Title: Hussein k. Isingoma
1A PRAGMATIC AND EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO
BUSINESS CONTINUITY AND RECOVERY PLANNING
- By
- Hussein k. Isingoma
- CISA,Cism,CRISC,CIA,FCCA,CPA,Msc,BBS
- Ag. Assistant commissioner,internal audit
- Ministry of finance,planning and economic
development
2Presentation Plan
- Introduction and Background
- Understanding Business Continuity and Disaster
Recovery Planning - The Need for BC/DR Planning and Management
- BC/DR Planning Tasks/Processes
- Achieving effective BC/DR Planning Key Issues
- BCP resiliency Thinking Cloud ?
- Conclusions
3Introduction and Background
- The World is still fresh with shock and memories
of the recent events and impact of the march 2011
Japanese earthquake/tsunami that has had
devastating destruction on infrastructure and
mainly on the Fukushima Nuclear Plant - The Fukushima disaster is being termed as
probably the biggest industrial catastrophe in
history of mankind - The Nuclear plant was run by the Tokyo Electric
Power Company(TEPCO) which supplied 1/3 of
Japans electricity before and until the quake. - The seawall that was designed to mitigate the
impact of a tsunami was only 5.7 metres high and
all previous assessments had never put a
possibility of the tsunami going beyond the 5.7
metres. It was wrong the 03/11 tsunami rose to
15metres !!!!!! just 45 minutes after the
earthquake - BBC news report and the Economist newspaper of
28th June 2011 reported a fall in share price of
TEPCO by 85, faced a prospect of 100 billion
compensation, 23,000 died or were missing ,
80,000 evacuated - The companys Tsunami safety plan was only one
page and had been last updated in 2001 - The 9/11 World Trade Centre terrorist attack took
out a total of 13,000 servers and estimated cost
of replacement of IT for the effected Securities
firms stood at 3.2 billion. - Some of the other disasters or near disasters
occasioned by IT failures include loss of 25
million records of the Child Benefit Recipients'
in the UK, failure of the former Soviet Union
Early warning System in 1983 that almost drew the
World to the prospect of World War III.
4Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery Planning
- The purpose of Business Continuity is to ensure
that core business functions continue with
minimal or no interruption. - The objective is to ensure that the organization
will survive and continue to generate revenue. - Disaster recovery is about rebuilding
- Clients and investors alike are notorious for
abandoning organizations during their rebuilding
phases - It doesnt take much effort to cause layoffs,
fall in stock or share prices or even permanent
shutdowns - The above realities lead us to the evolution from
disaster recovery to business continuity
5The Need for BC/DR Planning and Management
- What do organizations or Businesses need ?
- News of the World !!!! Did they ever plan for the
phone hacking scandal that led to its closure ???
- In the aftermath of recent natural disasters,
terrorism, equipment breakdown, businesses have
recognized more than ever the need for ever to be
prepared - Firms/companies are striving to meet demand for
continuous service - The growth of e-commerce has pushed the need for
systems availability expectations toward 24x365 - It is important that a BCP adequately supported
throughout the organization, embodies the
strategic framework for a corporate culture to
mitigate risks that might cause - Business process failure
- Asset loss
- Regulatory liability
- Customer service failure
- Damage to reputation
- Business survival necessitates planning for every
type of business interruption.
6BC/DR Planning The Risk Management Perspective
- Part of the Risk Response Strategies
7BC/DR Planning Tasks/Processes
8BC/DR Planning Enablers
9Rationale for BC/DR Planning the Business Value
case
- Value delivery. Coping with severe impacts to
business arising out of interruptions makes
businesses more valuable, reliable and
dependable - Survival. A well designed, exercised and
maintained plan lies between a businesss ability
to continue as a going concern or going bust ! - Risk Management maturity enhancement
- Competitive advantage case for offshore soft
ware development initiatives/vendors - Staff and client confidence
- Compliance
- Insurance costs/premiums
- Diagnosing organizational efficiency
10Business Contingency Planning General Procedures
Disaster
Call Business Continuity Coordinator
1st Person on scene calls BC Manager
Call Recovery Management Team
Inform HQs
Recovery Mgt Team report to Command Centre
Recovery Team report to Disaster Scene
Report status to Recovery Mgt Team
Will Orgn. be out gt 72hrs
Return to Normal Operations
No
Inform COO/CTO
Yes
Invoke BCP?
