Design for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Design for

Description:

Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma DFSS Activities Concept development, determining product functionality based upon customer requirements, technological capabilities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:152
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: Jame527
Category:
Tags: design | robust | taguchi

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Design for


1
Chapter 12
  • Design for
  • Six Sigma

2
DFSS Activities
  • Concept development, determining product
    functionality based upon customer requirements,
    technological capabilities, and economic
    realities
  • Design development, focusing on product and
    process performance issues necessary to fulfill
    the product and service requirements in
    manufacturing or delivery
  • Design optimization, seeking to minimize the
    impact of variation in production and use,
    creating a robust design
  • Design verification, ensuring that the capability
    of the production system meets the appropriate
    sigma level

3
Key Idea
Like Six Sigma itself, most tools for DFSS have
been around for some time its uniqueness lies in
the manner in which they are integrated into a
formal methodology, driven by the Six Sigma
philosophy, with clear business objectives in
mind.
4
Tools for Concept Development
  • Concept development the process of applying
    scientific, engineering, and business knowledge
    to produce a basic functional design that meets
    both customer needs and manufacturing or service
    delivery requirements.
  • Quality function deployment (QFD)
  • Concept engineering

5
Key Idea
Developing a basic functional design involves
translating customer requirements into measurable
technical requirements and, subsequently, into
detailed design specifications.
6
Quality Function Deployment
7
Key Idea
QFD benefits companies through improved
communication and teamwork between all
constituencies in the value chain, such as
between marketing and design, between design and
manufacturing, and between purchasing and
suppliers.
8
House of Quality
9
Building the House of Quality
  1. Identify customer requirements.
  2. Identify technical requirements.
  3. Relate the customer requirements to the technical
    requirements.
  4. Conduct an evaluation of competing products or
    services.
  5. Evaluate technical requirements and develop
    targets.
  6. Determine which technical requirements to deploy
    in the remainder of the production/delivery
    process.

10
Concept Engineering
  • Understanding the customers environment.
  • Converting understanding into requirements.
  • Operationalizing what has been learned.
  • Concept generation.
  • Concept selection.

11
Tools for Design Development
  • Tolerance design
  • Design failure mode and effects analysis
  • Reliability prediction

12
Key Idea
Manufacturing specifications consist of nominal
dimensions and tolerances. Nominal refers to the
ideal dimension or the target value that
manufacturing seeks to meet tolerance is the
permissible variation, recognizing the difficulty
of meeting a target consistently.
13
Tolerance Design
  • Determining permissible variation in a dimension
  • Understand tradeoffs between costs and
    performance

14
Key Idea
Tolerances are necessary because not all parts
can be produced exactly to nominal specifications
because of natural variations (common causes) in
production processes due to the 5 Ms men and
women, materials, machines, methods, and
measurement.
15
DFMEA
  • Design failure mode and effects analysis (DFMEA)
    identification of all the ways in which a
    failure can occur, to estimate the effect and
    seriousness of the failure, and to recommend
    corrective design actions.

16
(No Transcript)
17
Reliability Prediction
  • Reliability
  • Generally defined as the ability of a product to
    perform as expected over time
  • Formally defined as the probability that a
    product, piece of equipment, or system performs
    its intended function for a stated period of time
    under specified operating conditions

18
Types of Failures
  • Functional failure failure that occurs at the
    start of product life due to manufacturing or
    material detects
  • Reliability failure failure after some period
    of use

19
Types of Reliability
  • Inherent reliability predicted by product
    design
  • Achieved reliability observed during use

20
Reliability Measurement
  • Failure rate (l) number of failures per unit
    time
  • Alternative measures
  • Mean time to failure
  • Mean time between failures

21
Cumulative Failure Rate Curve
22
Key Idea
Many electronic components commonly exhibit a
high, but decreasing, failure rate early in their
lives (as evidenced by the steep slope of the
curve), followed by a period of a relatively
constant failure rate, and ending with an
increasing failure rate.
23
Failure Rate Curve
Infant mortality period
24
Average Failure Rate
25
Reliability Function
  • Probability density function of failures
  • f(t) le-lt for t gt 0
  • Probability of failure from (0, T)
  • F(t) 1 e-lT
  • Reliability function
  • R(T) 1 F(T) e-lT

