
    evidence (or ignorance) is proof of truth.
  • "No one has ever proven that UFOs exist.
    Therefore, they don't exist."

42
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Proving a Negative - a relative to Ad
    Ignorantium, No evidence is possible for an event
    that did not occur. This is impossible.
  • There is a purple dragon behind the moon that
    created the earthnow prove me wrong.

43
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Out of Context - When a writer cites only a part
    of a statement in such a way as to distort the
    overall meaning of the original statement. BE
    CAREFUL.
  • However, sometimes the person who says something
    stupid later claims that it was taken out of
    context.
  • Praying for help and letting God guide your
    finger.

44
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Ambiguity and Equivocation - when a statement is
    written in a way that can be understood in more
    than one way, tricking you into interpreting the
    text in the one way the writer intends.
  • President Clinton I did not have sex with that
    woman, Monica Lewinsky, not one time.

45
Fallacies of Unfairness
  • Non-Sequitur (It doesnt make sense) - When the
    conclusion bears no logical relation to the
    statements which precede it.
  • Bill Morrison is a great writer, so he will make
    a great US Senator.
  • Americans love movies, so Garfield will be very
    popular.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com