Why Russia? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Why Russia?

Description:

Why Russia? 2 PERSPECTIVES ON COMMUNISM Communism as a global systemic phenomenon a product of, and a challenge to, global capitalism Communism as a regional ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: yorkuCasp5
Category:
Tags: china | mongol | rule | russia

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why Russia?


1
Why Russia?
2
  • 2 PERSPECTIVES ON COMMUNISM
  • Communism as a global systemic phenomenon a
    product of, and a challenge to,
  • global capitalism
  • Communism as a regional and civilizational
    phenomenon -
  • a phase in the historical development of some
    countries, starting with Russia

3
Global System Perspective
4
  • Internationale.
  • International socialist anthem
  • Words by Eugène Pottier (1871) music by Pierre
    Degeyter (1888)
  • State anthem of the Soviet Union (1918-1943)

5
  • Capitalism
  • A social system based on private ownership of the
    means of production, in which the main goal of
    economic activity is the maximization of profit
  • The main mechanism of social coordination is the
    market
  • Guided by the unseen hand of the market,
    individuals buy and sell labour, land, goods,
    services, stocks, information
  • The capitalist system began to form about 500
    years ago when the following developments
    converged
  • Formation of the capitalist class (the
    bourgeoisie - literally, the word means the city
    dwellers) first, merchants and bankers, later,
    industrialists people whose main source of
    power is money derived from the workings of the
    market economy
  • Creation of nation-states
  • Expansion of international trade and conquest
    of colonies
  • New technologies made human labour more
    productive
  • The rise of new ideas social change,
    progress, democracy
  • The notion of revolution

6
  • With or without command
  • 4 basic methods of social control and
    coordination in any society
  • 1. Directed coordination, or authority (somebody
    plans for the group, gives commands, others obey)
  • 2. Mutual adjustment, or exchange (everyone does
    his/her thing, nobody plans, nobody commands,
    coordination takes place through the web of
    interactions between gain-seeking individuals)
  • Capitalism expands the realm of mutual adjustment
    the rise of the market system, the power of
    self-interest
  • But directed coordination exercise of
    authority, the power of command
  • does not disappear. Quite the opposite it
    becomes more effective
  • No society can rely only on market-type
    interactions
  • Many important social tasks can only be performed
    through the use of authority
  • See, for instance, Charles Lindblom, The Market
    System, Yale University Press, 2002, also Charles
    Lindblom, Politics and Markets, Yale university
    Press, 1976

7
  • Control through the mind
  • The 2 other methods have to do with what we think
    and believe
  • 3. Persuasion Getting people to act (or no to
    act) by persuading them that they need it, that
    it is in their own interests, etc.
  • 4. Moral codes The power of belief, tradition,
    and ethics
  • In actual human practice, all these methods
    interact in a lot of complex ways
  • Every social system is based on a specific
    combination of these (and probably other) methods
  • Some combinations are more effective than others

8
  • Authority structures under capitalism
  • The family
  • The workplace (obey the boss, be disciplined,
    work hard)
  • The state (whether democratic or authoritarian)
  • Liberal democracy is a way of combining the power
    of command with the power of self-interest,
    putting a strong emphasis on self-interest.
  • The state derives its authority to command from a
    market-type deal between the citizen and the
    politician
  • Ill give you my vote and my taxes, if you work
    to deliver the public goods I need (for example,
    peace, order, good government)

9
  • Liberal democracy can be regarded as the perfect
    political form for capitalism
  • It accommodates the constant process of change
    that capitalism fosters
  • Including social change
  • Yet, at the same time, democracy and capitalism
  • are in conflict
  • In the market economy, people are formally equal
    free agents, each after his/her own interests
  • But in reality, they have vastly different
    amounts of social power
  • The market system, in and by itself, does not
    reduce those differences. On the contrary, it
    increases existing inequalities both within
    societies and between societies.
  • The inequality of social power and the control
    over means of production through the institution
    of private ownership gives the bourgeoisie power
    over the workers

