Robin Hood and Spite Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Robin Hood and Spite Rights

Description:

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW Robin Hood and Spite Rights Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA) Reid Mortensen – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Jo117
Category:
Tags: hood | rights | robin | spite

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Robin Hood and Spite Rights


1
Robin Hood and Spite Rights Interest on
Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA)Reid Mortensen
T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
2
Outline
  • 1 Australian IOLTA schemes
  • 2 Usage of IOLTA in Australia
  • 3 The public ethics of IOLTA in Australia
  • 4 The possibilities for the moral salvage of
  • IOLTA in Australia

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
3
Australian IOLTA Schemes (5-6)
  • 1 Statutory deposit schemes
  • 2 Residual balances schemes

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
4
Australian IOLTA Schemes Statutory deposit
schemes (6-17)
  • Clients and Solicitor1
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account
  • Clients and Solicitor2
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account
  • Clients and Solicitor3
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account

2/3 previous year
2/3 previous year
2/3 previous year
T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
5
Australian IOLTA Schemes Statutory deposit
schemes (6-17)
  • Clients and Solicitor1 IOLTA Trustee QLS
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account Statutory
    deposit account
  • Clients and Solicitor2
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account
  • Clients and Solicitor3
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account
  • Interest

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
6
Australian IOLTA Schemes Residual balances
schemes (17-20)
  • Clients and Solicitor1 Agreement
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account IOLTA Trustee
    QLS Banks
  • Clients and Solicitor2
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account
  • Clients and Solicitor3
  • other beneficiaries Trust Account
  • Interest

2/3 previous year
2/3 previous year
2/3 previous year
T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
7
Usage of IOLTA in Australia
  • Two patterns of allocation (26)
  • 1 Legislated proportions to be allocated to
    various
  • programs (eg, Qld to 2004)
  • 2 IOLTA Trustee (with government control or
    input)
  • has discretion as to how IOLTA is allocated
    (eg, Qld from 2004)
  • Common uses why IOLTA is a Robin Hood taking
    (25-34)
  • 1 Legal aid in State matters (over 30 million
    per annum) (31-2)
  • 2 Fidelity funds administration, and
    maintenance of corpus
  • 3 Community legal centres, PLT, CLE, law
    reform, etc - Supreme
  • Court Library (Qld only)

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
8
The public ethics of IOLTA
  • Two misconceptions
  • 1 Trust account deposits are sterile IOLTA
    creates value (20-1)

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
9
The public ethics of IOLTA
  • Two misconceptions
  • Trust account deposits are sterile IOLTA creates
    value (20-1)
  • Claims to interest are uncoupled from claims to
    capital (36-7) eg
  • I, for one, wholeheartedly support that
    application of interest which at present is not
    of any benefit to anyone client, solicitor, or
    the owner of the money
  • Percy Smith MLA, Queensland Legislative
    Assembly, 2 December 1964

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
10
The public ethics of IOLTA
  • Two misconceptions
  • Trust account deposits are sterile IOLTA creates
    value (20-1)
  • Claims to interest are uncoupled from claims to
    capital (36-9) cf
  • Phillips v Washington Legal Foundation, 524 US
    156 (1998)
  • Brown v Legal Foundation of Washington, 123 S Ct
    1406 (2003)
  • Brown v Inland Revenue Commissioners 1965 AC
    244

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
11
The public ethics of IOLTA (39-41)
  • Lord Justice sic Upjohn said
  • A practice whereby the solicitor uses his
    clients money, too small in individual amounts
    or held for too short a time to make individual
    investment worthwhile on behalf of the individual
    client but which, in the aggregate, amounts to a
    large floating sum, to earn interest for him is
    an entirely innocent and commonsense practice
    which harms no one and probably indirectly
    benefits the general body of clients.
  • The only organization or individual to lose
    anything by reason of this legislation will be
    the bankers.
  • McCaw AG, NSW Legislative Assembly, 15 March
    1967

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
12
The public ethics of IOLTA (39-41)
  • Lord Upjohn said
  • A practice whereby the solicitor uses his
    clients money, too small in individual amounts
    or held for too short a time to make individual
    investment worthwhile on behalf of the individual
    client but which, in the aggregate, amounts to a
    large floating sum, to earn interest for him is
    an entirely innocent and commonsense practice
    which harms no one and probably indirectly
    benefits the general body of clients. But this
    interest belongs collectively to the clients and
    not to the solicitor and equity has always
    regarded, and rightly regarded, the fiduciary
    relationship of client and adviser as subject to
    such strict rules of conduct that its retention
    by the solicitor cannot be justified in law
    without the clients consent. So the solicitor
    must explain the matter to his client and obtain
    his consent thereto.

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
13
The public ethics of IOLTA
  • Three further issues
  • 1 The assumption that the trust account does not
    hold investable amounts (41-4)
  • No duty in Australia to advise a client to have
    investable amounts placed in controlled money
    (ie, savings) accounts
  • cf Brown v Legal Foundation of Washington, 123
    S Ct 1406 (2003)
  • Ample evidence that investable amounts are
    routinely held in trust accounts

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
14
The public ethics of IOLTA
  • Three further issues
  • 1 The assumption that the trust account does not
    hold investable amounts (41-4)
  • 2 The absence of a duty to disclose that the
    trust account does not earn the client any
    interest, and that interest is used to fund
    public programs - the clients consequential
    spite right (44-6)

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
15
The public ethics of IOLTA
  • Three further issues
  • 1 The assumption that the trust account does not
    hold investable amounts (41-4)
  • 2 The absence of a duty to disclose that the
    trust account does not earn the client any
    interest, and that interest is used to fund
    public programs - the clients consequential
    spite right (44-6)
  • 3 Interested, private associations as agents of
    distributive justice
  • (47-8)

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
16
The possibilities for moral salvage
  • Three reforms (50)
  • 1 An expressed solicitor's duty to advise
    clients that amounts capable of earning net
    interest be placed in controlled money accounts
  • 2 An expressed solicitors duty to disclose that
    money in the trust account does not earn the
    client any interest, and that interest is used to
    fund public programs
  • 3 The transfer of IOLTA trusteeship to the
    Government

T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
17
Robin Hood and Spite Rights Interest on
Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA)Reid Mortensen
T.C. BEIRNE SCHOOL OF LAW
FACULTY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com