26
Series Systems
RS R1 R2 ... Rn
27
Parallel Systems
RS 1 - (1 - R1) (1 - R2)... (1 - Rn)
28
Series-Parallel Systems
C
RA
RB
RD
RC
A
B
D
C
RC
  • Convert to equivalent series system

RA
RB
RD
A
B
C
D
RC 1 (1-RC)(1-RC)
29
Tools for Design Optimization
  • Taguchi loss function
  • Optimizing reliability

30
Key Idea
Design optimization includes setting proper
tolerances to ensure maximum product performance
and making designs robust, that is, insensitive
to variations in manufacturing or the use
environment.
31
Loss Functions
Traditional View
Taguchis View
32
Taguchi Loss Function Calculations
Loss function L(x) k(x - T)2
Example Specification .500 ? .020. Failure
outside of the tolerance range costs 50 to
repair. Thus, 50 k(.020)2. Solving for k
yields k 125,000. The loss function is L(x)
125,000(x - .500)2 Expected loss k(?2
D2) where D is the deviation from the target.
33
Optimizing Reliability
  • Standardization
  • Redundancy
  • Physics of failure

34
Tools for Design Verification
  • Reliability testing
  • Measurement systems evaluation
  • Process capability evaluation

35
Key Idea
Design verification is necessary to ensure that
designs will meet customer requirements and can
be produced to specifications.
36
Reliability testing
  • Life testing
  • Accelerated life testing
  • Environmental testing
  • Vibration and shock testing
  • Burn-in (component stress testing)

37
Measurement System Evaluation
  • Whenever variation is observed in measurements,
    some portion is due to measurement system error.
    Some errors are systematic (called bias) others
    are random. The size of the errors relative to
    the measurement value can significantly affect
    the quality of the data and resulting decisions.

38
Metrology - Science of Measurement
  • Accuracy - closeness of agreement between an
    observed value and a standard
  • Precision - closeness of agreement between
    randomly selected individual measurements

39
Repeatability and Reproducibility
  • Repeatability (equipment variation) variation
    in multiple measurements by an individual using
    the same instrument.
  • Reproducibility (operator variation) - variation
    in the same measuring instrument used by
    different individuals

40
Repeatability Reproducibility Studies
  • Quantify and evaluate the capability of a
    measurement system
  • Select m operators and n parts
  • Calibrate the measuring instrument
  • Randomly measure each part by each operator for r
    trials
  • Compute key statistics to quantify repeatability
    and reproducibility

41
Spreadsheet Template
42
RR Evaluation
  • Under 10 error - OK
  • 10-30 error - may be OK
  • over 30 error - unacceptable

43
Key Idea
One of the most important functions of metrology
is calibrationthe comparison of a measurement
device or system having a known relation-ship to
national standards against another device or
system whose relationship to national standards
is unknown.
44
Process Capability
  • The range over which the natural variation of a
    process occurs as determined by the system of
    common causes
  • Measured by the proportion of output that can be
    produced within design specifications

45
Types of Capability Studies
  • Peak performance study - how a process performs
    under ideal conditions
  • Process characterization study - how a process
    performs under actual operating conditions
  • Component variability study - relative
    contribution of different sources of variation
    (e.g., process factors, measurement system)

46
Process Capability Study
  1. Choose a representative machine or process
  2. Define the process conditions
  3. Select a representative operator
  4. Provide the right materials
  5. Specify the gauging or measurement method
  6. Record the measurements
  7. Construct a histogram and compute descriptive
    statistics mean and standard deviation
  8. Compare results with specified tolerances

47
Process Capability
48
Key Idea
The process capability index, Cp (sometimes
called the process potential index), is defined
as the ratio of the specification width to the
natural tolerance of the process. Cp relates the
natural variation of the process with the design
specifications in a single, quantitative measure.
49
Process Capability Index
UTL - LTL 6s
Cp
UTL - m 3s
Cpu
m - LTL 3s
Cpl
Cpl, Cpu
Cpk min
50
Spreadsheet Template
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com