10
  • Capitalism as a revolutionary system
  • How capitalism undermines its own foundations
  • 1. Market forces, not subject to effective
    control by society, can turn against man
  • -- inadequacy of the profit motive to meet many
    human needs
  • -- the destructive power of the market (creative
    or not)
  • 2. Capitalism, through increasing inequality of
    social power, creates its own enemies in society
    the dispossessed, the exploited, which become
    breeding grounds for movements for radical change
  • 3. Liberal democracy enables radicals to struggle
    for power. Whether the radical impulses can be
    tamed through reforms is always an open question

11
  • The rise of socialism (19th-20th centuries)
  • Follow the link The Socialist International
  • Socialist movements accompany the development of
    capitalism
  • They follow on the steps of capitalist
    development
  • Most socialists start out as radical democrats,
    disappointed with the failures and limitations of
    liberal democracy
  • The socialist movement emerges as a product of
    the age of liberal revolutions, triggered off by
    the American War of Independence and the Great
    French Revolution of 1789-93
  • 1848 After an unsuccessful wave of democratic
    revolutions swept through Europe, a group of
    German radical democrats led by journalist Karl
    Marx and industrialist Friedrich Engels founded
    The League of Communists
  • Their founding document was The Communist
    Manifesto
  • THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO

12
Marx and Engels in London, 1867
13
Regional-civilizational perspective
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Europes East and West
  • The stereotype the West is advanced, the East is
    backward.
  • It hasnt always been this way.
  • The divisions of Europe
  • East vs. West (the Greek-Persian wars,
    Alexanders synthesis)
  • South vs. North (Rome vs. Barbarians)
  • East vs. West (2 parts of the Roman Empire)
  • East vs. West (Orthodox Christianity vs. Roman
    Catholicism)
  • East vs. West (nomadic invasions of Europe)
  • West vs. East (Western modernization, Eastern
    stagnation)
  • East vs. West (the Communist challenge from
    Russia and China)
  • East vs. West (new Europe vs. old Europe)

18
Europes Eastern frontier
  • The belt between the Baltic and the Adriatic
  • East European state-forming nations
  • Greeks
  • Germans
  • Slavs
  • Eastern Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians
  • Western Poles, Czechs, Slovaks
  • Southern Serbs, Croatians, Slovenians,
    Macedonians, Montenegrins, Bosniaks, Bulgarians
  • Hungarians (Magyars)
  • Finns
  • Balts (Lithuanians, Estonians, Latvians)
  • Romanians (19th-century name)
  • Albanians
  • Turks
  • Tatars
  • ALL, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FINNS, GREEKS AND
    TURKS, LIVED UNDER COMMUNIST REGIMES IN THE 20TH
    CENTURY

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
  • EVOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN STATE SYSTEM

22
EUROPE 0001
23
EUROPE 1000
24
EUROPE 1600
25
EUROPE 1900
26
EUROPE 1914
27
  • A 3-way conflict of civilizations for control of
    Eastern Europe. Objects of the struggle
  • Resources
  • Trade routes
  • Security
  • THE CONTINENTAL EMPIRES
  • Western Christian (German) successors to the
    Western Roman Empire and Holy Roman Empire the
    Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) and the
    Hohenzollern Empire (Germany)
  • Orthodox Christian (Russian) successor to
    Eastern Roman Empire (The Romanov Empire)
  • Muslim (Turkish) successor to the Arab
    Caliphate (The Ottoman Empire)

28
How the East fell behind the West
  • Western Europe begins modernization (16th 17th
    centuries)
  • Eastern Europe as the Wests defence barrier
  • Eastern Europe as the Wests agricultural base
  • The West
  • Industrializing
  • Global trade
  • Capitalism
  • Nation-state
  • The East
  • Farming (with pockets of industry)
  • Regional trade
  • Feudalism
  • Empire