No
Invoke BCP
Yes
11Achieving effective BC/DR Planning Key Issues
- Top or Senior Management Sponsorship. Consensus
ought to be established to - Guide which aspects of business to stay
operational in case of disruptions - The level of protection needed risk appetite
- synchronize BC/DR plans with overall business
strategy - Risk Analysis
- Risk identification should consider a wide range
of possible scenarios. - More often than not, BCPs consider the most
likely scenarios - Although focusing on big events is desirable, a
narrow focus on risk could lead to potentially
disastrous events - Business Impact Analysis
- Organizations' have limited resources. There is
need to focus on key processes that need to be
recovered in case of a disaster - Focus on key business processes and critical
dependencies - BIA need to kept updated as the business changes
or subject to periodic review - Identify process specific Recovery time
objectives(RTOs) - Prioritise recovery efforts based on agreed RTOs
- Review service level agreements with service
providers
12Contd
- BC/DR organization
- Roles and responsibilities need to be defined
- BC/DR requires organization, coordination, and
execution - How and when is a disaster declared and by who ?
- Criteria for disaster definition and therefore
declaration - Plan exercising/testing
- If a BC/DR plan is not tested, it could fail
under the stress of real disaster - The ability of the BCP to execute when a disaster
is declared is key - Annual testing of the plan is desirable
- Look at ways of integrating of testing into
normal business operations - Opportunity to test failover/redundancies
- Scoping
- Over concentration on resumption of business at
the expense of people and processes - Personnel can be incredibly inventive and
innovative as opposed to systems in times of
disaster - People issues tend to be the more difficult of
challenges to resolve during disaster -
13Contd..
- Funding of BC/DR activities
- Many organizations consider BC/DR as good but not
essential - Many plans are unfunded posing further risks to
the organization's business continuity - There is need to develop formal business cases
for BC/DR for funding - Projects need to take into consideration
continuity issues before implementation - Communication plan
- There is need to have a well documented
communication plan - Employees call trees, supplier and vendor
contacts need to be constantly updated - Consider multi vendor support for key means of
communication - Media Management/Public relations
- Need to mitigate reputation loss through
effective media management - Clients and the public need reassurance and faith
that the situation is not as bad as perceived and
is under control - Its about winning the Hearts and Minds of
stakeholders - Staff members or employees need not give their
own view of the situation to the media - Prepare public statements in advance to prevent
the media from turning the situation into a
Public relations nightmare
14Contd.
- Security
- The time the organization is most vulnerable to
security threats is in time of disaster - The propensity to ignore security procedures is
very high - Incident Management team and structure must
include appropriate IT security staff to stem all
possible anomalies - Inventory Management
- Review inventory list continuously
- A comprehensive list of equipment needed for
recovery and resumption activities should be
maintained - Role of insurance
- Need to ensure that insurance provisions address
timely re-imbursements in case of losses accruing
from disaster - Internal organizational policies need to address
the accounting treatment of assets and related
depreciation - Clear definition of scope covered under insurance
is critical - Insurance policies need to be constantly
monitored so as to reflect the new realities,
risks or challenges to business -
15Complacency !
- BCP requires constant updating
-
- Business risks and related potential impacts are
constantly changing
16BCP resiliency Thinking Cloud ?
- Whilst it is easy to be critical of Amazon, for
many who have used its EC2 Cloud, the benefits to
their performance, business continuity and
resilience have been significant. - Many have been able to achieve higher levels of
uptime and reduce costs whilst managing higher
demands. - The April 2011 AWS (Amazon EC2) "failure" has
probably caused their customers to take a hard
look at their business continuity plans - Challenges related to security responsibility,
information residence, data ownership and
confidentiality remain in the cloud - A well structured service level agreement(SLA)
that includes the rights to audit is key in
assisting the organization in data mgt in stored,
transit or processed data in the cloud
- Think through the going Cloud Business carefully
and thoroughly - Understand the infrastructure upon which the
cloud operates do you need internal IT resources
??? - How robust are your cloud SLAs as regards
compensation for downtime. Are they worth the
cost of the downtime? - Remember too well that
- You fate is in the hands of the service
provider whose fate is in the hands of .?????
17BCP Which Way to go ???
- Crossroads or an epitome of science?
-
- The greatest joy of living is not in never
falling but getting up every time you fall - Nelson Mandela
18References BCP standards
- Control objective for information and related
technology (CoBIT) - Federal Emergency Management Association(FEMA)
- National Institute of Standards and
Technology(NIST) - Disaster Recovery Institute International(DRII)
19Conclusion!
- BCP is about managing and mitigating the
potential impact change - Remember !
- When trying to predict future organizational
environments, it seems that our only certainty is
that things will change - (Kotler,1998)