29
\
  • MODERNIZATION CHALLENGES
  • TO EASTERN EUROPE
  • Political Independence building modern
    nation-states
  • Industrialization
  • The agrarian question turning peasants into
    farmers, developing modern agriculture
  • Social development
  • Building civil societies
  • POLITICAL OPTIONS
  • Western liberalism
  • Socialism of various types
  • Conservative nationalism or (later) fascism

30
  • 19th century in Eastern Europe turmoil
  • National liberation struggles against empires
    (Turkish, Russian, Habsburg)
  • A few nations become independent
  • Democratic revolutions, led by middle classes
  • Unsuccessful
  • The rise of socialist movements, led by
    intellectuals, supported by workers and peasants
    -
  • Suppressed
  • Reforms from above -
  • Inadequate
  • Repression (including foreign intervention)
  • Breeding new discontent and radicalization

31
  • As a result of World War I, all four empires
    which had dominated Eastern Europe
  • Russian,
  • Turkish,
  • Austro-Hungarian,
  • and German
  • DISINTEGRATED
  • The region was up for massive upheavals, violent
    struggles for power, attempts at radical change

32
Russia
33
  • Russia is 1,200 years old
  • It has existed in 6 historical forms
  • Kiev Rus (9th-13th centuries)
  • Domain of the Tatar-Mongol empire (13th-15th
    centuries)
  • Moscovy (15th-17th centuries)
  • The Russian Empire (18th century-1917)
  • The Soviet Union (1917-1991)
  • The Russian Federation (1991- today)
  • Each stage was a product of interactions between
    European and Asian influences

34
Kiev Rus before 1054
35

The empire of Chengiz Khan and his successors
36
Chengiz Khan
37
The rise of the Moscow state
38
Tsar Peter the Great, Founder of the Russian
Empire
39
  • In the Modern Age, Russia expanded to take
    control of most of the Eurasian Heartland
  • Gradually, it filled much of the space first
    integrated by the Mongols
  • Expansion was driven by
  • Struggle for independence and security
  • Struggle for control of resources and trade
    routes
  • Human settlement
  • Imperial inertia

40
(No Transcript)
41
Coat-of-arms of the Russian Empire
42
The State Emblem of the Russian Federation
                                               
                                                  
                                                  
      
43
Moscow Kremlin
Moscow Kremlin
44
The Church of Ivan the Great, Moscow Kremlin
45
(No Transcript)
46
Tsar Peter the Great, Founder of the Russian
Empire
47
Monument to Peter the Great, St. Petersburg
48
The Winter Palace of Russian Emperors, St.
Petersburg
49
  • The question of civilization
  • Where does Russia belong?

50
  • A civilization is the highest cultural
    grouping of people and the broadest level of
    cultural identity people have short of that which
    distinguishes humans from other species. It is
    defined both by common objective elements, such
    as language, history, religion, customs,
    institutions, and by the subjective
    self-identification of people. People have levels
    of identity a resident of Rome may define
    himself with varying degrees of intensity as a
    Roman, an Italian, a Catholic, a Christian, a
    European, a Westerner. The civilization to which
    he belongs is the broadest level of
    identification with which he strongly identifies.
    Civilizations are the biggest we within which
    we feel culturally at home as distinguished from
    all the other thems out there.
  • Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations
    and the Remaking of World Order. Touchstone
    Books, 1997, p.43

51
  • A civilization is neither a given economy nor
    a given society, but something which can persist
    through a series of economies and societies,
    barely susceptible to gradual change. A
    civilization can be approached, therefore, only
    in the long term, taking hold of a constantly
    unwinding thread something that a group of
    people have conserved and passed on as their most
    precious heritage from generation to generation,
    throughout and despite the storms and tumults of
    history.
  • Fernand Braudel, A History of Civilizations,
    translated by Richard Mayne. Pengui Books, 1993,
    p.35


52
  • Civilizations emerge in the course of history
    under the combined impact of various factors
  • Geographic different types of interactions
    between man and the natural environment
  • Sociological different types of societies
    (rural or urban, degrees of inequality, etc.)
  • Economic what technologies are used, how
    productive is human labour, how wealth is
    distributed, etc.
  • Mental different ways of thought and belief
  • See Braudel, pp.9-23

53
  • Braudel again
  • In every period, a certain view of the world, a
    collective mentality, dominates the whole mass of
    society. Dictating a societys attitudes, guiding
    its choices, confirming its prejudices and
    directing its actions, this is very much a fact
    of civilization. Far more than the accidents or
    the historical and social circumstances of a
    period, it derives from the distant past, from
    ancient beliefs, fears and anxieties which are
    almost unconscious an immense contamination
    whose germs are lost to memory but transmitted
    from generation to generation. A societys
    reactions to the events of the day, to the
    pressure upon it, to the decisions it must face,
    are less a matter of logic or even self-interest
    than the response to and unexpressed and often
    unexpressible compulsion arising from the
    collective unconscious

54
  • These basic values, these psychological
    structures, are assuredly the features that
    civilizations can least easily communicate one to
    another. They are what isolate and differentiate
    them most sharply. And such habits of mind
    survive the passage of time. They change little,
    and change slowly, after a long incubation which
    itself is largely unconscious, too.
  • Here religion is the strongest feature of
    civilizations, at the heart of both their present
    and their past. And in the first place, of
    course, in civilizations outside Europe.
  • Braudel, p.22

55
  • The Russian Civilization
  • Geographic
  • Harsh climate
  • Insularity
  • Forests, rivers and steppe (grasslands)
  • Sociological
  • Peasant
  • Communitarian
  • Egalitarian
  • State-society relations
  • The state as an alien force vs.
  • The states battle order

56
  • Economic
  • Low productivity
  • Underdeveloped market economy
  • Property relations
  • The dominance of the state
  • The state is both a retarding factor and an
    engine of progress
  • Mental
  • Religion
  • Justice
  • Morality and law
  • Universalism and messianism
  • Patience and rebelliousness

57
  • The Russian civilization emerged at the
    crossroads of civilizations
  • Civilizations interact in many ways
  • Axes of interaction, tension and conflict
  • West-Islam (otherness)
  • West-Russia (otherness of a different kind)
  • HISTORY
  • Russia appears on world stage as a European
    country (9th-13th centuries)
  • Then it falls under Asian control (13th century)
  • Which changes it profoundly
  • Then it fights to
  • Regain its independence, own role and place
  • Catch up with the West (for development and
    security)
  • But the West has gone its own way already
  • And Russia discovers that it is different

58
  • It creates an empire which embraces
  • The original Slavic lands
  • The steppe which was always a key challenge
  • Siberia and the Far East
  • Caucasus and Central Asia
  • KEY STRUGGLE
  • Balkans and the Black Sea
  • The empire as a superstate
  • Requires a huge army, a centralized bureaucracy,
    an ideology, etc. THE LOGIC OF A STATE
  • The empire as a living organism
  • Mass base, popular support, integration of
    diverse societies


59
  • The issue of identity
  • What is Russia?
  • RUSSKIE and ROSSIYANE
  • The state of the ethnic Russians?
  • Or the state built on the basis of the Russian
    nationality, which integrated other
    nationalities, too?
  • Nation-state or empire?
  • Depends on the ability of Russians to act as the
    magnet, integrate, build a larger and more
    inclusive state
  • In which other nationalities may be better off
    than on their own

60
  • So, Russias quest has always been twofold
  • Assert its own identity as a Russian state which
    includes a chunk of Asia and a lot of
    non-Russians
  • Assert its affinity with the West
  • Can it do both?
  • VERY DIFFICULT, BUT NECESSARY
  • A STRUGGLE WITHIN THE RUSSIAN MIND, NOT BETWEEN
    RUSSIA AND THE WEST
  • Slavophiles and Westernizers
  • Eurasianists
  • What about interactions with others?
  • China, India, Japan, Islam?
  • Always a sense of otherness
  • Which makes for a simpler mode of relations
    (without the complicating impact of culture)

61
  • When did the conflict reach its apexes?
  • 1. The Wests offensives
  • Germans (since 13th century)
  • Poles (17th century)
  • Swedes (18th century)
  • Napoleon (19th century)
  • Germans (WWI and II)
  • 2. The West containing Russia
  • The Crimean War (1844-46), Russo-Turkish War
    (1877-88)
  • WWI
  • WWII
  • Cold War

62
  • In each case, the West was divided
  • Cases of Russias triumph
  • 1721
  • 1815
  • 1945
  • In both cases, Russia affirmed its Westernness

63
  • Russian historian I.B.Orlova on the contrast
    between Western and Eurasian civilizations)
  • Western
  • The classical heritage
  • Western Christianity
  • Roman and German language families
  • Division between spiritual and secular
    authorities
  • Rule of law
  • Social and political pluralism and civil society
  • Representative government
  • Individualism and rationalism

64
  • Eurasian Civilization
  • The Byzantian heritage a Eurasian Orthodox state
  • Ethnic tolerance
  • Religious tolerance
  • Spirituality, dominance of
  • Heart over mind
  • Contemplation over analysis
  • Conscience over pragmatism
  • Free will over compulsion
  • Collectivism
  • The Russian language
  • The Russian base

65
  • THE RUSSIAN SYSTEM
  • The state was huge, costly, militarized
  • Society (especially the peasantry) was heavily
    exploited and tightly controlled by the state
  • The political system was autocratic-patrimonial,
    with the monarch being the sole source of
    sovereignty
  • The church was subservient to the state
  • Individual rights and liberties were severely
    curbed
  • Market economy had very limited potential for
    development
  • When reforms became overdue, the state acted as
    the main agent of change, usually with limited
    effect
  • Society had no legal means of influencing
    government policies the people had an impact on
    the state either by obedience to it or by
    resistance to it (passive or active)

66
  • What kept the system going was its
  • battle order
  • NO CITIZENS JUST SOLDIERS, OFFICERS, AND
    WORKERS WHO FED THE ARMY
  • The system was designed primarily for war.
  • Successful wars kept it going.
  • Failed wars undermined it.

67
  • Grain production in Russia, late 19th century
  • 1/3 of the German level
  • 1/7 of the British level
  • ½ of the French and Austrian levels
  • Richard Pipes, Russia Under the old Regime.
    Penquin Books, 1974, p.8
  • The issue of the surplus.
  • The costs of security and development

68
  • RUSSIAS DECEPTIVE APPEARANCE
  • The image of stability vs.
  • The potential for revolution
  • Lenins conversation with a police investigator
  • Yes, it is a wall, but it is all rotten just
    push it, and it will fall down
  • RUSSIAS REBELS
  • Cossack uprisings of 17th and 18th centuries
  • (Razin, Bolotnikov, Pugachev)
  • 19th century
  • The Decembrists (Ryleev, Pestel)
  • The Revolutionary Democrats (Chernyshevsky,
    Herzen)
  • The Populists (Herzen, Bakunin, Lavrov)
  • The Anarchists (Kropotkin, Bakunin)
  • The Social Democrats (Plekhanov, Lenin)

69
  • Russias 19th century
  • The apex of expansion and the lag behind the
    West
  • The pressures for change
  • The reforms of Alexander II
  • Development of capitalism
  • vs.
  • Political modernization
  • Capitalism was creating new classes, new issues,
    new conflicts and the state was expected to
    evolve to be able to deal with them.
  • But the Russian state was not up to the task.
  • It was not part of the solution, it was the
    source of additional problems

70
  • By the end of the 19th century, the flaws of the
    Russian system become manifest
  • The gap between Europe and Russia widens fast,
    the Russian system is too inefficient, too rigid,
    resistant to reform
  • The 1904-05 war with Japan and then World War I
    exhaust the Russian state and expose its flaws
  • 1905-1917 12 YEARS OF UPHEAVAL WHICH DESTROYED
    THE RUSSIAN AUTOCRACY AND EMPIRE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com